Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

6. Gawn - great again against a very promising opponent. 8 marks, 18 possessions, 40 hit outs, all class

5. Petracca - 3 goals and 20 possessions, always a danger

4. Harmes - another workmanlike job.

3. Oliver - quiet in the second but otherwise a good game

2. Lever - disposal was shoddy but 9 marks

1. Salem - best of the rest probably

 

6. Gawn

5. Oliver

4. Lever

3. Petracca

2. Harmes

1. Salem

Petracca - easily bog for me. For the amount of opportunities he had it was a great game. 

Harmes

gawn

fristch

viney

salem


6. Gawn

5. Trac

4.Harmes

3. Jetta

2. Fritsch 

1. Salem

 

Bitterly sad to see a once in a generation ruckman carry this pathetic excuse of a footy side.

6) Gawn

5) Petracca

4) Harmes 

3) Lever

2) Oliver 

1) Frost

6.  Gawn

5.  Tracc

4.  Clarry

3.  Harmes

With the exception of these four, the remainder of the team either played a two sided game with two many flaws/turnovers or were completely shizen.  Some were a mile off AFL level tonight.  Unfortunately Oskar Baker was virtually unsighted with only three effective disposals, four turnovers and one miserly tackle.  


6 Gawn

5 Harmes

4 Petracca 

3 Lever 

2 Oliver

1 Frost

yes Fritsch and Salem next in line

more passengers AGAIN this week

-3 Omcd -2 J Wagner -1 TSmith 

Do people just automatically put Gawn as the best player? Not a huge influence in my opinion 

6. Harmes

5. Petracca

4. Lever

3.Gawn

2. Salem

1.  ????

6 votes is way to many for this mob, it’s to hard most weeks to find 6 good players 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Billy said:

Do people just automatically put Gawn as the best player? Not a huge influence in my opinion 

6. Harmes

5. Petracca

4. Lever

3.Gawn

2. Salem

1.  ????

6 votes is way to many for this mob, it’s to hard most weeks to find 6 good players 

 

 

Go back and have another look at the game.  18 disposals at 83% plus 8 marks as well as double digit hit outs to advantage and 40 hit outs in total against a very decent opponent.  He is carrying this side at the moment. The problem he has is that the benchmark he has set is now so ridiculously high that he needs to be twice as good as his opponent to be considered to have had an influence.  Imagine what last night would have looked like without him (you got a brief glimpse when Bruce kicked two of his goals playing in the ruck against Smith).

6 - Max

5 - Tracc

4 - Harmes

3 - Clayton

2 - Lever

1 - Frost

Without Frost & Lever we would have gone down by 60 points.................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


6.OMac

5. ANB

4. J. Wagner

3. C. Wagner

2. Baker

1. T. Smith

18 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

6.OMac

5. ANB

4. J. Wagner

3. C. Wagner

2. Baker

1. T. Smith

Casey’s finest

6. Gawn

5. Oliver

4. Petracca

3. Harmes

2. Frost

1. Lever

Every one of the above has played better games than they played last night and all made mistakes or were poor in patches, but in my view, they were still better the remaining 16 players.

Edited by La Dee-vina Comedia

6. Petracca

5. Oliver

4. Gawn

3. Harmes

2. Fritsch

1. Frost


6.  Gawn

5.  Petracca

4.  Harmes

3.  Frost

2.  Lever

1.  Fritsch

6 Gawn

5 Petracca

4 Harmes

3 Lever

2 Oliver

1 Frost

  • Author

Max is back in command

Progressive voting -

191. Max Gawn    

169. Clayton Oliver    

129. Christian Salem

122. James Harmes

74. Angus Brayshaw  

66. Jack Viney         

51. Sam Frost 

48. Nathan Jones     

42. Marty Hore    

38. Christian Petracca

36. Steven May

31. Jake Melksham         

30. Bayley Fritsch

28. Jayden Hunt       

27. Tom McDonald   

13. Michael Hibberd 

12. Jay Lockhart    

7. Jake Lever Harry Petty

5. Oskar Baker Braydon Preuss

4. Josh Wagner  

3. Corey Wagner Sam Weideman  

2. Alex Neal-Bullen     

1. Jeff Garlett Neville Jetta Jordan Lewis Oscar McDonald Billy Stretch         

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...