Jump to content

The Crushing Burden of Being Pick 1

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

 

Again the media being tone deaf. They are the ones that create the burden and excessive expectations by flogging the the Number 1 from both ends to generate clicks. 

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
    1 hour ago, John Crow Batty said:

    Again the media being tone deaf. They are the ones that create the burden and excessive expectations by flogging the the Number 1 from both ends to generate clicks. 

    Pretty sure it wasn't the media who drummed up Watts' debut on queen's birthday. I remember cringing as they played it up on the scoreboard before the game, showing him in the rooms, running onto the ground etc He was still in high school for heaven's sake.

    Edited by Dr. Gonzo

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
     

    No doubt in my mind that Watts was the correct call for the #1 pick in 2008.

    Had we have selected Naitanui, there is no way we would’ve drafted Gawn in 2009.

    Edited by Demon Disciple

  • Quote
    • Like 7
    • Love 1
    18 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Pretty sure it wasn't the media who drummed up Watts' debut on queen's birthday. I remember cringing as they played it up on the scoreboard before the game, showing him in the rooms, running onto the ground etc He was still in high school for heaven's sake.

    That’s true but then the club was run like a media circus. The powers that be thought they could play the media for their own ends but as we know if you don’t get it right you get pilloried from pillar to post. The media were drumming up the Watts hype way before we drafted him. He was portrayed as some sort of super man who was supreme over all other draft hopefuls bar Niknat. He was handed the poison chalice then.

    Edited by John Crow Batty

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1

    19 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

    No doubt in my mind that Watts was the correct call for the #1 pick in 2008.

    Had we have selected Naitanui, there is no way we would’ve drafted Gawn in 2009.

    As I said previously,  if we had kept Stefan Martin, Gawn would have likely been delisted or traded before he had a chance for a breakout game. At that time he was another under performing hopeful no different to Spencer or Fitzpatrick. It is what it is. 

    Edited by John Crow Batty

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    The only crushing burden that $cully ever carried was his wallet.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Haha 4
     

    Couldn't read, paywall.

    However, Hodgey, Walsh, Roo and Whitfield didn't suffer too badly from being no 1.

    Mixture of player mindset, club culture, development and luck with injuries.

    The no 1 picks were wasted on us, we were a shambles. 

    Had Watts and Scully come to us now, I reckon the result would be a 180 deg turnaround 

    Ironic that Watts' pick turned into Fritter. What Jack should've been

    Edited by Stiff Arm

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    30 minutes ago, John Crow Batty said:

    As I said previously,  if we had kept Stefan Martin, Gawn would have likely been delisted or traded before he had a chance for a breakout game. At that time he was another under performing hopeful no different to Spencer or Fitzpatrick. It is what it is. 

    I don’t think this is correct. Someone inside the club told me in 2013 that Max would be a star if he got a good run with injury.  No way were they thinking about delisting him, and although Jamar was clearly number 1 at the time Max, at least internally, was rated really highly. The club was a shambles in 2012 and we got nothing for Martin in the trade, but there was a pretty high expectation on Max. I never heard the same said about Spencer or Fitzpatrick.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    39 minutes ago, Stiff Arm said:

     

    However, Hodgey, Walsh, Roo and Whitfield didn't suffer too badly from being no 1.

     

    Hodge copped it for along time for not being as good as Chris Judd who went #3.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    8 minutes ago, Watson11 said:

    I don’t think this is correct. Someone inside the club told me in 2013 that Max would be a star if he got a good run with injury.  No way were they thinking about delisting him, and although Jamar was clearly number 1 at the time Max, at least internally, was rated really highly. The club was a shambles in 2012 and we got nothing for Martin in the trade, but there was a pretty high expectation on Max. I never heard the same said about Spencer or Fitzpatrick.

    Martin had to leave for awkward reasons not related to football. He had more upside as a ruckman then than Gawn.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Fork 'em said:

    Hodge copped it for along time for not being as good as Chris Judd who went #3.

    Which one would look back on their career with a greater sense of achievement?

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, John Crow Batty said:

    Martin had to leave for awkward reasons not related to football. He had more upside as a ruckman then than Gawn.

    You’re confusing who you thought had more upside and who did have more upside. 5 All-Australians, All-Australian captain, premiership captain, 2x B&F etc makes it obvious who did have more upside.

    I can’t really critique what you thought though as in 2013 I didn’t see it either, but the original point was those within the club did see the potential.

  • Quote
    40 minutes ago, Watson11 said:

    You’re confusing who you thought had more upside and who did have more upside. 5 All-Australians, All-Australian captain, premiership captain, 2x B&F etc makes it obvious who did have more upside.

    I can’t really critique what you thought though as in 2013 I didn’t see it either, but the original point was those within the club did see the potential.

    If you read carefully I  said “then” for 2012. In 2012 Martin was doing very well as a ruckman before issues beyond his control derailed his season and career at Melbourne. He was then the logical replacement for an ageing Jamar. It took Gawn another two and half seasons before his breakout  game in 2015. Martin was already showing he was an accomplished Number 1 ruckman in 2014 at Brisbane and likely one of the top 3 in the comp at the time whilst Gawn was still struggling. He was averaging over 20 touches and 30 hit outs a game.  Reality is that Gawn would have had little opportunity to upstage Martin if Martin had remained. Credit to Gawn to become the superstar he is now. 

    Edited by John Crow Batty

  • Quote

    15 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Pretty sure it wasn't the media who drummed up Watts' debut on queen's birthday. I remember cringing as they played it up on the scoreboard before the game, showing him in the rooms, running onto the ground etc He was still in high school for heaven's sake.

    Before the QB game he'd just come off booting four in the VFL.

    I've heard many a Demonlander demand a player be selected after kicking four for Casey.

    He may or may not have been ready but the whole messiah thing Schwab was pushing at the time was way over the top.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    The selection of Watts was correct, the carry on surrounding it was not.

    However, the idea that he got ‘smashed’ by Collingwood on the day is a ridiculous furphy. He wasn’t a game-changer and they tried, but the handful of attempts missed the mark and he came up largely unscathed.

  • Quote
    • Like 4

    This is one of the reasons that if I was North Melbourne, I'd be calling out Daicos not Horne-Francis. 

    Collingwood have already committed, so it's a no risk. And Daicos will be a gun even if they do get stuck with him.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    2 hours ago, deanox said:

    This is one of the reasons that if I was North Melbourne, I'd be calling out Daicos not Horne-Francis. 

    Collingwood have already committed, so it's a no risk. And Daicos will be a gun even if they do get stuck with him.


    Besides, there is no win available for Collingwood if they choose not to match a bid, so the chances of them doing so are Buckley’s.

    And it lessens the pressure on JHF.

    Edited by Mach5

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Jack Watts would have been pretty good in this current Melbourne side

  • Quote

    1 hour ago, adonski said:

    Jack Watts would have been pretty good in this current Melbourne side

    jack watts would not make the current melbourne side

    never came close to working hard enough on or off the field

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    We got Fritsch for him so I say we wouldn't be in a premiership window if we didn't let him go.

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, Mach5 said:


    Besides, there is no win available for Collingwood if they choose not to match a bid, so the chances of them doing so are Buckley’s.

    And it lessens the pressure on JHF.

    But he doesn't get the Sponsorship for Investment !

    Thats important to him. 

  • Quote
    •  
    52 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

    jack watts would not make the current melbourne side

     

    Disagree.

    Also the culture, talent and class of the current side would have made him a better and more damaging player.

    He was a great shot for goal and this team would find him more and give him more chances of scoring.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    On 11/20/2021 at 2:49 PM, John Crow Batty said:

    Martin had to leave for awkward reasons not related to football. He had more upside as a ruckman then than Gawn.

    How did it even get out that Mitch Clark pulled a ‘Wayne Carey’ on Martin? 

    Edited by Foopy on the telly

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Haha
        • Like
      • 94 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Like
      • 359 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Shocked
        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All