Jump to content

2020 Phantom Drafts & Rankings


Nascent

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Dannyz said:

Sam Fisher (Swan Districts) has spoken to the MFC Recruitment team. 

I thought he was very good at Northern Blues in 2019 and competed strongly against AFL listed opponents. I thought he could have earned himself a spot on an AFL list.
Definitely was a good move to the WAFL in 2020 and from the YouTube games I saw this year, he’s got AFL standard skills, build and running power.   One of our options for pick 50 ish imv alongside Mansell or Wehr if we opted for a potential ready to go type player. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

cal twomey and shifter sheehan have done a mock draft and have us selection jack carroll and conor stone with our two picks

The mock draft you’re referring to was done on this week’s AFL Road to the Draft podcast. The aim was to select players for each club aligning to their list needs. Here’s how it panned out - 

1. Adelaide Riley Thilthorpe
2. Western Bulldogs Jamara Ugle-Hagan *
3. North Logan McDonald
4. Sydney Elijah Hollands
5. Hawthorn Denver Granger Baras 
6. Gold Coast Archie Perkins
7. Essendon Will Phillips 
8. Essendon Oliver Henry 
9. Sydney Braeden Campbell *
10. Port Adelaide Lachie Jones *
11. Essendon Nik Cox  
12. Adelaide Finlay Macrae
13. GWS Giants Zach Reid
14. North Melbourne Heath Chapman 
15. Fremantle Tanner Bruhn
16. GWS Giants Tom Powell
17. Collingwood Brayden Cook
18. Sydney Errol Gulden *
19. GWS Giants Sam Berry 
20. Collingwood Caleb Poulter
21. Richmond Nathan O’Driscoll
22. Collingwood Reef McInnes
23. Melbourne Jack Carroll
24. Melbourne Connor Stone
25. GWS Giants Bailey Laurie
26. St Kilda Jake Bowey

* matched academy bids

LISTEN: First-round mock draft based on club needs

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

The mock draft you’re referring to was done on this week’s AFL Road to the Draft podcast. The aim was to select players for each club aligning to their list needs. Here’s how it panned out - 

1. Adelaide Riley Thilthorpe
2. Western Bulldogs Jamara Ugle-Hagan *
3. North Logan McDonald
4. Sydney Elijah Hollands
5. Hawthorn Denver Granger Baras 
6. Gold Coast Archie Perkins
7. Essendon Will Phillips 
8. Essendon Oliver Henry 
9. Sydney Braeden Campbell *
10. Port Adelaide Lachie Jones *
11. Essendon Nik Cox  
12. Adelaide Finlay Macrae
13. GWS Giants Zach Reid
14. North Melbourne Heath Chapman 
15. Fremantle Tanner Bruhn
16. GWS Giants Tom Powell
17. Collingwood Brayden Cook
18. Sydney Errol Gulden *
19. GWS Giants Sam Berry 
20. Collingwood Caleb Poulter
21. Richmond Nathan O’Driscoll
22. Collingwood Reef McInnes
23. Melbourne Jack Carroll
24. Melbourne Connor Stone
25. GWS Giants Bailey Laurie
26. St Kilda Jake Bowey

* matched academy bids

LISTEN: First-round mock draft based on club needs

It was interesting listening.   Actually they had Dees making a bid on Reef Mcinnes. Nonetheless hoping Jack Carroll does find his way to the Dees. Aligns perfectly with our needs and I’d reckon he’d be a definite chance to get senior footy in 2021.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some really interesting tidbits in this article here.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/swans-commit-to-bid-on-ugle-hagan-if-he-s-available-at-pick-no-3-20201201-p56jjs.html

Mentions that a bid on JUH will come no later than pick 3 with Sydney a certainty to bid on him if he still there although Adelaide and North also likely to bid.

Braeden Campbell, the swans academy player allegedly won't slide past Adelaide's pick 9 for a bid.

Collingwood are allegedly weighing up placing a bid on Blake Coleman, Lions Academy player, with one of their two first round picks.

 

Perhaps the best part for us Dees fans could come courtesy of everyone's favourite 2nd team the Bombers :laugh:. Reef McInnes, who the pies are wanting to get past their first 2 selections, is reportedly coming into strong consideration for one of the bombers first 3 picks. Pies will then have a big decision to make on whether they match this or not.

There's obviously a lot that can still play out here and much can change with draft picks still able to be traded, but it's interesting to run through some hypothetical scenarios nonetheless.

Bare with me here and hopefully this makes sense.

Say both JUH and Campbell are taken prior to the bombers selections as has been frequently suggested by various phantom drafts. This pushes the bombers picks from 6, 7 and 8 out to 8, 9 and 10. Collingwoods hand moves out from 14 and 16 to at least 16 and 18. A bid for Lachie Jones could also come in amongst the bombers selections but to keep things a bit simpler I will leave that out of the equation.

Bombers now have 8, 9 and 10. Pies have 16 and 18.

I'll be a little generous to the pies here and run with Bombers placing a bid on McInnes at pick 10 instead of pick 8 or 9.

Pick 10 is worth 1395 points, Pies get a 20% discount to match meaning they need to make up 1116 points.

Their pick 16 is worth 1067 points meaning they will still need to make up the difference of 49 points.  Pick 18 is worth 985 points, remove 49 from this figure and pick 18 gets pushed out to pick 20.

Making sense?

Looking at our draft hand, our picks have theoretically moved from selections 18, 19 out to 21, 22 with these 4 academy bids noting that Collingwoods first pick was ahead of ours.

So what's left in the wash up of this scenario?

Collingwood would be hoping for a scenario where a bid for McInnes is placed after their second pick, meaning they get Pick 14, 16 and McInnes. What will happen instead is they will get McInnes and pick 20 essentially stripping them of a "bonus" first round pick and pushing out their later selection. And lets face it, anything that hinders the pies is a happy news for everyone.

Our picks of 18 and 19 end up being 21 and 22. The real benefit for us here is the fact that there will be an extra player in the draft pool for us to to make our selection from, thus increasing the chances of a player like Carroll or whoever it may be to slip through to us.

Now there are obviously multiple scenarios that could also play out here including the pies trading out their selections or choosing to not match the bid at all, instead take their two first rounders to the draft. Either way, this leaves us in a better position in my opinion. This scenario also gets better for us if the Bombers place a bid with one of their earlier picks.

Hopefully that made sense and my calculations are correct.

 

Edited by Nascent
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


13 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Some really interesting tidbits in this article here.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/swans-commit-to-bid-on-ugle-hagan-if-he-s-available-at-pick-no-3-20201201-p56jjs.html

Mentions that a bid on JUH will come no later than pick 3 with Sydney a certainty to bid on him if he still there although Adelaide and North also likely to bid.

Braeden Campbell, the swans academy player allegedly won't slide past Adelaide's pick 9 for bid.

Collingwood are allegedly weighing up placing a bid on Blake Coleman, Lions Academy player, with one of their two first round picks.

 

Perhaps the best part for us Dees fans could come courtesy of everyone's favourite 2nd team the Bombers :laugh:. Reef McInnes, who the pies are wanting to get past their first 2 selections, is reportedly coming into strong consideration for one of the bombers first 3 picks. Pies will then have a big decision to make on whether they match this or not.

There's obviously a lot that can still play out here and much can change with draft picks still able to be traded, but it's interesting to run through some hypothetical scenarios nonetheless.

Bare with me here and hopefully this makes sense.

Say both JUH and Campbell are taken prior to the bombers selections as has been frequently suggested by various phantom drafts. This pushes the bombers picks from 6, 7 and 8 out to 8, 9 and 10. Collingwoods hand moves out from 14 and 16 to at least 16 and 18. A bid for Lachie Jones could also come in amongst the bombers selections but to keep things a bit simpler I will leave that out of the equation.

Bombers now have 8, 9 and 10. Pies have 16 and 18.

I'll be a little generous to the pies here and run with Bombers placing a bid on McInnes at pick 10 instead of pick 8 or 9.

Pick 10 is worth 1395 points, Pies get a 20% discount to match meaning they need to make up 1116 points.

Their pick 16 is worth 1067 points meaning they will still need to make up the difference of 49 points.  Pick 18 is worth 985 points, remove 49 from this figure and pick 18 gets pushed out to pick 20.

Making sense?

Looking at our draft hand, our picks have theoretically moved from selections 18, 19 out to 21, 22 with these 4 academy bids noting that Collingwoods first pick was ahead of ours.

So what's left in the wash up of this scenario?

Collingwood would be hoping for a scenario where a bid for McInnes is placed after their second pick, meaning they get Pick 14, 16 and McInnes. What will happen instead is they will get McInnes and pick 20 essentially stripping them of a "bonus" first round pick and pushing out their later selection. And lets face it, anything that hinders the pies is a happy news for everyone.

Our picks of 18 and 19 end up being 21 and 22. The real benefit for us here is the fact that there will be an extra player in the draft pool for us to to make our selection from, thus increasing the chances of a player like Carroll or whoever it may be to slip through to us.

Now there are obviously multiple scenarios that could also play out here including the pies trading out their selections or choosing to not match the bid at all, instead take their two first rounders to the draft. Either way, this leaves us in a better position in my opinion. This scenario also gets better for us if the Bombers place a bid with one of their earlier picks.

Hopefully that made sense and my calculations are correct.

 

Good stuff!  Brisbane will match any bid for Coleman in the teens,  no chance they don't get him.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on how Collingwood has set their picks in the mid teens, there may also be a strong chance that Collingwood simply isn't much interested in McInnes. Effectively, they'll take him for peanuts if he lasts past their picks, but they aren't that fussed to miss out. They have history don't this too, as they passed on James Stewart back in the day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Some really interesting tidbits in this article here.

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/swans-commit-to-bid-on-ugle-hagan-if-he-s-available-at-pick-no-3-20201201-p56jjs.html

Mentions that a bid on JUH will come no later than pick 3 with Sydney a certainty to bid on him if he still there although Adelaide and North also likely to bid.

Braeden Campbell, the swans academy player allegedly won't slide past Adelaide's pick 9 for a bid.

Collingwood are allegedly weighing up placing a bid on Blake Coleman, Lions Academy player, with one of their two first round picks.

 

Perhaps the best part for us Dees fans could come courtesy of everyone's favourite 2nd team the Bombers :laugh:. Reef McInnes, who the pies are wanting to get past their first 2 selections, is reportedly coming into strong consideration for one of the bombers first 3 picks. Pies will then have a big decision to make on whether they match this or not.

There's obviously a lot that can still play out here and much can change with draft picks still able to be traded, but it's interesting to run through some hypothetical scenarios nonetheless.

Bare with me here and hopefully this makes sense.

Say both JUH and Campbell are taken prior to the bombers selections as has been frequently suggested by various phantom drafts. This pushes the bombers picks from 6, 7 and 8 out to 8, 9 and 10. Collingwoods hand moves out from 14 and 16 to at least 16 and 18. A bid for Lachie Jones could also come in amongst the bombers selections but to keep things a bit simpler I will leave that out of the equation.

Bombers now have 8, 9 and 10. Pies have 16 and 18.

I'll be a little generous to the pies here and run with Bombers placing a bid on McInnes at pick 10 instead of pick 8 or 9.

Pick 10 is worth 1395 points, Pies get a 20% discount to match meaning they need to make up 1116 points.

Their pick 16 is worth 1067 points meaning they will still need to make up the difference of 49 points.  Pick 18 is worth 985 points, remove 49 from this figure and pick 18 gets pushed out to pick 20.

Making sense?

Looking at our draft hand, our picks have theoretically moved from selections 18, 19 out to 21, 22 with these 4 academy bids noting that Collingwoods first pick was ahead of ours.

So what's left in the wash up of this scenario?

Collingwood would be hoping for a scenario where a bid for McInnes is placed after their second pick, meaning they get Pick 14, 16 and McInnes. What will happen instead is they will get McInnes and pick 20 essentially stripping them of a "bonus" first round pick and pushing out their later selection. And lets face it, anything that hinders the pies is a happy news for everyone.

Our picks of 18 and 19 end up being 21 and 22. The real benefit for us here is the fact that there will be an extra player in the draft pool for us to to make our selection from, thus increasing the chances of a player like Carroll or whoever it may be to slip through to us.

Now there are obviously multiple scenarios that could also play out here including the pies trading out their selections or choosing to not match the bid at all, instead take their two first rounders to the draft. Either way, this leaves us in a better position in my opinion. This scenario also gets better for us if the Bombers place a bid with one of their earlier picks.

Hopefully that made sense and my calculations are correct.

 

Yep great stuff. Another factor to look at is where our second rounder ends up. Brisbane and Hawthorn both have picks in-between our picks 19 and 28. In my phantom draft I had us bidding on Downie (Hawthorn NGA) and Coleman (Brisbane NGA) because it makes sense on a need basis but the double advantage to is that the Hawks and Lions will lose their those second round picks in-between ours if they match those bids (which they most likely will), which essentially means there will be 2 extra players in the pool when our pick 28 comes around. So if they don't match those bids, great we get an outside runner and a small forward, if they do match the bids, great we get 2 extra players to pick from with our second rounder.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Essendon are thinking of picking McInnes( and I hope they I hope they do) would it not make sense to do a trade with GWS. Pick 13 should be good enough to pick up McInnes and they would also get another good pick from GWS

 

Edit

Just read on Cals December update that Adelaide might be interested in him too so might pick swap with GWS may not make sense. Still good news for us though. 

Edited by Colm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.afl.com.au/news/526016/cal-twomey-s-phantom-form-guide-december-update

Cal Twomey's latest rankings with some draft whispers attached.

Mentions Carroll is likely to be available in the second round and hasn't got us linked to him.

Has Macrae at 15 but mentions that he could slip if he doesn't go early and we are a possibility.

We've allegedly shown interest in Bailey Laurie who he has ranked at pick 23.

Also mentions us in relation to a bid on Blake Coleman if he got through to 28.

 

Edited by Nascent
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nascent said:

Perhaps the best part for us Dees fans could come courtesy of everyone's favourite 2nd team the Bombers :laugh:. Reef McInnes, who the pies are wanting to get past their first 2 selections, is reportedly coming into strong consideration for one of the bombers first 3 picks. Pies will then have a big decision to make on whether they match this or not.

Another report:  magpies-essendon-bombers-blake-coleman-reef-mcinnes

"Draft sources have told Foxfooty.com.au the Bombers have spoken openly of potentially swapping Pick 8 with the Pies, but an official offer is yet to come" 

If that swap happens there is no way Ess will bid on McInnes, especially if Coll sweeten the swap with picks 14, 16 and down grade next years first pick, which they are dying to get rid of - it has a whiff of draft tampering about it but hey both clubs are fairly shallow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything hangs on when the bids come for JUH, McInnes etc. Dogs know JUH will cost pretty much all of their picks. McInnes being bid on before the Pies first pick would be a very good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/16/2020 at 3:18 PM, Whispering_Jack said:

In Knightmare’s draft, Melbourne’s pick #18 turns out to be #23:-

23. Melbourne - Sam Berry
Height, Weight: 181cm, 83kg
Profile: Winning a high proportion of the ball in contested situations, Berry plays with aggression and tackles strongly. He balances the aggression with acceleration out of stoppages, reliable distribution by hand, composure with ball in hand and precise kick placement out in front of leading inside 50m targets.

Just exactly what we dont need is another inside Mid!! What we lack is  outside Class!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@Gawndog98i see in your latest draft you have the Gold Coast passing on their second round pick ( currently pick 27) due to their  free pick ups. Just seems a waste surely they will swap it out somehow. 
I see Cal Twomey has GWS as a possibility to taking Hawks academy player Downie at pick 20. 
What’s your thoughts on a 3 way trade involving our pick 19 going out along with pick 50, we get 24&27 and GC get hawks future 3rd? ( Hawks have already traded out their future 4th so I’m not sure if they are allowed to trade another future)   

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Colm said:

@Gawndog98i see in your latest draft you have the Gold Coast passing on their second round pick ( currently pick 27) due to their  free pick ups. Just seems a waste surely they will swap it out somehow. 
I see Cal Twomey has GWS as a possibility to taking Hawks academy player Downie at pick 20. 
What’s your thoughts on a 3 way trade involving our pick 19 going out along with pick 50, we get 24&27 and GC get hawks future 3rd? ( Hawks have already traded out their future 4th so I’m not sure if they are allowed to trade another future)   

 

Yep Gold Coast is certain to trade out their pick 27, because they don't have enough list spots to accomodate any more than their pick 5 and their two academy boys who can't be bid on but are first rounders on talent. I was just using the current draft order because its a bit easier than predicting and accounting for potential trades. 

I think that trade checks on our and Hawthorn's behalf but I'd think Gold Coast would want a future second coming their way not a future third. I think there will definitely be clubs offering future seconds for Gold Coast's pick with clubs like Geelong or West Coast who don't have many picks looking to get up in the order. Or there is probably going to be sliders around that points so Gold Coast might get overs for that pick on draft night if there's someone who slides who a club really rates. Either way that pick won't belong to Gold Coast by the time the pick comes around, someone will be using it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nascent said:

https://www.afl.com.au/news/526016/cal-twomey-s-phantom-form-guide-december-update

Cal Twomey's latest rankings with some draft whispers attached.

Mentions Carroll is likely to be available in the second round and hasn't got us linked to him.

Has Macrae at 15 but mentions that he could slip if he doesn't go early and we are a possibility.

We've allegedly shown interest in Bailey Laurie who he has ranked at pick 23.

Also mentions us in relation to a bid on Blake Coleman if he got through to 28.

 

Yes if Jack Carroll was available at 18/19, we wouldn’t or shouldn’t let him fall through the Saints.  He ticks all our needs and his East Freo connection with LJ and Riv would help retention of the lads.  
 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another draft chat with Cal Twomey for those that are interested.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/527152/chat-recap-a-draft-with-so-many-steals-new-name-in-top-20

Not a whole lot of information regarding the Dees except reiterating our links with Bailey Laurie with the Giants in the mix as well.

What I did find interesting was the mention of Conor Stone and Luke Pedlar as possible first round bolters. Don't know much about Pedlar but Stone sounds like an interesting "explosive" player that knows how to hit the score board playing mainly as a forward flanker in 2019. Apparently is versatile with clubs seeing him as having potential in the back half and through the middle. Wonder if we're one of the clubs keen.

If not, that's two more players into the first round unexpectedly that could see a slider drift out to us. Macrae was said to go early but Cal for the second time has mentioned that if he doesn't go early he could slide a bit into the later parts of the first round. Also talk of Tanner Bruhn more unlikely than likely to go top 10. Will he slide to our picks? Not sure he's the type of player we're after but on talent he would almost be too good to pass up if that did somehow happen.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nascent said:

Another draft chat with Cal Twomey for those that are interested.

https://www.afl.com.au/news/527152/chat-recap-a-draft-with-so-many-steals-new-name-in-top-20

Not a whole lot of information regarding the Dees except reiterating our links with Bailey Laurie with the Giants in the mix as well.

What I did find interesting was the mention of Conor Stone and Luke Pedlar as possible first round bolters. Don't know much about Pedlar but Stone sounds like an interesting "explosive" player that knows how to hit the score board playing mainly as a forward flanker in 2019. Apparently is versatile with clubs seeing him as having potential in the back half and through the middle. Wonder if we're one of the clubs keen.

If not, that's two more players into the first round unexpectedly that could see a slider drift out to us. Macrae was said to go early but Cal for the second time has mentioned that if he doesn't go early he could slide a bit into the later parts of the first round. Also talk of Tanner Bruhn more unlikely than likely to go top 10. Will he slide to our picks? Not sure he's the type of player we're after but on talent he would almost be too good to pass up if that did somehow happen.

Is it just me or does it seem like this years draft is a giant lottery?  Obviously it always is but there seems to be about 30 names that could be a first rounder.  Obviously there's a group in the top 5, and then after that there's about 20 names to fit into the next 10 and on it goes...

Seems like it's not a bad year to have multiple picks in the top 30 (even with the academy / father son selections).... or (hopefully not for us) it could be a very even draft of low quality  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    EASYBEATS by Meggs

    A beautiful sunny Friday afternoon, with a light breeze and a strong Windy Hill crowd set the scene, inviting one team to seize the day and take the important four points on offer. For the Demons it was not a good Friday, easily beaten by an all-time largest losing margin of 65 points.   Essendon threw themselves into action today, winning most of the contests and had three early goals with Daria Bannister on fire.  In contrast the Demons were dropping marks, hesitant in close and comm

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 2

    DEFUSE THE BOMBERS by Meggs

    Last Saturday’s crushing loss to Fremantle, after being three goals ahead at three quarter time, should be motivation enough to bounce back for this very winnable Round 5 clash at Windy Hill. A first-time venue for the Melbourne AFLW team, this should be a familiar suburban, windy, footy environment for the players.   Essendon were brave and competitive last week against ladder leader Adelaide at Sturt’s home ground. A familiar name, Maddison Gay, was the Bombers best player with

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 33

    BLOW THE SIREN by Meggs

    Fremantle hosted the Demons on a sunny 20-degree Saturdayafternoon winning the toss and electing to defend in the first quarter against the 3-goal breeze favouring the Parry Street end. There was method here, as this would give the comeback queens, the Dockers, last use of the breeze. The Melbourne Coach had promised an improved performance, and we did start better than previous weeks, winning the ball out of the middle, using the breeze advantage and connecting to the forwards. 

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    GETAWAY by Meggs

    Calling all fit players. Expect every available Melbourne player to board the Virgin cross-continent flight to Perth for this Round 4 clash on Saturday afternoon at Fremantle Oval. It promises to be keenly contested, though Fremantle is the bookies clear favourite.  If we lose, finals could be remoter than Rottnest Island especially following on from the Dees 50-point dismantlement by North Melbourne last Sunday.  There are 8 remaining matches, over the next 7 weeks.  To Meggs’

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    DRUBBING by Meggs

    With Casey Fields basking in sunshine, an enthusiastic throng of young Demons fans formed a guard of honour for the evergreen and much admired 75-gamer Paxy Paxman. As the home team ran out to play, Paxy’s banner promised that the Demons would bounce back from last week’s loss to Brisbane and reign supreme.   Disappointingly, the Kangaroos dominated the match to win by 50 points, but our Paxy certainly did her bit.  She was clearly our best player, sweeping well in defence.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 4

    GARNER STRENGTH by Meggs

    In keeping with our tough draw theme, Week 3 sees Melbourne take on flag favourites, North Melbourne, at Casey Fields this Sunday at 1:05pm.  The weather forecast looks dry, a coolish 14 degrees and will be characteristically gusty.  Remember when Casey Fields was considered our fortress?  The Demons have lost two of their past three matches at the Field of Dreams, so opposition teams commute down the Princes Highway with more optimism these days.  The Dees held the highe

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    ALLY’S FIELDS by Meggs

    It was a sunny morning at Casey Fields, as Demon supporters young and old formed a guard of honour for fan favourite and 50-gamer Alyssa Bannan.  Banno’s banner stated the speedster was the ‘fastest 50 games’ by an AFLW player ever.   For Dees supporters, today was not our day and unfortunately not for Banno either. A couple of opportunities emerged for our number 6 but alas there was no sizzle.   Brisbane atoned for last week’s record loss to North Melbourne, comprehensively out

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    GOOD MORNING by Meggs

    If you are driving or training it to Cranbourne on Saturday, don’t forget to set your alarm clock. The Melbourne Demons play the reigning premiers Brisbane Lions at Casey Fields this Saturday, with the bounce of the ball at 11:05am.  Yes, that’s AM.   The AFLW fixture shows deference to the AFL men’s finals games.  So, for the men it’s good afternoon and good evening and for the women it’s good morning.     The Lions were wounded last week by 44 points, their highest ever los

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 3

    HORE ON FIRE by Meggs

    The 40,000 seat $319 million redeveloped Kardinia Park Stadium was nowhere near capacity last night but the strong, noisy contingent of Melbourne supporters led by the DeeArmy journeyed to Geelong to witness a high-quality battle between two of the best teams in AFLW.   The Cats entered the arena to the blasting sounds of Zombie Nation and made a hot start kicking the first 2 goals. They brought tremendous forward half pressure, and our newly renovated defensive unit looked shaky.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 11
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...