Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Is a key cog in the league leader's midfield, despite missing the last few games with injury. A yes from me.

Not sure why he'd leave Hawthorn when they're on the cusp of potential premierships.

A bunch of Hawks like Watson, Meek, maybe even Day are coming out of contact in 25/26. One or two of there best players will be pushed out or be low balled.

Edit: they be gunning to land a free agent like Allen or trade for Harley as well.

Edited by MrFreeze

 

The question is why have Hawthorn not prioritised signing him?

 

If he bring an assistant coach (to be senior coach for us) and the game plan it's a yes from me


4 hours ago, DubDee said:

The question is why have Hawthorn not prioritised signing him?

Injurie aside, as others have mentioned they have a lot of players outperforming their contract values, so probably a wise decision from Hawthorn to hold back a little here

 
5 hours ago, DubDee said:

The question is why have Hawthorn not prioritised signing him?

I'll hazard a guess because well managed clubs don't sign players until they have to.

1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Who says they’re not?

The alternative is he wants out

Seems unlikely


14 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Is a key cog in the league leader's midfield, despite missing the last few games with injury. A yes from me.

Not sure why he'd leave Hawthorn when they're on the cusp of potential premierships.

The bigger question for me is

Why would he want to come to us?

Will Day out for 3-4 month. Does that change things? Job satisfaction factor maybe, more time in middle, they might up there offer to keep him

Edited by John Demonic

21 hours ago, DubDee said:

The question is why have Hawthorn not prioritised signing him?

because he can't kick.

Whether we are looking into Worpel or not (or even whether we should), my bigger question, and the most important one is:

Why would he want to come here?

What's the sell?

We are 2nd last on the ladder (thanks to %), an absolute shambles on the ground, which you think might and should improve, but based on what metric, I don't know. Most of our guys are on the park right now. And we're not exactly destination material for a CEO either.

This is the problem with letting a potential dynasty not only pass by, but almost being stomped on.

It took us DECADES to be relevant again, because of the cyclical problem of being [censored], and therefore it being harder to attract people who want to win (not sit in the doldrums for their career), and also losing the quality we do have.

It doesn't mean we don't have young talent around, we do. But we need senior talent, and it will be hard to keep them, and attract other senior talent to guide the younguns if the don't fix whatever is going on.... NOW, with some hard-nosed, respectable footy so that others look at us and say hey, I want some of that.

Because that's not happening right now. This isn't the 60s, we're not a marque club anymore. We're being passed, again, by the Hawks, the Pies (with the oldest list going around), even the Saints look respectable. The Roos will pass us soon, if not already, as shown by the way they completely embarrassed us (to the extent we didn't already embarrass ourselves).

I love a trade target chat, but geez I really am not sure who'd be looking at us at the moment. 'Potential' ain't cutting it anymore.

Anyway, rant over. Sorry, today is a 'mostly blue' day.


Yes from me assuming he can get his body sound and doesn't command too high of a salary.

Our midfield is a mess and we've lost depth this past few seasons without replacing it. While we've got great young talent and good senior players, the middle age bracket of our list is where we fall down. We drafted well, but recruited poorly.

Worpel is a proven AFL level player and has shown seriously good clearance ability. Not the best ball user, but he's an upgrade on the next rung down in our midfield (Sparrow, Laurie, Woewodin types). At his peak in 2023, he was top 10 in the league for clearances and top 5 in the league for centre clearances. He was also pretty handy last year in a strong Hawks team.

We've got no high draft picks and limited lower draft this year due to poor trading, so we'd be mad not to target him as a free agent if he doesn't command a big salary. He's a decent midfielder IMO.

The big question is why would he want to come to us? We stink on field and off field. Hawks are flying on field and off field. Other than getting squeezed out for salary reasons, surely there's better options for him.

How can we have threads like "Recruiting - where did it all go wrong", while at the same have people looking for reasons to not look at someone like Worpel, who we'd get for free, would make a demonstrable improvement to our list and is exactly the sort of guy Hawthorn would be chasing, if they didn't already have him?

32 minutes ago, JTR said:

How can we have threads like "Recruiting - where did it all go wrong", while at the same have people looking for reasons to not look at someone like Worpel, who we'd get for free, would make a demonstrable improvement to our list and is exactly the sort of guy Hawthorn would be chasing, if they didn't already have him?

why don't they sign him then?

They can't be having salary cap issues already with such a young team

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

why don't they sign him then?

They can't be having salary cap issues already with such a young team

Maybe the same reason we didn't re-sign guys like Bedford or Jordan?

Good players, but we saw them as depth and lower priority signings to young guns and bigger name players coming off contract.

Worpel is much better than most of our depth and in a year where we don't have a first round pick (and I assume would be packaging up any early picks for the Father Son/NGA guys anyway), then good quality free agents is what we should be after.

Imo...

  • 3 weeks later...

Would have Warp Speed anyday!!

1 hour ago, adonski said:

Of course he'd wind up at Geelong. They somehow endlessly get players go to them and keep under the salary cap. Free agent too, so costs them nothing as no trade required. That would suck.

 
2 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Of course he'd wind up at Geelong. They somehow endlessly get players go to them and keep under the salary cap. Free agent too, so costs them nothing as no trade required. That would suck.

it's how they roll

let others develop, then top up with uncontracted and disaffected players and maintain a stop in the 8 where they can challenge every year

i envy them

Got a lot of Hawthorn supporting mates and not one of them are remotely upset about the prospect of losing him.

Has gone backwards at a rate of knots from his first couple of years.

Not quick, not a great kick, not a great decision maker. No thanks.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 134 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 416 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies