Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, goodoil said:

He started in the centre and had 1 possession to halftime I think.

 

39 minutes ago, Seraph said:

He started on ball. At the opening bounce he was in the middle.

He did nothing the entire first half.

So he didn't get a touch at the opening bounce...you think he was in the midfield for the entire first half?

I reckon we started to get the mix right as the game went on.

Brayshaw is an integral part of that mix if we're going to be successful.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

6. Clarrie - back yourself son and you will be elite as shown tonight 

5. May - awesome down back never looked in trouble 

4. Viney - set the tone in the first and was good throughout 

3. Lever - along with May controlled the backhalf although some strange decisions to punch when he could have marked but very good overall 

2. Trac - nearly set the game alight on several occasions and showed some real class at times

1. Weid/Jacko - loved their work together in bringing the ball to ground and second efforts at ground level 

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, rjay said:

 

So he didn't get a touch at the opening bounce...you think he was in the midfield for the entire first half?

I reckon we started to get the mix right as the game went on.

Brayshaw is an integral part of that mix if we're going to be successful.

The response was in relation to the earlier post, which was wildly wrong and impugned the coaching group, not a comment on the efficacy of Brayshaw.

Posted
4 minutes ago, goodoil said:

The response was in relation to the earlier post, which was wildly wrong and impugned the coaching group, not a comment on the efficacy of Brayshaw.

I agree with the sentiment of the earlier post.

I don't think the coaching group have handled him well at all.

I think we have had the mix in the midfield all wrong.

Tonight was better but as a group they can work a lot better yet.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Fanatique Demon said:

There's a lot of premature love (and hope) for Jackson!

There's good reason for that 'Fanatique'...he's a beauty.

  • Like 4
Posted
9 minutes ago, rjay said:

I agree with the sentiment of the earlier post.

I don't think the coaching group have handled him well at all.

I think we have had the mix in the midfield all wrong.

Tonight was better but as a group they can work a lot better yet.

Yeah the sentiment was good, it just reeked of ignorance factually.

Posted

Unbelievable game by Oliver - it was everything we had been hoping for since his debut and shows that both he and Goody have finally understood what so many have said on DL and other places. That was the most elite game we have seen by anybody at this club for a long, long time.

6 Oliver

5 Viney

4 May

3 Salem

2 Trac

1 Weid

  • Like 1
Posted

6 - Oliver - trade bait? ?

5 - Viney - having a very good year

4 - May - love his physicality and leadership down back

3 - Petracca - not quite, but still good

2 - Harmes - thought he was good, in the first half especially

1 - Jackson - doing a great job for a young fella

 

Posted (edited)

6. Oliver

5. May

4. Viney

3. Salem

2. Jackson

1. Weideman  

Great last quarter by Brayshaw. 

Edited by Star of the 80s
  • Like 1
Posted

6. Clarry

5. Viney

4. May

3. Petracca

2. Jackson

1. Lever.

 

Special mention to the Weed, Harmsey's first quarter and Brayshaw's last.  

 

Posted

6. Oliver

5. May

4. Viney

3.Petracca

2.Jackson
1. Lever

Posted

6. Oliver 

5. May 

4. Jackson 

3. Viney 

2. Petracca 

1. Harmes 

Posted

6. Oliver

5. May

4. Viney

3. Petracca

2. Salem

1. Weideman

.5 Brayshaw half a point for half a game

Posted

6 Oliver

5 Viney

4 May

3 Petracca 

2 Jackson 

1 Weideman 

Apologies to Lever. 
 

Salem was ok but not in my best.  He still didn’t use the footy to a huge advantage. 15 metre kicks are soft targets for a bloke with his talent. He can lift and show us what he is really capable of. 

Posted

6 - Clarry

5 - May

4 - Viney

3 - Tracc

2 - Salem

1 - Weid

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...