Jump to content

Featured Replies

16 hours ago, old dee said:

No to Graham Wright

 We have seldom  won with pies cast offs. 

We won the Brownlow with a pies cast off

 
9 hours ago, FreedFromDesire said:

We did win our first flag in 57 years with an ex-Pies CEO, an ex-Pies player as assistant coach, and a list built largely by an ex-Pies recruiting manager.

Just get the best people, it's largely irrelevant where they're from.

Exactly.

Get best people in and stop whinging about where they're from or conspiracy theories.

 
On 16/09/2024 at 04:09, Little Goffy said:

I did some googling and was a bit surprised to see he'd been with us since 2012.

Basically makes him the architect of our premiership list - pursing the structural players which made our game plan and our glory possible.

No mistaking that there has been a string of misses in the last couple of years, albeit relatively low-cost misses. I suspect trying to find a back-up ruck capable of stepping in full-time if needed while also being content to be 80% forward for potentially years is one of the hardest recruiting tasks there is, especially if you are hoping for that recruit to be a longer term successor to the game's greatest ruckman.

The perception last trade period was that Tim Lamb was simply dealing with too much all at once, between the Petty, Oliver and Grundy kerfuffles on top of the usual trade period nonsense.

Clearly it would be silly to try to bump Lamb on in the handful of weeks between now and trade period this season, so let's see if we can get some transparency on what people expect.

So...

What benchmark in this coming trade period needs to be reached in order for Lamb to re-establish himself as our preferred recruiting / list manager?

I don't think we can blame Lamb and his recruiting team as they operate on a just-in-need situation whilst endeavouring to look forward to upcoming future needs, BUT my point is that current needs at the time are the first to set in place. 

Lamb continues to be our best person for the job I believe.

As for the current benchmark - we need a supportive Ruck for the aging Gawn plus we need forward driving power in the mid-size range. Overall, we have a good up-and-coming crop. Look for improvement in Jefferson.


54 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Of course.

Left Pies, now joins Blues, on I would imagine a very nice salary package.

Now Blues and Pies continue the fight for Houston.

Edited by Redleg

 

Very good get for Carlton. I’m annoyed we didn’t throw our hat in the ring as replacement for Pert.


1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

Does this mean Brian Cook is available?

Who knows? Probably going the way of Peter Jackson after this. 

Hopefully Wright is better suited to what he was doing and CEO was a bad idea. 

1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

Does this mean Brian Cook is available?

No, he is looking at retirement. He is contracted at Carlton until the end of next year.

Next year will be Wright's CEO training year under Cook.

Might be good for CFC if he could stay on as a consultant post 2025 though but I understand he no longer wants to work full time after next year.

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Outstanding get for Carlton.

Likewise for wright. He was never going sideways career wise. Ready for ceo and smart planning by blues Board and Cook.

I am bewildered that someone would ask this question. 

Tim Lamb and the members of the recruitment team have done an outstanding job for many years. We cannot be critical of the strategy the club has developed. It is simple, trade up the draft board to pick up the best talent available. This strategy appears to work to renew the team.

The 2024 year, has not in any way been a consequence of the recruitment strategy. You simply can not forecast, that you will lose three of the best midfielders in the AFL and the club's history within six months. You cannot forecast what their behaviour will be after serious injuries, both physical and psychological. They are not machines as the media would suggest (looking at Tracc's Instagram, I may be corrected).

We and more importantly the media have a two-minute cycle of dredge and a poor memory. Oxygen is free!

Let Tim and the football department do their job.

 

 

 

 

I was critical of Lambs presser performance earlier this week.

But kudos to him and whomever propped him for today's conference which I have just watch.

In the face of relentless and mindless questions Tim stayed on message brilliantly.

Well done.


7 hours ago, No. 31 said:

No, he is looking at retirement. He is contracted at Carlton until the end of next year.

Next year will be Wright's CEO training year under Cook.

Might be good for CFC if he could stay on as a consultant post 2025 though but I understand he no longer wants to work full time after next year.

Brian will be 70 next year so probably a good time to step back...

29 minutes ago, Demon17 said:

I was critical of Lambs presser performance earlier this week.

But kudos to him and whomever propped him for today's conference which I have just watch.

In the face of relentless and mindless questions Tim stayed on message brilliantly.

Well done.

I didn’t even realise he did one today

Is it online?

8 hours ago, Balance Demon said:

I am bewildered that someone would ask this question. 

Tim Lamb and the members of the recruitment team have done an outstanding job for many years. We cannot be critical of the strategy the club has developed. 

Let Tim and the football department do their job.

Dear bewildered drafting has been good.

Player trading has been terrible & made our list worse to whit Dunstan, Schache, Hunter, McAdam, Fullerton, Billings.

Compare that to Hawthorn & Geelong in the same period.


7 minutes ago, Cranky Franky said:

Compare that to Hawthorn & Geelong in the same period.

Just cherry-pcking = confirmation bias.

Why not compare to say St Kilda or North. Look at who Freo have lost over the last few years. etc. etc. 

Not only are your posts tirelessly repetitive, they're superficial.

2 hours ago, Demon17 said:

I was critical of Lambs presser performance earlier this week.

But kudos to him and whomever propped him for today's conference which I have just watch.

In the face of relentless and mindless questions Tim stayed on message brilliantly.

Well done.

today's presser? where?

15 hours ago, rjay said:

Brian will be 70 next year so probably a good time to step back...

I know Brian quite well. I think he and his wife Claire are keen to travel. They've only been able to have brief stints OS the past few years. He's also keen to spend more time with family. He has a soft spot for the Dees as he started his senior football with our U19's. IMO he be a great get for a board position or similar. He would similarly have been ideal for a position on the review panel had he been available. Both Brian and his mentor, the late Frank Costa, resurrected the GFC leading to their 2007 flag. As a football administrator he has no peer.

 
34 minutes ago, M_9 said:

I know Brian quite well. I think he and his wife Claire are keen to travel. They've only been able to have brief stints OS the past few years. He's also keen to spend more time with family. He has a soft spot for the Dees as he started his senior football with our U19's. IMO he be a great get for a board position or similar. He would similarly have been ideal for a position on the review panel had he been available. Both Brian and his mentor, the late Frank Costa, resurrected the GFC leading to their 2007 flag. As a football administrator he has no peer.

Get in his ear

1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

Get in his ear

Given that he's got a year to run at the Blues now is not the time. May ask about his future intentions but I doubt he'll know. Pretty sure he was hesitant to commit to three years with the Blues. Right now is the busiest time of the year for the likes (life) of Brian.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies