Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, BDA said:

why won't they work with her?

i'll be gobsmacked if this is true

lmfao and i heard Gerald Healy is making a comeback for us thats true you believe that don't you.

 
1 minute ago, demon3165 said:

lmfao and i heard Gerald Healy is making a comeback for us thats true you believe that don't you.

i said if true

go away fool

2 minutes ago, BDA said:

i said if true

go away fool

Sneaky feeling you believe anything someone says as fact....

 
1 minute ago, demon3165 said:

Sneaky feeling you believe anything someone says as fact....

i always suspected you were a troll. good work

  • 2 weeks later...

This will be finished before we probably even get an update on Caulfield...

20240907_132908.jpg.f130ac2e6a27f69565d46cff39fafe40.jpg

20240907_132910.thumb.jpg.3dc07cbef468bbbe4113625e54b6c251.jpg


21 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

This will be finished before we probably even get an update on Caulfield...

20240907_132908.jpg.f130ac2e6a27f69565d46cff39fafe40.jpg

20240907_132910.thumb.jpg.3dc07cbef468bbbe4113625e54b6c251.jpg

That's what we need to be pitching for Caulfield:

 

The Barassi Community and Dog-Walking Centre

Home of the Melbourne Football Club

 

Get it done!!!

The Home Base for the Melbourne Football Club at Caulfield Racecourse needs to be one of the top priorities for Steven Smith or whomever becomes the next President.

This matter will also need to be brought up at the next Melbourne Demons AGM. We cannot allow the issue of the Home Base to linger on forever. Time to get it done!

Edited by Supreme_Demon

25 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

This will be finished before we probably even get an update on Caulfield...

20240907_132908.jpg.f130ac2e6a27f69565d46cff39fafe40.jpg

20240907_132910.thumb.jpg.3dc07cbef468bbbe4113625e54b6c251.jpg

...and Hawthorn have been fundraising for this for the past couple of years.  

What have we been doing in preparation? 

Nothing. 

Imagine how much would have been contributed by our members post Premiership toward a future base fund.  

 
On 29/08/2024 at 07:54, BLWNBA said:

Yeah, it's actually pretty damning given that stakeholder engagement and management is one of her spruiked 'skills'. 


I’m told she’s seen as a bully. In my experience of her it’s not too far from the truth (at least tries to be a forceful personality with none of the requisite charm).

Edited by Mach5

2 hours ago, george_on_the_outer said:

...and Hawthorn have been fundraising for this for the past couple of years.  

What have we been doing in preparation? 

Nothing. 

Imagine how much would have been contributed by our members post Premiership toward a future base fund.  

The stagnation and lack of consultation/comms with the member base on this has actually become pretty embarrassing now.

Pert included.

As you said they could've utilised the momentum following our success in 2021 but alas much of that appears to have been flushed down the proverbial.

The boys delivered on the field and the top brass appear to have let us down since then.


This is what occurs when you don’t cast your net wide enough, fail to draw in Commercial partners and the local community.

Port Melbourne, Royal Park and the old Williamstown racecourse were more viable options.

If this dream is to proceed at Caulfield, the Trust must make a positive recommendation to the State Government for a largesse of funding, before it may be included into the 2025 State Budget.

Blind Freddy can see this will never happen.

 

Edited by bluey
Thinking

I think it has already been covered in detail earlier in this thread but it is hard to see Port Melbourne as a feasible alternative.

Altona/Williamstown is quite removed from traditional Dees supporter territory in Melbourne.

Royal Park admittedly could be explored even though its in the backyard of another club. It is in the City of Melbourne and relatively close to the CBD.

Why is the State Government the only source of potential government funding?

Numerous community sporting projects are partially funded by a mixture of the local municipality, State Government and Federal Governmnent.

Melbourne Football Club with a home base in Williamstown? Really?

Sentimentality aside, the conditions for footy down there are regularly horrible. Worse than Casey.

On 07/09/2024 at 13:29, gs77 said:

That's what we need to be pitching for Caulfield:

 

The Barassi Community and Dog-Walking Centre

Home of the Melbourne Football Club

 

Get it done!!!

You'd think anything with the name Barassi behind it would get instant government backing.

 

Talk about a disconnect eg Roffey and the board in an another building .. may be 1% but they all count … this no home base and under the same roof.. I wet to a work seminar at a function room at Carlton .. you walk in and see their premiership cups and watch the team train … all under 1 roof! This everlasting saga, honestly find a solution & get out of the 50 min drive to Casey 


On 16/08/2024 at 15:29, drdrake said:

Yep, Vic government is basically broke, the big build is coming with a big debt.  This means the positioning for any state money needs to show big community impact and votes.  Geelong will be targeting federal money commitments from both parties for 2025 election promises.

 

Our concern doesn't seem to be funding as yet, we still don't have a firm location as yet.  Caulfield racecourse is the latest but really this is still a maybe.

I wonder how much money the club has burnt doing the feasibility studies on various options

Well they dont appear to have burnt any on Fishermans Bend options. Nor have they responded to any of my questions raised from the last AGM.

I have deliberately stepped back as I advised the Board so there would be no corruption of their negotiations. I also hoped that Roffey might use her experience and networks to make some positive action.

I still believe a carefully proposed community, retail, entertainment and business facility with appropriate training areas could be attractive to the stalled FB development.

 

There are two inescapable facts in any future homes.

1) we will need contributions from government.

2) the state government is broke they cannot even afford to keep the hospital system functioning at required levels. There will be no money spent on a perceived silver tails football club.

Nothing will happen this decade. So get your minds around our current bases  at Goschs and Casey. 

END of story!

On 28/08/2024 at 16:21, BLWNBA said:

Roffey is largely removed from the project, as it stands. 

I guess that's project #3 she couldn't get done, unfortunately.

Project #1
Project #2 (thanks to consortium links to Scientology and China)

All fart, no poo

22 minutes ago, old dee said:

we will need contributions from government.

2) the state government is broke

we could put our facility in a tunnel somewhere between Cheltenham and Box Hill - no apparent shortage of funding there

31 minutes ago, monoccular said:

we could put our facility in a tunnel somewhere between Cheltenham and Box Hill - no apparent shortage of funding there

Sir Willian Fry Reserve, Cheltenham, plenty of room and next to SRL  .... call it SRL Arena ... I will waive my consultancy fee, gratis for the Dees 😁


2 hours ago, Demonsone said:

I wet to a work seminar at a function room at Carlton .. you walk in and see their premiership cups

Were they wooden and rotting?

2 hours ago, Demonsone said:

Talk about a disconnect eg Roffey and the board in an another building .. may be 1% but they all count … this no home base and under the same roof.. I wet to a work seminar at a function room at Carlton .. you walk in and see their premiership cups and watch the team train … all under 1 roof! This everlasting saga, honestly find a solution & get out of the 50 min drive to Casey 

Antiques Roadshow?

54 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

Were they wooden and rotting?

No they were in brown paper bags.

 

The save caulfield fb page posted a abc article from yesterday about us 

6 minutes ago, Satan said:

The save caulfield fb page posted a abc article from yesterday about us 

And?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 400 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies