Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

A few changes here and there isn't the priority. A lift from our midfield is what's really needed.

But there are a few changes to be made.

Looks like Sparrow's going to be out for a while. Will Jones get his spot back?

Fingers crossed Gawn's fit and can come back in. Should be for Preuss. However, I'm not a fan of TMac's current form and I think we need to consider dropping him. But we may be reaching too many changes.

And finally, Melksham. We know Goodwin/the FD rate him given he was captain vs North. But this is probably the 8th game he's played this year which simply isn't good enough. Another 50m conceded, another weak defensive game, and to top it all off a set shot kicked into the man on the mark. IMO, those sorts of performances should result in being dropped, particularly when they're on the back of a year of largely poor performances. Bennell could be a replacement.

I'd keep Pickett in because there's no better option out of the side and he did lay 5 tackles to his credit, but he keeps being close without actually converting that into a solid performance. Maybe he needs to kick an early goal to get into it, and he had two chances today. 

 

Sparrow out with Jones back in will sort the outside run issues ?

IN: Jones (or Jordon if Jones isn't right), Bedford, Hunt, Rivers, Gawn

OUT: Sparrow (inj), Melksham, vandenBerg, Hannan, Preuss
 
Move Harmes into Sparrow's role. Also feel it's time to change up the forward mix, get more run in there and less midsized forwards who don't tackle. Wouldn't be against Brown for TMac either.
 
We all love vanders, but 5 turnovers and 2 clangers from 11 disposals and 1 tackle is not helping us.

Edited by Lord Nev

 

I know Bedford is playing as a forward but he has great endurance. Could he play mid for sparrow? Or is this something for the future years?

Surely it’s time to give Bennell another shot at it. Gawn in, as Preuss showed a lack of footy smarts and that Max is light years ahead of him. I’d like to see Salem moved up the ground. He was fairly ordinary today. Hibberd is not the answer off half back either. He butchers every kick. I’d look at Rivers back in for either Hibbo or Lockhart. Jones for Sparrow the obvious one. 


15 minutes ago, Nelo said:

I know Bedford is playing as a forward but he has great endurance. Could he play mid for sparrow? Or is this something for the future years?

Bring in Bedford for sure, huge tank and some zip.

Saints are a great running team and quick, so this is the week to get him in. 

Gawn comes in for Preuss.  That is a no brainer.

Sparrow out opens up a few possibilities.  Do they push Harmes up the field and bring in Rivers?  Or, if he is right to go, does Jones come straight back in?

There are others they might look at, but it's a bit like deckchairs at the minute.  I mean, dropping a Pickett is something that will come up, but is swapping him for Bennell only making the issue of pressure even worse for us?

Some want to give Bedford a run but the bloke hasn't been in the mix since Round 1.  I can't see them wanting to rush him in to the side.

I think it will end up being

In:  Gawn, Jones

Out:  Preuss, Sparrow

I'll be surprised if Jones comes back, quads aren't 6 day injuries, and his punch suggested more than just cautionary tightness. 

Harmes has been very poor down back, although I'm unsure if they'll drop a senior player. Id like to see Rivers take his spot.

Bennell will come in for Sparrow if Jones isnt right. His disposal at least adds a point of difference. Also, any other change options will result in reshuffling (ie Omac in, Tomlinson to the wing).

Gawn back if fit. I think Preuss has given us more than TMac has the last two weeks, so i'd drop TMac and try to use Gawn or Preuss forward of the ball. 

Melksham has been terrible but does keep generating scoring opportunities, so will probably hold his spot. 

Out: Sparrow (inj.), Harmes, Preuss/Tmac 

In: Bennell, Rivers, Gawn, 

 

In -  Gawn, Bedford, Bennell,  Rivers

Out - Sparrow,  T Mac,  Hannan, Spargo

 

Start Preuss forward, I said last week he couldnt do any worse than T Mac and I stand by that.

Edited by Pickett2Jackson


19 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

Surely it’s time to give Bennell another shot at it.

From what I've heard, they're aiming for the Freo game for his return, could be back for the Sydney one though. Just part of his management.

 

We don't see the scratch matches or training so it's really hard to tell if there's anything there.

Tempted to play Brown in place of T mac assuming Gawn plays and use Tomlinson for relief if needed in the ruck.

Not sure on Pickett or Spargo but if we are to challenge this year they need to play.

Hannan Melksham and AVB are all on the edge but is there anybody better? No use just trying in hope (Of course lose next week and we may as well experiment.)

Bennell is the quandary but my guess is not yet and maybe not this year.

10 minutes ago, deanox said:

I'll be surprised if Jones comes back, quads aren't 6 day injuries, and his punch suggested more than just cautionary tightness. 

Harmes has been very poor down back, although I'm unsure if they'll drop a senior player. Id like to see Rivers take his spot.

Bennell will come in for Sparrow if Jones isnt right. His disposal at least adds a point of difference. Also, any other change options will result in reshuffling (ie Omac in, Tomlinson to the wing).

Gawn back if fit. I think Preuss has given us more than TMac has the last two weeks, so i'd drop TMac and try to use Gawn or Preuss forward of the ball. 

Melksham has been terrible but does keep generating scoring opportunities, so will probably hold his spot. 

Out: Sparrow (inj.), Harmes, Preuss/Tmac 

In: Bennell, Rivers, Gawn, 

Why don’t they revert back to playing Harmes as a tagger? Seemed to work. 

out: pickett, harmes, Preuss, tmac, sparrow 

in: bedford, jordan, gawn (if fit), brown, chandler    

there's no way jones would come up you'd think if he's got issues with his quad

sparrow and preuss are clearly going to be out and then i guess it becomes about what forward make-up we want

melksham, avb, pickett, and hannan all should be under the gun, as should t mac, harmes and lockhart, but i don't think there's much depth to replace them with - don't see any of the wagners, hunt, o mac near best 22 personally

who knows what they'll do, but personally i'd go with...

OUT: hannan, preuss, t mac (all omit), sparrow (inj)
IN: gawn, bennell (but i wouldn't be surprised if it was more of a mid selected, so possibly jordan to debut?), rivers, brown

harmes to replace jones in the hff moving up into the midfield, rivers as the 7th defender, bennell to try and encourage pickett, spargo, melksham to apply some defensive pressure...would be handy if he could too...and brown to offer better ground ball involvement than tommy mac

gawn will be going up against ryder and marshall, who are working together in tandem very well, so they could also opt to try preuss instead of brown as a forward but i somehow doubt it


Desperately need pace

 

In: Gawn, Rivers, Bedford, Baker, Brown, Hunt

Out: Tmac, Sparrow, Spargo, Pickett, Hannan, Lockhart

IN: JONES, BROWN, RIVERS, GAWN, BENNELL, BEDFORD

OUT: SPARGO, T.MCDONALD, HARMES, PREUSS, SPARROW, HANNAN

Edited by WERRIDEE

9 minutes ago, Nelo said:

Why don’t they revert back to playing Harmes as a tagger? Seemed to work. 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/teams/melbourne/how-melbourne-stumbled-on-a-gun-tagger-in-james-harmes/news-story/d09d859f1cc5c6c9c507473a5fc0e49b

Harmes went into the midfield with Viney out and Petracca forward. He is behind Clarry, Truck, Viney and Brayshaw for a spot in there. 

40 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

Surely it’s time to give Bennell another shot at it. Gawn in, as Preuss showed a lack of footy smarts and that Max is light years ahead of him. I’d like to see Salem moved up the ground. He was fairly ordinary today. Hibberd is not the answer off half back either. He butchers every kick. I’d look at Rivers back in for either Hibbo or Lockhart. Jones for Sparrow the obvious one. 

Nope not against the saints. He has zero pressure in his game.

In; Gawn, Bennell, Rivers, Jones 

out: Harmes, Preuss, Sparrow, Spargo 


Out: Preuss  In: Gawn
Out: Sparrow  In: Rivers
Out: Melksham  In: Hunt

FB: Hibberd  May  Tomlinson
HB:  Rivers  Lever  Salem
C;  Vanders   Oliver   Langdon
HF: Spargo  McDonald   Pickett
FF: Hannan  Weid  Fritsch
Foll: Gawn  Petracca Viney
Int: Lockhart Brayshaw  Harmes   Hunt 

  • Author
6 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Out: Preuss  In: Gawn
Out: Sparrow  In: Rivers
Out: Melksham  In: Hunt

FB: Hibberd  May  Tomlinson
HB:  Rivers  Lever  Salem
C;  Vanders   Oliver   Langdon
HF: Spargo  McDonald   Pickett
FF: Hannan  Weid  Fritsch
Foll: Gawn  Petracca Viney
Int: Lockhart Brayshaw  Harmes   Hunt 

First two changes I can get around.

Not sure about Hunt for Melksham (I'm in favour of dropping Melksham though). I accept St Kilda is fast but is Hunt reliable enough to use his pace to our advantage?

16 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

IN: JONES, BROWN, RIVERS, GAWN, BENNELL, BEDFORD

OUT: SPARGO, T.MCDONALD, HARMES, PREUSS, SPARROW, HANNAN

B: LOCKHART, MAY, LEVER

HB: HIBBERD, TOMLINSON, SALEM

C : LANGDON, PETRACCA, VANDENBERG

HF: MELKSHAM, BROWN, FRITSCH

F: PICKETT, WEIDEMAN, BEDFORD

FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, VINEY

IC: JONES, BRAYSHAW, BENNELL, RIVERS

 
4 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

First two changes I can get around.

Not sure about Hunt for Melksham (I'm in favour of dropping Melksham though). I accept St Kilda is fast but is Hunt reliable enough to use his pace to our advantage?

Melksham has to go if Goodwin is fair dinkum about setting a culture of professionalism.

Hunt's the best of a bunch of suboptimal choices. I'd play him as the 3rd wingman as well as forward. Harmes to play forward/mid.

10 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Out: Preuss  In: Gawn
Out: Sparrow  In: Rivers
Out: Melksham  In: Hunt

FB: Hibberd  May  Tomlinson
HB:  Rivers  Lever  Salem
C;  Vanders   Oliver   Langdon
HF: Spargo  McDonald   Pickett
FF: Hannan  Weid  Fritsch
Foll: Gawn  Petracca Viney
Int: Lockhart Brayshaw  Harmes   Hunt 

Agree on first two, plus

Out Pickett, needs a break.  In Hunt

Out Hannan, gap between good & bad games is too wide. In Bedford or Bennell or Smith


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 528 replies