Jump to content

PREGAME: Rd 18 vs Brisbane


Demonland

Recommended Posts

Not too fussed if we lose Grundy. It's not like the double ruck combo has been crushing it. Grundy really isn't a great mark around the ground as well. Maybe we sneak in another tall up forward and kick some more goals. May be quite fortunate.

Edited by leave it to deever
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MrFreeze said:

Agreed, without Grundy, Gawn would have had to continue to play big TOG% and play through injuries and niggles. We have been effectively managing him, in game, to preserve him long term.

Makes sense post the knee issue.  I don't feel it's the right strategy if Max was fully fit and not in that space though.

I'd want my best ruck to be at his very best and dominating.

Even if it was just say two more seasons, for an improved chance at one more cup vs just plodding along  for longevity sake with the help of another 'ok' ruck and probably missing out.

Hope to be proven wrong, but the extra ruck means you have given up a place for a potential very good KF, inside or outside mid.

When all is said & done i just don't feel the pay off will be worth that sacrifice after we look back and review this decision after another season or two.

For whatever reason, post injury and/or other, at the moment Max looks like a shadow of his former self.  That's not to say he isn't playing some pretty good footy at times.  It's more his body language on the field and in general.  The happy-go-lucky confident Max (on the field) that played with a bit of fire in the belly and freedom appears to be missing somewhat for mine this season.

Edited by Demon Dynasty
  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

This FD needs an honest review of itself at the end of the year if the above means what I think it means.

I, and others, said before we picked him up that it’s a lot to invest in the ruck position.

But now it’s done we have to lean into it, and they sound like we are readdressing the concept…

Max needs to realise he is a fwd first, and the sooner he does, the better he will be and the team.

We are not losing because of the ruck situation.

  • Like 4
  • Thinking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting if Grundy can't play two back to back games on a 6 day break immediately after he has had 3 x 10 day breaks between games.  Can he be that unfit...

If he had an injury wouldn't we just say so rather than risk having his fitness called into question.

...tending to agree with others that we are trying a one man ruck again.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, rpfc said:

This FD needs an honest review of itself at the end of the year if the above means what I think it means.

I, and others, said before we picked him up that it’s a lot to invest in the ruck position.

But now it’s done we have to lean into it, and they sound like we are readdressing the concept…

Max needs to realise he is a fwd first, and the sooner he does, the better he will be and the team.

We are not losing because of the ruck situation.

What it means is we want to manage another of our players, just like we've managed Hibbo, JVR, Chandler, BB and Spargo, and even Bowey. Now it's Grundy's turn, so he's fresh for Adelaide.

  • Like 8
  • Thinking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Interesting if Grundy can't play two back to back games on a 6 day break immediately after he has had 3 x 10 day breaks between games.  Can he be that unfit...

If he had an injury wouldn't we just say so rather than risk having his fitness called into question.

...tending to agree with others that we are trying a one man ruck again.

I think it could be both. That we want to try one ruck this week, but going by Chaplin's comments, I'd suggested now would be a good time to rest Grundy.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, rpfc said:

This FD needs an honest review of itself at the end of the year if the above means what I think it means.

I, and others, said before we picked him up that it’s a lot to invest in the ruck position.

But now it’s done we have to lean into it, and they sound like we are readdressing the concept…

Max needs to realise he is a fwd first, and the sooner he does, the better he will be and the team.

We are not losing because of the ruck situation.

I wasn't aware we were blooding him as a mostly forward.

The CBA numbers don't support this with Max still taking the bulk of them vs Grundy.

Max is also running at 39% accuracy at goals vs Grundy 63% so far this season.

Why would you want your least accurate Ruckman, and by a long margin, up forward?  While Max does take double the number of marks inside 50 each match it's still less than 1 per match (on average) @ 0.8 vs Grundy 0.4  Neither are setting the world on fire in this regards either.

I would argue the premise of looking to turn one of them (or both !!??) into a serious TF option is a flawed concept in itself.

Most teams only ever see the main rucks drift or push forward to stretch the oppos ruck and offer an 'occasional' extra option up forward.

They certainly don't try to turn them into a genuine (regular with serious minutes) forward target if that's what you're suggesting we are attempting to do with Max.

And if we have attempted this (from one or both) the results so far would suggest we shouldn't be.

  • Like 2
  • Thinking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


21 minutes ago, A F said:

What it means is we want to manage another of our players, just like we've managed Hibbo, JVR, Chandler, BB and Spargo, and even Bowey. Now it's Grundy's turn, so he's fresh for Adelaide.

Maybe.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, rpfc said:

This FD needs an honest review of itself at the end of the year if the above means what I think it means.

I, and others, said before we picked him up that it’s a lot to invest in the ruck position.

But now it’s done we have to lean into it, and they sound like we are readdressing the concept…

Max needs to realise he is a fwd first, and the sooner he does, the better he will be and the team.

We are not losing because of the ruck situation.

If max is a fwd first we are done.

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

I wasn't aware we were blooding him as a mostly forward.

The CBA numbers don't support this with Max still taking the bulk of them vs Grundy.

Max is also running at 39% accuracy at goals vs Grundy 63% so far this season.

Why would you want your least accurate Ruckman, and by a long margin, up forward?  While Max does take double the number of marks inside 50 each match it's still less than 1 per match (on average) @ 0.8 vs Grundy 0.4  Neither are setting the world on fire in this regards either.

I would argue the premise of looking to turn one of them (or both !!??) into a serious TF option is a flawed concept in itself.

Most teams only ever see the main rucks drift or push forward to stretch the oppos ruck and offer an 'occasional' extra option up forward.

They certainly don't try to turn them into a genuine (regular with serious minutes) forward target if that's what you're suggesting we are attempting to do with Max.

And if we have attempted this (from one or both) the results so far would suggest we shouldn't be.

This isn’t my idea - Stafford, Goodwin, and Gawn himself have talked about the heavier kid forward that Max will/should take. 

They wanted to bring someone in that can actually keep Max out of the ruck - which Grundy is good enough to at his best. 

They are not leaning into their strategy in year one but they do have another 4 years so maybe they will get it going one day…

  • Like 2
  • Thinking 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, A F said:

What it means is we want to manage another of our players, just like we've managed Hibbo, JVR, Chandler, BB and Spargo, and even Bowey. Now it's Grundy's turn, so he's fresh for Adelaide.

Can people get dropped anymore?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, rpfc said:

Can people get dropped anymore?

Yep, Smith. Chandler was dropped, but IMO he'll be in the FDs best 22 for the finals. Likewise, Spargo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


11 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Tom likes to stir the pot doesn't he? I doubt he has any sources inside the FD he hasn't burned. 

  • Like 10
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rpfc said:

This FD needs an honest review of itself at the end of the year if the above means what I think it means.

I, and others, said before we picked him up that it’s a lot to invest in the ruck position.

But now it’s done we have to lean into it, and they sound like we are readdressing the concept…

Max needs to realise he is a fwd first, and the sooner he does, the better he will be and the team.

We are not losing because of the ruck situation.

Agreed. We have a real problem with our forward line which is now exacerbated by our number one goal kicker out for awhile. It was our forward line that failed towards the end of last season that saw is go out of finals in straight sets to teams we should have beaten. However the Max Grundy Combo was to supposed to  extent help the loss of Jackson up forward. I believe the FD thought it would add some goal scoring power to the team. Combined, the two have added an avge of just over a goal per game which is pretty low. I would just prefer that we recruited a decent marking CHF instead of this experiment. It's not like it's been cheap either.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just went back to the Injury page at Melbournefc.com.au and it looks like they've cleaned up the page - maybe they are reading this!

Not so concerned about Grundy being out, hopefully Max goes back to dropping into the backline for intercepts, opening up the fwd line for Brown and JVR.

What is of concern is Oliver is out for another 4 weeks!  It means he will be back for finals, but will he be match or finals fit?

I really think we need to get Smith back into the side too for Melksham, we need someone who can apply pressure acts in finals. Or at least tackle.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, A F said:

Tom likes to stir the pot doesn't he? I doubt he has any sources inside the FD he hasn't burned. 

An ambulance chasing trollop.

I have no doubt that we are not happy with how the Gawn/Grundy combo is working, and that we expected a lot more out of it. However I also have no doubt that we are resting Grundy, not relegating him to Casey (who have a bye, so what a good time to 'rest' a player).

He spent 12 months out of the game last year, and is no doubt still building back his fitness. He has been in better form IMO than Gawn, but I think we want to exploit the Lions' distinct lack of speed, especially if Dunkley doesn't play.

It is the one area where we can really expose them, especially on the wide spaces of the MCG. 

 

Edited by Jaded No More
  • Like 9
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Makes sense post the knee issue.  I don't feel it's the right strategy if Max was fully fit and not in that space though.

I'd want my best ruck to be at his very best and dominating.

Even if it was just say two more seasons, for an improved chance at one more cup vs just plodding along  for longevity sake with the help of another 'ok' ruck and probably missing out.

Hope to be proven wrong, but the extra ruck means you have given up a place for a potential very good KF, inside or outside mid.

When all is said & done i just don't feel the pay off will be worth that sacrifice after we look back and review this decision after another season or two.

For whatever reason, post injury and/or other, at the moment Max looks like a shadow of his former self.  That's not to say he isn't playing some pretty good footy at times.  It's more his body language on the field and in general.  The happy-go-lucky confident Max (on the field) that played with a bit of fire in the belly and freedom appears to be missing somewhat for mine this season.

It might be that the plan was to get as much forward line presence from both big men during the year, then let Gawn rip with full minutes in the late part of the year. We absolutely have a lot to gain with a KPF or extra runner replacing Grundy. But we need to get the timing juuuuust right. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

An ambulance chasing trollop.

I have no doubt that we are not happy with how the Gawn/Grundy combo is working, and that we expected a lot more out of it. However I also have no doubt that we are resting Grundy, not relegating him to Casey (who have a bye, so what a good time to 'rest' a player).

He spent 12 months out of the game last year, and is no doubt still building back his fitness. He has been in better form IMO than Gawn, but I think we want to exploit the Lions' distinct lack of speed, especially if Dunkley doesn't play.

It is the one area where we can really expose them, especially on the wide spaces of the MCG. 

 

Haha, I love the word trollop. 

And agree with the rest of your post mate.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MrFreeze said:

It might be that the plan was to get as much forward line presence from both big men during the year, then let Gawn rip with full minutes in the late part of the year. We absolutely have a lot to gain with a KPF or extra runner replacing Grundy. But we need to get the timing juuuuust right. 

I doubt that would have been proposition that would have sold Grundy though. I hope we have an ace up our sleeve in terms of making this work, but let's see.

FWIW, I don't think it's been a failure either, a huge win in many respects. How would we have gone without Grundy when Max went down? But there's no doubt we'd like to get more dominance from both.

Edited by A F
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    THE BLOW by Whispering Jack

    Narrm’s finals prospects took a crushing blow after the team’s insipid performance at Optus Stadium against a confident Waaljit Marawar in the first of its Doug Nicholls Round outings for 2024.  I use the description “crushing blow” advisedly because, although the season is not yet at it’s halfway mark, the Demons have now failed abysmally in two of their games against teams currently occupying bottom eight places on the ladder.  The manner in which these losing games were played out w

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 6

    HALF FULL by KC from Casey

    It was a case of the Casey Demons going into a game with a glass half full in their match up against the Brisbane Lions at Casey Fields on Saturday. As the list of injured and unavailable AFL and VFL listed players continues to grow and with Melbourne taking all three emergencies to Perth for the weekend on a “just in case” basis, its little brother was always destined to struggle. Casey was left with only eight AFL listed players from who to select their team but only two - an out-of-form

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    PREGAME: Rd 11 vs St. Kilda

    The Demons return to the MCG to take on the Saints in Round 11 on the back of two straight losses in a row. With Jake Lever out with concussion who comes in and who goes out?

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 212

    PODCAST: Rd 10 vs West Coast

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 20th May @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we dissect the Demons disaapoiting performance against the Eagles at Optus Stadium in Round 10. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 40

    VOTES: Rd 10 vs West Coast

    Last week Captain Max Gawn consolidated his lead over reigning champion Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award. Steven May, Alex Neal-Bullen & Jake Lever make up the Top 5. Your votes for the loss against the Blues. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 37

    POSTGAME: Rd 10 vs West Coast

    Many warned that this was a danger game and the Demons were totally outclassed all game by a young Eagles team at Optus Stadium in Perth as they were defeated by 35 points.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 445

    GAMEDAY: Rd 10 vs West Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons have returned to the site of their drought breaking Premiership to take on the West Coast Eagles in what could very well be a danger game for Narrm at Optus Stadium. A win and a percentage boost will keep the Dees in top four contention whilst a loss will cast doubt on the Dees flag credentials and bring them back to the pack fighting for a spot in the 8 as we fast approach the halfway point of the season.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 884

    WARNING by William from Waalitj

    As a long term resident of Waalitj Marawar, I am moved to warn my fellow Narrm fans that a  danger game awaits. The locals are no longer the easybeats who stumbled, fumbled and bumbled their way to the good fortune of gathering the number one draft pick and a generational player in Harley Reid last year. They are definitely better than they were then.   Young Harley has already proven his worth with some stellar performances for a first year kid playing among men. He’s taken hangers, k

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 22

    OVER YET? by KC from Casey

    The Friday evening rush hour clash of two of the VFL’s 2024 minnows, Carlton and the Casey Demons was excruciatingly painful to watch, even if it was for the most part a close encounter. I suppose that since the game had to produce a result (a tie would have done the game some justice), the four points that went to Casey with the win, were fully justified because they went to the best team. In that respect, my opinion is based on the fact that the Blues were a lopsided combination that had

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...