Jump to content

CHANGES: QF vs Sydney

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

23 minutes ago, binman said:

Whereas i think i'm right in saying Bowey has only played at HB in the ones and at Casey.

More fervent Casey watchers will know, but I seem to recall Bowey a game (or a fair part thereof) at half forward near the end of the regular season. Kicked a goal or two as well.

 
16 hours ago, BDA said:

 

Didn't realise he got one. 

So you can get one without actually playing in the granny. In this instance i'm not against it

 

I think that' s why many wanted Nate Jones to stay in Perth and maybe get a gig as the sub, he would have got his medal.  Anyway, not to be.

Medi sub being Smith or Tomlinson probably makes more sense as already a tall down with Melksham instead of TMac and we got caught against Freo, Swans and Pies mid season with mixture of May injured/missing, Max injured, Petty injured leaving us 2 talls down in each game for at least a half!

Harsh on Bowey with Salem to come in!

 

Like most DLers I can only see one change with Salem returning for Bowey.

But the sub selection is pretty interesting.

To me it's a toss up between Bowey (the unlucky omission) and Smith (the versatile one).

Given the height of the Swans and the fact that we are playing one tall short up forward, I'd probably go Smith.

Imagine the structural issues if one of our bigs goes down early and has to be subbed.

Smith can cover big and short and if we lost a midfielder early, we have plenty of options of adding players into the rotation. 

As to our back seven match-ups, here my stab at them.

May on Franklin, Petty on Reid, Lever on McDonald - I am confident we have the edge with those three.

Then it's Hibberd on Heaney when he plays near goalsquare and Hunt on Papley, but if Papley plays more from the goalsquare then the switch needs to be made so that Hunt isn't isolated like last time. Rivers gets Hayward, who has been great for them in recent weeks. Salem will be tagged/closely marked by Clarke, who is a negater forward.

Up the other end the Swans have to decide who to play Fox and Blakey on with one having to take Kozzie.

McCartin on Brown, McCartin 2 on Jackson/Gawn, Rampe on Fritsch, Fox on Melksham, Blakey on Kozzie??, Lloyd on Spargo and Florent on ANB.

    • Like 5

    1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

    Really?

    I would thought the guy with finals experience, premiership player and all around better player made more sense..

    Bedford as a sub makes zero sense imo. Whilst you say he's played a little bit of mid at Casey, he has not once been used in that position at AFL and nor will he be given an opportunity especially pressure cooker of finals. 

    And as for having experience of coming on as a sub. Well he's started off as sub in 12 games this and has only ever come on mid way in only 2 games. Would you say that's actually experience enough?

    Between the two, Bowey offers more versatility as he was an elite junior prospect playing as a midfield/half forward.  Not that they will use him in that position anyway if he was to be a sub and come on.

    3 players stick out for me as sub options and they are Adam Tomlinson, Joel Smith and Luke Dunstan.

    If Bedford makes zero sense as a sub why has he, as you point out, been a sub in 12 games?

    I like Smith as a sub because of his athleticism and versatility. 

    Not  keen on Dunstan or Tomo as subs as neither are versatile or athletic enough

    • Like 5

    Tough as always but I think no change.
     

    The obvious one that makes this controversial is Salem for Bowey but Salem has been down on his best the second half of this year and Bowey has more than earned his spot back. That said I wouldn’t be surprised if Salem comes in, his best is outstanding, Bowey being extremely unlucky.

    TMac, Smith or Weid to sub. Given that our team is not tall we have the luxury of throwing Melk, Spargo, Harmes, Sparrow, ANB even Frittata or Kozzie into the mid/wing if a mid goes down, allowing us a tall sub. TMac has ruck, forward and backline experience, making him ideal, obviously the question is fitness. Smith has the forward/backline experience, Weid the ruck/forward. Line ball really. 

    • Like 1
    18 hours ago, Seraph said:

    I guess he did get one last year as an unused sub.

    Not really the same though.

    They should have subbed him on in the last 15. Pay the fine. Or there must have been someone with severe stomach pain..

     
    21 minutes ago, binman said:

    If Bedford makes zero sense as a sub why has he, as you point out, been a sub in 12 games?

    I like Smith as a sub because of his athleticism and versatility. 

    Not  keen on Dunstan or Tomo as subs as neither are versatile or athletic enough

    Can Smith play forward?

    Bedford is like for like for Jj but I feel we are too short so smith may be a good option.

    I'm also inclined to make a bigger call and leave Bowie in at the expense of Salem.

    I can't believe I'm saying that. 

    I understand the calls for Bowey over Salem. But imo Salem’s contest work is elite, and well ahead of Bowey, and that is what will see him in over Bowey. But gosh we need to find a spot for Bowey some time soon… he’s far too good to rot away in the twos. 

    • Like 7

    Salem will probably come in. The problem is that he often takes several games to get back into it after injury.

    • Like 1
    4 minutes ago, DeeMee said:

    Salem will probably come in. The problem is that he often takes several games to get back into it after injury.

    Agreed. And now is not the time. 

    35 minutes ago, Deespicable said:

    Like most DLers I can only see one change with Salem returning for Bowey.

    But the sub selection is pretty interesting.

    To me it's a toss up between Bowey (the unlucky omission) and Smith (the versatile one).

    Given the height of the Swans and the fact that we are playing one tall short up forward, I'd probably go Smith.

    Imagine the structural issues if one of our bigs goes down early and has to be subbed.

    Smith can cover big and short and if we lost a midfielder early, we have plenty of options of adding players into the rotation. 

    As to our back seven match-ups, here my stab at them.

    May on Franklin, Petty on Reid, Lever on McDonald - I am confident we have the edge with those three.

    Then it's Hibberd on Heaney when he plays near goalsquare and Hunt on Papley, but if Papley plays more from the goalsquare then the switch needs to be made so that Hunt isn't isolated like last time. Rivers gets Hayward, who has been great for them in recent weeks. Salem will be tagged/closely marked by Clarke, who is a negater forward.

    Up the other end the Swans have to decide who to play Fox and Blakey on with one having to take Kozzie.

    McCartin on Brown, McCartin 2 on Jackson/Gawn, Rampe on Fritsch, Fox on Melksham, Blakey on Kozzie??, Lloyd on Spargo and Florent on ANB.

    Great post.

    30 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

    They should have subbed him on in the last 15. Pay the fine. Or there must have been someone with severe stomach pain..

    there were certainly many with bursting hearts

    • Like 1
    13 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

    there were certainly many with bursting hearts

    Finding a volunteer to come off was the problem.


    The Weed will be sub, can play ruck, forward and back.

     

    6 minutes ago, bluey said:

    Finding a volunteer to come off was the problem.

    Someone in a post match interview mentioned that Harmes had volunteered to have a major cramp.

    • Like 2

    I like the versatility that Smith offers as sub, my only concern is that his kicking for goal isn't great (admittedly based only on the last VFL final game v Sydney). 

    54 minutes ago, deejammin' said:

    The obvious one that makes this controversial is Salem for Bowey but Salem has been down on his best the second half of this year and Bowey has more than earned his spot back. That said I wouldn’t be surprised if Salem comes in, his best is outstanding, Bowey being extremely unlucky.

    I agree

    Bowey missed 5 games until he returned v the Lions. Struggled for a period before being dropped. Played well against the Lions but I wouldn't say he has more than earned his spot. 

    Salem was excellent during last years finals campaign. If he can get near that form again then he's in our Top 5 performers. Beautiful composure and use of the ball. He had a long injury lay off though and hasn't hit the heights since his return. I'd include him against the Swans and hope he plays himself back into form. He has greater upside than Bowey imv

    • Like 1
    13 minutes ago, bluey said:

    Finding a volunteer to come off was the problem.

    iirc harmsey volunteered

    • Like 1

    3 minutes ago, BDA said:

    I agree

    Bowey missed 5 games until he returned v the Lions. Struggled for a period before being dropped. Played well against the Lions but I wouldn't say he has more than earned his spot. 

    Salem was excellent during last years finals campaign. If he can get near that form again then he's in our Top 5 performers. Beautiful composure and use of the ball. He had a long injury lay off though and hasn't hit the heights since his return. I'd include him against the Swans and hope he plays himself back into form. He has greater upside than Bowey imv

    I’m a big Salem fan, but after watching the replay I though Bowey was fierce with his tackling. I recon we lose a bit if we drop him, just my opinion.

    Id make Salem sub 

    • Like 1

    How often is a key position player the medi sub though?

    I'd prefer it to be Smith but even then it could be unlikely. 

    1 hour ago, homsar said:

    I understand the calls for Bowey over Salem. But imo Salem’s contest work is elite, and well ahead of Bowey, and that is what will see him in over Bowey. But gosh we need to find a spot for Bowey some time soon… he’s far too good to rot away in the twos. 

    Tend to agree, and I've been a bit down on Salem's output this year, but just a bit harder and seasoned. Bowey is best 24. Sadly though, this year it might be Hunts turn. 

     
    24 minutes ago, SPC said:

    I’m a big Salem fan, but after watching the replay I though Bowey was fierce with his tackling. I recon we lose a bit if we drop him, just my opinion.

    Id make Salem sub 

    I think that is a really good point regarding Bowey and his tackling.. lets hope its not in thier fwd half much anyway.

    2 hours ago, D4Life said:

    Medi sub being Smith or Tomlinson probably makes more sense as already a tall down with Melksham instead of TMac and we got caught against Freo, Swans and Pies mid season with mixture of May injured/missing, Max injured, Petty injured leaving us 2 talls down in each game for at least a half!

    Harsh on Bowey with Salem to come in!

    Smith has a variety of versatile assets, up back, down front, spoiling in packs from the side. His height is important to us, his leap and his aggression (from backline experience, mainly) and his rather pacey mobility would mean many useful things in a fluent and less-congested game than those played recently in the VFL (where entire games are congested and disarrayed). At AFL level, there is more open space to exploit his manoeuvrability and opponent coverage skills when the going gets 'thick'.  At the least, he may well be able to cover, spoil and occupy a feathered Swan defender - and Smith is known for his tap-ons to smalls and other teammates. 


    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Thanks
      • 25 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

        • Thanks
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 232 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All