Jump to content

AFL Concussion Class Action Lodged

Demonstone
Demonstone
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

 
1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

This development has been anticipated for some time.

It doesn't mention who the other players are apart from Rooke, but I wouldn't be surprised if former Demon Daniel Bell is among them.

 https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/former-geelong-player-rooke-to-lead-class-action-lodged-against-afl-in-supreme-court-20230314-p5crxx.html

This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    If he pulled the boots on as recently as 2021 can we assume that his symptoms started after that date or is he perhaps suggesting that his decision to play is due to impaired judgement caused by his head knocks?

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    5 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

    And the potential to change the way the game is played. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    7 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

    Not so sure about bankruptcy. But rules and umpiring will be changed.

    Maybe those who think the game is poorer for having lost some of the "biffo" will be forced to reconsider their position.

  • Quote
    • Like 8
    7 minutes ago, hemingway said:

    And the potential to change the way the game is played. 

    If it means that the umpires, the MRO and the tribunal start to look after Max’s head, then bring it in. 

  • Quote
    • Like 7
    • Clap 2
     
    14 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

    Not too sure.

    I'm no lawyer but I would think the 'injured' has to 1) show cause and effect between the events and the injury, 2) there was negligence on the part of the accused and 3) that the injury caused or will cause quantifiable losses.  There may be other criteria that come into play...

    Not sure what the level of proof is for those three things (and any other criteria) but I would think it has to be reasonably substantial.

    Should be an interesting test case.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    This was always going to happen in a world full of ambulance chasing law firms. Settle out of court with cashed up corporations is their bread and butter.

    Just wait for ex AFLW players to get in on the action over the next 20 years.

    Its going to be hard though to prove your headaches or mood swings are because of playing footy years ago not to mention the makeup of player contracts. A woman will sue because she cant have kids or has cancer of some kind.

    It will happen. Its called money.

     

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    12 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

    This was always going to happen in a world full of ambulance chasing law firms. Settle out of court with cashed up corporations is their bread and butter.

    Just wait for ex AFLW players to get in on the action over the next 20 years.

    Its going to be hard though to prove your headaches or mood swings are because of playing footy years ago not to mention the makeup of player contracts. A woman will sue because she cant have kids or has cancer of some kind.

    It will happen. Its called money.

    I think that's a very cynical view of a serious condition.

    There is strong evidence of the effects of concussion, just as there is/was evidence for asbestos, cigarette smoking and now silicosis ... you know, all the other tragic conditions the "ambulance chasers" made us alert to. 

  • Quote
    • Like 20
    • Thanks 1
    1 hour ago, Winners at last said:

    Hmm, I wonder if the AFL has insurance cover for these risks. 🤔

    For some reason, the AFL is exempted from Workcover obligations as pertains to footballers. So that’s not gonna help. 

  • Quote

    This could be a very costly situation. I am surprised it hasn’t happened sooner 

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Not too sure.

    I'm no lawyer but I would think the 'injured' has to 1) show cause and effect between the events and the injury, 2) there was negligence on the part of the accused and 3) that the injury caused or will cause quantifiable losses.  There may be other criteria that come into play...

    Not sure what the level of proof is for those three things (and any other criteria) but I would think it has to be reasonably substantial.

    Should be an interesting test case.

    The test is one of negligence. The group will have to prove that the AFL fell short of its expected duty of care. I wait with great anticipation to see how it will play out. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, Deebauched said:

    This was always going to happen in a world full of ambulance chasing law firms. Settle out of court with cashed up corporations is their bread and butter.

    Just wait for ex AFLW players to get in on the action over the next 20 years.

    Its going to be hard though to prove your headaches or mood swings are because of playing footy years ago not to mention the makeup of player contracts. A woman will sue because she cant have kids or has cancer of some kind.

    It will happen. Its called money.

    Why reference AFLW?  It shouldn't matter if it is a male or female that has been concussed.  No need to wait 20 years for an AFLW player to go to court on this:  re-read the article in the op.

    The lawyers wouldn't go to court or even hope for an out of court settlement if they didn't have a reasonable case and evidence.  Judges don't like having their time wasted.   

    The injuries are a lot more than headaches or mood swings and there needs to be losses resulting from those injuries to get compensation. 

  • Quote
    • Like 8

    Important case for the code and sport in general.  The AFL has talked big with protecting the head through the MRO and tribunal system, but so often have failed to deliver.  No idea if those failures come into it or not.

    Interesting that Emma Grant and Liam Picken chose not to be part of this class action.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    I have no idea what the outcome of this will be, but anything that increases the AFL's caution towards head knocks is a good thing. 

    Danny Frawley and Shane Tuck offer two glimpses into what chronic traumatic encephalopathy can lead too. Sounds like a pretty awful condition to live with.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    6 minutes ago, Vipercrunch said:

    Important case for the code and sport in general.  The AFL has talked big with protecting the head through the MRO and tribunal system, but so often have failed to deliver.  No idea if those failures come into it or not.

    Interesting that Emma Grant and Liam Picken chose not to be part of this class action.

    Yeah, interesting especially as Emma Grant is using the same law firm as the class action.

    I wonder if their cases are more clear cut in that they can identify relatively recent, specific instances and there is video footage of the events, at a time when AFL had protocols in place with a lot more documentation happening.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    50 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    The test is one of negligence. The group will have to prove that the AFL fell short of its expected duty of care. I wait with great anticipation to see how it will play out. 

    Well they can point the finger at the Cripps decision being overturned on legal grounds, if they want to prove negligence. And the Cotchin decision also proves that the AFL fall short when it comes to duty of care.

    I'm staggered that the AFL haven't overturned more MRP and Tribunal decisions. Maybe this is a wake up call.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Angry 1
    1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Why reference AFLW?  It shouldn't matter if it is a male or female that has been concussed.  No need to wait 20 years for an AFLW player to go to court on this:  re-read the article in the op.

    The lawyers wouldn't go to court or even hope for an out of court settlement if they didn't have a reasonable case and evidence.  Judges don't like having their time wasted.   

    The injuries are a lot more than headaches or mood swings and there needs to be losses resulting from those injuries to get compensation. 

    Not singling out Aflw. Whatever the men do the women will follow suit not now but in the future. 

    Am i cynical?  yes, absolutely. How can you not be in this world.

    Start the clock running now. If the men win a case the girls will follow in the near future.

  • Quote

    3 hours ago, monoccular said:

    If it means that the umpires, the MRO and the tribunal start to look after Max’s head, then bring it in. 

    It is unbelievable how few free kicks Max gets for hits in the head and chopping of the arms. Never ceases to amaze me.

    Many AFL non suspensions open them up to legal action.

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, D4Life said:

    It is unbelievable how few free kicks Max gets for hits in the head and chopping of the arms. Never ceases to amaze me.

    Many AFL non suspensions open them up to legal action.

    Couldn’t agree more, again.

    Hypocritical hand wringing and talk of the head being sacrosanct when deliberate head hits go unpenalised week after week should leave the AFL vulnerable.  Accidental head knocks on the other hand are far more a grey area.

    Maybe they should consider what has been one of my hobby horses over the years, penalizing players who recklessly lead with their head into another player or a pack.  Currently they are more likely to be awarded a free for high contact, even though they instigated it.  Some poor bugger one day will be made to feel eternal guilt when one of these incidents results in paralysis. It must be stamped out at its source. (Gil or his successor will go on about how the head and neck should be protected whilst not doing something proactive to reduce the risk.) 

    Edited by monoccular

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Players that charge into a pack Head first should be penalized. They have no intention of getting the ball. 
    Happens far too often 

  • Quote
    •  
    7 hours ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

    The first goal of the season hasn't been kicked, and we have our clubhouse leader . . .

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, monoccular said:

    Couldn’t agree more, again.

    Hypocritical hand wringing and talk of the head being sacrosanct when deliberate head hits go unpenalised week after week should leave the AFL vulnerable.  Accidental head knocks on the other hand are far more a grey area.

    Maybe they should consider what has been one of my hobby horses over the years, penalizing players who recklessly lead with their head into another player or a pack.  Currently they are more likely to be awarded a free for high contact, even though they instigated it.  Some poor bugger one day will be made to feel eternal guilt when one of these incidents results in paralysis. It must be stamped out at its source. (Gil or his successor will go on about how the head and neck should be protected whilst not doing something proactive to reduce the risk.) 

    We are totally in agreement on this...if a player puts himself at risk like this they need to get at least a 4 week suspension to have a good think.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Richmond

      A few years ago, the Melbourne Football Club produced a documentary about the decade in which it rose from its dystopic purgatory of regular thrashings to the euphoria of a premiership victory. That entire period could have been compressed in a fast motion version of the 2025 season to date as the Demons went from embarrassing basket case to glorious winner in an unexpected victory over the Dockers last Saturday. They transformed in a single week from a team that put in a pedestrian effort of predictably kicking the ball long down the line into attack that made a very ordinary Bombers outfit look like worldbeaters into a slick, fast moving side with urgency and a willingness to handball and create play with shorter kicks and by changing angles to generate an element of chaos that yielded six goals in each of the opening quarters against Freo. 

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 07

      Round 7 gets underway in iconic fashion with the traditional ANZAC Day blockbuster. The high-flying Magpies will be looking to solidify their spot atop the ladder, while the Bombers are desperate for a win to stay in touch with the top eight. Later that evening, Fremantle will be out to redeem themselves after a disappointing loss to the Demons, facing a hungry Adelaide side with eyes firmly set on breaking into the top four. Saturday serves up a triple-header of footy action. The Lions will be looking to consolidate their Top 2 spot as they head to Marvel Stadium to clash with the Saints. Over in Adelaide, Port Adelaide will be strong favourites at home against a struggling North Melbourne. The day wraps up with a fiery encounter in Canberra, where the Giants and Bulldogs renew their bitter rivalry. Sunday’s schedule kicks off with the Suns aiming to bounce back from their shock defeat to Richmond, taking on the out of form Swans.Then the Blues will be out to claim a major scalp when they battle the Cats at the MCG. The round finishes with a less-than-thrilling affair between Hawthorn and West Coast at Marvel. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • 3 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Fremantle

      For this year’s Easter Saturday game at the MCG, Simon Goodwin and his Demons wound the clock back a few years to wipe out the horrible memories of last season’s twin thrashings at the hands of the Dockers. And it was about time! Melbourne’s indomitable skipper Max Gawn put in a mammoth performance in shutting out his immediate opponent Sean Darcy in the ruck and around the ground and was a colossus at the end when the game was there to be won or lost. It was won by 16.11.107 to 14.13.97. There was the battery-charged Easter Bunny in Kysaiah Pickett running anyone wearing purple ragged, whether at midfield stoppages or around the big sticks. He finish with a five goal haul.

        • Love
        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: UWS Giants

      The Casey Demons took on an undefeated UWS Giants outfit at their own home ground on a beautiful autumn day but found themselves completely out of their depth going down by 53 points against a well-drilled and fair superior combination. Despite having 15 AFL listed players at their disposal - far more than in their earlier matches this season - the Demons were never really in the game and suffered their second defeat in a row after their bright start to the season when they drew with the Kangaroos, beat the Suns and matched the Cats for most of the day on their own dung heap at Corio Bay. The Giants were a different proposition altogether. They had a very slight wind advantage in the opening quarter but were too quick off the mark for the Demons, tearing the game apart by the half way mark of the term when they kicked the first five goals with clean and direct football.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Richmond

      The Dees are back at the MCG on Thursday for the annual blockbuster ANZAC Eve game against the Tigers. Can the Demons win back to back games for the first time since Rounds 17 & 18 last season? Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 214 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Fremantle

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on TUESDAY, 22nd April @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons first win for the year against the Dockers. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All