Jump to content

AFL Concussion Class Action Lodged

Demonstone
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

 
1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

This development has been anticipated for some time.

It doesn't mention who the other players are apart from Rooke, but I wouldn't be surprised if former Demon Daniel Bell is among them.

 https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/former-geelong-player-rooke-to-lead-class-action-lodged-against-afl-in-supreme-court-20230314-p5crxx.html

This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    If he pulled the boots on as recently as 2021 can we assume that his symptoms started after that date or is he perhaps suggesting that his decision to play is due to impaired judgement caused by his head knocks?

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    5 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

    And the potential to change the way the game is played. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    7 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

    Not so sure about bankruptcy. But rules and umpiring will be changed.

    Maybe those who think the game is poorer for having lost some of the "biffo" will be forced to reconsider their position.

  • Quote
    • Like 8
    7 minutes ago, hemingway said:

    And the potential to change the way the game is played. 

    If it means that the umpires, the MRO and the tribunal start to look after Max’s head, then bring it in. 

  • Quote
    • Like 7
    • Clap 2
     
    14 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

    Not too sure.

    I'm no lawyer but I would think the 'injured' has to 1) show cause and effect between the events and the injury, 2) there was negligence on the part of the accused and 3) that the injury caused or will cause quantifiable losses.  There may be other criteria that come into play...

    Not sure what the level of proof is for those three things (and any other criteria) but I would think it has to be reasonably substantial.

    Should be an interesting test case.

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    This was always going to happen in a world full of ambulance chasing law firms. Settle out of court with cashed up corporations is their bread and butter.

    Just wait for ex AFLW players to get in on the action over the next 20 years.

    Its going to be hard though to prove your headaches or mood swings are because of playing footy years ago not to mention the makeup of player contracts. A woman will sue because she cant have kids or has cancer of some kind.

    It will happen. Its called money.

     

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    12 minutes ago, Deebauched said:

    This was always going to happen in a world full of ambulance chasing law firms. Settle out of court with cashed up corporations is their bread and butter.

    Just wait for ex AFLW players to get in on the action over the next 20 years.

    Its going to be hard though to prove your headaches or mood swings are because of playing footy years ago not to mention the makeup of player contracts. A woman will sue because she cant have kids or has cancer of some kind.

    It will happen. Its called money.

    I think that's a very cynical view of a serious condition.

    There is strong evidence of the effects of concussion, just as there is/was evidence for asbestos, cigarette smoking and now silicosis ... you know, all the other tragic conditions the "ambulance chasers" made us alert to. 

  • Quote
    • Like 20
    • Thanks 1
    1 hour ago, Winners at last said:

    Hmm, I wonder if the AFL has insurance cover for these risks. 🤔

    For some reason, the AFL is exempted from Workcover obligations as pertains to footballers. So that’s not gonna help. 

  • Quote

    This could be a very costly situation. I am surprised it hasn’t happened sooner 

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Not too sure.

    I'm no lawyer but I would think the 'injured' has to 1) show cause and effect between the events and the injury, 2) there was negligence on the part of the accused and 3) that the injury caused or will cause quantifiable losses.  There may be other criteria that come into play...

    Not sure what the level of proof is for those three things (and any other criteria) but I would think it has to be reasonably substantial.

    Should be an interesting test case.

    The test is one of negligence. The group will have to prove that the AFL fell short of its expected duty of care. I wait with great anticipation to see how it will play out. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, Deebauched said:

    This was always going to happen in a world full of ambulance chasing law firms. Settle out of court with cashed up corporations is their bread and butter.

    Just wait for ex AFLW players to get in on the action over the next 20 years.

    Its going to be hard though to prove your headaches or mood swings are because of playing footy years ago not to mention the makeup of player contracts. A woman will sue because she cant have kids or has cancer of some kind.

    It will happen. Its called money.

    Why reference AFLW?  It shouldn't matter if it is a male or female that has been concussed.  No need to wait 20 years for an AFLW player to go to court on this:  re-read the article in the op.

    The lawyers wouldn't go to court or even hope for an out of court settlement if they didn't have a reasonable case and evidence.  Judges don't like having their time wasted.   

    The injuries are a lot more than headaches or mood swings and there needs to be losses resulting from those injuries to get compensation. 

  • Quote
    • Like 8

    Important case for the code and sport in general.  The AFL has talked big with protecting the head through the MRO and tribunal system, but so often have failed to deliver.  No idea if those failures come into it or not.

    Interesting that Emma Grant and Liam Picken chose not to be part of this class action.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    I have no idea what the outcome of this will be, but anything that increases the AFL's caution towards head knocks is a good thing. 

    Danny Frawley and Shane Tuck offer two glimpses into what chronic traumatic encephalopathy can lead too. Sounds like a pretty awful condition to live with.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    6 minutes ago, Vipercrunch said:

    Important case for the code and sport in general.  The AFL has talked big with protecting the head through the MRO and tribunal system, but so often have failed to deliver.  No idea if those failures come into it or not.

    Interesting that Emma Grant and Liam Picken chose not to be part of this class action.

    Yeah, interesting especially as Emma Grant is using the same law firm as the class action.

    I wonder if their cases are more clear cut in that they can identify relatively recent, specific instances and there is video footage of the events, at a time when AFL had protocols in place with a lot more documentation happening.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    50 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    The test is one of negligence. The group will have to prove that the AFL fell short of its expected duty of care. I wait with great anticipation to see how it will play out. 

    Well they can point the finger at the Cripps decision being overturned on legal grounds, if they want to prove negligence. And the Cotchin decision also proves that the AFL fall short when it comes to duty of care.

    I'm staggered that the AFL haven't overturned more MRP and Tribunal decisions. Maybe this is a wake up call.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Angry 1
    1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Why reference AFLW?  It shouldn't matter if it is a male or female that has been concussed.  No need to wait 20 years for an AFLW player to go to court on this:  re-read the article in the op.

    The lawyers wouldn't go to court or even hope for an out of court settlement if they didn't have a reasonable case and evidence.  Judges don't like having their time wasted.   

    The injuries are a lot more than headaches or mood swings and there needs to be losses resulting from those injuries to get compensation. 

    Not singling out Aflw. Whatever the men do the women will follow suit not now but in the future. 

    Am i cynical?  yes, absolutely. How can you not be in this world.

    Start the clock running now. If the men win a case the girls will follow in the near future.

  • Quote

    3 hours ago, monoccular said:

    If it means that the umpires, the MRO and the tribunal start to look after Max’s head, then bring it in. 

    It is unbelievable how few free kicks Max gets for hits in the head and chopping of the arms. Never ceases to amaze me.

    Many AFL non suspensions open them up to legal action.

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, D4Life said:

    It is unbelievable how few free kicks Max gets for hits in the head and chopping of the arms. Never ceases to amaze me.

    Many AFL non suspensions open them up to legal action.

    Couldn’t agree more, again.

    Hypocritical hand wringing and talk of the head being sacrosanct when deliberate head hits go unpenalised week after week should leave the AFL vulnerable.  Accidental head knocks on the other hand are far more a grey area.

    Maybe they should consider what has been one of my hobby horses over the years, penalizing players who recklessly lead with their head into another player or a pack.  Currently they are more likely to be awarded a free for high contact, even though they instigated it.  Some poor bugger one day will be made to feel eternal guilt when one of these incidents results in paralysis. It must be stamped out at its source. (Gil or his successor will go on about how the head and neck should be protected whilst not doing something proactive to reduce the risk.) 

    Edited by monoccular

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Players that charge into a pack Head first should be penalized. They have no intention of getting the ball. 
    Happens far too often 

  • Quote
    •  
    7 hours ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    This has the potential to bankrupt the competition if it gets up

    The first goal of the season hasn't been kicked, and we have our clubhouse leader . . .

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, monoccular said:

    Couldn’t agree more, again.

    Hypocritical hand wringing and talk of the head being sacrosanct when deliberate head hits go unpenalised week after week should leave the AFL vulnerable.  Accidental head knocks on the other hand are far more a grey area.

    Maybe they should consider what has been one of my hobby horses over the years, penalizing players who recklessly lead with their head into another player or a pack.  Currently they are more likely to be awarded a free for high contact, even though they instigated it.  Some poor bugger one day will be made to feel eternal guilt when one of these incidents results in paralysis. It must be stamped out at its source. (Gil or his successor will go on about how the head and neck should be protected whilst not doing something proactive to reduce the risk.) 

    We are totally in agreement on this...if a player puts himself at risk like this they need to get at least a 4 week suspension to have a good think.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 15

      As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

        • Clap
      • 227 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Port Adelaide

      Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • 2 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Essendon

      Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Gold Coast

      The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

        • Haha
      • 113 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Sad
        • Thanks
      • 32 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

      The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

        • Sad
        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 252 replies
      Demonland
    View All