Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I see Teflon Dan has recently been exposed for giving Tennis Australia $63 million in a “secret deal” just two months before the 2022 state election.....AND a $43 million loan to Tennis Australia was wiped. Wish we got a sweet deal like this one. 

but, spending public money you don't have is not an expense .... it's an "investment".

 
1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

but, spending public money you don't have is not an expense .... it's an "investment".

as part of the forgiveness of debt they got a further two years of rights for the australian open at m&op

 

6 hours ago, Ouch! said:

You were inferring it was how the AFL throwing money at the Tassie, side now it's local / state govt's

I'd suggest you should also add in some inept MFC boards over the years as well.  You can't just blame one factor,... It's a whole host of factors.  Our current administration is, from what it would appear, attempting to prioritise finding a base. They are just doing it in a climate where securing the funding is harder than to secure. 

You haven’t have a realistic proposal first that is approved by most stakeholders. 

Bet you never gave your kids $20 to spend without some strong reason or need to purchase or justify.

Are you surprised that Govt’s work in exactly the same way. Stop whinging about no funding when there is no reason to need it yet. The process has just started and once it’s worked into a fully developed plan for the area then specific costs can be allocated from stakeholders. 

 
5 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I see Teflon Dan has recently been exposed for giving Tennis Australia $63 million in a “secret deal” just two months before the 2022 state election.....AND a $43 million loan to Tennis Australia was wiped. Wish we got a sweet deal like this one. 

There'd be something coming back for 'wiping' a loan. They don't get it for nothing. The AO has huge, world wide coverage

Big news from right wing nut jobs, yeh we will kick a community in the guts because some people in cheap suits have shared a buffet.

 


2 minutes ago, bluey said:

Big news from right wing nut jobs, yeh we will kick a community in the guts because some people in cheap suits have shared a buffet.

 

 

22 hours ago, 58er said:

You haven’t have a realistic proposal first that is approved by most stakeholders. 

Bet you never gave your kids $20 to spend without some strong reason or need to purchase or justify.

Are you surprised that Govt’s work in exactly the same way. Stop whinging about no funding when there is no reason to need it yet. The process has just started and once it’s worked into a fully developed plan for the area then specific costs can be allocated from stakeholders. 

Umm, who's whinging?

I have no idea what you are even talking about?

 

If we are unable to play practice matches there with spectators, I see the Caulfield idea as a bust. Whilst not opposed to keeping the Casey connection, I think we need to have a training facility that is open to the public, and capable of hosting some preseason games. Agree that AFLW should remain at Casey and play some home games at Princes Park. The venue ought to be able to host family days and the like

8 hours ago, Ouch! said:

Umm, who's whinging?

I have no idea what you are even talking about?

You were complaining about the AFL and the money it was throwing at Tassie for their team in the near future. And bemoaning no  funding for MFC for our training base yet. Saying  it was partly due to the MFC Boards ineptitude over the time. 

My point us that until a firm proposal has been announced no money is going to be provided by any Govts or stakeholders for our training base. 


6 hours ago, 58er said:

You were complaining about the AFL and the money it was throwing at Tassie for their team in the near future. And bemoaning no  funding for MFC for our training base yet. Saying  it was partly due to the MFC Boards ineptitude over the time. 

My point us that until a firm proposal has been announced no money is going to be provided by any Govts or stakeholders for our training base. 

No, I was doing the exact opposite! 

I was responding to Demonsone who was the one complaining about how the AFL is throwing cash at Tassie's base.

Only thing I'll admit to saying is that I don't think previous administrations haven't been that great at prioritising our home base, but thats not exactly a contentious comment. I also didn't bemoan anything about lack of funding. You need to read comments, context and WHO actually wrote the words before blowing up. 🙄

 

Edited by Ouch!

On 14/01/2024 at 19:46, kev martin said:

I'll have go at the Caulfield racecourse.  

Nature reserve, indigenous overlay of plants and landscaping around the existing ponds for the Pelicans and other wildlife.

The master plan indicates it as being a percentage of the area, leaving enough space for recreation. 

I'd assume a lobby group wants it to be the main purpose of the space. 

As I understand it, there's yabbies in that pond...

43 minutes ago, Grr-owl said:

As I understand it, there's yabbies in that pond...

Hopefully they're the typical common yabbies and not some endangered type that'd mean no development is allowed

9 hours ago, samcantstandya said:

Hopefully they're the typical common yabbies and not some endangered type that'd mean no development is allowed

I think they're orange-bellied yabbies, or something like that....😉

I took my last bag of yabbies from there in about 1964.   Took them home put them in a large plastic bucket and was going to cook them the following afternoon.

they must have known cos they were all gone in the morning 

Smart thing’s yabbies 

Edited by 640MD
Spell checker


8 hours ago, 640MD said:

I took my last bag of yabbies from there in about 1964.   Took them home put them in a large plastic bucket and was going to cook them the following afternoon.

they must have known cos they were all gone in the morning 

Smart thing’s yabbies 

Could have been divine intervention by parent or sibling, from my experience they aren’t that smart(but don’t quote me).!!

On 17/01/2024 at 18:30, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

If we are unable to play practice matches there with spectators, I see the Caulfield idea as a bust. Whilst not opposed to keeping the Casey connection, I think we need to have a training facility that is open to the public, and capable of hosting some preseason games. Agree that AFLW should remain at Casey and play some home games at Princes Park. The venue ought to be able to host family days and the like

The 2006 MELBOURNEfc Family Day, to be held on Saturday, 11 February 2006, promises to be a great day for the whole family to enjoy. Due to the Commonwealth Games, the MCG will be unavailable, which means that Family Day will be held at Caulfield Racecourse.

This also means that you can enjoy all the elements of Family Day and a great day of racing! The Caulfield Group 1 CF Orr Stakes is the meeting on the day, and marks the start of the Melbourne Summer Classics Racing Carnival.

The day’s activities include: 
• Roving Entertainers 
• Autograph and photo opportunities with the 2006 MELBOURNEfc team
• Children’s games and activities 
• Merchandise merchandise sales 
• Membership enquiries and purchase opportunities 
• 2006 Member Scarf redemption 
• Giveaways 
• and more…

Members Admission on the day $10.00 
Non Member Admission on the day $15.00
Concession $7.00
Those aged 17 and under will enjoy the day for free (identification required)

Early Bird Admission
Early bird admission for MELBOURNEfc Members - $5.00 
Please contact Membership Services (03) 9652 1150 to arrange purchase. 
*Early Bird offer ends COB Wednesday, 8 February 2006
 

 

Caulfield has already ticked one of those boxes. Hopefully it can do it again………and soon.

Would cost dollars but with the technology and engineering now of movable stands at Marvel and moveable playing surfaces eg Tottenham Hotspur Stadium and Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas I don’t see why you can’t have a moveable stand on the inside of the racetrack for premium race meetings that moves to the football field to enable the ability to host AFLW games at Caulfield. Might be a stretch hosting AFL practice games would depend on the height of stands allowed to boost capacity.Agree that we should keep Casey for the club to use. Despite its geographical location it is a good facility and we need to have a presence out there as it is the base of our Next Generation Academy and zone (FWIW). Don’t agree that we should be playing home AFLW games at IKon purely and simply because it’s not our ground. I would argue that if we played both our finals at Casey this year we would have one at least one of them. 

Edited by Dee Viney Intervention


20 hours ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

Yep that organisation is so morally corrupt with ulterior motives.

You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still filth.

The government should claw the money back from the pies. Grant agreements usually have a clause to do so if money hasn’t been spent as agreed. 

 
On 20/01/2024 at 20:44, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

Well well well what a surprise this is.

What a shell game, all this siphoning of money for women's teams/junior teams/dog walkers/locals who want electric BBQs, etc. When the whole time it's going to facilities for the men's team.

Dogs, Blues, Pies ... most Vic clubs seem adept at playing the game and pretending to tick all the right boxes. Apart from the Cats who don't need to do a thing except point out what a marginal seat they're in. And of course the Might Demons who don't even seem to realise there's a game involved and play a straight bat as if the whole thing is awarded on merit.

"What ... us? Oh no! We want the money ... I mean, the community wants the money for better facilities for the womens' teams ... and junior soccer teams ... and we'll plant a few trees to save the planet while we're at it ... have an off leash area to placate, I mean, enhance the experience for local residents. Us? Why, it never crossed our minds! But now that you mention it, an extra oval the same size as the MCG might be of use to us ... plus a plunge pool, hypoxic tent. grandstand, social club (with bar) ... gee, these things the community are crying out for ... well, we might be able to use them too ...." [*back at the club*] "Yeah, I snowed 'em pretty good. They bought the lot. Sit back and wait for the cheque."


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 147 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Angry
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 41 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Angry
    • 322 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies