Welcome to the Dees land of hope for the lost, the begotten and the NQR 

Oh , hang on .... that was pre Roosy!

23 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Tigers suggesting Vickery has done a deal with another club. He will finish his season in the VFL.

My guess is that he's done a deal with Whorethorn.

3 knees to rucks in half an hour-he may yet get a call  from someone .

Please not us........

On 25/07/2016 at 11:26 AM, dazzledavey36 said:

No i have not said i want him but they discussed this on SEN about not having to throw Watts into the ruck and also giving Hogan up forward a chop out along with Gawn.

Pretty sure he is a free agent?

I was once a Vickery supporter.  But he has not developed as he should have, & appears lazy to me, just going through the motions. 

 

He's a disappointment to his talent.

They were suggesting today it is Carlton.

Apparently Roosy prefers smart players. Tyrone is anything but by all reports.

Can't remember who, but there was a poster adamant we should take him at pick 1 in the Watts\Natainui draft.

We have copped it over Wattsy, but imagine the grief if we had taken Vickery.

Oh, and definitely a no for me.

On 19/08/2016 at 1:53 PM, Old Bear said:

Agree About Keilty

Any club taking Vickery would have to have a clause making him shave his head 

Worst Hair Cut in AFL history 

 

preferably have a clause making him play in a burqa

On 19/08/2016 at 1:57 PM, Roost It said:

I'd certainly take Vickery over Daw but yes he would have to get a haircut

You're not tonsorially challenged are you?

Vickery will get a new home, i personally don't rate him but i reckon enough teams need tall forwards/ruck players that someone will be all over it.

Rumor reported on talkingfooty and the superfooty podcast that he's off to Hawthorn next year. RIP FITZY? 

Edited August 22, 20169 yr by johndemons

12 hours ago, Abe said:

Vickery will get a new home, i personally don't rate him but i reckon enough teams need tall forwards/ruck players that someone will be all over it.

IMO

1 He is a better kick than Hogan

2 He is a better Relief ruck than Watts

3 He ( CAN) be a matchwinner ( Kicks GOALS)  which makes him better than Dawes.

Package him up an offer Richmond Grimes and Possibly Trengove and see what happens!

IMO

34 minutes ago, picket fence said:

IMO

1 He is a better kick than Hogan

2 He is a better Relief ruck than Watts

3 He ( CAN) be a matchwinner ( Kicks GOALS)  which makes him better than Dawes.

Package him up an offer Richmond Grimes and Possibly Trengove and see what happens!

IMO

For a free agent?

On 8/22/2016 at 8:44 PM, picket fence said:

IMO

1 He is a better kick than Hogan

2 He is a better Relief ruck than Watts

3 He ( CAN) be a matchwinner ( Kicks GOALS)  which makes him better than Dawes.

Package him up an offer Richmond Grimes and Possibly Trengove and see what happens!

IMO

Can't trade Grimes unless Richmond and Grimes agree to do it that way, which they won't

Sounds like Vickery will be a Hawk either way

2 hours ago, picket fence said:

Package him up an offer Richmond Grimes and Possibly Trengove and see what happens!

IMO

 

Grimes should be in the #27 package for Hibberd and their 3rd or 4th round. My opinion, not a club rumor. I've heard a few bomber fans express interest in him. 

Edited August 22, 20169 yr by johndemons

2 hours ago, johndemons said:

Rumor reported on talkingfooty and the superfooty podcast that he's off to Hawthorn next year. RIP FITZY? 

RIP Hawthorn. 

On 20 August 2016 at 1:01 PM, hells bells said:

Apparently Roosy prefers smart players. Tyrone is anything but by all reports.

You are aware that Roos finishes up in a week and won't be our coach next year? Just checking...

On 22/08/2016 at 10:43 PM, johndemons said:

 

Grimes should be in the #27 package for Hibberd and their 3rd or 4th round. My opinion, not a club rumor. I've heard a few bomber fans express interest in him. 

Grimes is a free agent

The pickiness of people in this forum is a joke. This is the exact player we need and you've got Hawthorn head hunting him with a long term deal because they know that it's not about umming and ahhhing about will he or won't he be worthwhile. If he's shown glimpses of his best then you BACK your own system to improve him. You either believe you're a better club than Richmond or you don't.

Probably the difference between us and other clubs, they go after what they need and back themselves.

 

Quote

TY VICKERY has been offered a long-term deal to join Hawthorn. The Hawks are keen to secure the wantaway Richmond ruck-forward and have laid out an attractive package to tempt Vickery to Waverley.

 

Quote

Geelong has also expressed an interest in Vickery, aware it may need tall reinforcements with Nathan Vardy set to explore greater opportunity and Mitch Clark struggling for fitness and form.

 

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/ty-vickery-offered-an-attractive-longterm-deal-to-leave-richmond-for-hawthorn/news-story/44b6301711b5a158299613e9ddf37d80

 

Edited August 31, 20169 yr by johndemonic

13 minutes ago, johndemonic said:

The pickiness of people in this forum is a joke. This is the exact player we need and you've got Hawthorn head hunting him with a long term deal because they know that it's not about umming and ahhhing about will he or won't he be worthwhile. If he's shown glimpses of his best then you BACK your own system to improve him. You either believe you're a better club than Richmond or you don't.

Probably the difference between us and other clubs, they go after what they need and back themselves.

 

 

 

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/ty-vickery-offered-an-attractive-longterm-deal-to-leave-richmond-for-hawthorn/news-story/44b6301711b5a158299613e9ddf37d80

 

I'm happy with this.

Hopefully where wecome in is where Nathan Vardy is exploring his options. I'll back us in to get the best out of him.

Not sure that there is a best of Ty Vickery?

46 minutes ago, johndemonic said:

The pickiness of people in this forum is a joke. This is the exact player we need and you've got Hawthorn head hunting him with a long term deal because they know that it's not about umming and ahhhing about will he or won't he be worthwhile. If he's shown glimpses of his best then you BACK your own system to improve him. You either believe you're a better club than Richmond or you don't.

Probably the difference between us and other clubs, they go after what they need and back themselves.

 

 

 

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/ty-vickery-offered-an-attractive-longterm-deal-to-leave-richmond-for-hawthorn/news-story/44b6301711b5a158299613e9ddf37d80

 

You do realise that this forum is not official MFC policy and that we have no idea what the club is doing behind the scenes ?

On 22 August 2016 at 8:44 PM, picket fence said:

IMO

1 He is a better kick than Hogan

2 He is a better Relief ruck than Watts

3 He ( CAN) be a matchwinner ( Kicks GOALS)  which makes him better than Dawes.

Package him up an offer Richmond Grimes and Possibly Trengove and see what happens!

IMO

He might be better in those aspects but overall he is a spud

Pass on grounds of haircut 

On 22 August 2016 at 6:44 PM, picket fence said:

IMO

1 He is a better kick than Hogan

2 He is a better Relief ruck than Watts

3 He ( CAN) be a matchwinner ( Kicks GOALS)  which makes him better than Dawes.

Package him up an offer Richmond Grimes and Possibly Trengove and see what happens!

IMO

FMD. For the 250th time, Grimes is a free agent.