Jump to content

Featured Replies

 I just don’t think it’s fair to the draftees and their families to drag it out. Well done Dilliton/Gill

 
 
Just now, Bitter but optimistic said:

No SWYL Burt style would be risky - I'm well into the Shiraz.

Adagio would be more accurate.

Smart thinking Bitters

those grinders are very unforgiving!!

Adelaide just traded out the pick they got from us for Lever and their 2019 1st rounder, to Carlton for their 2019 1st round pick (around pick 1 to 4)

Carlton obviously very keen to get Stocker from Sandringham.

Lots of pick movement going on - wonder what Mahoney and Taylor are thinking tonight, now that we have slipped down the order!  They might be manning the phones overnight!

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


Wow. Carlton trade their future 1st rounder for 19 and Adelaide future 1st rounder. Could well have traded #1 next year for 19 and 10+

9 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I just turned the draft broadcast on ...and off. FMD that is possibly the most boring and laborious shite I've seen on television.

I' m going back to angle grinding the  tinea off my toes.

 

 I had the draft radio on... and turned it off & the telly back on.   boring as...  batshyte.

Any picks of the tinea, Bbo.  it would be more interesting than this draft, so far.

Crazy by the Blues, don’t they realise there still shizen?

 
1 minute ago, DV8 said:

 I had the draft radio on... and turned it off & the telly back on.   boring as...  batshyte.

Any picks of the tinea, Bbo.  it would be more interesting than this draft, so far.

I've probably got a couple of inside mids burbling away down there.

4 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Adelaide just traded out the pick they got from us for Lever, to Carlton for their 2019 1st round pick (around pick 1 to 4) and Adelaides 2019 1st rounder. 

Carlton obviously very keen to get Stocker from Sandringham.

Lots of pick movement going on - wonder what Mahoney and Taylor are thinking tonight, now that we have slipped down the order!  They might be manning the phones overnight!

The Crows and Blues have an ugly little lovebird trist going on, ever since Betts and Gibbs days.

 


Brisbane going down our path of inside bulls.

2 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I've probably got a couple of inside mids burbling away down there.

Don't grind them too close Beebo, we might want them down the track.

43 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

That trade of Syd 2019 2nd round pick (around 30+) for WCe pick 24 explains the earlier lop-sided trade that greatly favoured WCE. 

We still have pick 23, one ahead of Sydney so may get our preferred player. 

 

Very clever of Sydney to do this after Blakey was selected otherwise they would have had to use pick 24 for him!!  They are very active and creative with pick trading - they may catch a few clubs napping!!

Edit: cross out ref to Syd pick

Sydney are masters of this. They’ll take O’Halloran, I know it.

 

According to the MFC website, clubs were told by the AFL that they had to use their entire 5 minute time allocation before selecting first round picks tonight.

The rest of the draft (commencing at noon tomorrow) the picks can be announced as fast as the clubs want to announce them. Indication again that the AFL has NFI.


1 minute ago, Mach5 said:

Sydney are masters of this. They’ll take O’Halloran, I know it.

GWS just beat them to it!

DRAFT SELECTIONS 2018 AFL NATIONAL DRAFT

ROUND ONE

1. Carlton Sam Walsh Midfielder, 183cm, 74kg, Geelong Falcons
2. Gold Coast Jack Lukosious Key forward, 194cm, 85kg, Woodville-West Torrens
3. Gold Coast Izak Rankine Midfielder, 180cm, 76kg, West Adelaide
4. St Kilda Max King Key forward, 201cm, 84kg, Sandringham Dragons
5. Port Adelaide Connor Rozee Midfielder, 184cm, 72kg, North Adelaide
6. Gold Coast Ben King King Key forward/defender, 202cm, 85kg, Sandringham Dragons
7. Western Bulldogs Bailey Smith Midfielder, 184cm, 79kg, Sandringham Dragons
8. North Melbourne Tarryn Thomas Midfielder, 189cm, 73kg, North Launceston
9. Adelaide Chayce Jones Midfielder, 180cm, 74kg, Launceston
10. Sydney Nick Blakey Forward/midfielder, 195cm, 85kg, NSW-ACT/Sydney Swans
11. Greater Western Sydney Jye Caldwell  Midfielder, 184cm, 78kg, Bendigo Pioneers
12. Port Adelaide Zak Butters Midfielder, 181cm, 70kg, Western Jets
13. Collingwood Isaac Quaynor Defender, 182cm, 82kg, Oakleigh Chargers
14. Greater Western Sydney Jackson Hately Tall utility, 190cm, 81kg, Central District
15. Geelong Jordan Clark Defender, 185cm, 81kg, Claremont
16. Adelaide Ned McHenry Midfielder/forward, 176cm, 71kg, Geelong Falcons
17. Fremantle Sam Sturt Forward, 189cm, 74kg, Dandenong Stingrays
18. Port Adelaide Xavier Duursma Midfielder/defender, 185cm, 71kg, Gippsland Power
19. Carlton Liam Stocker Midfielder, 184cm, 83kg, Sandringham Dragons 
20. Richmond Riley Collier-Dawkins Midfielder, 193cm, 88kg, Oakleigh Chargers
21. Brisbane Ely Smith Midfielder, 188cm, 86kg, Murray Bushrangers 
22. Greater Western Sydney Xavier O’Halloran Midfielder, 186cm, 82kg, Western Jets

We don't get to pick tonight !!! 

WTF*@#

 

Why did I bother waiting for this, and tuning in.  pisssed off.

2 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

Sydney are masters of this. They’ll take O’Halloran, I know it.

GWS got in before them. :(


So what number are our first 2 picks now and who's still available for them? Anyone got a decent list?

Ian Hill is available, he provides a lot of run and spark, so too is Bailey Williams and Jack Bytel.

We've been pushed out to 26 & 31 for the moment, but that might change with likely bids on Will Kelly, Kieren Briggs and Rhylee West.

Edited by Demon Disciple

 

This has too be the worst draft night in the history of VFL/AFL history? 

The whole AFL should be sacked.

How is that Syd/wce action not draft tampering?  Park a second rounder at wce, so bundle lower picks, then trade it straight back after the lower picks have been used.  How is this fair or in the spirit of the draft?  I know it cost them a later round downgrade next year, but this means they get Blakey and a second rounder for peanuts.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 275 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies