Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, The Chazz said:

We put Petty up forward because we literally had no-one else.  Mitch Brown was a delisted veteran who we've picked up as a rookie.  And Jackson hasn't played a game yet.  Presuming all is fair and equal, you've got these 3 ahead of Joel Smith.  Think you've proven my point.

As for shifting him back, I just don't know what role he fills.  Is he our 2nd/3rd tall?  Having him competing with Lever and Oscar?  Is he that mid-sized defender, competing with Hibberd and Hore?  He's not a small like Nev, and he's not a Salem-type.  And given our tall forward stocks, if someone went down in the backline, Petty is a capable replacement.

The initial point was that some think that having a fit Smith will make a significant difference to the team.  I just can't see where he fits in, and at whose expense, and quite frankly, I just don't think he's good enough in the first place, with many players ahead of him in competing positions (as you've kindly pointed out above).

Agree with your point that we can’t be relying on him, although of course we shouldn’t be relying on anyone to make a significant impact outside our top players.

As for what position he should play - I think all players should train for their best position and develop their strengths. There’s 45+ spots on the list to field a team, get each player to do what they do well first. What does Smith do best - move incredibly well with good size, where’s that best utilized - the backline.

As for team balance: Frost is out down back, Fritsch is in forward and Petty is forward. -1 back, +2 forward. 

I was a Petty down back fan but he lacks speed and doesn’t seem a natural contesting for position, where as his marking and finding front position are strong traits. On the theory of developing players at what they do best it makes sense to try that marking/presenting ability as a forward, even with a packed depth chart.

 
2 hours ago, The Chazz said:

And Jackson hasn't played a game yet.  Presuming all is fair and equal, you've got these 3 ahead of Joel Smith.  Think you've proven my point.

JSmith imv,  is not a tall; and not a small, obviously.

2 hours ago, The Chazz said:

As for shifting him back, I just don't know what role he fills.  Is he our 2nd/3rd tall?  Having him competing with Lever and Oscar?  Is he that mid-sized defender, competing with Hibberd and Hore?  

I my mind, I think JSmith will be our new, to become competent, 'swingman'_

An ex basketballer, so should have good hands and mind in close,  probably could play in all sectors For/Bck/Mids.

I see him as a medium who plays tall, and good below his hands.? 

 

My tall forwards bracket are TMc, Weide, Petty, MBrown, LJackson, May, Gawn, Preuss.

47 minutes ago, MyFavouriteMartian said:

JSmith imv,  is not a tall; and not a small, obviously.

I my mind, I think JSmith will be our new, to become competent, 'swingman'_

An ex basketballer, so should have good hands and mind in close,  probably could play in all sectors For/Bck/Mids.

I see him as a medium who plays tall, and good below his hands.? 

 

My tall forwards bracket are TMc, Weide, Petty, MBrown, LJackson, May, Gawn, Preuss.

Just to clarify, are you proposing taking May out of the defence permanently or just moving him forward should a need arise?  

 
5 hours ago, The Chazz said:

 

The initial point was that some think that having a fit Smith will make a significant difference to the team.  I just can't see where he fits in, and at whose expense, and quite frankly, I just don't think he's good enough in the first place, with many players ahead of him in competing positions (as you've kindly pointed out above).

Frosts’ role is there for the taking is it not? If we want Lever to play the intercept then its Omac or Smith for the second tall defender. Smith offers more defensive flexibility I suggest. 

Can i ask everyone's honest opinion on the melbournefc.com media coverage on the camp..

Cheers.


1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Can i ask everyone's honest opinion on the melbournefc.com media coverage on the camp..

Cheers.

Thought it was crap compared to previous years. I have enjoyed the one on one interviews but the stories and the humour in previous training camps was far better. Hated the limited vision and photos and think some of the contributors on here would have done a far better job as volunteers. If this is an example of what our media people produce, when it's their only job while they're up there, then I think they are being payed under false pretenses. By all means post snippets on twitter but how can our own media department not understand the member and potential member demographic?

Edited by dworship
Puntuation

7 hours ago, The Chazz said:

We put Petty up forward because we literally had no-one else.  Mitch Brown was a delisted veteran who we've picked up as a rookie.  And Jackson hasn't played a game yet.  Presuming all is fair and equal, you've got these 3 ahead of Joel Smith.  Think you've proven my point.

As for shifting him back, I just don't know what role he fills.  Is he our 2nd/3rd tall?  Having him competing with Lever and Oscar?  Is he that mid-sized defender, competing with Hibberd and Hore?  He's not a small like Nev, and he's not a Salem-type.  And given our tall forward stocks, if someone went down in the backline, Petty is a capable replacement.

The initial point was that some think that having a fit Smith will make a significant difference to the team.  I just can't see where he fits in, and at whose expense, and quite frankly, I just don't think he's good enough in the first place, with many players ahead of him in competing positions (as you've kindly pointed out above).

You make some good points. I was one who thought his best position was forward and I was sure he would be played forward. That does not appear to be the case. Agree that it is hard to see where he fits in down back.

I can also understand why you dont rate him that highly.

All that said I really reckon he has something. And i expect him to play most games.

 

 
51 minutes ago, dworship said:

Thought it was crap compared to previous years. I have enjoyed the one on one interviews but the stories and the humour in previous training camps was far better. Hated the limited vision and photos and think some of the contributors on here would have done a far better job as volunteers. If this is an example of what our media people produce, when it's their only job while they're up there, then I think they are being payed under false pretenses. By all means post snippets on twitter but how can our own media department not understand the member and potential member demographic?

Agree wholeheartedly.  Our media department in covering this was quite [censored] poor compared to other years.

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Can i ask everyone's honest opinion on the melbournefc.com media coverage on the camp..

Cheers.

Channelling joeboy:

Not good enough.


2 hours ago, dworship said:

Thought it was crap compared to previous years. I have enjoyed the one on one interviews but the stories and the humour in previous training camps was far better. Hated the limited vision and photos and think some of the contributors on here would have done a far better job as volunteers. If this is an example of what our media people produce, when it's their only job while they're up there, then I think they are being payed under false pretenses. By all means post snippets on twitter but how can our own media department not understand the member and potential member demographic?

What a ridiculous comment.

Please list the number of staff who were up there, their roles, their position descriptions, KPIs and salary.

(You may want to note that all the content produced by MFC from the camp was credited under one name).

Honestly, having a sook about training camp videos not being funny enough is one thing, but claiming people you don't know, let alone what their jobs are, are being "payed under false pretenses" is next level stuff.

14 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

What a ridiculous comment. Ridiculous is in the eye of the beholder

Please list the number of staff who were up there, their roles, their position descriptions, KPIs and salary.

Touche, that's like me asking people for a source isn't it? How about; if there was a cast of thousands paid squillions then there output wasn't as good as it was in the past. Conversely, if it was the work experience kid, the output wasn't as good as it was in the past. Dazzle asked for honest opinions regarding our media performance, that's what I gave.

(You may want to note that all the content produced by MFC from the camp was credited under one name). Aha, so it was under resourced and perhaps that was why it was not as good. (My work experience analogy might not have been so outrageous.) Gee think about how busy the kid must have been running around taking his 4 photos every second day and the 90sec poorly filmed bit of action. Then it was get it up on twitter and then ..................

I did enjoy the interviews as I said. 

Honestly, having a sook about training camp videos not being funny enough is one thing, but claiming people you don't know, let alone what their jobs are, are being "payed under false pretenses" is next level stuff.

Well that's pretty funny, I just gave an honest opinion to a question that was asked by Dazzle, a question that you didn't respond to but instead decided to attack my opinion. You must have been enraged. Enough to not be accurate. I said "the stories and the humour in previous training camps was far better" I never said anything about funny videos. As to "next level stuff" let's be honest, you and I have had a number of differing opinions of late. That has surprised me as that hasn't always been the case, or at least our differences have been cordial. I suspect that you decided to pot me due to history and I think you're bigger than that.

 

3 hours ago, binman said:

You make some good points. I was one who thought his best position was forward and I was sure he would be played forward. That does not appear to be the case. Agree that it is hard to see where he fits in down back.

I can also understand why you dont rate him that highly.

All that said I really reckon he has something. And i expect him to play most games.

 

If we're talking Smith here 'bin', I think we're in trouble if he plays most games.

Like Frost I think the athleticism he offers is often undone by poor decision making.

Excuse me if it’s been mentioned before but was KK sighted at the camp AT ALL?

On 2/2/2020 at 6:59 AM, old dee said:

Hi Rev good to see you again, the difference is this mob continue it into the real games.

Yeah, I know. This year I'm adopting an attitude of optimistic indifference. I've promised myself I will not repeat last year's unbridled pre-season enthusiasm that saw me lash out early and buy memberships for my two sons and my lovely lady.  Oh, it was so promising, and then we got hit with the demon stick once again. This year I'm pretending to be oblivious to all pre-season  hype and maintaining a calm and rational demeanour .

Hope you're well young man.


7 hours ago, rjay said:

If we're talking Smith here 'bin', I think we're in trouble if he plays most games.

Like Frost I think the athleticism he offers is often undone by poor decision making.

Yes, you might be right that with the second paragraph. But I think he has significant scope for improvement where's frost doesn't. As I noted I just reckon he has something. Also as an elite basketball his decision making should be pretty good.

 If we have fit, good list to choose 22 from each week and Smith is in that 22 it will be an indication he is up to it not a sign we are in trouble.

Time will tell.

13 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Can i ask everyone's honest opinion on the melbournefc.com media coverage on the camp..

Cheers.

I thought it was lame. When they trotted out the footage of a handful of players walking down some steps, I thought - is that all you can come up with? The rest was for the most part bland.

3 hours ago, The Reverend said:

Yeah, I know. This year I'm adopting an attitude of optimistic indifference. I've promised myself I will not repeat last year's unbridled pre-season enthusiasm that saw me lash out early and buy memberships for my two sons and my lovely lady.  Oh, it was so promising, and then we got hit with the demon stick once again. This year I'm pretending to be oblivious to all pre-season  hype and maintaining a calm and rational demeanour .

Hope you're well young man.

Even if your enthusiasm is more constrained this year, I hope you've still bought memberships for yourself, your two sons and lovely lady.

Edited by La Dee-vina Comedia
typo

14 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Can i ask everyone's honest opinion on the melbournefc.com media coverage on the camp..

Cheers.

Burgo’s ‘ Daily Camp Diary’ a few years back was great quality and one that most remember for good reason. I thought this year we were getting more content as opposed to last year, the quality didn’t quite stack up to Burgo but i guess it comes down to what the individual craves. 

All I remember from last year’s camp was Hibbo doing some sort of tribal dance in the middle  of the group and Salo’s Barber Shop.

1 hour ago, Roger Mellie said:

I thought it was lame. When they trotted out the footage of a handful of players walking down some steps, I thought - is that all you can come up with? The rest was for the most part bland.

The thing that is frustrating is that there is no need for all of the video content to be of a professional production standard.

And whilst tbe the standard player interview had its place they are usually pretty boring and dont give much insight about the player himself (boys are up and about, tge new giuys ate settling in but can't cook, a hood chance to bond yada yada yada)

Post somw smart phone clips giving an insight into who tbe players are and some inner sanctum behind tbe scenes stuff . Quality doesnt matter. Kids wstch hundrrds iof ow quality clips on their various platforms. Rhey could care less about quality.

Easy, cheap and fans, particularly ypung people love it. Nba clubs do it all the time. No excuse for us not to be doing so also.

 

Edited by binman


42 minutes ago, binman said:

The thing that is frustrating is that there is no need for all of the video content to be of a professional production standard.

And whilst tbe the standard player interview had its place they are usually pretty boring and dont give much insight about the player himself (boys are up and about, tge new giuys ate settling in but can't cook, a hood chance to bond yada yada yada)

Post somw smart phone clips giving an insight into who tbe players are and some inner sanctum behind tbe scenes stuff . Quality doesnt matter. Kids wstch hundrrds iof ow quality clips on their various platforms. Rhey could care less about quality.

Easy, cheap and fans, particularly ypung people love it. Nba clubs do it all the time. No excuse for us not to be doing so also.

 

Hitting the juice early Bin?

1 hour ago, Lord Nev said:

Dees fans - 'Stop talking and start winning!'

Also Dees fans - 'The club doesn't talk enough!'

 

Yeah, can't remember how many times on this site I have heard stuff along the lines of forget the talk we want wins

Edited by drysdale demon
additional info

 

Those complaining about the media coverage don’t forget we have the hell and back video dropping soon 

2 hours ago, binman said:

The thing that is frustrating is that there is no need for all of the video content to be of a professional production standard.

And whilst tbe the standard player interview had its place they are usually pretty boring and dont give much insight about the player himself (boys are up and about, tge new giuys ate settling in but can't cook, a hood chance to bond yada yada yada)

Post somw smart phone clips giving an insight into who tbe players are and some inner sanctum behind tbe scenes stuff . Quality doesnt matter. Kids wstch hundrrds iof ow quality clips on their various platforms. Rhey could care less about quality.

Easy, cheap and fans, particularly ypung people love it. Nba clubs do it all the time. No excuse for us not to be doing so also.

 

I reckon you'r right be.

Dland reporters have provided some high quality commentary and photos without any huge infrastructure or structural support.

The Qland troupe maintained the standard and well done to them.

The club provided content is necessarily formulating c as they are probably offered to conventional media. We still do not have enough clout to get the content on that media, unless it is Max's leg.

Its good that the club a team least posts its content to us but we are unlikely to get more cover until we have success.

Who knows Dland posters may have job opportunities (ie hardbacks son Liam) as we begin to forge our next premiership. By the time we have completed our three peat Saty, Baghdad, and George will be the Joffa of Demons.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Richmond

    A few years ago, the Melbourne Football Club produced a documentary about the decade in which it rose from its dystopic purgatory of regular thrashings to the euphoria of a premiership victory. That entire period could have been compressed in a fast motion version of the 2025 season to date as the Demons went from embarrassing basket case to glorious winner in an unexpected victory over the Dockers last Saturday. They transformed in a single week from a team that put in a pedestrian effort of predictably kicking the ball long down the line into attack that made a very ordinary Bombers outfit look like worldbeaters into a slick, fast moving side with urgency and a willingness to handball and create play with shorter kicks and by changing angles to generate an element of chaos that yielded six goals in each of the opening quarters against Freo. 

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 07

    Round 7 gets underway in iconic fashion with the traditional ANZAC Day blockbuster. The high-flying Magpies will be looking to solidify their spot atop the ladder, while the Bombers are desperate for a win to stay in touch with the top eight. Later that evening, Fremantle will be out to redeem themselves after a disappointing loss to the Demons, facing a hungry Adelaide side with eyes firmly set on breaking into the top four. Saturday serves up a triple-header of footy action. The Lions will be looking to consolidate their Top 2 spot as they head to Marvel Stadium to clash with the Saints. Over in Adelaide, Port Adelaide will be strong favourites at home against a struggling North Melbourne. The day wraps up with a fiery encounter in Canberra, where the Giants and Bulldogs renew their bitter rivalry. Sunday’s schedule kicks off with the Suns aiming to bounce back from their shock defeat to Richmond, taking on the out of form Swans.Then the Blues will be out to claim a major scalp when they battle the Cats at the MCG. The round finishes with a less-than-thrilling affair between Hawthorn and West Coast at Marvel. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

    • 3 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Fremantle

    For this year’s Easter Saturday game at the MCG, Simon Goodwin and his Demons wound the clock back a few years to wipe out the horrible memories of last season’s twin thrashings at the hands of the Dockers. And it was about time! Melbourne’s indomitable skipper Max Gawn put in a mammoth performance in shutting out his immediate opponent Sean Darcy in the ruck and around the ground and was a colossus at the end when the game was there to be won or lost. It was won by 16.11.107 to 14.13.97. There was the battery-charged Easter Bunny in Kysaiah Pickett running anyone wearing purple ragged, whether at midfield stoppages or around the big sticks. He finish with a five goal haul.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: UWS Giants

    The Casey Demons took on an undefeated UWS Giants outfit at their own home ground on a beautiful autumn day but found themselves completely out of their depth going down by 53 points against a well-drilled and fair superior combination. Despite having 15 AFL listed players at their disposal - far more than in their earlier matches this season - the Demons were never really in the game and suffered their second defeat in a row after their bright start to the season when they drew with the Kangaroos, beat the Suns and matched the Cats for most of the day on their own dung heap at Corio Bay. The Giants were a different proposition altogether. They had a very slight wind advantage in the opening quarter but were too quick off the mark for the Demons, tearing the game apart by the half way mark of the term when they kicked the first five goals with clean and direct football.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Richmond

    The Dees are back at the MCG on Thursday for the annual blockbuster ANZAC Eve game against the Tigers. Can the Demons win back to back games for the first time since Rounds 17 & 18 last season? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 204 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Fremantle

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on TUESDAY, 22nd April @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons first win for the year against the Dockers. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 46 replies
    Demonland