Jump to content

  • IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

    The Demonland Terms of Service, which you have all recently agreed to, strictly prohibit discussions of ongoing legal matters, whether criminal or civil. Please ensure that all discussions on this forum remain focused solely on on-field & football related topics.


Recommended Posts

Posted

I wonder whether Essendon is actually playing the long game here. They have effectively admitted they made a mistake locking themselves into the Docklands ground thereby limiting them to maximum capacities whenever they play there of 55,000, or thereabouts. It has been said many times that they would like to relocate their tenancy to the MCG. This could be all part of a plan to (1) convince the AFL and the MCC to allow that tenancy relocation to occur and/or (2) make the AFL, as owner of the Docklands stadium, work harder to retain them as anchor tenants. 

Posted

Gerard Whately now advocating our game be swapped to Marvel.

  • Shocked 1
  • Angry 2
Posted (edited)

so I pay money for a MFC membership and a MCC membership and im going to miss out on a game.. if this happens I will be very angry. Move Essendon Hawthorn to Sunday at the G and Nth Port to Saturday night at Marvel.

 

 

Edited by Demon3
  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

We’re just 1 of 10 sets of Victorian fans who desperately want to see their team play after a long absence.  Tribal hostilities aside, as a footy fan I want as many fans as possible to see their team. I expect our club to consider the greater good of the game in making their decision. 

We’re not an island. There are broader considerations to think of. And i would expect a benefit or concession to be received in return.

F... the greater good

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

I expect only members would be able to attend the Essendon game wherever it is played, so moving it only allows more spectators rather than raising additional revenue for the club.

Good point...IIRC the MCC pays a little per head to the home club for MCC attendance.

Bottom line is that all the clubs will take a hit to their balance sheets.

Scope for the away clubs to offer alternative big screen viewing and make a few dollars perhaps

Posted

I pay an MCC Membership each year as an MFC Supporter (and Member) 

if our game is moved, from a fixture that was already finalized by the AFL, i will be furious. 
Docklands is Essendrugs home ground, they signed the original contract. 
 

stand firm MFC. 

Shut your Cake ? Hole Whately 

  • Like 5
Posted
54 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

We’re just 1 of 10 sets of Victorian fans who desperately want to see their team play after a long absence.  Tribal hostilities aside, as a footy fan I want as many fans as possible to see their team. I expect our club to consider the greater good of the game in making their decision. 

We’re not an island. There are broader considerations to think of. And i would expect a benefit or concession to be received in return.

garbage, I, for one do not care about the other teams supporters in this instance.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Better days ahead said:

We’re just 1 of 10 sets of Victorian fans who desperately want to see their team play after a long absence.  Tribal hostilities aside, as a footy fan I want as many fans as possible to see their team. I expect our club to consider the greater good of the game in making their decision. 

We’re not an island. There are broader considerations to think of. And i would expect a benefit or concession to be received in return.

I respect your opinion on this, and I consider myself someone who is pretty civic minded and supports fairness, but in this instance i couldn't disagree more about moving.

In addition to the points I have made previously I'd at the following ones:

  • Its our home game at our home ground. The bombers are talking about moving their home game from their home ground. Makes no sense at all.
  • The bombers made a decision to make Docklands their home ground. IIRC they had the option of making the G their home ground but chose the Docklands because with the deal they brokered they thought they would make more money there. Erroneously as it turns out
  • They chose the Docklands over the g knowing that full well that with a capacity of 50k there would be occasions where their fans would be disenfranchised and no be vale to secure tickets. IIRC this was the cause of a fair bit of angst from bomber's fans and comes up as an issue whenever the ground is likely to sell out - and has come up again for much the same reason
  • The docklands is the bomber's bed. A bed they sought out for profit. They can lie in it.
  • How would people go with the idea of the Cats asking for a similar swap away from Kardinia park?
  • We are the oldest football club in the word and have played at the G for 140 odd years. History is important.
  • In reality how many extra fans would actually be able to attend? We might get say 35k people to the game if it is played at the G. In that scenario  only 15k extra people would be able to attend. 
  • The MCC members should be factored into the equation. It is their ground. And the majority of members are dees fans. Why should those members be disenfranchised? (note: i'm not a a member)
  • Grand finals are played at the G. not docklands. Our record has not been great at the G in the last few years and we need to take every single opportunity to play games there
  • The Docklands is a soulless, rubbish venue that most fans hate going to. I certainly do. Why should i and other fans have to have a lesser experience because the bombers want to play their game at our home ground
  • The AFL should recognize the fixturing rubbish we put up with last year and shut down the talk about a move
  • Why is this only coming out now - two weeks before the game? Surely the time for the bombers to address this was prior to the fixture being announced, or if not then soon after (ie last December).
  • People, businesses, the MFC, the MCC etc etc  have made plans based on the fixture. It is just not on to make any changes this late in the day.
  • On the above point, like many fans, the thing I missed the most is watching the dees play at the G. And have been waiting a long time for this day. I have made plans. I have been waiting with keen anticipation. Now two weeks out the bombers want to mess with this because they couldn't get their act together to advocate for the change three months ago? 
  • I will be furious if there is a change and we have to play docklands. Furious. And I suspect I wont be the only MFC fan to feel that way.
  • If the club does a deal that fury would directed at the MFC and in addition to causing reputational damage would very likely impact on membership sales, offsetting any financial benefit a 'deal' might bring us.
  • No likely financial deal or any compensation would offset the impact of a move
  • Who knows what might happen this year. What if there is another wave and the clubs have to go into another bubble? Say the wave comes after round one. And we don't get another chance to play at the G all season. Bird in the hand. Fury magnified.
  • Football is tribal. And if there is one club i have no desire to 'help out, it is the bombers who were guilty of the most comprehensive, systemic program of cheating in the history of our sport. 
Edited by binman
  • Like 6
Posted
10 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

garbage, I, for one do not care about the other teams supporters in this instance.

constructive as ever DD. Hopefully you never end up being my neighbor.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

Well argued. No wonder our politics is stuffed.

But this isn't politics. This is football. Football is passion. 

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

Well argued. No wonder our politics is stuffed.

What is there to argue?

Fixture is out.

We're playing on the G that Saturday.

Oh and the primary assumption of your "argument"  is flawed as MFC should be able to get close to 50% of MCG capacity for Rd 1.

Aaaannnd putting the nosed of Hawks and Dons fans out of joint... is a bonus.

Edited by PaulRB
  • Like 3
Posted
8 minutes ago, binman said:

I respect your opinion on this, and I consider myself someone who is pretty civic minded and supports fairness, but in this instance i couldn't disagree more about moving.

In addition to the points I have made previously I'd at the following ones:

  • Its our home game at our home ground. The bombers are talking about moving their home game from their home ground. Makes no sense at all.
  • The bombers made a decision to make Docklands their home ground. IIRC they had the option of making the G their home ground but chose the Docklands because with the deal they brokered they thought they would make more money there. Erroneously as it turns out
  • They chose the Docklands over the g knowing that full well that with a capacity of 50k there would be occasions where their fans would be disenfranchised and no be vale to secure tickets. IIRC this was the cause of a fair bit of angst from bomber's fans and comes up as an issue whenever the ground is likely to sell out - and has come up again for much the same reason
  • The docklands is the bomber's bed. A bed they sought out for profit. They can lie in it.
  • How would people go with the idea of the Cats asking for a similar swap away from Kardinia park?
  • We are the oldest football club in the word and have played at the G for 140 odd years. History is important.
  • In reality how many extra fans would actually be able to attend? We might get say 35k people to the game if it is played at the G. In that scenario  only 15k extra people would be able to attend. 
  • The MCC members should be factored into the equation. It is their ground. And the majority of members are dees fans. Why should those members be disenfranchised? (note: i'm not a a member)
  • Grand finals are played at the G. not docklands. Our record has not been great at the G in the last few years and we need to take every single opportunity to play games there
  • The Docklands is a soulless, rubbish venue that most fans hate going to. I certainly do. Why should i and other fans have to have a lesser experience because the bombers want to play their game at our home ground
  • The AFL should recognize the fixturing rubbish we put up with last year and shut down the talk about a move
  • Why is this only coming out now - two weeks before the game? Surely the time for the bombers to address this was prior to the fixture being announced, or if not then soon after (ie last December).
  • People, businesses, the MFC, the MCC etc etc  have made plans based on the fixture. It is just not on to make any changes this late in the day.
  • On the above point, like many fans, the thing I missed the most is watching the dees play at the G. And have been waiting a long time for this day. I have made plans. I have been waiting with keen anticipation. Now two weeks out the bombers want to mess with this because they couldn't get their act together to advocate for the change three months ago? 
  • I will be furious if there is a change and we have to play docklands. Furious. And I suspect I wont be the only MFC fan to feel that way.
  • If the club does a deal that fury would directed at the MFC and in addition to causing reputational damage would very likely impact on membership sales, offsetting any financial benefit a 'deal' might bring us.
  • No likely financial deal or any compensation would offset the impact of a move
  • Who knows what might happen this year. What if there is another wave and the clubs have to go into another bubble? Say the wave comes after round one. And we don't get another chance to play at the G all season. Bird in the hand. Fury magnified.
  • Football is tribal. And if there is one club i have no desire to 'help out, it is the bombers who were guilty of the most comprehensive, systemic program of cheating in the history of our sport. 

Thanks for respectfully arguing your point. I appreciate it.

Posted

There are surely financial expectations that should see this idea sink quickly... surely MFC gate is going to be significantly higher if the game is at the G? How do you compensate them? How do you compensate MCC supporters that would have to pay to watch them at Marvel?

Posted

I rang Whately this morning and made a suggestion similar to Dr Gonzo's yesterday.

1) Move GWS V St Kilda to Saturday night 7:25pm

2) Move Essendon V Hawthorn to Sunday 3:20pm

Everyone's a winner:

Essendon and Hawthorn get their MCG wish

GWS and St Kilda get some Saturday night exposure

Channel 7 don't miss out as both games are on channel 7 regardless

Melbourne keep their MCG game as is, and Freo get their one and only MCG game for the year.

Whately called the idea "pragmatic."

  • Like 3
  • Love 1
Posted

I can't see anybody is playing at the MCG on Sunday. Why don't they just move the Essendon game from Marvel on Saturday to the MCG on Sunday? (I'm sure there's some broadcaster issue......)

Posted

If we get screwed on this I will lose it

We should instantly put in a request to have round two moved to the G from Marvel

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    TRAINING: Monday 17th February 2025

    Demonland Trackwatchers were on hand at Monday morning's preseason training at Gosch's Paddock to bring you their brief observations of the session. HARVEY WALLBANGER'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Gentle flush session at Gosch's this morning. Absent: May, Pickett (All Stars) McVee, McAdam. Rehabbing: Great to see Kentfield back (much slimmer), walking with Tholstrup, TMac (suspect just a management thing), Viney (still being cautious with that rib cartilage?), Melksham (

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    MATCH SIM: Friday 14th February 2025

    A couple of Demonland Trackwatchers made their way out to Casey Field's for the Melbourne Football Club's Family Series day to bring you their observations on the Match Simulation. HARVEY WALLBANGER'S MATCH SIMULATION OBSERVATIONS Absent: May, Pickett (All Stars), McVee, Windor, Kentfield, Mentha Present but not playing: Petracca, Viney, Spargo, Tholstrup, Melksham Starting Blue 18 (+ just 2 interchange): B: Petty, TMac, Lever, Howes, Bowey Salem M: Gawn, Oliver, La

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    TRAINING: Wednesday 12th February 2025

    Demonland Trackwatchers braved the scorching morning heat to bring you the following observations of Wednesday's preseason training session from Gosch's Paddock. HARVEY WALLBANGER'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Absent: Salem, Windsor (word is a foot rash going around), Viney, Bowey and Kentfield Train ons: Roy George, no Culley today. Firstly the bad news - McVee went down late, which does look like a bad hammy - towards the end of match sim, as he kicked the ball. Had to

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    MATCH SIM: Friday 7th February 2025

    Demonland Trackwatcher Gator ventured down the freeway to bring you his observations from Friday morning's Match Simulation out at Casey Fields. Rehab: Jake Lever and Charlie Spargo running laps.  Lever was running short distances at a fast click as well as having kick to kick with a trainer. He seems unimpeded. Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler, Shane McAdam and Tom Fullarton doing non-contact kicking and handball drills on the adjacent oval.  All moving freely at pace.  I didn’

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 2

    TRAINING: Wednesday 5th February 2025

    Demonland Trackwatchers were out in force as the Demons returned to Gosch's Paddock for preseason training on Wednesday morning. GHOSTWRITER'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Kozzie a no show. Tommy Sparrow was here last week in civvies and wearing sunnies. He didn’t train. Today he’s training but he’s wearing goggles so he’s likely got an eye injury. There’s a drill where Selwyn literally lies on top of Tracc, a trainer dribbles the ball towards them and Tracc has to g

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports

    THAT WAS THE YEAR THAT WAS: 2024

    Whichever way you look at it, the Melbourne Football Club’s 2024 season can only be characterized as the year of its fall from grace. Whispering Jack looks back at the season from hell that was. After its 2021 benchmark premiership triumph, the men’s team still managed top four finishes in the next two seasons but straight sets finals losses consigned them to sixth place in both years. The big fall came in 2024 with a collapse into the bottom six and a 14th placing. At Casey, the 2022 VFL p

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Special Features

    MATCH SIM: Friday 31st January 2025

    Veteran Demonland Trackwatcher Picket Fence ventured down to Casey Fields to bring you his observations from Friday's Match Simulation. Greetings Demonlanders, beautiful Day at training and the boys were hard at it, here is my report. NO SHOWS: Luker Kentfield (recovering from pneumonia in WA), also not sure I noticed Melky (Hamstring) or Will Verrall?? MODIFIED DUTIES (No Contact): Sparrow, McVee (foot), Tracc (ribs), Chandler, (AC Joint), Fullarton Noticeable events (I’ll s

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 2

    TRAINING: Wednesday 29th January 2025

    A number of Demonland Trackwatchers swooped on Gosch's Paddock to bring you their observations from this morning's Preseason Training Session. DEMON JACK'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS Beautiful morning at Gosch's Paddock. Very healthy crowd so far.  REHAB: Fullerton, Spargo, Tholstrup, McVee Viney running laps. EDIT: JV looks to be back with the main group. Trac, Sparrow, Chandler and Verrell also training away from the main group. Currently kicking to each other ins

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports 1

    TRAINING: Wednesday 22nd January 2025

    Demonland Trackwatchers were out in force for training at Gosch's Paddock on Wednesday morning for the MFC's School Holidays Open Training Session. DEMONLAND'S PRESEASON TRAINING OBSERVATIONS REHAB: TMac, Chandler, McVee, Tholstrup, Brown, Spargo Brown might have passed his fitness test as he’s back out with the main group.  Sparrow not present. Kozzy not present either.  Mini Rehab group has broken off from the match sim (contact) group: Max, Trac, Lever, Fullarton

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Training Reports
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...