Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
41 minutes ago, Soidee said:

Damn good assessment 

Agree. A quality read with some strong points and arguments. 100% agree with his comments about our surfeit of contested ball winners and it is a point I have made since roos came to the club (which by the by is why I reckon roos should shoulder some blame for our unbalanced list and lack of skills for that matter).

He doesn't note that the he issue of too many contested ball winnets is componded by the fact all are butchers with the ball.

My only quibble is that he like so many others, does not take into account that it is not injury alone that is our issue. The issue is injury PLUS a rubbish preseason (an issue that was in turn compounded by some players not coming back in great shape if Lewis is to be believed). We were never close to being fit enough as our scoring (or more accurately our lack of scoring) p patterns clearly showed.

I feel pretty strongly that we are going to come to the stage where we have to trade one of the three big inside bulls, Viney, Brayshaw, Oliver and in my opinion Viney is the most one dimensional of the three. 

 
1 hour ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

I feel pretty strongly that we are going to come to the stage where we have to trade one of the three big inside bulls, Viney, Brayshaw, Oliver and in my opinion Viney is the most one dimensional of the three. 

If Oliver is in any such discussions i'll eat my hat PO.

And i doubt Viney would be looked at while Todd is in the house.  The fact he had an interrupted pre-season, gut feel is the FD will be keeping the faith here for an expected return to 'the old Jack' in 2020 assuming a full pre-seaaon.

That leaves Gus.  I think his underwhelming performance leaves him a tad vulnerable.  Who knows he might also want to head back home anyway to play with bro.  Meant to be?

Agree with the sentiment though.  Something has to give as we are well 'overweight' inside mids.  Time to free up some room if possible for some genuine outside and/or forward talent.

Edited by Rusty Nails

1 hour ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

I feel pretty strongly that we are going to come to the stage where we have to trade one of the three big inside bulls, Viney, Brayshaw, Oliver and in my opinion Viney is the most one dimensional of the three. 

You can’t trade Oliver. I do believe every player is tradeable for the right price. It’s just no club can afford him / offer a realistic trade.

Viney is father son that addressed leadership issues from the moment he arrived and drives standards across the club. He is feared by opposition when his body holds up.

Brayshaw is a favourite of mine and I think his kicking misfortune is more to do with what is ahead of him ie. our structures than his poor use.

Of the 3 only Brayshaw could be traded and that is doubtful with his concussion issues meaning we wouldn’t get what a player with his output deserves.

One thing often neglected in these threads is the lack of players wanting to leave MELBOURNE. We wanted Hogan out and had to push Watts out kicking and squealing.

List management has many facets but keeping key personal is vitally important if not the most important factor. Particularly, in the age of free agency where you can lose or gain serious talent for nothing but salary cap space.

 


4 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

He is a die-in-the-woods North supporter.  Keen observer of the game and has the knack of being quite neutral and objective in his articles.  Not to mention insightful.

A what?

29 minutes ago, Mach5 said:

A what?

I'll have a stab, when dogs are sick they go off and 'die in the woods'. Thus when NM are sick (aka [censored]), he wanders off - a true bandwagon supporter.

7 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

I'll have a stab, when dogs are sick they go off and 'die in the woods'. Thus when NM are sick (aka [censored]), he wanders off - a true bandwagon supporter.

 

I reckon LH was going for dyed-in-the-wool

 
8 hours ago, Mach5 said:

A what?

LOL!!

Just shows what a mess auto correct and not checking typing can make.

Should read: 'dyed-in-the-wool'

Good pick-up

Edit: just saw your last post - spot on!

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

8 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

I'll have a stab, when dogs are sick they go off and 'die in the woods'. Thus when NM are sick (aka [censored]), he wanders off - a true bandwagon supporter.

Love it!

Gave me a great laugh - always a good first thing in the morning.


On 8/22/2019 at 12:18 PM, MikeAlphaTango said:

Not sure if either have been mentioned but surely we'd be looking at the below mature aged players from the state leagues.

Matt Hammellman has kicked 60 + goals two years in a row in the NEAFL. Previously listed at Brisbane and delisted in 2017. 197cm strong marking forward.

Liam McBean is leading the SANFL goal kicking this year with 46 goals from 17 games. 202cm forward, delisted by Richmond in 2016.

 

Love the name

 

Kerr from the blues officially delisted, this is someone i would consider as a delisted free agent or a rookie, he's big and strong, has a good set of hands and has a real presence around the ground. considering he'd come for nothing i think we could do a lot worse than roll the dice on this kid for a year or 2 

Thoughts on Zac Fisher? i think he's got a lot of the attributes we're looking for. i've heard the Blues are potentially open to including him in trade packages to land jack Martin. i wonder if we could get involved in that and get him to the club. 

 

OUT: LEWIS, STRETCH, MAYNARD, KENNEDY HARRIS, HUNT, NEAL-BULLEN, GARLETT, T.SMITH, J.WAGNER, KEILTY

IN: JENKINS, LANGDON, AMON, ANDERSON, 4 DRAFT PICKS, ROOKIE

LANGDON FOR 2ND ROUND PICK

AMON FOR NEAL-BULLEN

JENKINS FOR STRETCH

3RD ROUND PICK FOR HUNT

 

B: JETTA, MAY, LEVER

HB: HIBBERD, FROST, SALEM

C : LANGDON, OLIVER, AMON

HF: MELKSHAM, T.MCDONALD, PETRACCA

F: FRITSCH, JENKINS, PETTY

FOLL: GAWN, VINEY, BRAYSHAW

IC: HARMES, JONES, ANDERSON, VANDENBERG

 

CASEY

B: NEITSHCKE, O.MCDONALD, WALKER

HB: DRAFT PICK, HORE, KOLODJASHNIJ

C : DRAFT PICK, SPARROW, BAKER

HF: DRAFT PICK, WEIDEMAN, HANNAN

F: DRAFT PICK, BRADTKE, J.SMITH

FOLL: PREUSS, JORDON, SPARGO

IC: LOCKHART, C.WAGNER, DUNKLEY, CHANDLER

EMERG: BEDFORD, ROOKIE


3 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

OUT: LEWIS, STRETCH, MAYNARD, KENNEDY HARRIS, HUNT, NEAL-BULLEN, GARLETT, T.SMITH, J.WAGNER, KEILTY

IN: JENKINS, LANGDON, AMON, ANDERSON, 4 DRAFT PICKS, ROOKIE

LANGDON FOR 2ND ROUND PICK

AMON FOR NEAL-BULLEN

JENKINS FOR STRETCH

3RD ROUND PICK FOR HUNT

 

B: JETTA, MAY, LEVER

HB: HIBBERD, FROST, SALEM

C : LANGDON, OLIVER, AMON

HF: MELKSHAM, T.MCDONALD, PETRACCA

F: FRITSCH, JENKINS, PETTY

FOLL: GAWN, VINEY, BRAYSHAW

IC: HARMES, JONES, ANDERSON, VANDENBERG

 

CASEY

B: NEITSHCKE, O.MCDONALD, WALKER

HB: DRAFT PICK, HORE, KOLODJASHNIJ

C : DRAFT PICK, SPARROW, BAKER

HF: DRAFT PICK, WEIDEMAN, HANNAN

F: DRAFT PICK, BRADTKE, J.SMITH

FOLL: PREUSS, JORDON, SPARGO

IC: LOCKHART, C.WAGNER, DUNKLEY, CHANDLER

EMERG: BEDFORD, ROOKIE

Missed these moves

i wonder, if we do execute the split with the two picks in the teens that gw$ hold, whether we'll go for brodie kemp, the kid who did his knee but was originally touted as a top five pick?

4 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

OUT: LEWIS, STRETCH, MAYNARD, KENNEDY HARRIS, HUNT, NEAL-BULLEN, GARLETT, T.SMITH, J.WAGNER, KEILTY

IN: JENKINS, LANGDON, AMON, ANDERSON, 4 DRAFT PICKS, ROOKIE

LANGDON FOR 2ND ROUND PICK

AMON FOR NEAL-BULLEN

JENKINS FOR STRETCH

3RD ROUND PICK FOR HUNT

 

B: JETTA, MAY, LEVER

HB: HIBBERD, FROST, SALEM

C : LANGDON, OLIVER, AMON

HF: MELKSHAM, T.MCDONALD, PETRACCA

F: FRITSCH, JENKINS, PETTY

FOLL: GAWN, VINEY, BRAYSHAW

IC: HARMES, JONES, ANDERSON, VANDENBERG

 

CASEY

B: NEITSHCKE, O.MCDONALD, WALKER

HB: DRAFT PICK, HORE, KOLODJASHNIJ

C : DRAFT PICK, SPARROW, BAKER

HF: DRAFT PICK, WEIDEMAN, HANNAN

F: DRAFT PICK, BRADTKE, J.SMITH

FOLL: PREUSS, JORDON, SPARGO

IC: LOCKHART, C.WAGNER, DUNKLEY, CHANDLER

EMERG: BEDFORD, ROOKIE

Do really rate Petty to figure in our best forward line?

I would rather see Wiederman get more time 

5 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

OUT: LEWIS, STRETCH, MAYNARD, KENNEDY HARRIS, HUNT, NEAL-BULLEN, GARLETT, T.SMITH, J.WAGNER, KEILTY

IN: JENKINS, LANGDON, AMON, ANDERSON, 4 DRAFT PICKS, ROOKIE

LANGDON FOR 2ND ROUND PICK

AMON FOR NEAL-BULLEN

JENKINS FOR STRETCH

3RD ROUND PICK FOR HUNT

 

B: JETTA, MAY, LEVER

HB: HIBBERD, FROST, SALEM

C : LANGDON, OLIVER, AMON

HF: MELKSHAM, T.MCDONALD, PETRACCA

F: FRITSCH, JENKINS, PETTY

FOLL: GAWN, VINEY, BRAYSHAW

IC: HARMES, JONES, ANDERSON, VANDENBERG

 

CASEY

B: NEITSHCKE, O.MCDONALD, WALKER

HB: DRAFT PICK, HORE, KOLODJASHNIJ

C : DRAFT PICK, SPARROW, BAKER

HF: DRAFT PICK, WEIDEMAN, HANNAN

F: DRAFT PICK, BRADTKE, J.SMITH

FOLL: PREUSS, JORDON, SPARGO

IC: LOCKHART, C.WAGNER, DUNKLEY, CHANDLER

EMERG: BEDFORD, ROOKIE

I like it. Trades make sense to get Langdon, Jenkins and Amon.  Anb and Stretch are perfect trade options. Walker will be gone but probably only have 44/45 on list. 

Use pick #2 or 3 on Anderson/Ash. #39 (Miles Bergman Wing) # 57 (Brodie Newman HBF) 

rookie option is Blake Kuipers. 196cm ruck/forward.  Impressed in games for Dandenong Stingrays. Reminds me of Tom Lynch (tigers) in style but only new to footy after volleyball background.  Huge potential. 

2 hours ago, Kent said:

Do really rate Petty to figure in our best forward line?

I would rather see Wiederman get more time 

I thought Petty was more impressive better around the ground and defensively. Can't rely on Weideman has to show plenty next pre season.


1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

I like it. Trades make sense to get Langdon, Jenkins and Amon.  Anb and Stretch are perfect trade options. Walker will be gone but probably only have 44/45 on list. 

Use pick #2 or 3 on Anderson/Ash. #39 (Miles Bergman Wing) # 57 (Brodie Newman HBF) 

rookie option is Blake Kuipers. 196cm ruck/forward.  Impressed in games for Dandenong Stingrays. Reminds me of Tom Lynch (tigers) in style but only new to footy after volleyball background.  Huge potential. 

With the draft picks I'm looking at 3 wingman\hbf and 3 small forwards. Do you have any small forwards we can look at?

3 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

i wonder, if we do execute the split with the two picks in the teens that gw$ hold, whether we'll go for brodie kemp, the kid who did his knee but was originally touted as a top five pick?

I hope so - he is described as playing like the Bont. That is good enough for me.

8 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

OUT: LEWIS, STRETCH, MAYNARD, KENNEDY HARRIS, HUNT, NEAL-BULLEN, GARLETT, T.SMITH, J.WAGNER, KEILTY

IN: JENKINS, LANGDON, AMON, ANDERSON, 4 DRAFT PICKS, ROOKIE

LANGDON FOR 2ND ROUND PICK

AMON FOR NEAL-BULLEN

JENKINS FOR STRETCH

3RD ROUND PICK FOR HUNT

not sure the adelaide teams would go for these trades mate!!

jenkins would be on 600K+,  rubbish soft player too

stretch would be close to delisting unfortunately

 
8 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

AMON FOR NEAL-BULLEN

JENKINS FOR STRETCH

I always love these types of theories "I don't want these players so I'll use them in trades". why in earth would either side do those deals?

Unless opposition clubs come out and say they want either of our players they stay (or get delisted)

12 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Thoughts on Zac Fisher? i think he's got a lot of the attributes we're looking for. i've heard the Blues are potentially open to including him in trade packages to land jack Martin. i wonder if we could get involved in that and get him to the club. 

One of their better players. That'd be quite incredible if they traded him.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 527 replies