Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Injury Update: Harmes sidelined, Viney set for return

Injury List: Round 2

Michael Hibberd (ankle) — Test

Jake Melksham (hamstring) — Test

Jack Viney (foot) — Test

Mitch Brown (calf) — 1 Week

Joel Smith (finger) — 1 Week

Jay Lockhart (testicles) — 1 to 2 Weeks

Sam Weideman (leg) — 2 to 4 Weeks

Ben Brown (knee) — 4 to 6 Weeks

James Harmes (wrist) — 6 Weeks

Marty Hore (knee) — Season

Aaron Nietschke (knee) — Season

 

It doesn't look too bad to me.  The top three all played in the praccy match, a couple are only one week injuries, Lockhart is still out for (with?) a pair and the two key forwards are getting closer.


1 hour ago, Chelly said:

Injury Update: Harmes sidelined, Viney set for return

Injury List: Round 2

Michael Hibberd (ankle) — Test

Jake Melksham (hamstring) — Test

Jack Viney (foot) — Test

Mitch Brown (calf) — 1 Week

Joel Smith (finger) — 1 Week

Jay Lockhart (testicles) — 1 to 2 Weeks

Sam Weideman (leg) — 2 to 4 Weeks

Ben Brown (knee) — 4 to 6 Weeks

James Harmes (wrist) — 6 Weeks

Marty Hore (knee) — Season

Aaron Nietschke (knee) — Season

Weideman 2 weeks  (possibly)   ....  very nice.

3 hours ago, Ollie fan said:

How crap is the MFC website!? Burgo gives the injury report, quite obviously wasn’t going to talk about Harmes until word got out and then they inserted a section which talks about him. Typical of the website – keep the supporters completely in the dark if they possibly can.

There's 2 reasons why I don't care about this:

1. Why give St Kilda any inside information any earlier than necessary

2. If Harmes has the surgery they then get a decent prognosis and can report that with more accuracy. And it is another news story and more clicks on the website. It's crappy content but whatever.

 

Sucks for Harmes, he's had a pretty poor time of it since his bursting 2018. Part of that is him and part of that is poor positioning IMO. 6 weeks out sucks, I wonder how close they were to subbing him?

Good to see Weid progressing, but it's interesting because the word from the club seemed to have Brown ahead of him for a return date in the early stages. Brown 4-6 is not very encouraging.

 
2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

There's 2 reasons why I don't care about this:

1. Why give St Kilda any inside information any earlier than necessary

2. If Harmes has the surgery they then get a decent prognosis and can report that with more accuracy. And it is another news story and more clicks on the website. It's crappy content but whatever.

I don’t understand the theory about keeping them guessing.

if the opposition finds out at the last minute that a player is out and being replaced by a lesser player, how does that help us? It would surely lift their morale. And if the injured player is being replaced by a better player: wouldn’t that happen anyway, regardless of the injury.

10 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

I don’t understand the theory about keeping them guessing.

if the opposition finds out at the last minute that a player is out and being replaced by a lesser player, how does that help us? It would surely lift their morale. And if the injured player is being replaced by a better player: wouldn’t that happen anyway, regardless of the injury.

The Saints wont waste a single moment worrying about a matchup for James Harmes. "Keeping them guessing" is the same as saying "i have no idea myself". No offence intended to the prior poster.

Edited by ding
typo


1 hour ago, Ollie fan said:

I don’t understand the theory about keeping them guessing.

if the opposition finds out at the last minute that a player is out and being replaced by a lesser player, how does that help us? It would surely lift their morale. And if the injured player is being replaced by a better player: wouldn’t that happen anyway, regardless of the injury.

I see your a fan of the oli

Looking much better this week even though M. Brown, J. Smith and Lockhart have nowhere to play and Jay's prognosis got somehow changed from "testicles" to "groin".

Injury List: Round 3

Mitch Brown (calf) — Available
Joel Smith (finger) — Available
Jay Lockhart (groin) — Available
Sam Weideman (leg) — 2 to 3 Weeks
Ben Brown (knee) — 3 to 5 Weeks
James Harmes (wrist) — 5 Weeks
Marty Hore (knee) — Season
Aaron Nietschke (knee) — Season

Had heard Brown and Weid were looking like returning at a similar time.  If Weid is ahead of Brown he might end up having a couple of matches to prove himself - will be very interesting to see how they manage the two of them, TMac, Fritsch and the resting ruckman.

19 minutes ago, Chelly said:

Looking much better this week even though M. Brown, J. Smith and Lockhart have nowhere to play and Jay's prognosis got somehow changed from "testicles" to "groin".

Injury List: Round 3

Mitch Brown (calf) — Available
Joel Smith (finger) — Available
Jay Lockhart (groin) — Available
Sam Weideman (leg) — 2 to 3 Weeks
Ben Brown (knee) — 3 to 5 Weeks
James Harmes (wrist) — 5 Weeks
Marty Hore (knee) — Season
Aaron Nietschke (knee) — Season

The whole secondary league is just crap really. 


20 minutes ago, Chelly said:

Looking much better this week even though M. Brown, J. Smith and Lockhart have nowhere to play and Jay's prognosis got somehow changed from "testicles" to "groin".

Injury List: Round 3

Mitch Brown (calf) — Available
Joel Smith (finger) — Available
Jay Lockhart (groin) — Available
Sam Weideman (leg) — 2 to 3 Weeks
Ben Brown (knee) — 3 to 5 Weeks
James Harmes (wrist) — 5 Weeks
Marty Hore (knee) — Season
Aaron Nietschke (knee) — Season

Three players available this week and nowhere to play them with no VFL practice matches. 

Very happy to see Weid is only a couple of weeks away and Benny Browns timeframe hasnt blown out.

3 minutes ago, deelusions from afar said:

Had heard Brown and Weid were looking like returning at a similar time.  If Weid is ahead of Brown he might end up having a couple of matches to prove himself - will be very interesting to see how they manage the two of them, TMac, Fritsch and the resting ruckman.

I find it hard to believe that the will return at the same time. Unless the current forwards lose form I don’t see a spot for the Weid. 

4 minutes ago, old dee said:

I find it hard to believe that the will return at the same time. Unless the current forwards lose form I don’t see a spot for the Weid. 

Sorry I mean that in interviews players had said they were on track to return from injury at the same time - it now looks like Weid is ahead of Brown in returning (from injury).  I imagine they will both play a bit at VFL level before joining the senior team

19 minutes ago, old dee said:

I find it hard to believe that the will return at the same time. Unless the current forwards lose form I don’t see a spot for the Weid. 

Weid for Jackson?

We lose some resting ruck ascendancy but gain some goal kicking ability, of which Jackson appears to have none of at the moment.

Not saying we should replace Weid with Jackson but unsure if we can fit another tall in.

 

17 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Not saying we should replace Weid with Jackson but unsure if we can fit another tall in.

 

This is what i am wondering about... when they are all fit, do we replace a small (spargo, ANB, Jones) with a tall (Ben Brown). making it TMac, Ben Brown and Jackson, with Fritsch and 2 smalls. I worry that we then won't apply enough pressure. Obviously talk of TMac going to wing (but then where does Brayshaw go)? Can deal with the problem when they are fit and ready i guess.


1 hour ago, deelusions from afar said:

Had heard Brown and Weid were looking like returning at a similar time.  If Weid is ahead of Brown he might end up having a couple of matches to prove himself - will be very interesting to see how they manage the two of them, TMac, Fritsch and the resting ruckman.

Weed said on the Gus and Gawny podcast that he will join in some training this week and look to play in the practice match in the VFL the week before round 1.  He mentioned that Brown was on track to play VFL rd 1 also.  So the VFL forward line for their rd 1 clash will consist of Ben Brown, Weed, Daw and Mitch Brown.  Good luck stopping that if they get enough supply. 

Personally i think the Weideman/ Jackson is a good problem to have, as they both are  learning their  craft, with an edge in versatility  to Jackson around the ball and to Weideman with goal kicking. Their strengths being capitalized on from up  field by the correct players will be commonplace hopefully this season.

47 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Weid for Jackson?

We lose some resting ruck ascendancy but gain some goal kicking ability, of which Jackson appears to have none of at the moment.

Not saying we should replace Weid with Jackson but unsure if we can fit another tall in.

 

Would appear to be the only spot.

 

one things for sure, we won't be dropped T Mac if he keeps up this form.  I expect him to get better over the nextr couple of weeks as his confidence grows too

30 minutes ago, DubDee said:

one things for sure, we won't be dropped T Mac if he keeps up this form.  I expect him to get better over the nextr couple of weeks as his confidence grows too

Hopefully none of the Media trash try to unsettle our lineups.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 629 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies