Jump to content


Recommended Posts


Posted (edited)

I'll frame the verdict and it'll go straight to the pool room!!

And it should go on Rooeys highlight reel!!

Edited by DemonicFinalFantasy
  • Like 1

Posted

Glad with decision but it is a mess that it had to go this far. The fact he was cited for striking is just beyond comprehension.

  • Like 9
  • Clap 3

Posted
56 minutes ago, Satan said:

Whats pay pal

It's like a digital wallet but if you get scammed using PayPal it's a lot easier to get your money back through them then it is the bank

  • Like 1

Posted

Got the right decision eventually but JVR should have NEVER been cited in the first place. 

GOOD WORK DEES. 

Now smash the dorks. 

  • Like 3
  • Love 1

Posted
Just now, Deebymistake said:

What compensation does the MFC get from the AFL for all this faffing around?

2023 premiership 

  • Like 2
  • Love 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, layzie said:

The spoil lives JR! 

I'm happy you were right Layzie. Great result in the end and now let's give those Hawks a horrible hiding.

  • Like 2

Posted
24 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

You know how much the pub on the ocean sold for recently @Emerald?

 

Maybe I should walk up there and buy a drink to celebrate.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Gawndy the Great said:

This is bigger than the toppling of the Berlin Wall. 

Historians will write about this day. 

"On that day, the web-site's bulletin board, with over 700 people and/or bots participating, stayed on-line with no 'crashing' and only short delays coinciding with a sporting tribunal debate. Experts are undecided if the debate contributed to the delays."

  • Haha 6


Posted

Awesome stuff from the club. very pleased. 
 

This hearing had the potential to change more than just the fabric of the game.
Supporters are growing tired of the ongoing meddling of the rules and the excessive amount of umpiring of our game. 
Strewth, if we sanitise this game too much it will lose pretty much all of its Uniqueness 

  • Like 13
  • Clap 2
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, YearOfTheDees said:

ImageImage

So they found that what we said on Tuesday night was correct.

Absolutely.

The Chairman on tuesday at the Tribunal made it up as he went along.

He added things to the rules, that weren't there.

Actually pretty simple.

Edited by Redleg
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • Love 1
Posted

Melbourne Demons forward Jacob van Rooyen’s controversial two-match ban upheld after appeal

[censored] West Australian, I have been hitting search every so often waiting for a result, and this was the headline, thought we had lost. 

 

Well done to the club!

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
  • Shocked 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Docs Demons said:

I'm happy you were right Layzie. Great result in the end and now let's give those Hawks a horrible hiding.

It lives for now, watch wording of the rules be changed tomorrow.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...