Jump to content

Featured Replies

Well I guess this explains his haircut.

 

By playing the 'mental health' card over and over again in the Statements, with AFL blessing, they have shut down media discussion of Smith's drug use.

Other cases of out of season drug use have had 2 -5 weeks suspension and Bailey should get similar.   To be served after his 2 weeks suspension for a head expires.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

 
57 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

They put it up there

Totally devoid of brain capacity.


1 hour ago, Emerald said:

Well I guess this explains his haircut.

There are NO excuses for that hair 

7 hours ago, Colm said:

Bulldogs will pull the mental health card and that will kill the story quick smart. 

And you were spot on…completely untouchable now. They’ve done the same with Hunter. Libba before that. 

So many questions for the AFL or is this all window dressing with the club/AFL being forced to deal with it due to the imminent release on social media. If they were genuine they would force the player to answer questions under threat of extreme sanctions. Such as when did the club become aware of the issue; who supplied the drugs; are other players involved. Whenever these things arise it is the stock standard regent mental health issues and a pledge to do better. Two week later it all forgotten and the drug use just rolls on

 
5 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

And you were spot on…completely untouchable now. They’ve done the same with Hunter. Libba before that. 

And Griffen a few years ago. Bevo has lots of form playing this card. 

46 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

so it's all the fault of the mfc?

I like to think last September we crushed that footy clubs soul


It’s also a bit of the chicken or the egg. Which came first?!
Didn’t take been beaten in GF well so went out parting to drown his sorrows. Made the decision to go a step further and hit the powder. 
Anybody that has taken a bit of powder in their time knows your mental health tends to suffer afterwards. 

8 minutes ago, Colm said:

It’s also a bit of the chicken or the egg. Which came first?!
Didn’t take been beaten in GF well so went out parting to drown his sorrows. Made the decision to go a step further and hit the powder. 
Anybody that has taken a bit of powder in their time knows your mental health tends to suffer afterwards. 

All his holiday snaps from the GC after the Granny seem to show he was perfectly fine and just having a massive bender with mates. The mental health card being pulled is a disgrace. 

20 minutes ago, Colm said:

And Griffen a few years ago. Bevo has lots of form playing this card. 

and boyd

2 hours ago, ManDee said:

There I was agreeing with much of what you said and then you reveal the chip on your shoulder.

"Private school types". You need to get over your misconception of private school types. If I was prepared to waste more time I believe I could establish a case for ratbag public and private school types. Equally, fine young men and natural leaders from both camps.

 

2 hours ago, ManDee said:

Some MFC private school ratbags.

Jack Viney 

Ed Langdon

Adam Tomlinson

James Jordan

Jayden Hunt

Harry Petty

Kate Chandler

Mitch Brown

What a bunch of trouble makers. Oh and Steven May.

 

Cheer up Mandee. I'm just having a little merry poke at the culture of hypocrisy, prejudice and entitlement that sets the tone of the private school alumni world and routinely costs outsiders all kinds of opportunities. Nothing to get wound up about.

No idea why he would post a photo of himself on social media like that. Under the influence or drugs or not it was very dumb. Personally I don't care what footballers get up in their private lives but if you make it public then you should suffer the consequences

And the mental health angle is bogus. He's using drugs recreationally to have a good time. Same as getting boozed up on a night out


We should probably take a little heat off Bailey Smith and direct a little more at the Bulldogs.

Teenager in predraft interview: "I've got some mental health issues which I sometimes struggle with."

Football club: "Great. That'll be really useful for spin later. We'd definitely encourage you to go on a Gold Coast party bender shortly after a bitter disappointment.

AFL: Yep, best option left after we stripped back all progress on player welfare resources to cover Covid losses.

Using mental health to cover up genuinely poor behavior just minimizes the seriousness of those who really suffer from poor mental health.

I’m not suggesting Smith hasn’t suffered from mental health problems, but let’s not for a minute blame that for using drugs and then having it recorded on social media. Seriously that’s not a mental health issue that’s a stupidity issue. 

The 'fix' is on its way:  Bailey is young,  he made a mistake, he needs support, ipso facto sanctions aren't the right option.  Rinse.  Repeat.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-2022-bailey-smith-white-powder-photo-western-bulldogs-investigation-news-updates/news-story/a9573fc0707d3aba543d146ee2fe4ea5

The AFL acknowledged Smith’s statement on Saturday afternoon and said it would interview him “in the coming days”.

The AFL Players’ Association said it would support Smith during this time and was “confident the Western Bulldogs will do likewise”.

“Bailey is a young man who has made a mistake, but importantly has owned that mistake and, even more importantly, has put steps in place to learn from it and grow as a person as a result of it,” the AFLPA statement read.  “The AFL environment is high pressure and high profile and Bailey has previously shared his battles with mental health.

“When issues such as this arise, there are typically two alternative approaches people think should be taken. “Condemn, sanction and shame the player involved or support, educate and try to use the issue as an opportunity for growth.

imv the AFLPA is saying Smith should not be sanctioned.

Don't expect to see anymore discussion in the media.  Case closed.

 

tbh I feel sorry for him to be going through this.  It could easily be one of our youngsters.

My frustration is at WB, the AFL and now the AFLPA.   They should apply the rules consistently and Bailey being 20 doesn't excuse him.

I can see the case building against May; he is nearly 30 he should know better.  I hope the AFLPA use their negotiating skills with the AFL on his behalf.

Edited by Lucifers Hero

21 minutes ago, BDA said:

No idea why he would post a photo of himself on social media like that. Under the influence or drugs or not it was very dumb. Personally I don't care what footballers get up in their private lives but if you make it public then you should suffer the consequences

And the mental health angle is bogus. He's using drugs recreationally to have a good time. Same as getting boozed up on a night out

Doubt he posted himself , the photos could have been from a facetime call screen shotted by other party, the video was done by another party

Just now, Satan said:

Doubt he posted himself , the photos could have been from a facetime call screen shotted by other party, the video was done by another party

i know the video in the club was a third party. As regards the photo though i read somewhere it was a private post. He's looking directly into the phone so whether its a photo or facetime screeshot still very stupid


Just now, Jaded No More said:

Using mental health to cover up genuinely poor behavior just minimizes the seriousness of those who really suffer from poor mental health.

I’m not suggesting Smith hasn’t suffered from mental health problems, but let’s not for a minute blame that for using drugs and then having it recorded on social media. Seriously that’s not a mental health issue that’s a stupidity issue. 

100%

I take medication to manage my mental health problem every day. Alongside lifestyle changes it’s made me a completely different person, and significantly happier, and healthier.

Trust me - if you’ve truly experienced mental health problems you’re not going to take drugs that will completely mess with your psychological health. If he takes mental health meds then it’s the definition of insanity to mix them with street drugs.

The blanket labelling of a host of behavioural issues under the guise of ‘mental health’ is an insult to all of us, and the fact we aren’t allowed to publicly call it out for what it is means that it will continue to be a problem. THIS is what journalism is supposed to be about. Uncovering the truth, not about a specific individual, but about a practice that reeks of insincerity.

My spin

1 Our obliteration of the Dish Lickers would have inflicted serious doubts and potential issues on many players such was our domination! I was part of a team that lost 2 G F in a Row but did I indulge in um alternate remedies because mentally I was disappionted?? NUP

2 I have seen many who only fess up AFTER they are caught doing something they should not have

3  A lot of AFL players think that they can get away with anything unless of course see point 2 above!

4 And as for playing the mental health card.... Please!

Edited by picket fence

4 hours ago, ManDee said:

There I was agreeing with much of what you said and then you reveal the chip on your shoulder.

"Private school types". You need to get over your misconception of private school types. If I was prepared to waste more time I believe I could establish a case for ratbag public and private school types. Equally, fine young men and natural leaders from both camps.

I suspect that there was a hint of irony in the post.  Maybe the next site update could add an “irony” emoji, such as  🙄

 
2 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Seriously that’s not a mental health issue that’s a stupidity issue. 

Mental without the health part...

2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

“Bailey is a young man who has made a mistake,

A mistake...

Is the mistake a single use or a multitude of uses creating a single problem?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies