Jump to content

My 3 word player analysis V The Crows

Featured Replies

Posted

Jones - tough and dependable

Viney - ruthless and focused 

Salem - was always composed

Watts - surprisingly lacked involvement 

Petracca - strength and vision 

Lewis - provided great direction 

Tyson - was never convincing 

Oliver - prolific and creative 

Hibberd - a wonderful acquisition 

Kent - justified his recall

Frost - continued impressive year

Hannan - missing in heat

Pedersen - loved his heart

Vince - demolished their tyro

T.McDonald - a versatile revelation 

Weideman - little to enthuse

O.McDonald - made a statement 

Hunt - thankfully still alive

Bugg - successfully played role

Garlett - occasional forward pressure

Jetta - reliable and effective

Wagner - gradually improved value

 

 

I don't agree on The Weed.  He didn't get many touches, but he chased, tackled and crashed packs all night.  He found ways to get involved.  He wasn't amazing by any means, but he did the job we needed him to do. 

Not sure how Kent justified his recall. Didn't do much. Will give him benefit of the doubt that it's his first hit-out back. Tyson didn't start well but ended up being reasonably good.

 
2 minutes ago, Northern Summer said:

Not sure how Kent justified his recall. Didn't do much. Will give him benefit of the doubt that it's his first hit-out back. Tyson didn't start well but ended up being reasonably good.

Geee a bit tough, collectively this unit gelled! hard to criticise anyone on tonights performance! 


16 minutes ago, RalphiusMaximus said:

I don't agree on The Weed.  He didn't get many touches, but he chased, tackled and crashed packs all night.  He found ways to get involved.  He wasn't amazing by any means, but he did the job we needed him to do. 

His tackling was a big improvement and a highlight, but he was still average at best tonight. Two holding the balls when he should have easily got a disposal.

However, he didn't let Talia have much of an impact which was also a positive considering what Hurley and Rance did to us.

6 minutes ago, DominatrixTyson said:

Garlett read the ball in flight like no one else on the field. His goals were a valuable and timely contribution.

Yeah, disagree with comments on Jeffy. Watch his efforts in the last qtr, bodied the ball, caused turnover -> goal. Never gave up.

 

Jack Watts - much more involved than credit given

Tyson's tacking was immense today. Iv been a critic but he went up in my estimations this evening!

awesome Dees!

3 minutes ago, The Stewster said:

Yeah, disagree with comments on Jeffy. Watch his efforts in the last qtr, bodied the ball, caused turnover -> goal. Never gave up.

Did you notice him not go for the ball, in the incident where he got a free for deliberate in the last quarter?

He is great for us, but he has his cautious moments.


Apart from 2 obvious turnovers, Tyson was really good tonight, applied great pressure, ran to space and had very important involvements.

Clayton Oliver has justifiably got great credit this year for his sensational play.  I want to add Christian Petracca - what an incredible talent!  He did some unbelievable things tonight.

I thought Hannan had a pretty good game tonight es well. Did some nice things. Oscar got caught out on Josh Jenkins a couple of times, apart from that a great team effort and Googy had a cracker as well.


2 hours ago, joeboy said:

Jones - tough and dependable

Viney - ruthless and focused 

Salem - was always composed

Watts - surprisingly lacked involvement 

Petracca - strength and vision 

Lewis - provided great direction 

Tyson - was never convincing 

Oliver - prolific and creative 

Hibberd - a wonderful acquisition 

Kent - justified his recall

Frost - continued impressive year

Hannan - missing in heat

Pedersen - loved his heart

Vince - demolished their tyro

T.McDonald - a versatile revelation 

Weideman - little to enthuse

O.McDonald - made a statement 

Hunt - thankfully still alive

Bugg - successfully played role

Garlett - occasional forward pressure

Jetta - reliable and effective

Wagner - gradually improved value

 

Tyson was extremely convincing in the second half

Weideman's tackling was so strong and effective. I can barely remember him having a disposal, but for a young player, who is clearly out of form and struggling at the level, you couldn't have asked for much more.

Kent- brings the mongrel

I will be the first to say I didn't think he deserved a recall, and I don't think he was outstanding. What I did notice watching the game is that kent brings aggression around every contest and even off the ball. He is for the lack of a better word a pr!ck to play against.

He aggression was contagious, and it caught on with his team mates (Weeds tackling was impressive).


10 hours ago, joeboy said:

 

Petracca - strength and vision 

 

Tyson - was never convincing 

 

 

 

Petracca - like Tim Watson

Tyson - influential second half

29 minutes ago, Satan said:

Frost -brilliant defensive fisting

This + the fact that when he beat Tex to the ball, he would look at Tex and then run around & away from him as if Tex was a witches hat.

 
43 minutes ago, Satan said:

Frost -brilliant defensive fisting

Was this at the Adelaide nightclubs after the match???

1 hour ago, Adzman said:

Kent- brings the mongrel

I will be the first to say I didn't think he deserved a recall, and I don't think he was outstanding. What I did notice watching the game is that kent brings aggression around every contest and even off the ball. He is for the lack of a better word a pr!ck to play against.

He aggression was contagious, and it caught on with his team mates (Weeds tackling was impressive).

This. If you think Kent was poor - watch the replay and look off rhe ball. All the contests when JKH was getting outmarked the last few weeks, kent actually jumps at it and brings it to ground. His off ball work was good all night and he sets the tone for aggression in an area of the field that has lacked some. 

With the ball, 20 touches and 2 goals is a good small forward's game. If he could kick set shots he could have had 3. Not sure why he doesnt run left in run up as he has a huge hook and always hits the right behind post


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
    • 38 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and 
 it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies