Jump to content

Featured Replies

I wonder if Frost's teammates rallied around him when May went off at him for 5 minutes or so in the Brisbane game.

If not then you could understand Frost looking for the nearest exit.  Players who get their noses put out of joint are prone to wanting out. 

I'd keep him not because he's a star but because he adds something different (pace & dash) And he is decent back-up. 

I'd be keeping Weideman for the same reason even though I only see Weideman as back-up. 

We've got too many C & D grade depth players as it is.  B-  players are better options.  The other thing is what do we get in return?  A pick in the 30's?  I'd rather keep him - unless he definitely wants out and then you do the best possible deal.

 
1 hour ago, Red and Blue realist said:

I suspect this might have something to do with us not giving Frost a contract yet. In the last game May played (Collingwood), he constantly looked like he was covering for Frost, and then Frost tunneled him in one of the contests. I wonder, and have said this previously, if May and Lever don't have full trust in Frost.

In 2018 we largely played a zone defense, and guys like May, Lever, Jetta and Hibberd play best in a zone structure. Whereas Frost needs a direct opponent, otherwise he gets too lost. We had to change the way our defense played this year in particular early in the year, but if the game plan is to go back to more of a zone going forward, well the question would be does Frost suit that?  

Some very astute observations there @Red and Blue realist

46 minutes ago, Macca said:

I wonder if Frost's teammates rallied around him when May went off at him for 5 minutes or so in the Brisbane game.

If not then you could understand Frost looking for the nearest exit.  Players who get their noses put out of joint are prone to wanting out. 

I'd keep him not because he's a star but because he adds something different (pace & dash) And he is decent back-up. 

I'd be keeping Weideman for the same reason even though I only see Weideman as back-up. 

We've got too many C & D grade depth players as it is.  B-  players are better options.  The other thing is what do we get in return?  A pick in the 30's?  I'd rather keep him - unless he definitely wants out and then you do the best possible deal.

This is a rubbish comment.  Players would have a go at each other all the time, it’s football ffs.

There is no way he would have even cared about the bust up.  It would have all been forgotten 24 hrs later.

 
25 minutes ago, Red and Blue realist said:

Article that focuses on Jake Lever, but doesn't mention Frost once. That might tell a very big story. Mentions Lever, May, hibbo and Jetta and how excited they are to play together. No mention of Frost, who was our only defender to play every game.

 

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2019-09-12/lever-keen-to-make-backline-a-force

To put that in context, here are the opening few lines.

JAKE Lever, Steven May, Michael Hibberd, Neville Jetta – the names go on.

This could’ve been Melbourne’s backline in 2019, but it never really got going

I think the gist of the article is mentioning the players that had injuries throughout the year and, thus, weren't able to play together.  It would explain why Frost isn't mentioned as he played all season.  Lever does mention the above three but, again, makes reference to the fact he hasn't played much with them due to injury.


I am now starting to feel that Frost is gone.

If true, I hope we have a win with the deal. That would be nice.

45 minutes ago, Red and Blue realist said:

Article that focuses on Jake Lever, but doesn't mention Frost once. That might tell a very big story. Mentions Lever, May, hibbo and Jetta and how excited they are to play together. No mention of Frost, who was our only defender to play every game.

 

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2019-09-12/lever-keen-to-make-backline-a-force

Never mentioned Salem either. No biggy I think they mentioned the injured players on purpose. Frost will stay.

1 hour ago, Demons11 said:

This is a rubbish comment.  Players would have a go at each other all the time, it’s football ffs.

There is no way he would have even cared about the bust up.  It would have all been forgotten 24 hrs later.

it's a strong response to a pretty fair comment

 
1 hour ago, Macca said:

We've got too many C & D grade depth players as it is.  B-  players are better options.  The other thing is what do we get in return?  A pick in the 30's?  I'd rather keep him - unless he definitely wants out and then you do the best possible deal.

That's the problem. We'll get offered their second round at best which will be pick 30 or an NQR player.

I think this is about money and opportunity for Frost.

2 hours ago, Macca said:

I wonder if Frost's teammates rallied around him when May went off at him for 5 minutes or so in the Brisbane game.

If not then you could understand Frost looking for the nearest exit.  Players who get their noses put out of joint are prone to wanting out. 

I'd keep him not because he's a star but because he adds something different (pace & dash) And he is decent back-up. 

I'd be keeping Weideman for the same reason even though I only see Weideman as back-up. 

We've got too many C & D grade depth players as it is.  B-  players are better options.  The other thing is what do we get in return?  A pick in the 30's?  I'd rather keep him - unless he definitely wants out and then you do the best possible deal.

I think Frost is pretty thick with the McDonald boys and Maxy.. you would hope they got a round him. in a list of 45, not everyone is going to get along, or at least its unlikely they will.


3 hours ago, Red and Blue realist said:

I suspect this might have something to do with us not giving Frost a contract yet. In the last game May played (Collingwood), he constantly looked like he was covering for Frost, and then Frost tunneled him in one of the contests. I wonder, and have said this previously, if May and Lever don't have full trust in Frost.

In 2018 we largely played a zone defense, and guys like May, Lever, Jetta and Hibberd play best in a zone structure. Whereas Frost needs a direct opponent, otherwise he gets too lost. We had to change the way our defense played this year in particular early in the year, but if the game plan is to go back to more of a zone going forward, well the question would be does Frost suit that?  

Good post. You certainly are a realist.

2 hours ago, Demons11 said:

There is no way he would have even cared about the bust up.  It would have all been forgotten 24 hrs later.

You obviously don't have any experience in these matters.  You're a bit wet behind the ears if you think a player being berated for over 5 minutes by a teammate is somehow ok

Happened again later in the year with Oliver & Fritsch.  Not only is it unprofessional,  it's churlush and childish.  Shouldn't have happened and should have been knocked on the head straight away - by the coach.  Apart from anything else,  it gives momentum to the team you're playing against.

So I'm more inclined to believe that your comments are rubbish,  not mine. 

Anyway,  I didn't state my opinion as fact.  I just opened up the possibility that Frost might have his nose out of joint from that incident.  Especially if his teammates didn't rally around him

It's a team sport and the players need to play as a team.  Not publicly embarrass them. 

You sound like one of these pound of flesh types.  You were probably egging May on to satisfy your frustrations.

 

6 minutes ago, Macca said:

You obviously don't have any experience in these matters.  You're a bit wet behind the ears if you think a player being berated for over 5 minutes by a teammate is somehow ok

Happened again later in the year with Oliver & Fritsch.  Not only is it unprofessional,  it's churlush and childish.  Shouldn't have happened and should have been knocked on the head straight away - by the coach.  Apart from anything else,  it gives momentum to the team you're playing against.

So I'm more inclined to believe that your comments are rubbish,  not mine. 

Anyway,  I didn't state my opinion as fact.  I just opened up the possibility that Frost might have his nose out of joint from that incident.  Especially if his teammates didn't rally around him

It's a team sport and the players need to play as a team.  Not publicly embarrass them. 

You sound like one of these pound of flesh types.  You were probably egging May on to satisfy your frustrations.

Good point.

I would have preferred that both May and Oliver had handled it the way the Hawks leadership team did with Wingard - he apparently didn't follow a team rule during that quarter.  At the break they stood on the field and had what looked like a tense discussion.  To me the club leaders dealing with it when cool is far better than a tirade from a team mate during the heat of play.

We have much to learn regarding teammate respect and leadership.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

5 hours ago, Mach5 said:

 

Serious question: how do you know he’s not demanding $800k pa?

It’s all relative.

If he is, then that is a bargain considering Twigs is on 850 and Maysie on similar coin.

As Rooey said, Frost gives supreme effort, and is the defender that most concerns an oppo forward.

 

We are a slow team, with sub effort everywhere.  Furthermore he is a MDMT that cam play small (Cameron Charlie) or a tall (Daniher).

 

The typically smug MFC supporter has suddenly gone from 'not AFL standard' to 'dont overlook his deficiency'.  

We dont have a frigging clue.  Sadly, I am not just talking about the average supporter.

This is Goodwin-Pert rebuilding, and not sane sensible and sober decision making for this supposed window.  One swallow made our summer.  How pathetic.

Frost goes, and the membership dept shouldnt bother calling.

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Good point.

I would have preferred that both May and Oliver had handled it the way the Hawks leadership team did with Wingard - he apparently didn't follow a team rule during that quarter.  At the break they stood on the field and had what looked like a tense discussion.  To me the club leaders dealing with it when cool is far better than a tirade from a team mate during the heat of play.

We have much to learn regarding teammate respect and leadership.

Let's get some facts corrected here. You explaing what they did at QTR time huddle with Wingard is exactly what May did with Frost during the 3QTR time break.

Whats the difference there?


12 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Let's get some facts corrected here. You explaing what they did at QTR time huddle with Wingard is exactly what May did with Frost during the 3QTR time break.

Whats the difference there?

iirc May first had a go at Frost during the quarter.  He continued it into the break.

May isn't part of our leadership team. 

He wasn't calm like the Hawks leaders. 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

18 minutes ago, TGR said:

If he is, then that is a bargain considering Twigs is on 850 and Maysie on similar coin.

As Rooey said, Frost gives supreme effort, and is the defender that most concerns an oppo forward.

 

We are a slow team, with sub effort everywhere.  Furthermore he is a MDMT that cam play small (Cameron Charlie) or a tall (Daniher).

 

The typically smug MFC supporter has suddenly gone from 'not AFL standard' to 'dont overlook his deficiency'.  

We dont have a frigging clue.  Sadly, I am not just talking about the average supporter.

This is Goodwin-Pert rebuilding, and not sane sensible and sober decision making for this supposed window.  One swallow made our summer.  How pathetic.

Frost goes, and the membership dept shouldnt bother calling.

 

 

 

 

That’s just embarrassing for you.

27 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

iirc May first had a go at Frost during the quarter.  He continued it into the break.

May isn't part of our leadership team. 

He wasn't calm like the Hawks leaders. 

Just like they were having a go at Wingard also during the game.

You're seriously kidding yourself if you think those hawks leaders haven't had robust discussion behind closed doors and during games. 

Oh and May has captain an AFL club. Regardless whether they were putrid or not, hes obviously shown high qualitie leadership skills to be put into that position to captain a club.

5 hours ago, Red and Blue realist said:

I suspect this might have something to do with us not giving Frost a contract yet. In the last game May played (Collingwood), he constantly looked like he was covering for Frost, and then Frost tunneled him in one of the contests. I wonder, and have said this previously, if May and Lever don't have full trust in Frost.

In 2018 we largely played a zone defense, and guys like May, Lever, Jetta and Hibberd play best in a zone structure. Whereas Frost needs a direct opponent, otherwise he gets too lost. We had to change the way our defense played this year in particular early in the year, but if the game plan is to go back to more of a zone going forward, well the question would be does Frost suit that?  

interesting as May stated to me that he prefers a lock down roll , rather than Zone defence. He prefers to be given one player and follow them and nullify their game. He said he had to get used to this Zone style. 

Edited by markc

 

1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Good point.

I would have preferred that both May and Oliver had handled it the way the Hawks leadership team did with Wingard - he apparently didn't follow a team rule during that quarter.  At the break they stood on the field and had what looked like a tense discussion.  To me the club leaders dealing with it when cool is far better than a tirade from a team mate during the heat of play.

We have much to learn regarding teammate respect and leadership.

Putting all the reasons for Frost possibly leaving aside.  I've said my bit and others have said their bit.  We're not all going to agree so it's best to make the most out of a possible trade (from the club's point of view)

If he is going and he is out of contract,  what bargaining chips does our club have?  I'd say not much at all. Does he become a Delisted free agent if not traded or re-contracted? Or does he have to enter the draft?  

If he had a year or 2 left on his contract it's a different story but right now he can effectively walk anyway.

Worse case scenario is that we get a swap of 4th round picks for Frost.  Or marginally better

Stand corrected on the details

 


2 minutes ago, markc said:

interesting as May stated to me that he prefers a lock down roll , rather than Zone defence. He prefers to be given one player and follow them and nullify their game. He said he had to get used to this Zone style. 

And, I recall him saying he didn't get a fitness program until he arrived for preseason and that his weight was fine for the lock down roll but the demon's zone role required him to lose weight.

One wonders how much communication there was about his role before he signed up.

Just now, Lucifer's Hero said:

And, I recall him saying he didn't get a fitness program until he arrived for preseason and that his weight was fine for the lock down roll but the demon's zone role required him to lose weight.

One wonders how much communication there was about his role before he signed up.

he pretty well said the same thing to me , he had to get much fitter for the new roll. 

he was very open and honest about it .

6 minutes ago, Macca said:

Putting all the reasons for Frost possibly leaving aside.  I've said my bit and others have said their bit.  We're not all going to agree so it's best to make the most out of a possible trade (from the club's point of view)

If he is going and he is out of contract,  what bargaining chips does our club have?  I'd say not much at all. Does he become a Delisted free agent if not traded or re-contracted? Or does he have to enter the draft?  

If he had a year or 2 left on his contract it's a different story but right now he can effectively walk anyway.

Worse case scenario is that we get a swap of 4th round picks for Frost.  Or marginally better

Stand corrected on the details

No bargaining chip at all.  Our only real option is to equal another club's offer which seems unlikely on the mixed reports.

Yes, he becomes an Unrestricted Free Agent.  We have to delist him before he can enter the draft. 

But as soon as we delist him (if we did) someone would snap him up as an UFA as he can walk to the club of his choice and we get zip.

If he wants to go best we get a trade done.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

 

Dees should be hell bent in keeping Frosty... 

He gives 100% week in week out. Might make some mistakes. But which defender doesn’t? He does a hell of a lot right!

I was rapt when we got him and would be rapt to keep him...

26 minutes ago, markc said:

interesting as May stated to me that he prefers a lock down roll , rather than Zone defence. He prefers to be given one player and follow them and nullify their game. He said he had to get used to this Zone style. 

He's come from Gold Coast, its all about self preservation up that way. One on one type operator.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies