Jump to content

CHANGES: Rd 05 vs Richmond

Diamond_Jim
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Astbury is a big out for The Tiges. Their backline is now light on for talls, and Grimes won't be anywhere near as effective with his mate out. 

Great time for The Weed to return. 

 

    • Like 4
     

    Why hasn't May been trialled up forward yet? 

    what's the worst that can happen?When McDonald has been playing like his younger brother Oscar, it makes perfect sense to trial him up forward.

    • Thanks 1
    • Shocked 1
    1 hour ago, Hell Bent said:

    Astbury is a big out for The Tiges. Their backline is now light on for talls, and Grimes won't be anywhere near as effective with his mate out. 

    Great time for The Weed to return. 

     

    That would appear logical but it seems they're wedded to this dumbarse forward structure for the short term at least.

    • Shocked 1
     
    2 hours ago, Hell Bent said:

    Astbury is a big out for The Tiges.

     

    And Rhys Stanley was a big out for Geelong.  And we have Gawn.  And we sill lost.

    The Astbury out isn't a big deal as all our tall forwards are garbage anyway.

    Edited by TheKozzieExperience

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Sad 1
    30 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

    Why hasn't May been trialled up forward yet? 

    because we're three games into a season

    Edited by whatwhatsaywhat

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    19 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

    leading metres gained for us last game??!?

    the notion of shifting him around from the role we brought him in as a free agent to play is one i don't understand at all

    it's like those suggesting we play may forward...why? by that logic o mac has to come in as a key defender; i'd rather may take that role and we find someone else who can play as a tall up forward...and i'd say no (at this stage) to smith or lever being the choices there as that trio need time to work out how to play together; it's been two games

    i can completely understand the calls for weideman or brown (or jackson) to come in to play as an additional tall forward, but i don't think it's time to throw the baby out with the bathwater when we're three games into the season, and only (an interrupted) two since resumption

    I would argue that's a good thing playing from CHF WW.  He can run his opponent ragged, away from the hot zones and / or double back on occasions into the hot zones.  I know many of those meters might be delivery / long kicking etc but a decent chunk is also probably the run and carry.  Also play higher when the team needs to offer the contested or leading link man between HB and CHF.  With Hannan back we don't need Tommo on the wing and Hannan offers a potentially more dangerous option on the opposite wing to Langdon.  Those two will at least pose a speed of transition challange to the opp.  Probably a neutral outcome but frees up Tommo to go forward or back into the "General" role.  Too powerful / tall and rangy to waste on a wing imv.

    Im not saying this will work but it might work.  Alternatively as the general at CHB using the same roaming / meters gained strengths.

    That was me putting up the No-Mac option for May moving forward.  Probably not this week given the twin KFs for the Tiges but pick the right group of 3 matches against somewhat lessor forward lines and i don't see why we can't trial that as a one off experiment. This issue is not three matches old WW.  This was there for the entire 2019 season other than one match where T-Mac happened to fire (then injured just as quickly).  Another reason to try and find another genuine KF solution to our forward scoring / conversion % woes imv.

    Edited by Rusty Nails

    • Like 2
    On 6/29/2020 at 1:08 PM, Lord Nev said:

    Picked up a newspaper or caught any sports media so far this week? Been a fair bit of talk from experts already, hardly 'speculative'.

    Confirmation bias.

    (Also hindsight bias in any case.)

    1 hour ago, Dr.D said:

    Why hasn't May been trialled up forward yet? 

    what's the worst that can happen?When McDonald has been playing like his younger brother Oscar, it makes perfect sense to trial him up forward.

    Jesus.

    • Haha 1
     
    4 minutes ago, bing181 said:

    Confirmation bias.

    (Also hindsight bias in any case.)

    Actually, there were at least 2 or 3 articles about our team selection well before game day. Mostly they were around Jetta, but they were also raising questions about selection in a broad sense.

    Then, following the game and the poor performance, more commentators raised questions.

    So it's not 'hindsight bias', and if that's what you interpret as 'confirmation bias' then you could apply that to absolutely anything. Of course, you're welcome to shoot that down by finding articles where our team selection strategy was praised. I'll wait.

    Edited by Lord Nev

    • Like 1

    After reading this it feels like maybe...

    ANB in (possibly for vandenBerg)

    Bennell, Jones and Jackson close, but maybe won't make the final team.

    Jetta and OMac won't be selected yet.

     

    • Like 1

    21 hours ago, TheJam said:

    Lever isn’t a key position back man either. He played his best football as a third defender. I’m still not sure on Oscar but i think what you may lose bringing him in you will gain it back plus more having lever floating. Wasted In my opinion 

    Agree Jam 

    • Like 1
    3 hours ago, TheKozzieExperience said:

    And Rhys Stanley was a big out for Geelong.  And we have Gawn.  And we sill lost.

    The Astbury out isn't a big deal as all our tall forwards are garbage anyway.

    Yes...because we only have one plus the ball is not being delivered properly. If you have videos of 2019 compare the quality of ball movement front of centre to the last 16 months.

    • Like 1

    I think the club wants to settle on a lineup and give it a chance to deliver.  I think there will be few changes, perhaps one or two like for like so the coaches can get their preferred group on the park and playing a few games together.  The posts that want ‘revolution’ (like May or Oscar forward) might have to settle, petal.  They have not trained there, the season is only 3 matches old for us, so there is a long way to go before those sort of tricks could be expected.

    11 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

    I think the club wants to settle on a lineup and give it a chance to deliver.  I think there will be few changes, perhaps one or two like for like so the coaches can get their preferred group on the park and playing a few games together.  The posts that want ‘revolution’ (like May or Oscar forward) might have to settle, petal.  They have not trained there, the season is only 3 matches old for us, so there is a long way to go before those sort of tricks could be expected.

    Yes Buck but a mid match switch like Smith forward would not be too revolutionary which is what I would have done at least at 3/4 time with maybe Melsham at HB and more game time fir Angus and ball tome for Harmesy.


    • Author
    22 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

    I think the club wants to settle on a lineup and give it a chance to deliver.  I think there will be few changes, perhaps one or two like for like so the coaches can get their preferred group on the park and playing a few games together.  The posts that want ‘revolution’ (like May or Oscar forward) might have to settle, petal.  They have not trained there, the season is only 3 matches old for us, so there is a long way to go before those sort of tricks could be expected.

    two more losses and the season is probably over. Had we lost to Essendon and then lost the next three we would be 1-5. As it is with two more losses we will be 1-4

    Tigers must be licking their lips at coming up against us. I hate saying stuff like this as I feeling I'm turning into the prototype MFCSS fan but I feel like we've become the confidence building team, we push teams just enough to give them a run but don't get the job done. 

    Anyway, to the point. One thing that successful teams build is consistency with line up, I don't see them doing major changes to the team or structure. Personally, as a fan not as an expert, I think our forward line looks small. I think the plan almost revolved around it looking small but playing tall, this isn't happening so I think we need a taller player to take the oppositions number one defender to provide a foil for Fritta and co. What that means is that one of Hannan, Melksham, or Hunt has to go. Personally I'd be dropping Melksham, and moving Fritta into the HFF role the Melksham has been doing and bringing in one of Brown or Weiderman. 

    I thought Hannan was solid without being outstanding in his first game back, I think he's deserved another crack. Hunt was very quiet but has been solid in the other two games. He also has pace to him which needs to be used more.

    Down back I am not a fan of Smith, but he was better against the cats and in fact I thought aside from those 3rd quarter brainfarts that cost us the game, the defence held up quite well. OMac was BOG in the scratch match, does that earn him a recall at Smith's expense?

    Finally the enigma of Bennell. Supremely skilful but how do we fit him in? AvB was quiet but I think he's best 22. Do we drop Lockhart and move Harmes back into defence? Give Brayshaw more time on the ball in Harmes' place.

    I've said it before, I think the pieces of the puzzle are there for a successful team. I just don't know how they fit together, and I'm not sure the match committee know either.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    how did Gawn not dominate on the weekend? 

    Actually kinda surprised by it - he should destroyed their rucks and drifted fwd and kicked 1/2. Probably asking a lot because he also gets 15+ touches a game but I just want to see him impose himself more when we need it

    He lifts everyone and we can't keep relying on Trac to do it every week (we have Viney but he can't kick more than 35m) 

    • Like 1
    1 hour ago, MF-C said:

    how did Gawn not dominate on the weekend? 

    Actually kinda surprised by it - he should destroyed their rucks and drifted fwd and kicked 1/2. Probably asking a lot because he also gets 15+ touches a game but I just want to see him impose himself more when we need it

    He lifts everyone and we can't keep relying on Trac to do it every week (we have Viney but he can't kick more than 35m) 

    He has been dominating all last year and three games this year how many have we won? 
    Tap ruckman don’t win games if they did we would be on top of the ladder undefeated.

     


    5 minutes ago, old dee said:

    He has been dominating all last year and three games this year how many have we won? 
    Tap ruckman don’t win games if they did we would be on top of the ladder undefeated.

     

    It would help if he actually directed his taps to teammates.

    • Like 5

    Can they please pick Weideman this week?

    T Mac will play better with only 1 bloke contesting with him and Fristch can play as more of a small forward rather than being our full forward which didn't work on the weekend. (in fact nothing about our forward line worked last week)

    • Like 4
    9 hours ago, bingers said:

    It would help if he actually directed his taps to teammates.

    This is spot on.

    We haven't seen Gawn seem to hit targets with his taps for 18 months, not sure what has happened.

    In the Geelong game, I'm not sure what the final number was, but at quarter time (I think it was) he had 10 hitouts with only 1 to advantage.

    This year he's average 28.3 hitouts (down on his career average of 35.4) with only 8.3 to advantage (down on his career average of 11.7).

    In 2018 he averaged 44.8 hitouts. (Obviously we allow for slightly less game time here too)

     

    Edited by Lord Nev

    • Like 1
     

    Jobe Watson made a good point about using Gawn as more of an offensive weapon. Obviously being a marking target is one thing, but it was more about him rucking inside 50, as opposed to TMac, and using his ruck work to try and get on the scoreboard. As Jobe kept banging on about, Gawn rucking to Petracca and Kossie inside 50 could be a real weapon.


    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

      The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 15

      As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

        • Like
      • 276 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Port Adelaide

      Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 3 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Essendon

      Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

        • Clap
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Gold Coast

      The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

        • Thanks
      • 157 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 33 replies
      Demonland
    View All