Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'm curious as to how we will approach player movement this offseason. We tradedĀ out of this years first round due to the compromised nature of it so I feel we will try to recruit players via trade and/or free agency. If we trade out both McDonalds as mooted, I can't imagine we will be keen on acquiring picks unless its used for players or possible investment in future picks.

On the flip side to this, would Taylor and co feel confident in landing quality players at later picks given the reduced exposure may leave "round 1 quality" kids to slide?Ā  And if so, could that lead to small pickĀ upgrades with clubs looking to trade down to accrue points? Factor in a possibly reduction in list sizes and, salary cap restraints and the number ofĀ academy/NGA selections, I thinkĀ we may be presented with some unique opportunities.Ā 

Ā 
2 hours ago, rolling fog said:

Was speaking with someone today who confirmed this

Please be true. Essendon could probably accommodate both.Ā 

On 9/19/2020 at 11:49 AM, Lord Nev said:

Both of our McDonald's have requested a trade apparently.

Ā 

Kind of cringeworthy and a 'high maintenance' red flag for opposition, that they've requested at the same time. (if true)

Edited by John Demonic

 
6 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

I would let Jacko take the ruck and bring in Brown as the 3rd tall with Weid and Petty.

Agree, he would compete and it’s not like Max has given us any great advantage in 2020

3 hours ago, Skuit said:

Please be true. Essendon could probably accommodate both.Ā 

Barrett suggesting disgruntlement towards the club from Hurley and Hooker too. You have to wonder if one of them could be squeezed out and involved in a McDonald trade.Ā Hurley would be a decent 2nd tall in defense to plug in for a couple of years, and the club was vocal about chasing him in the past. Either way, let's get Saad.

Edited by John Demonic


40 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

Barrett suggesting disgruntlement towards the club from Hurley and Hooker too. You have to wonder if one of them could be squeezed out and involved in a McDonald trade.Ā Hurley would be a decent 2nd tall in defense to plug in for a couple of years, and the club was vocal about chasing him in the past. Either way, let's get Saad.

I don't think we need to change the backline Tomlinson at CHB has been good I've been happy with him maybe Hore in for Smith that would be it we need a wingman and small forward and maybe a tall forward if Petty can't get out on the park.

On 9/19/2020 at 6:49 PM, Lord Nev said:

Both of our McDonald's have requested a trade apparently.

Ā 

Ā 

22 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Laughable by Oscar.Ā 

More chance he'll have to fill out a delisted free agency form then get a trade..Ā 

Happy to get rid of both.

Ā 

21 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

TBF, he's out of contract and may have just said he'd like to try for more opportunity elsewhere.

Ā 

10 hours ago, rolling fog said:

Was speaking with someone today who confirmed this

Ā 

4 hours ago, John Demonic said:

Kind of cringeworthy and a 'high maintenance' red flag for opposition, that they've requested at the same time. (if true)

Just elaboratingĀ a little further, TMac has, in no uncertain terms, requested to be traded out of MFC for a number of reasons that are plain to see.

OMac on the other hand and somewhat seperate from TMac, is keen to gauge what if/anyĀ interest exists for his services andĀ at this stage is on more of a fishing expedition than anything else.

Ā 

Zac Merrett from Essendon.. i reckon its worth having a chat. Worked with Goody at Essendon and played with Hibberd and Melksham as well.

A few senior players not happy at Essendon regarding direction of the club.

Ā 
16 minutes ago, rolling fog said:

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Just elaboratingĀ a little further, TMac has, in no uncertain terms, requested to be traded out of MFC for a number of reasons that are plain to see.

OMac on the other hand and somewhat seperate from TMac, is keen to gauge what if/anyĀ interest exists for his services andĀ at this stage is on more of a fishing expedition than anything else.

Ā 

what are his reasons for requesting a Trade rf?? I have heard nothing

The problem for Tom IF he wants to be traded, and it's a big if, is that he is half the player he used to be and that he's on a fairly expensive contract.Ā  What club out there would take him on?Ā  It's not as if he kicked 30 goals this year, then got dropped and wanted to move on.Ā  He didn't really play well in any game this season so I can't see clubs knocking down our door.

Would the Kangas do it for Polec?Ā  I'm not that keen on Polec but it's more a suggestion that we would probably need to take back a contract from another team to make it work.

Ā 


16 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

The problem for Tom IF he wants to be traded, and it's a big if, is that he is half the player he used to be and that he's on a fairly expensive contract.Ā  What club out there would take him on?Ā  It's not as if he kicked 30 goals this year, then got dropped and wanted to move on.Ā  He didn't really play well in any game this season so I can't see clubs knocking down our door.

Would the Kangas do it for Polec?Ā  I'm not that keen on Polec but it's more a suggestion that we would probably need to take back a contract from another team to make it work.

Ā 

It will be similar to the Hannebery trade.Ā  Injury history, in-contract (3 years to go), in and out of the side and was traded for peanuts.Ā  The pick swaps made it look aĀ  goodish deal but it was peanuts for a player with his honours:Ā  The Swans have traded Hannebery and pick 28 to the Saints, and received pick 39 and St Kilda's 2019 second-round pick in return.Ā  ie effectively a late 2nd round pick but the Swans got his $800,000k salary off their books.

Not saying we will get the equivalent of a late 2nd rnd pick, just that the club will probably be happy to get TMac's salary off the books.

1 minute ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

It will be similar to the Hannebery trade.Ā  Injury history, in-contract (3 years to go), in and out of the side and was traded for peanuts.Ā  The pick swaps made it look aĀ  goodish deal but it was peanuts for a player with his honours:Ā  The Swans have traded Hannebery and pick 28 to the Saints, and received pick 39 and St Kilda's 2019 second-round pick in return.Ā  ie effectively a late 2nd round pick but the Swans got his $800,000k salary off their books.

Not saying we will get the equivalent of a late 2nd rnd pick, just that the club will probably be happy to get TMac's salary off the books.

That sounds about right.Ā  If getting Tom off the books allowed us to pursue a different player, or allowed us some more wiggle room in re-signing some of our stars, then I'm not too fussed what we get in return.Ā Ā 

Would his salary off the books allow us to offer someone like Mihocek a decent deal to switch from the Pies?Ā  He would be a great addition to the Weid/Jackson combo.

7 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

That sounds about right.Ā  If getting Tom off the books allowed us to pursue a different player, or allowed us some more wiggle room in re-signing some of our stars, then I'm not too fussed what we get in return.Ā Ā 

Would his salary off the books allow us to offer someone like Mihocek a decent deal to switch from the Pies?Ā  He would be a great addition to the Weid/Jackson combo.

TMac is said to be be on around $650-$750.Ā  If the scuttlebutt is right the club is happy for him to go.Ā  I'd guess it sees him gone as a way to find the money for a top line player.Ā  I'm not tracking who is available but I would imagine that sort of money would get us a Mihocek, Saad, Polec or similar.Ā 

It would be good if we can get a TMac himself into such a trade so the pick we give up is a bit less.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Of the likely targets we might pick up, the talk has been about a mature big bodied key forward.Ā  Like they grow on trees!Ā  what are the thoughts about (just brainstorming - not recommending):

- Paddy McCartin

- Perryman

- Daniher (wont get him)

- Majak Daw (as was suggested in some article recently)

- Darcy Moore (as a fwd)

- Sam Day

- Carlton - McKay, Curnow or Casboult

Perryman is the only one id touch.and he requires a first round pick minimum


52 minutes ago, BScotti said:

Of the likely targets we might pick up, the talk has been about a mature big bodied key forward.Ā  Like they grow on trees!Ā  what are the thoughts about (just brainstorming - not recommending):

- Paddy McCartin

- Perryman

- Daniher (wont get him)

- Majak Daw (as was suggested in some article recently)

- Darcy Moore (as a fwd)

- Sam Day

- Carlton - McKay, Curnow or Casboult

  • Would be very surprised if McCartin plays ANY form of football again, let alone AFL (concussion issues).
  • Can't see Carlton letting go of McKay or Curnow, no idea re Casboult.

Edited by TRIGON

50 minutes ago, BScotti said:

Of the likely targets we might pick up, the talk has been about a mature big bodied key forward.Ā  Like they grow on trees!Ā  what are the thoughts about (just brainstorming - not recommending):

.....

- Perryman

.....

Ā 

14 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

Perryman is the only one id touch.and he requires a first round pick minimum

Ummm ..... the answer to our key forward requirements isĀ 6 foot 1 wingman, Harry Perryman?!?!?

3 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Zac Merrett from Essendon.. i reckon its worth having a chat. Worked with Goody at Essendon and played with Hibberd and Melksham as well.

A few senior players not happy at Essendon regarding direction of the club.

He would be a great get.Ā 

With a few father sons, zones and academy picks I can see is getting in some 2nd rounders for TMac, Preuss and our current 2nd rounder and packaging them up to teams looking for points and getting in a good 1st rd pick.Ā 

2 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

He would be a great get.Ā 

Dodo will be demanding two 1st round picks. That's a whole another issue..


7 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

I don't think we need to change the backline Tomlinson at CHB has been good I've been happy with him maybe Hore in for Smith that would be it we need a wingman and small forward and maybe a tall forward if Petty can't get out on the park.

What I like with Tomlinson playing the CHB role is that he is a big body that is mobile and has a half decent kick.Ā 

3 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Zac Merrett from Essendon.. i reckon its worth having a chat. Worked with Goody at Essendon and played with Hibberd and Melksham as well.

A few senior players not happy at Essendon regarding direction of the club.

Not the type of player we really need IMOĀ but a gun.

Ā 
13 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

Not the type of player we really need IMOĀ but a gun.

???

outiside mid with very good skills. Ā Tell me why we don’t need this type?Ā 

18 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Dodo will be demanding two 1st round picks. That's a whole another issue..

DodoĀ might be close to the next one out of EssendonĀ 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 136 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 423 replies