Jump to content

Farewell Jack Watts

Trade Jack Watts or not? 477 members have voted

  1. 1. Do we trade Jack Watts?

    • Yes.
      143
    • No.
      311

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

7 minutes ago, the rolling fog said:

Just when I thought I was the only schmuck streaming Trade Radio.

They're about to stream a function where Watts and Paul Connors are both speaking at. Watch this space.

Just tuned in for the first time too.

Duhwayne Russell..... Noooooooooo......

 
8 minutes ago, Luther said:

If he does, it needs to be a galvanising moment for him and he'd need to come out firing in 2018. Otherwise he'd certainly be gone at the end of next season you would think.

To be honest if Watts came out and said "I'm staying and will prove myself to the MFC and force the coaches hands in terms of earning a place in the best 18.'  That would have the be the best outcome for all parties. It shows Watts is going to shoulder responsibility for whats happened in his career to date, and prove doubters wrong.

Not sure that will be the outcome. However if he is only worth a second round pick (thats 30+ if we are talking Sydney or Port) then he's more value to the club as a player surely!

Question: Is it only possible to listen to trade radio via the AFL website? 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

 
17 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

3 years ago today we lost R. Flower

 

43815600-A987-4723-A318-761AC3554FEC.jpeg

Robbie will never be lost while people my vintage are still around.

Greatest Demon in my time with Gaz Lyon at No.2. 

From his presser:

Wants to stay, would be a shock to miss out on the good times ahead, thinks he's playing good footy up until the hammy and then struggled..

Surprised by Goodwin's words and the opinions of the coaches.

 


2 minutes ago, McQueen said:

From his presser:

Wants to stay, would be a shock to miss out on the good times ahead, thinks he's playing good footy up until the hammy and then struggled..

Surprised by Goodwin's words and the opinions of the coaches.

 

Seems to indicate he still doesn't get it.

1 minute ago, McQueen said:

From his presser:

Wants to stay, would be a shock to miss out on the good times ahead, thinks he's playing good footy up until the hammy and then struggled..

Surprised by Goodwin's words and the opinions of the coaches.

 

Not really what I wanted to hear from him. Mindset hasn't changed.

Why say he 'doesn't want to miss out on the good times ahead', when he could say 'I want to help drive the footy club to its next flag?'

The hunger isn't there.

27 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Question: Is it only possible to listen to trade radio via the AFL website? 

Transcript here:https://twitter.com/traderadio

Jack very strong on wanting to stay.

Clearly different view than the one Goodwin is trying to portray - that they have a great relationship, he wants to look at options, Jack is welcome to stay etc etc.  He and the club are trying to paint a picture that it was Jack's decision to go so that they can appease supporters.

Jack is bucking that and letting supporters know he desperately wants to stay.

He wouldn't take Goodwin on like that if there was a chance of him staying. 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

 
1 minute ago, Luther said:

Not really what I wanted to hear from him. Mindset hasn't changed.

Why say he 'doesn't want to miss out on the good times ahead', when he could say 'I want to help drive the footy club to its next flag?'

The hunger isn't there.

He did indicate that he wants to help the team achieve it.

1 minute ago, Luther said:

Not really what I wanted to hear from him. Mindset hasn't changed.

Why say he 'doesn't want to miss out on the good times ahead', when he could say 'I want to help drive the footy club to its next flag?'

The hunger isn't there.

Further, dismisses words of the coaching team.


Behind closed doors im sure in no certain terms Goodywould have let him know if he stays he is on his last chance and must prepare and train his arse off.

Will be a good thing.

1 minute ago, McQueen said:

From his presser:

Wants to stay, would be a shock to miss out on the good times ahead, thinks he's playing good footy up until the hammy and then struggled..

Surprised by Goodwin's words and the opinions of the coaches.

I think that's a reasonable assessment of his season isnt it?, although I think his pre-season might have indicated a lack of commitment to the team's goals

I think another thing that is a little odd is when he pinged his hamstring, I remember the club and Misson indicated that it was very minor and he would be back pretty quickly....(1-2 weeks max!)  that explanation dragged out over his rehab time (4 or 5 weeks?) which either indicated the conditioning staff misjudged or misrepresented the injury and how significant it actually was, or Watts rehab of that injury wasn't as good as it should have been. 

Is my recount of this different to others here on DL?

I'm glad he wants to stay and his manager has said MFC have handled this well so far.

the fact that he is surprised by this after being dropped twice this year - almost missing round 1 and the last couple of rounds says a lot.

you dont know what you have until its gone - or almost gone. My heart wants him to stay and do well but my head says he will continue to be inconsistent. my liver wants me to stop drinking but my spleen is up for up...

confusing times indeed!

7 minutes ago, Ouch! said:

I think that's a reasonable assessment of his season isnt it?, although I think his pre-season might have indicated a lack of commitment to the team's goals

I think another thing that is a little odd is when he pinged his hamstring, I remember the club and Misson indicated that it was very minor and he would be back pretty quickly....(1-2 weeks max!)  that explanation dragged out over his rehab time (4 or 5 weeks?) which either indicated the conditioning staff misjudged or misrepresented the injury and how significant it actually was, or Watts rehab of that injury wasn't as good as it should have been. 

Is my recount of this different to others here on DL?

I got the impression that the initial injury was at the lower end of the scale but he did more damage at training


11 minutes ago, Ouch! said:

I think that's a reasonable assessment of his season isnt it?, although I think his pre-season might have indicated a lack of commitment to the team's goals

I think another thing that is a little odd is when he pinged his hamstring, I remember the club and Misson indicated that it was very minor and he would be back pretty quickly....(1-2 weeks max!)  that explanation dragged out over his rehab time (4 or 5 weeks?) which either indicated the conditioning staff misjudged or misrepresented the injury and how significant it actually was, or Watts rehab of that injury wasn't as good as it should have been. 

Is my recount of this different to others here on DL?

The rules of Misson's injury report:  1 to 2 is really code for 4.2.6.:)

 

They really don't know how long soft tissue injuries take.  In Jack's case he had had back spasms, a problem ankle and hamstring tightness in the weeks prior but kept playing. 

So these probably complicated his recovery. 

Not sounding like this will end nicely

26 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:
Question: Is it only possible to listen to trade radio via the AFL website? 

Download the official AFL app.. If your a telstra customer you can stream for free

Didn't Goodwin say, that if watts ends up staying, "he knows clearly what is expected of him"?

it would seem that an ultimatum has been given and Jacknshould be crystal clear about where he stands. I guess if he stays and doesn't live up to the expected standard, he will be in the seconds and let go this time next year.


Good on him.

Even after the way the club has operated over his time with us, it sounds like his attitude is the same as the thousands of long-suffering fans - he loves the club.  Yes, there are many points that he can improve on as a player, but it's great to hear someone on our list so steadfast in their desire to stay and be part of what we're building.

Who knows if he stays or goes, but contrast this attitude with the news coming out of the club in trade weeks 2011-15... it is a very, very different place.

28 minutes ago, Luther said:

Not really what I wanted to hear from him. Mindset hasn't changed.

Why say he 'doesn't want to miss out on the good times ahead', when he could say 'I want to help drive the footy club to its next flag?'

The hunger isn't there.

 What would he mean by good times other than getting to a flag?  Give him a bit of slack for goodness sake.

 

David Schwarz won our best and fairest the year after he was touted as being part of a Wayne Campbell trade.

Having said that, I still think once a coach decides to farm out a player, there's very little chance of them switching that position.

9 minutes ago, george_on_the_outer said:

Still doesn't get it.....everyone else and anything else to blame....

Put in and the conversation wouldn't be taking place

*retweet*


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

      • Angry
      • Sad
      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

      • Like
    • 440 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 25 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Haha
    • 566 replies