Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

He wanted to leave though and was out of contract so we did the best we could.

No point whinging about a player who didn't want to be here, when the majority do.

Agreed about Gawn injury, but most teams are the same (dockers probably the only ones who can cover their number one ruck).

If English goes down Dogs have to ruck either Darcy or Lobb full time. If Marshall goes down the Saints have Tom Campbell. If Soldo goes down the Power have Jordon Sweet and so on and so on. There aren't many good ruckman around and there are hardly any AFL standard rucks in the VFL.

I’m not whinging just stating the obvious - the deal we got for LJ was not ā€œthe best value everā€ - simpleĀ 

was it all that was on the table - maybe - but best value ever is laughable - in value terms we are miles behind on that trade atmĀ 

Ā 

As Petty is contracted in 25 they’ll need a top 10 and a top 20 pick to satisfy us. Either that or a top liner from their list who wants back to Vic. Any less would be unders.Ā 

7 minutes ago, Sydee said:

I’m not whinging just stating the obvious - the deal we got for LJ was not ā€œthe best value everā€ - simpleĀ 

was it all that was on the table - maybe - but best value ever is laughable - in value terms we are miles behind on that trade atmĀ 

Well yeah but you very rarely get what a player is worth once they are out of contract and want to leave, given the players can choose where they want to go.

We are very lucky Freo tanked last year and we got Windsor!

 
1 minute ago, Roost it far said:

As Petty is contracted in 25 they’ll need a top 10 and a top 20 pick to satisfy us. Either that or a top liner from their list who wants back to Vic. Any less would be unders.Ā 

Exactly. Once he is OOC this changes, but for the end of this year we can just say no deal and he comes back for another season. These articles saying 'Crows think they can get him' are all just for clickbait, fact is we don't have to trade.

If we don’t get top value for Petty this year, I would hold him to his contract in ā€˜25

We can use Gus money this year to get some high end talentĀ 


1 hour ago, Garbo said:

1332 km Melbourne to Wuddina

Got me.Ā 

1 hour ago, Jjrogan said:

Future first and an Adelaide death ride coming up.Ā 

First and future first with our 2nd going back. Same as Lever deal. Seems fair for a key position player in his prime that can play both ends and is still contracted.Ā 

Their first this year is currently pick 6.

Hopefully we can change his mind.

Ā 

On 15/03/2024 at 09:16, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I can't see how we don't hold Petty to his contract for 2025 unless we have a proven and experienced key forward to replace him. The club owes it to itself and its members to look after its backyard first and foremost (which they didn't do with the Grundy trade)

We should tell Adelaide that if a forward hasn't agreed to come to us before or during trade week this year, then we're not trading him.Ā 

Not changing my stance on this one.

No experienced key forward coming through our doors, then no Petty/Adelaide trade for 2025.

What's more important?

1) Trade Petty and obtain a good trade by way of potentially two top 20 picks for the 2025 season but having no replacement (assuming BBB retires and we have to persist with Schache if Jefferson and Adams don't develop)

2) Retaining Petty for 2025 who will provide usĀ with a bona fide KPF/KPD to help us contend for another flag at the expense of receiving a mediocre draft pick return for the 2026 season because we won't have bargaining power.

I know which option I'm taking.

Ā 

Ā 
2 hours ago, Beetle said:

The club are resigned to the fact now we will likely lose him at year’s end.Ā 
I was originally of the understanding he was more than happy here, but they held him to his contract for this year given how important he is to our side.

Whether it be the money or not, he is apparently ā€œdesperate to get back to SAā€.Ā 

I know you can't judge everything on game day but he looked as invested as ever on the field last week and was sticking up for his teammates such as Max when Hawks players had a crack at us.

Makes you wonder what's changed in terms of his homesickness from October 2021 when he committed medium term (2025) to the current day where he is allegedly desperate to come home.

4 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I know you can't judge everything on game day but he looked as invested as ever on the field last week and was sticking up for his teammates such as Max when Hawks players had a crack at us.

Makes you wonder what's changed in terms of his homesickness from October 2021 when he committed medium term (2025) to the current day where he is allegedly desperate to come home.

I can’t answer that sorry mate. As I said it may be money related or it may not be.

That was purely what I was told in a conversation from a very reliable source.Ā 
Of course the club will do everything they can to keep him, they just don’t think they’ll be able to.Ā 


If he wants out nothing we can do. Just need him to give max effort towards a flag tilt before sending him on his merry way. Look for the best deal we can at the trade table.

P.S. I want a future first as part of the deal because I miss death riding.

1 hour ago, Grr-owl said:

Got me.Ā 

i doubt harry would move to wuddina.Ā  radelaide for sure if he goes.

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

It looks like Jeffo ahead of Petty and if so, he looks taller than Petty. In another few photos of them, I thought the same thing.

Petty is listed as 197 cms. So if Jeffo is taller, he has grown since being drafted and will be a big unit.

I think he will become another key forward with us, hopefully playing alongside JVR and Fritta for several years.

Ā 

Ā 

Jeffo has shown absolutely nothing at VFL level, and doesnt look like it either at this point in time. weve got another 2 years of him to hopefully show us his wares. god knows we need him to!

3 hours ago, Sydee said:

I think reading between the lines the farm is being offered to Petty not the MFCĀ 

This could be similar or worse than the LJ fiasco - the compensation in that case was well under market imo and as time moves on it looks even worse. Players that can have a significant impact on the outcome of individual games are as rare as hens teeth - LJ is unquestionably in that category now and will become more valuable in time. For us Petty is close to that because he is our most versatile tall (the main question mark on him would be capacity to stay on the park consistently)Ā 

I’m still hopeful he decides to stick with us but if he is determined to leave get ready for us to to very disappointed with the compensationĀ 

Ā 

Ā 

With ya on being hopeful he stays but if it's the Crows then they will be coughing up heaps in salary for him and I trust 1st round picks for us.


3 hours ago, Nascent said:

First and future first with our 2nd going back. Same as Lever deal. Seems fair for a key position player in his prime that can play both ends and is still contracted.Ā 

Their first this year is currently pick 6.

Hopefully we can change his mind.

Ā 

If Petty is determined to go and Adelaide finish bottom 4 I’m in.

Had a dream night before last he signed for 1.2m p.a with dees

weird

i expect to have Augusta and Ronde van Vlanderaan and snowboarding dreams this time of yearĀ 

If Petty goes wont bat an eyelid...As long as we get some first rounders he is ...surplus to needs!

Hopefully if he does want to go back to SA, then Port also put a big number in front of him too. Ā I would love a true bidding war to break out if we are to lose him (but would much prefer him to decide to stay though).

Ā 

1 hour ago, picket fence said:

If Petty goes wont bat an eyelid...As long as we get some first rounders he is ...surplus to needs!

What? Petty surplus to needs? Who have we got his size and ability, that make him surplus to needs.


Sorry but why would we be getting a ā€œmid teensā€ compensation pick?
Ā 

Petty vs McKay

24 years vs. 26 years old

Pick 37 vs Pick 21

62 games vs 71 games

1x Premiership vs Nil.

Ā 

McKay Essendon Deal

6 years at $850k pa = Round 1 compensation pick (#3)

Ā 

John Ralf Reported Offer

5 years at $800k pa = Mid Teens

1 minute ago, TheWiz said:

Sorry but why would we be getting a ā€œmid teensā€ compensation pick?
Ā 

Petty vs McKay

24 years vs. 26 years old

Pick 37 vs Pick 21

62 games vs 71 games

1x Premiership vs Nil.

Ā 

McKay Essendon Deal

6 years at $850k pa = Round 1 compensation pick (#3)

Ā 

John Ralf Reported Offer

5 years at $800k pa = Mid Teens

Forget compo picks, he is contracted to us next year.

1 hour ago, picket fence said:

If Petty goes wont bat an eyelid...As long as we get some first rounders he is ...surplus to needs!

Get off the jungle juice, picket!

May is 78, which leaves us with only Lever as a tall back in 2 years.

Or are you claiming Hore, Howes or Turner as our next key back stars? 🤪

Ā 
Just now, Moonshadow said:

Get off the jungle juice, picket!

May is 78, which leaves us with only Lever as a tall back in 2 years.

Or are you claiming Hore, Howes or Turner as our next key back stars? 🤪

No way Moonman, he is gooooorne, time to plan for it! Mark my WordsšŸ¤‘

2 minutes ago, picket fence said:

No way Moonman, he is gooooorne, time to plan for it! Mark my WordsšŸ¤‘

Please define how Petty is surplus to needsĀ 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 104 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

      • Like
    • 4 replies