Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

That would make you my grand son.

You're Lee Hoi-chuen? 

Image result for bruce lee father

 
7 hours ago, SaberFang said:

Not in a million years would I trade pick 5 for Steven May. Jesus! What a disastrous outcome that would be.

I'd rather take a punt in the draft with talent that high, at least you'll get a decade longer out of them!

GC will want a high pick because if he stays the compo pick they get next year will be high.

7 hours ago, Krazy Jaeger O'Smeara said:

I'm hearing very similar 

Me too.

 

 

 

But only from reading yours and  CHF's posts.

 
6 hours ago, EnterTheDragon said:

See DrD’s post above. He nails it. Frost/OMac v Lynch/Riewoldt? v Kennedy/Darling? v Patton/Cameron? Please.

Who are you trying to kid LordNev.

And who cares if it’s slightly overs for May? Freo are likely to pay us slightly overs for Hogan. Swings and roundabouts.

It’s all about winning a premiership now for the Melbourne Football Club. Not forever mining for draft gold that may or may not materialise.

May is a gun. And an absolute brute to boot. Or do you have better judgment than the MFC, Hawks, Bombers and Pies football departments? Coz it really seems like you think you do.

I have no idea 'who you are' (though if you are a poster who has changed their name and not made it clear - eg in the sig block as some respectful posters have - that's all I need to know to assess your credibility) but really you have some front knocking posters, as you frequently do, given you write some very silly things.

As ane example you have zero idea what the judgement of any football department is. All you know is some have spoken to may and MIGHT be interested in trading for him. But no clue as to what they think he is worth or prepared to pay. Other than of course what numnskulls like Sam McClure 'report' - that's to say guess.

Sheesh

 

Edited by binman

8 hours ago, Redleg said:

The elephants have entered the ring, after the clowns and jugglers.

This one ?

 

elephant.png


May is 26, turning 27 in january, so why do I keep reading "28 year old" on here?

7 hours ago, monoccular said:

Oh ...

 so his foot has healed, at least for now?

 

Ambivalent - ambidextrous - ambulatory. I was playing word association football.

7 hours ago, RalphiusMaximus said:

Got five weeks not that long ago.  Do you give a first round pick for a 28 year old who's one stray elbow away from a lifetime ban? 

Completely stupid post

 
9 hours ago, Dee tention said:

OUT - Hogan, Melb 2019 1st Round Future Pick, Pick 33

IN - Pick 5, Freos 2019 1st Round Future Pick, Ed Langdon

IN - May, Kade K, Pick 26, 

OUT - Freos 2019 1st Round Pick, Dom Tyson, Pick 43

 

Is Gaff still coming ?


8 hours ago, RalphiusMaximus said:

I want to know how far May is off a lifetime ban.  He's been rubbed out a few times.  Got five weeks not that long ago.  Do you give a first round pick for a 28 year old who's one stray elbow away from a lifetime ban? 

May turns 28 in 2020.

You mean we're already there ?

33 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Ambivalent - ambidextrous - ambulatory. I was playing word association football.

Ambulance.

did I miss anything ?  Or can I go back to sleep ?


21 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Is Gaff still coming ?

He’s still deciding.

12 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Ambulance.

Ambitious!

22 minutes ago, ProDee said:

Is Gaff still coming ?

He was scared Angus would belt him into oblivion for the remainder of his career!

13 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Ambulance.

Irony from a lawyer ????


9 hours ago, Redleg said:

You have changed the goal posts and gone beyond the statement you asked me to comment on.

Hush.  Don't give the AFL any more stupid ideas.

1 hour ago, binman said:

I have no idea 'who you are' (though if you are a poster who has changed their name and not made it clear - eg in the sig block as some respectful posters have - that's all I need to know to assess your credibility) but really you have some front knocking posters, as you frequently do, given you write some very silly things.

As ane example you have zero idea what the judgement of any football department is. All you know is some have spoken to may and MIGHT be interested in trading for him. But no clue as to what they think he is worth or prepared to pay. Other than of course what numnskulls like Sam McClure 'report' - that's to say guess.

Sheesh

 

He joined on Sept 27, but he’s definitely been here before; he referred to @Fifty-5 as “old55” in another post recently, when 55 dropped the “old” years ago. I’m guessing Range Rover or poster of that type. I could probably do some sleuthing to get to the bottom of it, but I can’t really be bothered.

8 hours ago, RalphiusMaximus said:

I want to know how far May is off a lifetime ban.  He's been rubbed out a few times.  Got five weeks not that long ago.  Do you give a first round pick for a 28 year old who's one stray elbow away from a lifetime ban? 

I don't believe the 16 weeks cumulative life time ban applies in AFL, only local leagues?

 
8 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Ambitious!

The ambience on Demonland and most posters ambivalence towards Jesse, not to mention the ambiguous messages coming from both clubs now has Freo in a position to ambush us on this trade....I'm thinking Jesse has been a good ambassador in the past and it's now time to move him on, for the most part I think Jesse has been amble and his ambition for a successful career now lays in his own hands

2 minutes ago, SFebes said:

The ambience on Demonland and most posters ambivalence towards Jesse, not to mention the ambiguous messages coming from both clubs now has Freo in a position to ambush us on this trade....I'm thinking Jesse has been a good ambassador in the past and it's now time to move him on, for the most part I think Jesse has been amble and his ambition for a successful career now lays in his own hands

OK, now that we've done the letter A let's move on to B and head towards 300.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 26 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
    • 235 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
    • 47 replies