Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (โ‹ฎ) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

I hate Adrian Anderson for initiating the tanking investigation but heโ€™s making a good case.ย 

I couldn't quite figure out why Angry was looming large from my sub-conscious to my consciousness tonight @Fat Tony. Now you've just traumatized me.

ย 
4 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

I hate Adrian Anderson for initiating the tanking investigation but heโ€™s making a good case.ย 

Didnโ€™t Adrian Anderson get Fritsch off in 2021?

4 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

It's not the length of the legal arguments to be concerned about - it's the length of the Tribunal's deliberations that count.

Updates seem to have eased off. Are they deliberating now?

ย 
3 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

It's not the length of the legal arguments to be concerned about - it's the length of the Tribunal's deliberations that count.

QD are you going to change your name to Kingbeyan Demon?

Speaking of deliberation, the book is open.

Over/Under set at 21.5 minutes. Place your bets.ย 


4 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Anderson is my new fave person in the world ๐Ÿ˜˜

I thought I was.

You are very fickle.

You do know that Anderson has lost most of his Tribunal appearances.

He was also the bloke that started the Tanking investigation against us.

30 minutes ago, sue said:

Best but might sound like a smartarse

ย 

Problem is you're dealing with shifty bloody afl smart-arses. All they want to do is justify their coin, remind minions of their position.ย 

The questioning is designed to trap

They are ( insert derogatory term of preference) x 10

ย 
1 minute ago, Redleg said:

ย 

You do know that Anderson has lost most of his Tribunal appearances.

Evenย Dennis Denuto would have a hard time in the farce that is the AFL tribunal system. It's the vibe.

When i saw we had Adrian Anderson on board I thought great the dees are throwing everything at this appeal.

Good to see.

JVR has covered himself in glory with his responses tonight. Well done young man.


Semantics! No injury, incidental contact in play. What semantics? Charge should be withdrawn.ย 

The AFLโ€™s arguments are deranged. Reeks of people who havenโ€™t played football ever.ย 

It makes me wild when the AFL bang on about the duty of care. Itโ€™s 44 blokes running around full tilt trying to compete and win the ball, yet they speak like heโ€™s a manager of a company deciding to skimp on the PPE.ย 

Edited by Phil C

9 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Anderson is my new fave person in the world ๐Ÿ˜˜

3 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I thought I was.

You are very fickle.

You do know that Anderson has lost most of his Tribunal appearances.

He was also the bloke that started the Tanking investigation against us.

Hey @Redleg. Must admit, I too was a bit hurt by @WalkingCivilWar's comment.

I'm just annoyed we didn't stump up for the Carlton lawyer... I hear he's good at the tribunal thing!

Edited by Sideshow Bob


Just now, Jaded No More said:

The AFLโ€™s arguments are deranged. Reeks of people who havenโ€™t played football ever.ย 

Get the lawyers out of the process. Their litigation is ridiculous.ย 
ย 

Resolve cases via 3 reps who have actually played the game.ย 

4 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I thought I was.

You are very fickle.

You do know that Anderson has lost most of his Tribunal appearances.

He was also the bloke that started the Tanking investigation against us.

No biggy. I change my fave person in the world more often than you change your socks. (Hadda clean that one up. The word rhymes with socks but arenโ€™t worn on your feet. Well, they can be, buts thatโ€™s just weird.) ๐Ÿคญ

4 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Semantics! No injury, incidental contact in play. What semantics? Charge should be withdrawn.ย 

Yeah that worries me. Sounds like a stitch up to me.

2 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Hey @Redleg. Must admit, I too was a bit hurt by @WalkingCivilWar's comment.

Awww you know youโ€™ll always be my fave person in the world (checks username of this particular poster), QDย 


The real question is what are the optics and can the AFL live with a "not guilty" whatever the actual facts are.ย 

Player A, runs into player B who goes off on a stretcher. Bad optics...AFL want to look good. Money, advertising etc.ย 

4 minutes ago, Phil C said:

It makes me wild when the AFL bang on about the duty of care. Itโ€™s 44 blokes running around full tilt trying to compete and win the ball, yet they speak like heโ€™s a manager of a company deciding to skimp on the PPE.ย 

Just said the same to a mate. They are trying to apply civil law principles to a contact sport. There is a voluntary assumption of risk that comes with plying this game. The duty of care argument is a bunch of bulldust. You could argue that the duty of care is breached in every tackle. The aim of the act is to physically challenge an opponent. Itโ€™s just outrageousย 

31 minutes ago, Kiss of Death said:

Interesting, they wanted a downgrade to medium, but itโ€™s almost like theyโ€™re pushing that it was now incidental

The only want it downgraded if it doesn't get thrown out.

ย 
1 minute ago, Wells 11 said:

The real question is what are the optics and can the AFL live with a "not guilty" whatever the actual facts are.ย 

Player A, runs into player B who goes off on a stretcher. Bad optics...AFL want to look good. Money, advertising etc.ย 

Facts and justice occasionally overlap @Wells 11.

1 minute ago, Wells 11 said:

The real question is what are the optics and can the AFL live with a "not guilty" whatever the actual facts are.ย 

Player A, runs into player B who goes off on a stretcher. Bad optics...AFL want to look good. Money, advertising etc.ย 

What about the optics of punishing players for making legitimate attempts to contest the ball in a contact sport?

Him not getting off would have bigger consequences than if the charges are dropped.ย 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 01

    With Opening Round done and dusted, Round 1 sees the full AFL competition finally swing into action for 2026. Discuss all the games this week that do not involve the Dees, share your tips, and let us know which results would suit Demons best.

      • Like
    • 132 replies
  • PODCAST: 2026 Season Preview

    The boys previewed the 2026 Season sharing their early impressions of the new coach, the new players, observations from preseason training, and what they've made of the new game style. They also look ahead to the season with their predictions, the players they expect to rise, their expectations for the team, and what they see as a realistic pass mark for Melbourne in 2026.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 14 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    When the Demons blew their 46-point lead at Marvel Stadium in Round 20 last year, the fallout was enormous. Like an event straight out of a Shakespearean tragedy, Melbourneโ€™s final-quarter collapse left fans reeling and the club grappling with the aftermath.ย 

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 10 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    With just over two weeks until their opening match of the 2026 AFL Premiership season, the Demons are already well on the path to redemption and have the Saints firmly in their sights ahead of their mid-March clash at the MCG. What do you think the team will look like when they run out on to the G?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 593 replies
  • NON-MFC: 2026 Opening Round

    Finally the 2026 AFL Premiership Season is upon us. While Melbourne sits out Opening Round, there is still plenty of footy to enjoy with five non-MFC clashes to kick off the new season. It all begins on Thursday night with a blockbuster at the SCG as Sydney hosts Carlton in what should be a strong early test for both sides. On Friday night, Gold Coast gets its chance to open the season in front of a home crowd when the Suns and Christian Petracca take on Geelong at People First Stadium. Saturday features a double-header, starting in the afternoon with Greater Western Sydney and Clayton Oliver meeting the Hawks at Engie Stadium. That is followed on Saturday night by Brisbane Lions hosting the Western Bulldogs at the Gabba, with the Lions embarking on their campaign to win the Threepeat. Opening Round wraps up on Sunday night at the MCG, where St Kilda takes on Collingwood in the only game in town in the first week of the season. There is no shortage of storylines across the round, so discuss all the action from the non-MFC games of Opening Round.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 557 replies
  • REPORT: Richmond

    Mars is not usually a place known for lighting strikes but on Friday evening it happened twice in the vicinity of the stadium in Ballarat that carries the name and is a half completed building site with limited capacity for spectators.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions โ†’ Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.