My 3 word player analysis V Who Cares

[joeboy 2,993]

6- Magner

5- Trengove

4 - Martin

3 - Rivers

2 - Howe

1 - Grimes

Trengove - never stopped trying

Grimes - was terrific early

Jones - always under pressure

Bartram - skill - less as ever

Watts - failed to impress

Bate - limited game time

Frawley - far from reliable

Clark - overpaid and underperformed

Mckenzie - selected too soon

Blease - was rarely sighted

Green - was never sighted

Garland - was he playing?

Moloney - not on field

Rivers - not the worst

Macdonald - possibly the worst

Martin - gave a little

Davey - career possibly over

Howe - spectacular , not effective

Jamar - was comprehensively destroyed

Bail - was rarely sighted

Magner- the only highlight

Edited March 31, 2012 by joeboy

[Striker475 696]

Tynan?

[joeboy 2,993]

Tynan - just a game

[ucanchoose 1,807]

Joeboy -original Rivers lover

I cannot stand this bloke, cannot handball to a proper target, cannot kick to a target, not tall enough for talls, to slow for smalls.

[Jesse Christ 2,884]

Rivers was OK today, other players deserve criticism before him today

[Jaded No More 59,996]

It doesn't matter how each individual performs, when as a team we are a soft, weak unit with no skills and very little intestinal fortitude.

Good luck to Mark Neeld if he wants us to be a tough team to beat. Right now we are the easiest team to destroy. GWS showed more pride in their performance than we did in ours today.

[Good Times Grimes 2,396]

My one word analysis:

Trengove - good

Grimes - awful

Jones - okay

Bartram - awful

Watts - meh

Bate - meh

Frawley - poor

Clark - awful

Mckenzie - awful

Blease - awful

Green - awful

Garland - awful

Moloney - awful

Rivers - bad

Macdonald - terrible

Martin - meh

Davey - WORST

Howe - meh

Jamar - awful

Bail - awful

Magner- EXCELLENT

Tynan- meh

Edit: Just for the record...up until now I've always been an optimist.

Edited March 31, 2012 by Good Times Grimes

[mrtwister 650]

Joeboy -original Rivers lover

I cannot stand this bloke, cannot handball to a proper target, cannot kick to a target, not tall enough for talls, to slow for smalls.

Yet put him on an opponent he is suited to and he will spoil EVERY attempted mark. HATES getting beaten and has the aggression that the majority of the others lack.

[rhaz 342]

For a team that got smashed i thought Tynan played pretty well. When the umpire didn't give him free kick for HTB after that brilliant tackle in the last quarter i was furious. Gotta reward players for that, ESPECIALLY first gamers. Cruel.

Yet put him on an opponent he is suited to and he will spoil EVERY attempted mark. HATES getting beaten and has the aggression that the majority of the others lack.

Hates getting beaten because he gets beaten a lot. I'd be happy with him playing that spoiling role if he provided some run and good disposal out of the backline but he doesn't.

Edited March 31, 2012 by rhaz

[Forest Demon 4,681]

Trengove - had no support

Grimes - tried but outplayed

Jones - down on pre-season

Bartram - always looks rushed

Watts - skilled but passive

Bate - boarded sinking ship

Frawley - not his best

Clark - always out numbered

Mckenzie - needs more pre-season

Blease - was rarely seen

Green - lift or retire

Garland - not his best

Moloney - gets another chance

Rivers - tried but undersized

Macdonald - picked wrong McDonald (or Davis)

Martin - martin of old (as in ineffectual / [censored] me off early when he was 1 on 1 with an undersized opponent in the goal square and played for the free when had the best position, pathetic and set the tone)

Davey - lift or retire

Howe - needed much more

Jamar - outplayed by Luey

Bail - tried but ordinary

Magner- an acceptable performance

Tynan- threw himself about

That was difficult

[titan_uranus 23,177]

Clark awful?

How ridiculous. Clark never stopped presenting, was constantly outnumbered because, as per Bailey, Neeld was content to have our forwards move up the ground, and continually brought the ball to ground. Terrible call. There were far worse than Clark (probably about 20 other players)

[DeeZee 6,910]

Watts was easily in the best

[Demon Disciple 11,208]

Only an idiot would accuse Clark of having a bad game. I challenge anyone to try and do well when the ball is being bombed into the forward line in hope, like it was today. Delivery was shocking all day.

It's one thing to have a gameplan that is as predictable as it is boring, it's another thing to be woeful in clearances, the main element that the game plan relies on.

[Forest Demon 4,681]

Watts was easily in the best

He probably was, but still doesn't mean he was good. Personally thought he was ok, and showed usual silk but still leaves me wanting more.

[Jaded No More 59,996]

If Watts becomes a gun midfielder, it would be a better long term result than if he becomes a good forward.

Teams have won premierships with ordinary forwards, nobody has ever gotten close to finals, let alone a flag, with the sort of garbage midfield we currently boast.

Of anyone running through the middle today, Watts was far and away the silkiest. He can hit a target for once. That's a really refreshing change from a bunch of dumb footballers bombing the ball to the boundary.

[Dee*ceiving 1,253]

I'd be happy if Watts became a gun anything. Anything.

Our midfield is so mediocre that you'd take 5 of Collingwood's midfielders before a single 1 of ours. 5!

Swan

Pendlebury

Thomas

Ball

Beams

[mrtwister 650]

Only an idiot would accuse Clark of having a bad game. I challenge anyone to try and do well when the ball is being bombed into the forward line in hope, like it was today. Delivery was shocking all day.

It's one thing to have a gameplan that is as predictable as it is boring, it's another thing to be woeful in clearances, the main element that the game plan relies on.

Neeld described Clark's game as disappointing. Does that classify him as an idiot?

[rhaz 342]

I'd be happy if Watts became a gun anything. Anything.

Our midfield is so mediocre that you'd take 5 of Collingwood's midfielders before a single 1 of ours. 5!

Swan

Pendlebury

Thomas

Ball

Beams

I'd take Trengove before Beams.

Also that is a premiership winning, last years runner-up, midfield. Against ours that hasn't finished... 16th 16th 13th 14th or something like that?

[The Great One 99 125]

Macdonald - possibly the worst

Harsh. Joel Mac was not great, but i thought he was among our best of the 20 others that were rubbish.

[heartbeatstrue 57]

It doesn't matter how each individual performs, when as a team we are a soft, weak unit with no skills and very little intestinal fortitude.

Good luck to Mark Neeld if he wants us to be a tough team to beat. Right now we are the easiest team to destroy. GWS showed more pride in their performance than we did in ours today.

Sadly true.

And as well as all this, they seemed to lack energy. Where was the run? Are they unfit? Uninspired? Not interested? Why do they as a team seem to be all these things? Where was the gut running to create opportunities when the ball was being carried from defence?

[JJJ 603]

Trengove - the effort was there but he looked a little short of a gallop. It will come.

Grimes - great early but fatigued due to constant pressure.

Jones - couldn't find any space and time. Needs more clearances.

Bartram - not sure what to do with this bloke.

Watts - almost all of our best passages of play featured watts. Needs to do it over 4 qtrs.

Bate - impacted game but it was already gone.

Frawley - a little loose. No attacking aspect which we need badly.

Clark - not great but limited chances with our delivery and slow ball movement.

Mckenzie - out of touch.

Blease - short steps and not a natural forward

Green - horrible vision and skills

Garland - worst game for years. Just awful.

Moloney - ditto.

Rivers - at a hiding to nothing. Had to fix others mistakes. Too small to defend lewy.

Macdonald - should have gone to rockliff way earlier. Coaching staff very slow to react.

Martin - typical Martin game. Some good some bad

Davey - not a congested football type. Needs to think about his future

Howe - played from behind most of the game. Not impressed by unwillingness to present as a hf.

Jamar - yikes.

Bail - a better running version of bartram? Butcher by foot but does other things well. Can you have these types in modern footy?

Magner- good first up effort

Neeld - reactive and has players hopelessly out of form. Is the game plan to play boundary at all costs? Hmmmm very predictable team with the ball in hand.

[jackaub 1,402]

Sadly true.

And as well as all this, they seemed to lack energy. Where was the run? Are they unfit? Uninspired? Not interested? Why do they as a team seem to be all these things? Where was the gut running to create opportunities when the ball was being carried from defence?

I must feel sorry for Magner and Tynan

They thought that you showed up and played footy you know run case kick tackle

What they obviously dont know yet that at melbourne you do none of these

You look like you try, you cruise, you shout and point and wave you arms and you do NOTHING

I wonder how long it will take for these two footy players to learn the Melboune way. Cruise at half pace be second always to contests, get no bruises and pick up your pay check and have a good old time playing not football but playing at being a privileged footballer.

The boys club that is the MFC was well and truely on display today.

A day when we should have inspired people to sign up as members

The membership tent was empty and closed at half time

So hard to follow this lot

Magner was a find, out played all other melbourne and thrashed himself everybody else showed no interest today

[Hannibal 5,814]

Trengove - battled hard

Grimes - ok

Jones - not our worst

Bartram - not up to it

Watts - had a dip

Bate - battler

Frawley - hiding to nothing

Clark - least of my concerns

Mckenzie - just a battler

Blease - meh

Green - close the door on the way out

Garland - not his best

Moloney - B grader

Rivers - a very disappointing RS winner

Macdonald - comical sometimes

Martin - reminds me of Hymie

Davey - close the door on the way out

Howe - will be terrific

Jamar - Hudson's [censored]

Bail - just a battler

Magner- poor bastard

Tynan - rushed, but will be good

We're desperate for Gysberts, Strauss and Tapscott to make the grade.

[loges 6,355]

Jamar - votes in paper???? Howe - Robbo impressions

[mrtwister 650]

Jamar - votes in paper????

Amassed quite a few hit-outs and took a few contested marks.

Not a lot, but enough to be respected by some.

Edited April 1, 2012 by mrtwister