Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
ALEX RANCE VS JAKE LEVER
ALEX RANCE VS JAKE LEVER

ALEX RANCE IN 2017

Disposals 16.0

Contested possessions 6.8

Intercept marks 3.2

Intercept possessions 9.4

Spoils 8.4

One-on-one mark win % 8.5

One-on-one win % 36.9

One-on-one loss %14.9

 

JAKE LEVER IN 2021

Disposals 16.2

Contested possessions 7.7

Intercept marks 4.8

Intercept possessions 11.2

Spoils 5.7

One-on-one mark win % 27.3

One-on-one win % 36.4

One-on-one loss % 22.7

 
17 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Are they going to snub him for the AA team like they did to May last season?

He should be a lock.

No one is a lock after 6 games in a 22 game season. Still a long way to go, but Jake has been outstanding, as has our entire defensive unit.

 

Lever isn't a sniper like Rance, nor does he spit the dummy like Rance.

Much better than Rance at the same age. 

Give me Jake any day.

1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Lever isn't a sniper like Rance, nor does he spit the dummy like Rance.

Much better than Rance at the same age. 

Give me Jake any day.

But, but, but...we paid two first rounders for him remember.

I never understood the argument we paid too much. He was always going to star for us and part of the timing for him to hit this form was due to our system not allowing him to work to his strengths. Tomlinson has been a key to this


1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Lever isn't a sniper like Rance, nor does he spit the dummy like Rance.

Much better than Rance at the same age. 

Give me Jake any day.

wtf. ask any supporter from any other club and they will make you look like a fool. Rance is one of the all time greats. Lever has strung 6 good games together.

I'm much more excited about our defensive combination than I am about whether any given one of them outperforms Rance.

Of course, that can't be said without also nodding to the fact that Lever showed magnificent leadership keeping our defense confident and organised after May went down.

Also worth noting that if not for the stats hole created by Tom Hawkins elbow, May's numbers would be just as good.

Hold this Lever-May-Tomlinson set of tall defenders together and in form and they will go down in history alongside the likes of the Scarlett-Harley-Taylor trio.

But that is ambition, not yet reality. Ambition definitely worth having, though.

 

He won't make AA because Bruce has retired so isn't screaming his name in ecstasy into a microphone and 'Lever' has too many syllables for BT to handle.

Edited by AmDamDemon
Sp

Different players, never like these comparisons.

Rance was a full back who had incredible intercept ability. Whereas Lever is simply a specialist intercept player. 

Always loved Lever at Adelaide and knew we needed an Adelaide type defensive setup for him to really play to the best of his ability. And finally we have two big gorilla's for that. To think he was going to be able to do what he's been able to with Oscar as a key post was almost comical. That and the fact he's had his first full pre season with us since arriving helps. 

Rance was unbelievable at his peak and one of the best full backs we've ever seen. 

Comparing Rance to May would be more appropriate if there's to be a comparison. Both play the same position and have a great ability to intercept also. 

 


Reviewing the OP, I'm not sure why the WA Premier is interested in the comparison between Rance and Lever. \

Unless he's trying to poach him for one of the WA teams...

55 minutes ago, deeTRACted said:

Pretty sure Lever never hit someone who was on the ground in the back of the head. 

 

once again, another ill-informed post. If May wasn't playing for Melbourne you'd be saying he was dirty too (runs past the ball, leaves the ground, hits Martin high etc.). I love May but to say Lever is better than Rance because Rance did something dirty is laughable and biased to cringe worthy levels. No-one in their right mind would take Lever over Rance. 

3 hours ago, Dr.D said:

wtf. ask any supporter from any other club and they will make you look like a fool. Rance is one of the all time greats. Lever has strung 6 good games together.

Read my post again.  I said Lever is better than Rance at the same age.  He was an AA in his early 20's before cruelled by injuries for several years and and will have more AA's before he retires.  Compare them then and I won't be the one looking like a fool.

25 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Read my post again.  I said Lever is better than Rance at the same age.  He was an AA in his early 20's before cruelled by injuries for several years and and will have more AA's before he retires.  Compare them then and I won't be the one looking like a fool.

wait, so let me get this straight, you think Lever will be better than Rance? Lol. you're embarrassing yourself.  Lever isn't even better than May. Let alone Rance. Rance was an all time great. He performed in grand finals. He shut down big and smalls. lever is an intercept defender that isn't that strong one on one. Stop comparing all time great to dees players that are in good form. 
 

A Melbourne player is being compared favourably with a star of the modern game. This is good news in anyone's language and is a sign of our increasing relevancy. Who "wins" is secondary. Compare away, media!


But Lever has the ‘tache, so there’s that.

Edited by kryton101

Both very good players in their own right.

Lever can finally play to his strengths now that Thommo can take the other opposition KPF. He is an outstanding intercept player who just reads the play so well. Fingers crossed he can stay fit and healthy because, other than injury, on current form and trajectory he’ll be an AA for sure.

Give me Lever anyday. Rance was nothing but a religious fruit loop or at least pretends to be.

I always thought Rance was overrated. He was certainly ordinary one on one

Commentators always got a stiff one over Rance

He was good, but not awesome in my eyes

Lever has been outstanding this year

6 games in....

I hate these comparisons to former top players, Lever isn’t having a Rance-like year, he’s having a Lever-outstanding year. 

Just like Kozzie isn’t the next Cyril Rioli, he’s the first Kozzie Pickett. 


Jake is 4 AA and 3 picture books behind but time is on his side. 

 

Rance is one of the most overrated players of all time. 
best defender ever they’d ask? Certainly the best if the modern era?

please. He left and the Tigers got better. A very good defender for sure but as good as the media say? No way

1 hour ago, kryton101 said:

But Lever has the ‘tache, so there’s that.

So it's Lever by a whisker, then.

 
12 hours ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Jake is 4 AA and 3 picture books behind but time is on his side. 

 

I would suggest one or two of those AA's were 'gifts' and Rance has only one 'picture hook'/premiership medal. 

Don't care about the AA's but would be very happy for Jake to surpass Rance's medal count. 

Plenty of time for Jake to do that.

Both Lever and Rance are/were beneficiaries of good defensive structures that make their success almost inevitable. 
The number of times the opposition pop it up for Lever to easily intercept would be embarrassing for them, if it wasn’t a deliberate result of us executing our game plan. 
Both great players, but Rance was a prat... so Lever by a mile. 

Edited by PaulRB


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
    • 719 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies