Jump to content

Featured Replies

Give me Harmes over Lachie Hunter.

I still believe Harmes should play as a permanent tagger, he actually is more attacking in that role because he is naturally around the ball more often.

 
31 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

In your opinion, he honestly won’t be missed by whom??!!  By you?!?!

Oh, I forgot, DD won’t see this since he’s got me on ignore, but I need to say that Harmesy WOULD INDEED be missed. He’d be sorely missed (clearly not by DD). He’d be missed by people who actually matter… he’d be missed by his teammates. He is hands down the player who would be missed the most by his teammates.

Yes, and look at how it broke the clubs spirit when we got rid of James McDonald. I don’t believe you can let players like this go and then ask players to bleed for the club.

Just now, Ollie fan said:

Yes, and look at how it broke the clubs spirit when we got rid of James McDonald. I don’t believe you can let players like this go and then ask players to bleed for the club.

Entirely different situation, McDonald was cut no chance for a contract.  Harmes has a contract and will see it out if he wants to stay at the Dees.  

 
31 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

In your opinion, he honestly won’t be missed by whom??!!  By you?!?!

Oh, I forgot, DD won’t see this since he’s got me on ignore, but I need to say that Harmesy WOULD INDEED be missed. He’d be sorely missed (clearly not by DD). He’d be missed by people who actually matter… he’d be missed by his teammates. He is hands down the player who would be missed the most by his teammates.

I get where you’re coming from, but this is footy. He’s contracted yet he’s choosing to explore his options. If he was that much a heart and soul player who loved his teammates so much, he’d understand that he can’t be ahead of Trac, Clarry and Viney and get on with it and do what the team needs him to do. Like when Gus played 3 different roles this year because this is what the team required of him. 
 

I would be happy for Harmes to stay. He got a big long contract from us after we pulled him off the rookie list. He won a flag with us. He is a regular in the 22. We’ve done absolutely nothing wrong by him, so if he’s choosing to explore his options then so be it. Clearly he isn’t that fussed about his teammates missing him and I’m sure they’ll get over it too. He’s not dying he’s maybe moving to a different team. They can still all be friends and love each other. 

16 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

If Harmes played 22 games as an unaccountable mid and the umps gave him all of Oliver’s votes he’d be a chance of that absurd result too. 
 

2018 Melbourne best and fairest votes

1

Max Gawn

657

2

Clayton Oliver

595

3

James Harmes

468

4

Nathan Jones

449

5

Tom McDonald

433

6

Angus Brayshaw

429

If Harmes played 22 games as an accountable mid it would mean we rate him as such. But we don’t.
4 years later he has been dropped several times. Since 2018 he hasn’t put a consistent season together

keep digging mate


3 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

Yes, and look at how it broke the clubs spirit when we got rid of James McDonald. I don’t believe you can let players like this go and then ask players to bleed for the club.

How is this a comparable situation? 
McDonald was captain and pushed out into early retirement when he wasn’t ready.
Harmes is IN CONTRACT and exploring his options. I haven’t heard a peep from Melbourne saying we want him to go. 
 

1 hour ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

Is Gus Brayshaw playing midfield next year? Because, IMO, he hampered us in the midfield in every game except the first one after signing the new deal. He is best suited to the wing. Our success in 21 was due to the selflessness of guys like Brayshaw. If the tail is wagging the dog, things like Harmes leaving start to happen. It was very odd that Brayshaw moved from the HBF to the midfield as soon as he signed on. Was it a condition ? There is chatter that Harmes is after more midfield time. He was pushed out when Brayshaw entered the picture. Sparrow is also loved by the coaches, as we found out at the Bluey. My concern remains that we seem to have lost the selfless approach and guys are disgruntled and looking to cash in as premiership players 

Do you honestly believe club's allow players dictate which position they play? And that club's keep them there if it is not working out because it is a condition of a contract? Honestly??

I find this very troubling. Something stinks at Casey

 

Harmes situation now being compared to James McDonald.

I've heard it all now.

11 minutes ago, Demon4Life said:

I find this very troubling. Something stinks at Casey

You’re right. It’s not like we signed every single one of our best players and locked away the two best mids in the competition for 7 years. 
 

We Are Doomed Reaction GIF

Edited by Jaded No More


At least posters are no longer complaining about it being a boring trade period with Melbourne not doing anything.

14 minutes ago, DubDee said:

If Harmes played 22 games as an accountable mid it would mean we rate him as such. But we don’t.
4 years later he has been dropped several times. Since 2018 he hasn’t put a consistent season together

keep digging mate

Played every game in 2019. Backline moved failed in 20. Played every game when healthy last year. Missed a couple of games as sub post injury this year which was the only time he was actually omitted. Hardly a surprise when wing/mid/half forward is an insane ask of any player. 

Played wing the last 3 weeks and played it perfectly fine.

A couple of injuries the last two years which are valid concerns on his value. But nothing major. If he could just play wing/mid or forward/mid he’d be as solid as a rock. Instead he’s moved around because we don’t have enough midfield versatility. 

43 minutes ago, DemonWA said:

I rate him and have enjoyed his service, even if I've been known to call him Nathan Jones from Wish... But I assume the FD see a host if names infront or on par with him. Not dissimilar to Ellis leaving the tigers for the gold coast. 

I reckon I've heard the Ellis leaving for Gold Coast example for 3 players so far.

10 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Played every game in 2019. Backline moved failed in 20. Played every game when healthy last year. Missed a couple of games as sub post injury this year which was the only time he was actually omitted. Hardly a surprise when wing/mid/half forward is an insane ask of any player. 

Played wing the last 3 weeks and played it perfectly fine.

A couple of injuries the last two years which are valid concerns on his value. But nothing major. If he could just play wing/mid or forward/mid he’d be as solid as a rock. Instead he’s moved around because we don’t have enough midfield versatility. 

Hasn’t finished in the top 10 in the BnF in the past 3 years. 

We could be quite active in the draft with all this player movement

The following are all guesses/approximates

Bedford (pick 35)

Hunt (pick 52)

Harmes (pick 25)

Jackson (picks 10 & 13 - this year)

Our own picks 32 & 50

So 10, 13, 25, 32, 35, 50 & 52)

We could bundle up picks 35, 50 & 52 for pick 23 (we could deal with GWS again)

Ending with picks 10, 13, 23, 25 & 32

We have to give Collingwood something for Grundy but what if we decide to pay more of his salary and not have to give them much of a draft pick (we 'are' freeing up our salary cap)

Effectively we end up with Grundy and 5 picks (all 1st & 2nd round) and only lose 1 required player (Jackson)

We could go to the draft with all the picks thus easing pressure on the salary cap (with low cost draftees) or use 2 or 3 of the picks on established talent (if we have the cap space)

Edited by Macca


13 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

At least posters are no longer complaining about it being a boring trade period with Melbourne not doing anything.

Is Melbourne doing anything? It’s some random players wanting out and a couple wanting in. The club’s like the rest of us, eating popcorn and waiting for something to happen.

28 minutes ago, Demon4Life said:

I find this very troubling. Something stinks at Casey

Yeah that premiership stinks 

1 hour ago, Dwight Schrute said:

The rumour going around is we're the team most keen to sign Lachie Hunter, i'm not a huge fan of this, just hope if it's true the club has done it's due diligence 

 28, not quick and poor culture. Wow! I hope not.

Where is that key forward, unless we think we can draft one with the picks we are getting.

There is one we could get with a pick in the 20's.

Edited by Redleg

52 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Dunstan is already on our list. He doesn't need to 'come into Harmes' spot' on the list.

No context change needed, just some hand holding and walking through apparently.

The point you miss again is that Dunstan or others can replaces Harmes and in the starting 22 and we dont lose too much on field. Harmes salary can be used for our key needs ... but you keep going back to old posts

Have just got back to Demonland after spending the past 4 hours in family time - remember them?

I won't spend hours reading through all comments,  but if Harmes is pushed out......it would be a catastrophe.  To me he is the most 'Melbourne' player. Love him to bits. Never heard anyone say he didn't give his all. FFS MFC, you have to see what he brings to the club, tangibly and in. Seriously,  my lifetime passion would be challenged.  He must stay!


28 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Hasn’t finished in the top 10 in the BnF in the past 3 years. 

2020 just flat out wasn’t good down back.
 

Last year his result from 18 games would’ve been very solid over 25 games, fringe top 10. Given he played 3 positions most weeks it was a great effort. 

Not a strong result this year but with a few missed games and the difficulty of his role he’s still around the mark for our role players. 

1 hour ago, Jaded No More said:

I get where you’re coming from, but this is footy. He’s contracted yet he’s choosing to explore his options. If he was that much a heart and soul player who loved his teammates so much, he’d understand that he can’t be ahead of Trac, Clarry and Viney and get on with it and do what the team needs him to do. Like when Gus played 3 different roles this year because this is what the team required of him. 
 

I would be happy for Harmes to stay. He got a big long contract from us after we pulled him off the rookie list. He won a flag with us. He is a regular in the 22. We’ve done absolutely nothing wrong by him, so if he’s choosing to explore his options then so be it. Clearly he isn’t that fussed about his teammates missing him and I’m sure they’ll get over it too. He’s not dying he’s maybe moving to a different team. They can still all be friends and love each other. 

This is why I never listen to anyone who claims that they think player x is so loyal and would never leave us. Its a game, people usually explore their options. 

4 hours ago, mo64 said:

I'd say the club is driving the move.

1 hour ago, DemonWA said:

I think his exit interview probably indicated that he might spend some time at Casey next year so feel free to explore options...

i was gonna say something dimilar, exit interview probably went something like this

JH: my best position is midfield i should play there more often and i want to play there more often

coaches: we agree, but youre behind a few there right now so we want to keep playing you at HF/W/tagging or stints in there when necessary

JH: hmm ok not sure, go dees but gee wonder if someone will pay me to be a permanent mid

dons: hi James

 

Does a role in the team and at times very well.  But we don't know who approached who.  If its numbers contacting him, why wouldn't you go listen to what they have to offer.

I think on memories he was a Dee's supporting growing up, whether that has weight who knows.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies