Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
1 minute ago, AMH said:

Yes. Cameron Ling...never has anything good to say about Melbourne. 

Yeah, not a big fan of Lingy but he generally says things that make sense to me even if I disagree.

Dermy is just full of it. He's just a constant jumble of wild theories.

 

6 Gawn

5 Pickett

4 Langdon

3 Hunt

2 Salem

1 Tomlinson

6. Hunt

5. Gawn

4. Langdon

3. Kozzie

2. Viney

1. Trac


6. Gawm

5. Langdon

4. Head band is back

3. Pickett

2. ANB

1. Lever.

6. Gawn

First half wasn't bad but couldn't quite put his stamp on it. Second half went to not another level, another 3 levels. 

5. Hunt

Best game in years. Got his confidence back in taking the game on but also timed his dashes forward for the handball receive perfectly.

4 . Langdon 

Starting to take his games for granted, which is stupid. Provides us with the best width on the park you could hope for. 

3. Pickett

What more can you say, kids at the nightclubs will be soon doing the Pickett shuffle.

2. Viney

If he plays that kind of game week in week out I will not complain at all.

1. Salem

The number of plays he kick starts with his short passing is often overlooked by everyone except us. 

 

6 Gawn

5 Pickett

4 Lever  (Was given huge responsibility to hold a position that was constantly exposed, allowing others to be free)

3 Viney

2 Langdon

1 Brayshaw (tie break with several others was the fact he is beginning to show promise in his wider role)

 

6 Max Gawn

5 Ed Langdon

4 Kysaiah Pickett

3 Jayden Hunt

2 Christian Petracca

1 Jack Viney

Honourable mentions;

Luke Jackson

Clayton Oliver

Jake Lever

Trent Rivers

James Jordon

Adam Tomlinson

Angus Brayshaw

Overall;

A comprehensive  team performance led admirably by Captain Max.

Edited by Tarax Club
Team first!


6.  Gawn

5.  Pickett

4.  Langdon

3.  Hunt

2.  Hunt

1.  Salem


6 Viney

5 Hunt

4 Gawn

3 Pickett

2 Salem

1 Langdon

1 hour ago, goodoil said:

6. Max Gawn

5. Ed Langdon

4. Jake Lever

3. Kysaiah Kropinyeri-Pickett

2. Jack Viney

1. Jayden Hunt

x2

 


Pickett

Hunt

Fritsch (Can't believe the lack of love for his kicking tonight)

Gawn

Langdon

Viney

6. Gawn

5. Kozzie

4. Hunt

3. Langdon

2. Viney

1. Lever

6. Gawn

5. Hunt

4. Pickett

3. Langdon

2. Viney

1. Salem

 

6.Gawn 5 Langdon 4 Pickett 3 Salem 2 Brayshaw and 1Hunt.

6. Gawn

5. Hunt

4. Pickett

3. Salem

2. Langdon

1. Lever


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies