Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Josh Daicos went from a fringe forward to a better player than Phillips last year. 

There’s a lot of clubs without proven options on the wing who can train them up. 

Apart from Baker we’ve got Harmes, Melksham, Hunt, Fritsch and even Jordon as internal candidates. Richmond took Marlion Pickett (A career half back/mid) and made him a very good wingman in 1 season. With the right coaching it can be done.

Personally I’d stop spending useful draft picks and hefty contracts on players who can’t kick. You get short term improvement but lose long term. 

Melksham and Hunt have proven they are not wingers. They have been trialled there and it hasn't worked. Why move Fritsch from his preferred and best position? Our forward line right now is being built around Weideman and Fritta.

Jordon is unproven and Harmes best position imo is Half forward/inside mid.

 
2 minutes ago, adonski said:

I agree but if you get him for a nothing pick (since it'd be a cap dump by the Pies), you'd have to take him. Would still walk into our 22.

Not sure he would walk into our team - he’s not replacing Langdon and not convinced he’s an upgrade on others that could play the other wing (Harmes, Salem, maybe even Baker who I’d say is quicker) 

5 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Melksham and Hunt have proven they are not wingers. They have been trialled there and it hasn't worked. Why move Fritsch from his preferred and best position? Our forward line right now is being built around Weideman and Fritta.

Jordon is unproven and Harmes best position imo is Half forward/inside mid.

I’m not convinced Weid, Brown and Jackson works. But if it does then Fritsch should probably spend at least part of the game somewhere else because 4 taller non tackling players certainly won’t work.

Melksham’s never played wing for us. Or at least not with his career at stake. Harmes played wing pretty well in 16/17 I believe. If Sparrow comes on or Rivers/Salem have to be part of the midfield mix then we could move Harmes.

Phillips is a clear solution that makes him attractive, but I’m just not a fan of the list strategy of plugging holes. Another one will always open up.
 

If Phillips is so cheap that’s he’s a 3rd rounder and 3 x 400k deal or similar then I’d get doing it. But overall my strategy would be search for genuine quality smart skilled players and trust the coaches to make it work. 

 
21 minutes ago, Sydee said:

Not sure he would walk into our team - he’s not replacing Langdon and not convinced he’s an upgrade on others that could play the other wing (Harmes, Salem, maybe even Baker who I’d say is quicker) 

He’s absolutely walk in to the best 22. The question is whether a Langdon/Phillips wing duo has enough hurt factor and class to win it all but he’d certainly help short term. 


1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

...

If Phillips is so cheap that’s he’s a 3rd rounder and 3 x 400k deal or similar then I’d get doing it. But overall my strategy would be search for genuine quality smart skilled players and trust the coaches to make it work. 

DeeSpencer - you must not be a 60 year Demonfan.

5 minutes ago, monoccular said:

DeeSpencer - you must not be a 60 year Demonfan.

You can always get new coaches. We've had a lot of poor coaching over that time but have we ever had a top quality list with a lot of skilled players? Some quality in the 90's and in the Daniher years but never anything top notch. The President seems to think we've got a top 4-6 list but I don't agree. A Phillips type would help, but there's still plenty of other gaps that need long term solutions.

 
2 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Is there any indication from a reputable source suggesting we have an interest in Phillips at this stage of the game?

The only times I've seen us mentioned in connection to Phillips in is regards to the Magpies needing to offload players to clear some dollars in their books and the Dees needing a wingman/outside pace.

Media and social media/forums connecting dots.

Signing this guy could be a real fillip. 


20 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

Is there any indication from a reputable source suggesting we have an interest in Phillips at this stage of the game?

 

16 minutes ago, Demonland said:

The only times I've seen us mentioned in connection to Phillips in is regards to the Magpies needing to offload players to clear some dollars in their books and the Dees needing a wingman/outside pace.

Media and social media/forums connecting dots.

At this stage the quick summary seems to be:

- Damien Barrett has hinted at him being an option for the Dees.
- Kane Cornes suggested we should target him.
- Tom Browne suggested we would be into him now.
- Alex McDonald (his manager) pretty much said he wants out of Collingwood so he can play wing.

So yeah, doesn't seem to be any rumours coming out of the club yet, just seems to be one of those ones footy people think is an obvious match.

20 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Signing this guy could be a real fillip. 

B+ for effort ?

I would rather get Brandon Matera as a delisted free agent than Phillips.

13 hours ago, Music said:

I would rather get Brandon Matera as a delisted free agent than Phillips.

there is not a single thing about these two players that are similar 

15 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

 

At this stage the quick summary seems to be:

- Damien Barrett has hinted at him being an option for the Dees.
- Kane Cornes suggested we should target him.
- Tom Browne suggested we would be into him now.
- Alex McDonald (his manager) pretty much said he wants out of Collingwood so he can play wing.

So yeah, doesn't seem to be any rumours coming out of the club yet, just seems to be one of those ones footy people think is an obvious match.

True, but if the player says i only want to talk to X club then there is no point.

Usually his starts out as murmurings and the manager/player will have a plan or club they want to go to. If that falls over the look for anyone interested.

I mean there are whole bunch of situations to play out, for example how required a player is, their price tag etc, but i reckon the pies have told Phillips ot look for options and they are exploring heir options.

As i mentioned price tag can be a big issue as well.

On a side note unless the pies are giving players away, why would any club want to help them with their Cap issue? 


16 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

 

At this stage the quick summary seems to be:

- Damien Barrett has hinted at him being an option for the Dees.
- Kane Cornes suggested we should target him.
- Tom Browne suggested we would be into him now.
- Alex McDonald (his manager) pretty much said he wants out of Collingwood so he can play wing.

So yeah, doesn't seem to be any rumours coming out of the club yet, just seems to be one of those ones footy people think is an obvious match.

I first posted this in September...seemed an obvious target.

On 9/14/2020 at 10:19 AM, rjay said:

The word is that Collingwood have a very tight salary cap and need to re sign Moore and De Goey....

Some players will be squeezed out.

Phillips (even though contracted) could be getable and would be a great compliment to Langdon.

Another hard running wingman.

 

 

16 hours ago, Music said:

I would rather get Brandon Matera as a delisted free agent than Phillips.

Firstly. Welcome.

Secondly. Very different players position wise. I don't recall ever seeing Matera play the wing (not a player i followed closely so could be wrong about that).

Not sure if posted elsewhere already but the below is an update from Sam Edmunds on SEN on tom phillips

“Tommy Phillips, same deal. A year to run on a contract, back-ended, more than 550. In fact, they’ve already told him that he could be traded and he’s open to that. I don’t believe there’s been a heck of a lot of interest.

The lack of interest surprises me. $550k is hardly outrageous money. Perhaps there’s more to his poor season than just the emergence of Daicos?

7 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

He will be at the Hawks 

Surely there's something brewing here with us to not be interested...I hope it ain't Treloar on the wing tho!


On 11/1/2020 at 1:47 PM, DeeSpencer said:

I’m not convinced Weid, Brown and Jackson works. But if it does then Fritsch should probably spend at least part of the game somewhere else because 4 taller non tackling players certainly won’t work.

 

But Jackson Brown on Weed is melifluous

1 hour ago, Demons11 said:

He will be at the Hawks 

You're throwing a lot of darts @Demons11 with no hits. You said yesterday that Aliir Aliir was off to the doggies but today Charlie Gardner CEO of Sydney came out and said that he'll most likely stay at Sydney and has only had significant interest from Port Adelaide..

Edited by dazzledavey36

16 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You're throwing a lot of darts @Demons11 with no hits. You said yesterday that Aliir Aliir was off to the doggies but today Charlie Gardner CEO of Sydney came out and said that he'll most likely stay at Sydney and has only had significant interest from Port Adelaide..

Trade week starts Wednesday and do you really think the CEO would come out and say he is going when he is contracted and as I have said if you don’t like my mail then don’t comment.  I’m happy to share what I heard 

Edited by Demons11

 
5 hours ago, Better days ahead said:

Not sure if posted elsewhere already but the below is an update from Sam Edmunds on SEN on tom phillips

“Tommy Phillips, same deal. A year to run on a contract, back-ended, more than 550. In fact, they’ve already told him that he could be traded and he’s open to that. I don’t believe there’s been a heck of a lot of interest.

The lack of interest surprises me. $550k is hardly outrageous money. Perhaps there’s more to his poor season than just the emergence of Daicos?

It’s a very good wage for a player of his caliber, he is not exactly a star 

1 minute ago, Demons11 said:

Trade week starts Wednesday and do you really think the CEO would come out and say he is going when he is contracted 

Well you pretty much said he was off to the doggies? I'm not doubting you mate, but like I said, you've had a lot of misses lately. I still think we should be in the market for Phillips but who knows. Freo are also a chance.

I'll keep an eye on this one.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 526 replies