Jump to content

2022 Free Kick Differential

Demonland
Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

In addition to the ducking, tilt of the head, dropping knees that lead to the 'head high' there are the 'holding' frees where a player lets go of the ball as the tackler touches him and leans back ditto when going for a mark a player leans back.  Then there is the allowing of 'throws' when players scoop the ball out double handed - they are not hand-balls, which is a real skill.

Buckley recently talked about 'dropping his centre of gravity' when commentating a Pies game.  Generally that s 'dropping the knees, so no free.  He also said players are training to use two hands when close to the ground ie scoop/throw the ball.

Players are becoming very adept at these tricks.

The genie is out of the bottle and there is no going back.  If the AFL don't stop the Weightman's of the world (and we have a few players who are also guilty) dubious frees will take over the game.  We will end up with a lot more of them and a lot more 'dissent'.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    In addition to the ducking, tilt of the head, dropping knees that lead to the 'head high' there are the 'holding' frees where a player lets go of the ball as the tackler touches him and leans back ditto when going for a mark a player leans back.  Then there is the allowing of 'throws' when players scoop the ball out double handed - they are not hand-balls, which is a real skill.

    Buckley recently talked about 'dropping his centre of gravity' when commentating a Pies game.  Generally that s 'dropping the knees, so no free.  He also said players are training to use two hands when close to the ground ie scoop/throw the ball.

    Players are becoming very adept at these tricks.

    The genie is out of the bottle and there is no going back.  If the AFL don't stop the Weightman's of the world (and we have a few players who are also guilty) dubious frees will take over the game.  We will end up with a lot more of them and a lot more 'dissent'.

    in terms of ducking or lowering your centre of gravity etc i like to split it into 2 categories

    1. ducking/weaving etc away from the tackler, to avoid a tackle and break free. i consider this legitimate

    2. ducking into a tackle. this is staging for a free and a free should not be played. it is either play on or holding the ball if there is prior. i would also like to see umps caution players who do this.

    Edited by daisycutter

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    I'm still grateful the free kick count was in our favor in the Granny.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 3
     
    7 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    Unbelievable that a  player openly admits he 'creates' the free..  Surely the AFL and umpires should take note.  It is not a skill!  It is cheating.  It is staging or exaggeration and not in the spirit of the game..

    The amount of staging for frees is out of control.  Coaches are openly talking about training players on how to draw free kicks.  Now we have Hardwick saying they will go to umpires to learn how to draw free kicks!!  hardwick-says-tigers-must-learn-how-to-win-frees

    The playing for frees is spoiling the game as a spectator.  Surely, the AFL realise all this is making a mockery of the rules. 

    This is a bloke who was drawing and giving away free kicks from when he touched a football.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    5 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Dale Lewis is a good example, thanks. However, I'm completely out of the loop when it comes to the "common knowledge" you refer to.

    Vladimir Putin famously took one Oligarch (Khodorkovsky from Gazprom) to court for corruption and kept him in a cage in the corner of the court room. It sent a blunt message to all of the other Oligarchs that they needed to co-operate with Putin or else.

    The AFL aren't that bad (yet) but the point is you only need to do it once for everyone to get the message, 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    3 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

    In addition to the ducking, tilt of the head, dropping knees that lead to the 'head high' there are the 'holding' frees where a player lets go of the ball as the tackler touches him and leans back ditto when going for a mark a player leans back.  Then there is the allowing of 'throws' when players scoop the ball out double handed - they are not hand-balls, which is a real skill.

    Buckley recently talked about 'dropping his centre of gravity' when commentating a Pies game.  Generally that s 'dropping the knees, so no free.  He also said players are training to use two hands when close to the ground ie scoop/throw the ball.

    Players are becoming very adept at these tricks.

    The genie is out of the bottle and there is no going back.  If the AFL don't stop the Weightman's of the world (and we have a few players who are also guilty) dubious frees will take over the game.  We will end up with a lot more of them and a lot more 'dissent'.

    Showing my age here but the definition of a handball used to be a clenched fist hitting a ball held in a stationary palm

    Dont know when that definition changed but you never used to see over the head handballs or the crow throw before 1990 or so.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    4 hours ago, jnrmac said:

    Showing my age here but the definition of a handball used to be a clenched fist hitting a ball held in a stationary palm

    Dont know when that definition changed but you never used to see over the head handballs or the crow throw before 1990 or so.

    A lot of the time most of the balls momentum comes from the hand holding the ball not the fist. 

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    7 hours ago, jnrmac said:

    Showing my age here but the definition of a handball used to be a clenched fist hitting a ball held in a stationary palm

    Dont know when that definition changed but you never used to see over the head handballs or the crow throw before 1990 or so.

    Len Smith's Fitzroy flick pass in the 1950-1960 era ... then the clenched fist was introduced but all that now seems forgotten.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     

    1911 official rules:
    Law 12.
    What constitutes, a throw? Answer : When there is any doubt that the ball has not been hand-balled fairly it must be considered a throw, and a free kick awarded accordingly. Handball is when the ball is clearly held in one hand and knocked with the other hand.

    1925 amendment:
    Handball rule clarified. Ball to be punched out not just struck. (Flick pass was permitted previously.)

    1928 official rules:
    Handball
    (6) Handball is where the ball is clearly held in one hand and punched with the closed fist of the other hand.

    1934 amendment:
    Handball rule altered. The ball could be held in one hand and knocked with the other (ie the flick pass was again permitted).

    1944 official rules:
    Handball.
    (6) Handball is where the ball is clearly held in one hand and knocked with the other hand.

    1966 amendment:
    Flick pass outlawed. Ball had to be struck with a clenched fist.

    2015 official rules:
    Handball: the act of holding the football in one hand and disposing of the football by hitting it with the clenched fist of the other hand.

    (2022 rules same definition as 2015.)

     

     

     

    The rules from 1911 show how much the modern game has degenerated with respect to handball.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Umpiring is obviously exceptionally difficult, you see half the vision, have to make snap decisions and have the crowd noise in the background calling for a free for their own team!

    The rules seem very technical and interpretation changes from season to season, week to week. 
    Three things I would do are:

    1. Swearing at umpire decision 50m otherwise nothing re head nods arms flapping.

    2. Staging, each game reviewed for staging and players fined $5k or $10k, would stop them pretty quickly. That Hawkins wasn’t fined was a disgrace, gives him approval to stage as much as he likes.

    3. Go back to one umpire, plenty of frees would be missed, but at least remove inconsistency of Interpretation between umpires. Only need 9 umpires instead of 27, hopefully we have 9 good ones!

  • Quote
    • Haha 1

    Another pretty standard Bulldogs umpiring result 24 to 10

    Doggies thew it and dropped it all day.

     

    image.png.1d1b4a5fb3044099f26f414376afaac5.png

    Strange to say, but glad the crows won

  • Quote
    • Like 8
    • Love 1
    • Angry 2

    Just another +14 for the Doggies there. How long until this farce gets the proper attention it deserves?

    I know the free kick count doesn’t need to be even or close for that matter, but when it’s a pattern of favoritism and by the end of the season one team has nearly 200 more free kicks than another, then surely it needs to be addressed?!

  • Quote
    • Like 6

    I’m lost why it isn’t discussed more. I don’t think the media are in fear of losing accreditation. With what Hardwick and Weightman said this week, if there was ever a time to discuss it, it would have been now. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    35 minutes ago, CYB said:

    I’m lost why it isn’t discussed more. I don’t think the media are in fear of losing accreditation. With what Hardwick and Weightman said this week, if there was ever a time to discuss it, it would have been now. 

    What did they say?

    Can't imagine that the DuckDogs have admitted they have a sweetheart deal with the umps.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    17 minutes ago, faultydet said:

    What did they say?

    Can't imagine that the DuckDogs have admitted they have a sweetheart deal with the umps.

    In an interview on SEN Breakfast, Weightman admitted he has the ability to win free kicks, but believes that is part of his on-field repertoire and he is not breaking any rules.

    “I think I do have an ability to draw free kicks and I think that’s a skillset rather than a flop or whatever you call that," Weightman said.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Sad 1
    • Angry 1
    • Vomit 2

    1 hour ago, ding said:

    In an interview on SEN Breakfast, Weightman admitted he has the ability to win free kicks, but believes that is part of his on-field repertoire and he is not breaking any rules.

    “I think I do have an ability to draw free kicks and I think that’s a skillset rather than a flop or whatever you call that," Weightman said.

    Jesus.

    A skillset rather than a dog act, bend-your-knees-while-throwing-your-head-back pansy effort at cheating.

    Weightman, Hunter, Matheison, Selwood, Spargo and their ilk make me want to spew.

    Should be a free and 50m every time they do it.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Angry 1
    On 4/23/2022 at 12:09 PM, Mazer Rackham said:

    1911 official rules:
    Law 12.
    What constitutes, a throw? Answer : When there is any doubt that the ball has not been hand-balled fairly it must be considered a throw, and a free kick awarded accordingly. Handball is when the ball is clearly held in one hand and knocked with the other hand.

    1925 amendment:
    Handball rule clarified. Ball to be punched out not just struck. (Flick pass was permitted previously.)

    1928 official rules:
    Handball
    (6) Handball is where the ball is clearly held in one hand and punched with the closed fist of the other hand.

    1934 amendment:
    Handball rule altered. The ball could be held in one hand and knocked with the other (ie the flick pass was again permitted).

    1944 official rules:
    Handball.
    (6) Handball is where the ball is clearly held in one hand and knocked with the other hand.

    1966 amendment:
    Flick pass outlawed. Ball had to be struck with a clenched fist.

    2015 official rules:
    Handball: the act of holding the football in one hand and disposing of the football by hitting it with the clenched fist of the other hand.

    (2022 rules same definition as 2015.)

     

     

     

    The rules from 1911 show how much the modern game has degenerated with respect to handball.

    Thanks for this. Can I ask where you it all from ? 

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, jnrmac said:

    Thanks for this. Can I ask where you it all from ? 

    I have copies of rules from different eras. They're hard to find. I got the really old ones from state libraries.

    In the modern era I have rules for every year from 2015 on. Often they are not on the AFL web site. Nearly always I get them from regional comps such as the QAFL or from umpires web sites.

    Strangely enough, the "amendments" part IS from the AFL web site. Normally allergic to publishing anything about the rules -- and they let it go out of date when they do -- they have a page summarising the rule changes over the ages, without publishing the rules themselves. They really don't care.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2

    I still have a little booklet (12 x 7.5cm) from 1964 titled "Laws of the Australian National Game of Football", distributed by the manufacturers of Viscount Cigarettes (!), with the approval of the Australian National Football Council.

    As you might expect, the rules are few and quite straightforward.  As you might also expect, the booklet contains advertising for Viscount which in those days sold for 3 bob (30 cents) for a pack of 20.

    A handball is defined as "holding the ball in one hand and hitting it with the other hand".

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1

    We got the rub on Sunday night. Come at me if you truly disagree. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    5 minutes ago, Skuit said:

    We got the rub on Sunday night. Come at me if you truly disagree. 

    I was anxious to check the count because it genuinely felt like a 5-35 free kick count given that the avg game has us 10-15 lower than our opponents. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    4 minutes ago, CYB said:

    I was anxious to check the count because it genuinely felt like a 5-35 free kick count given that the avg game has us 10-15 lower than our opponents. 

    What was it? I'm not suggesting they were incorrect, but it felt like we had a lot go our way, especially during an important stretch in the game. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Love 1
     

    richmond - as hardwick himself acknowledged - are incredibly ill-disciplined at and around the contest and their backline is making old-fashioned holding and defensive spoiling errors which result in fairly obvious free kicks being given

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 10

      The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

        • Like
      • 87 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Brisbane

      And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

      • 9 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Hawthorn

      There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Footscray

      At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Brisbane

      The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thumb Down
        • Haha
        • Like
      • 270 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Hawthorn

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Haha
      • 53 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All