Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

It was interesring to hear one radio commentator in the very one sided WAFL Grand Final comment on the number of players who lost their footing today and in RECENT GAMES at the ground. Is the surface more slippery than others? Didn't seem to be a problem for the Weagles though. Maybe they had boots better equipped for the ground. The lost footing and falling certainly cost us plenty yesterday. Must have happened three or more times which is not normal for our boys. Thoughts?

 

I was at Optus Stadium today watching the Falcons getting belted.

They did go to ground fairly regularly.

This ground hates Red and Blue.

I thought they stopped playing games at Optus Oval  (Princess Park) back in 2005???

 

I posted after the round 22 that we slipped a lot in that game too.  Aren't most boots universal, I was thinking maybe the grass is still getting deep roots???  At times it did cause turnovers that resulted in goals

 

I noticed Pie's players also slipped in their final there.

 

 

The Optus Oval staff over watered the grass. The Weagles knew and wore longer studs. We wore what we had for training and kept slipping. It is blatant cheating by The Eagles supporting staff but probably not actionable. The AFL should investigate though. 


43 minutes ago, Thehardtackler said:

The Optus Oval staff over watered the grass. The Weagles knew and wore longer studs. We wore what we had for training and kept slipping. It is blatant cheating by The Eagles supporting staff but probably not actionable. The AFL should investigate though. 

I was at the game and I thought this too.  But the players did a warm up long enough to have got a feel for the surface.

11 minutes ago, hells bells said:

I was at the game and I thought this too.  But the players did a warm up long enough to have got a feel for the surface.

Warm-up isn't at full speed under pressure though.

 

This also happened to Collingwood in their final at Optus. It's not just a coincidence. 

1 minute ago, Bonkers said:

This also happened to Collingwood in their final at Optus. It's not just a coincidence. 

Someone ought to have been paying attention.


28 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Someone ought to have been paying attention.

It happened to us in the game we won too. Although not as bad.

30 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Someone ought to have been paying attention.

Agree. Surely in the warmup or at some stage the players or runner or whoever tests  the surface at pace and turning etc. If not we are not as professional as we should be. 

12 hours ago, MadAsHell said:

I thought they stopped playing games at Optus Oval  (Princess Park) back in 2005???

Big believer in not promoting the brand name on these ovals.

Does anyone know if the new Perth stadium has a common name a la Kardinia Park etc

Would be interested to hear comments about the raised ground viewing area and the fence. The high fence is certainly a worrying look on TV.

Thanks

1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Big believer in not promoting the brand name on these ovals.

Does anyone know if the new Perth stadium has a common name a la Kardinia Park etc

Would be interested to hear comments about the raised ground viewing area and the fence. The high fence is certainly a worrying look on TV.

Thanks

May just be Burswood Oval.

Have to say that while it's an aesthetically good looking ground, it's pumped up way too much. Poorly signed & maned aisles and limited room around the concourse. Give me the MCG anyday.

1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Big believer in not promoting the brand name on these ovals.

Why?


2 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Big believer in not promoting the brand name on these ovals.

Does anyone know if the new Perth stadium has a common name a la Kardinia Park etc

Would be interested to hear comments about the raised ground viewing area and the fence. The high fence is certainly a worrying look on TV.

Thanks

so you'd have Dockland as Marvel-less  ??

2 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Big believer in not promoting the brand name on these ovals.

Does anyone know if the new Perth stadium has a common name a la Kardinia Park etc

Would be interested to hear comments about the raised ground viewing area and the fence. The high fence is certainly a worrying look on TV.

Thanks

The lobster pot, apparently, is its nickname locally

17 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

so you'd have Dockland as Marvel-less  ??

Definitely ....that place has had more name changes than I have had hot dinners

To me it has always been Docklands but I'm tending toward Iceberg Stadium after going there a few times this year

3 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Big believer in not promoting the brand name on these ovals.

Does anyone know if the new Perth stadium has a common name a la Kardinia Park etc

Would be interested to hear comments about the raised ground viewing area and the fence. The high fence is certainly a worrying look on TV.

Thanks

A friend was over there on Saturday and says they call it 'The Craypot' locally. His main take-out was that it was incredibly loud and reckons it would have been pretty intimidating to play in. Sounds like it will become a fortress for the Weagles in the coming years.


It was too damn hot....worst day at the footy ever I was in the blazing sun the entire match thought I was going to roast. Night footy there in future only please, 1:20PM in Perth Springtime, madness

19 minutes ago, sisso said:

It was too damn hot....worst day at the footy ever I was in the blazing sun the entire match thought I was going to roast. Night footy there in future only please, 1:20PM in Perth Springtime, madness

the dreaded tv driven time slots and in this instance the madness of having to get a flight back to Melbourne.

At the world cup this year the TV slots worked in reverse and the games were often late. Had two games that started at 9:30pm. Boy did that give the Colombians time to charge up before heading for the stadium.

3 hours ago, MadAsHell said:

May just be Burswood Oval.

Have to say that while it's an aesthetically good looking ground, it's pumped up way too much. Poorly signed & maned aisles and limited room around the concourse. Give me the MCG anyday.

I though [censored] was pretty good all around. Agree on poor signing though. using asile no bay is misleading as each 'bay' is obviously borded by different aisles. 

My mate and i paid top dollar for our seast ($190 plus) and were right at the very back of level i. Couldn't believe it but seats were under an overhang, which i knew they would be as i had looked at the virtual ground thingo.

But i assumed there would be no restriction on viewing. Was very disappointed there was pill box effect and you would lose track of the ball when kicked high. They also had some square things  hanging off the edge of the overhang which blocked the view.

Most bizarre of all was that you could not see the score board. At all! i mean this is brand new 1 billion dollar stadium.

The saving grace was that we were in the shade. It was hot and the sun sharp and the demons fans in front om looked as if they were cooking. Given how bad the game was i at least pleased i didn't roast. 

Another strange thing was entry. We just filed in with hundreds of other through an open gate and someone had hand scanner. Had a bag but there was only one guys searching and people were  just flowing past him, as i did. Crazy

 
3 hours ago, binman said:

I though [censored] was pretty good all around. Agree on poor signing though. using asile no bay is misleading as each 'bay' is obviously borded by different aisles. 

My mate and i paid top dollar for our seast ($190 plus) and were right at the very back of level i. Couldn't believe it but seats were under an overhang, which i knew they would be as i had looked at the virtual ground thingo.

But i assumed there would be no restriction on viewing.

Welcome to the Western Australian way of doing things.

Seat locations

Our tickets, were for seats on Level 3, Section 353, which was really Level 2, Section 354. Attendant looked askance at us when we mentioned this made no sense, surprised they didn't go with the old "From Victoria are you"  chestnut,  truly bizarre.

Restricted viewing

We got talking to some Eagles supporters pre-match. The front row, Level 3 seats sold as "MFC Premium"  are actually cut price Eagles members seats in the regular season as they have the view restricted by glass panels.

As you state, billions spent on design and construction of a stadium where front row seats have restricted views, and your seat number doesn't actually match where your seat is!!

Seems they ticketing team "saw us coming" and gypped MFC with the dud seats in the sun with restricted viewing

 

 

2 hours ago, nomed said:

Welcome to the Western Australian way of doing things.

Seat locations

Our tickets, were for seats on Level 3, Section 353, which was really Level 2, Section 354. Attendant looked askance at us when we mentioned this made no sense, surprised they didn't go with the old "From Victoria are you"  chestnut,  truly bizarre.

Restricted viewing

We got talking to some Eagles supporters pre-match. The front row, Level 3 seats sold as "MFC Premium"  are actually cut price Eagles members seats in the regular season as they have the view restricted by glass panels.

As you state, billions spent on design and construction of a stadium where front row seats have restricted views, and your seat number doesn't actually match where your seat is!!

Seems they ticketing team "saw us coming" and gypped MFC with the dud seats in the sun with restricted viewing

 

 

ah.. the old discretionary re classification trick

At the world cup they reclassified most of the stadiums to category 1 for the round of 16 onwards

Nosebleed for US$250 round of 16.

Worth complaining about Optus* though if only to get some transparency in the ticketing arrangements :)

Sorry should have said Craypot Stadium

Edited by Diamond_Jim


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies