Gold Coast Suns Rebrand

[Ethan Tremblay 30,856]

1 hour ago, No. 31 said:

Always though the "Suns" was such a lame name. They should merge with Southport Sharks, rebrand as the Gold Coast Sharks and use the Sharks guernsey but in red & yellow.  

Apparently “Sharks” was too offensive and aggressive. Not even joking.

[old dee 23,787]

17 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

Still an amateurly run club, kinda like ourselves when CS released the MFC shield with 20 million things happening in it.

Never forget the Blazers! 

[old dee 23,787]

5 hours ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

I've been saying for a while, one of three things will happen to the Suns - either fold, merge or relocate.  They're simply not viable as they are.  As for the new logo, I reckon the Year 7 Visual Communication Design class at my school could come up with something better.

I heard they were approached but declined. Something about ruining their reputations when  they will soon hit the job market. 

[No. 31 1,235]

4 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Apparently “Sharks” was too offensive and aggressive. Not even joking.

A football team adopt an aggressive moniker ... outrageous for a competive, contact football code!

The Sharks were good enough for East Freo in the WAFL. 

According to their logic, MFC should have remained the Fuchsias instead of become the feared Demons and going on a 30+ year reign of 10 Premierships ... no room for aggression in this sport 😁

[Left Foot Snap 2,401]

1 hour ago, No. 31 said:

A football team adopt an aggressive moniker ... outrageous for a competive, contact football code!

The Sharks were good enough for East Freo in the WAFL. 

According to their logic, MFC should have remained the Fuchsias instead of become the feared Demons and going on a 30+ year reign of 10 Premierships ... no room for aggression in this sport 😁

I also recall what Ethan is saying about using the sharks. That ridiculous argument was put forward back in the the inception of the suns. Was then, and still is, bewildering to me.

[binman 42,892]

5 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

A camel is a horse designed by committee. 

Who designed the horse?

[whatwhat say what 22,738]

7 minutes ago, binman said:

Who designed the horse?

donkey designer

[demosaw 1,025]

10 hours ago, Fritta and Turner said:

I reckon Collingwood should go with a giant C.

And U relocate them to the NT

[Dr. Gonzo 24,207]

15 hours ago, Roger Mellie said:

I suppose so but you don't see too many clubs running round with that kind of branding. Eg. Could you imagine Essendon running around with a giant 'B' on all their apparel? Or Collingwood with 'M' etc

The D's?

[Ethan Tremblay 30,856]

3 hours ago, binman said:

Who designed the horse?

Evolution (or God, depending on which way you swing). 

[Ethan Tremblay 30,856]

Guernseys by Ethan. 
 

Edited November 13 by Ethan Tremblay

[Katrina Dee Fan 3,647]

20 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Apparently “Sharks” was too offensive and aggressive. Not even joking.

Are sharks more or less aggressive than lions? Tigers?  Devils? Swooping annoying magpies? Asking for a friend.  Even swans can have their moments of aggression.

[DistrACTION Jackson 8,714]

1 hour ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

Are sharks more or less aggressive than lions? Tigers?  Devils? Swooping annoying magpies? Asking for a friend.  Even swans can have their moments of aggression.

Seeing as more people die of skin cancer each year I think the Suns is the scariest of the team names!

[Deepfreeze 216]

No issue with the colours, but the jumper design is pox.

And that stupid looking logo that looks like a lifesaver has been spaghettified by crossing the event horizon of a  black hole. Who was the idjit who approved that? Not even sure they still use it.

 

Edited November 14 by Deepfreeze

[layzie 33,793]

The name and the jumper have always stunk up the joint. 

[Sir Why You Little 37,031]

Rebranding: The act of making some people feel better, but actually achieving nothing. 
Which is how Gold Coast have always operated 

Every time i see them play they are wearing a different crappy jumper…
 

Meh….

[Rab D Nesbitt 8,367]

Nothing wrong with a rebranding per se. They’ll now have a heritage guernsey to wear. The new logo, if legit, is putrid though, in my opinion. 

[Dr. Gonzo 24,207]

On 13/11/2024 at 15:14, Ethan Tremblay said:

Apparently “Sharks” was too offensive and aggressive. Not even joking.

I thought it was due to Southport being the Sharks and it alienating the other non-Southport supporters up there? Or was that just about them being Southport and not Gold Coast? I may be getting my wires crossed.

Sharks is a great name for a footy team, if they knocked it back due to being too aggressive then that tells you all you need to know about the spivs running the league.

[Nascent 9,212]

https://www.goldcoastfc.com.au/news/1693173/gold-coast-suns-unveil-new-logo

Edited November 14 by Nascent

[The Lobster Effect 891]

Google the company Epoch Systems

[Nascent 9,212]

1 minute ago, The Lobster Effect said:

Google the company Epoch Systems

Lol, so much for their "innovative" design

[Demonland 72,147]

 

[Roger Mellie 4,012]

13 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Their home strip looks like a training jumper and there away, looks like West Coasts.

They should call themselves the Gold Coast Bland

[Roost it far 8,255]

Oh my, they are so average. I love how people get paid to design this stuff…..laughable. 

[whatwhat say what 22,738]

1 hour ago, Demonland said:

 

so embarrassed by their new logo that they hide it in the red of the jumper

and that alternative guernsey looks like meth coke to me