Herald Sun reports Gysberts to be shown the door...Neeld has gone mad!!!

[dee-luded 2,958]

You were a fan of Cook weren't you, wasn't you that said he'd be a good player for us? What do you think he has to do to improve?

Play in Defence?

[jumbo returns 6,488]

Nothing changes if nothing changes.

[Fitz Fitzpatrick 886]

I could not agree more. A coaches main role is to get the most out of his players. What ever way you look at it Neeld does not have the ability to do this. He has lost the playing group. I have it on good authority that 15 of our 45 are investigating their options to leave, the exitist will take years of recruiting to repair, we are destined to the bottom 4 for at least another 3 years. Neeld has destroyed their confidence and thus the players ability. What a disaster Neeld is.

Neeld is the worst mistake our club has made since sacking Norm Smith. I have already put money on the Dees for the wooden spoon next year.

The board must fire him leave and leave Neil Craig in charge before more players leave. Who in their right mind would want to come and play for Melbourne.

I beg the board to fire Neeld.

HAHAHAHAHA,

this guy , pantsman and hard whatever his name is have the biggest boner for Neeld. Did neeld nail their women or something. i love it, its so entertaining.

[Lucifers Hero 37,079]

Neeldy is doin' the Spring Clean, and practicing his new responsibilities. May take him a little to get used to, but He'll get the hang of It, I'm sure.

[media=]

Two things from the cartoon that seem to fit our coach:

1. Daph has Mark Neeld eyes!

2. We are in for one hell of a ride...can't wait!

[Jonesbag 487]

23 pages....

[beelzebub 22,225]

Two things from the cartoon that seem to fit our coach:

1. Daph has Mark Neeld eyes!

2. We are in for one hell of a ride...can't wait!

funny... I thought that about the eyes too..lol

[dee-luded 2,958]

Two things from the cartoon that seem to fit our coach:

1. Daph has Mark Neeld eyes!

2. We are in for one hell of a ride...can't wait!

It's a BIG Job sorting out our Ingrown Culture, & this culture is all about,,,, everwhere. The Staff, the MCC, everywhere, but people won't be aware of it or how they contribute to it.

We'll be trying to quell it for a decade from the club, but Neeldy can do what he's doing with the players & List & try to control it from that End.

We need to start it as he is, but Our young players need to adhere to the Value systems & Behave to the standards... If not they should come clean & speak the the playing group & the Footy dept, & taker whats coming.

This is a monster were taking on, but it's the only thing we can do.

Those already infected & are mostly past there footy, should go to a strong cultured club to see out there time.

When we get this culture thing tamed, we will start to be able to develop young recruits into fine footballers again. Leave the off field careers stuff & hobnobbing, till they're 25 Yrs, please.

Edited September 13, 2012 by dee-luded

[Cheap Seats 3,300]

23 pages....

Haha I am enjoying the lols as well...... this thread just keeps on giving!!

[tess 19]

You were a fan of Cook weren't you, wasn't you that said he'd be a good player for us? What do you think he has to do to improve?

A work rate that key forwards need to have to be a success, a thirst for the contest, a desire for body contact and a huge amount of improved body strength.

[Sir Why You Little 34,511]

A work rate that key forwards need to have to be a success, a thirst for the contest, a desire for body contact and a huge amount of improved body strength.

Rather a lot really!!

[tess 19]

Play in Defence?

He does not have the speed.

The slow key backs at AFL level are all strong units. He does not have the strength.

[dee-luded 2,958]

He does not have the speed.

The slow key backs at AFL level are all strong units. He does not have the strength.

Has he played there? I hadn't noticed.

[tess 19]

Has he played there? I hadn't noticed.

Not once this year. The coaches just must not rate him at all.

[dee-luded 2,958]

What I'm saying is try him out in the position. If we don't get any offers give it a fly. Theres no use wasting it altogether.

Coaches have overlooked plenty of things before this. AFL history is full of missed Ideas.

[DemonWA 3,439]

Moloney and Rivers are expected to leave as free agents, and Jordan Gysberts and Colin Garland have attracted interest from other clubs

- HUN

Surley we wont trade Garland unless the deal is absolutley awesome?

[stuie 7,374]

Moloney and Rivers are expected to leave as free agents, and Jordan Gysberts and Colin Garland have attracted interest from other clubs

- HUN

Surley we wont trade Garland unless the deal is absolutley awesome?

http://demonland.com/forums/index.php?/topic/31572-garland-possibly-trade-bait/

[jnrmac 18,980]

Moloney and Rivers are expected to leave as free agents, and Jordan Gysberts and Colin Garland have attracted interest from other clubs

- HUN

Surley we wont trade Garland unless the deal is absolutley awesome?

Gee we signed Col to a 3 yr deal in July. Let's trade him.

Sheesh.

[Dee_Flower 53]

Gee we signed Col to a 3 yr deal in July. Let's trade him.

Sheesh.

Everybody is tradeable for the right price.

[demoniac 1,243]

Tex and Chris from Camberwell need their own radio show. Now!

[Hannibal 5,814]

Tex and Chris from Camberwell need their own radio show. Now!

That whiny pain in the arse. All he used to talk about was Leigh Newton.

Typical Melbourne supporter.

[Jack Jack 415]

Gee we signed Col to a 3 yr deal in July. Let's trade him.

Sheesh.

I haven't seen a copy of the new CBA, but the previous version had a clause that you could not trade a recently re-contracted player. I'd assume the clause would continue in the new CBA.

So does this make it another pathetic and ridiculous Hun rumour?

[rpfc 27,476]

I haven't seen a copy of the new CBA, but the previous version had a clause that you could not trade a recently re-contracted player. I'd assume the clause would continue in the new CBA.

So does this make it another pathetic and ridiculous Hun rumour?

My understanding is that rule was pretty toothless and just said the player had to agree to be traded - which they have to anyway.

[Jack Jack 415]

My understanding is that rule was pretty toothless and just said the player had to agree to be traded - which they have to anyway.

Yep, You might be right.

Anyway as jnrmac mentioned, if he was only re-contracted 2 months ago, so why would either party have changed their mind?

[scarlett 247]

i always thought in the year the contract was signed (first year) had to be seen through, i have no hard source though, anyone know for sure?

[Sir Why You Little 34,511]

Tex and Chris from Camberwell need their own radio show. Now!

HaHa Chris From Camberwell....He gets on the radio and asks about 35 questions and is lucky to get one answer!!