Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Its the 5% im worried about!!

 

 

Champion Data are rubbish.

With that said and looking at the draw, I think we’ll fall over the line by percentage without winning another game.  It’ll be absurd, and some may even say undeserving, but we’ll make it.

 

Stats never tell the full story. We look good on paper, just look at our percentage. But it can never measure the mental strength that we seem to lack.


On 8/13/2018 at 4:44 PM, Jibroni said:

Its the 5% im worried about!!

 

 

:-(

 

and I would prefer the 9% of being premiers 

:-)

 

Statistics are only correct 60% of the time and are wrong another 60% !

On 8/13/2018 at 6:49 PM, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Champion Data are rubbish.

With that said and looking at the draw, I think we’ll fall over the line by percentage without winning another game.  It’ll be absurd, and some may even say undeserving, but we’ll make it.

So you are expecting port to lose last game against the Essendon? 

 

The St.Kilda game is going to bite us on the ass. Never should have lost to a woeful team like that disgusting.

10 minutes ago, bandicoot said:

So you are expecting port to lose last game against the Essendon? 

If Essendon turn up to play (Collingwood 2017) then they should beat a depleted Port.


On 8/13/2018 at 6:44 PM, Jibroni said:

Its the 5% im worried about!!

When it comes to defying the odds, Melbourne are elite!

"95% chance of making finals?! Hold my beer."

3 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

The St.Kilda game is going to bite us on the ass. Never should have lost to a woeful team like that disgusting.

No more than loosing to Geelong twice, Port and to Sydney last week.  This year it has been more just failing to get the job done against the better teams that has cost us.

Sure the St Kilda game was disapointing but many of the top sides have lost to lesser teams during the season, as I think the competition is that close where you have a bad game, an underdog has a good one and senses a victory and gets up on the day.  We have done pretty well by AFL standards getting the job done against lesser teams.

Geelong bad losses: Bulldogs, Adelaide, Essendon;

Hawthorn bad losses: Brisbane  (twice), North;

Port bad losses: Freo, Essendon, Adelaide;

Sydney bad losses: Suns, North;

GWS bad losses: St Kilda (draw), North, Essendon.

 

This not beating top teams thing is starting to get over hyped and over rated.  Last year we beat 4 top 8 teams (Adelaide, Port, Essendon and West Coast), but still missed finals, because we had dropped so many games to lesser sides.  I feel like we have been so much more competitive overall and consistently better this year, that I'm hoping we look at the lack of beating a top team to this point as more of a querk than any kind of mental deficiency or lack of ability.  It's about beating who ever is in front of you on a weekly basis and the rest is retrospect... but only time will tell in the next two weeks I guess.

10 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

No more than loosing to Geelong twice, Port and to Sydney last week.  This year it has been more just failing to get the job done against the better teams that has cost us.

Ah, some perspective, with a reasoned argument to back it up.

Rare around these parts at the moment.

Thank you.

5 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

The St.Kilda game is going to bite us on the ass. Never should have lost to a woeful team like that disgusting.

Clearly beating Geelong one time would have made a bigger difference.

We need to turn the corner. Worst thing for this team's development atm would be to lose both and miss finals.

Missing finals last year is imo what puts us in this situation again. Without breaking through the pressure and playing finals, they don't know of the actual level required to reach there. 

It's a chicken egg scenario: you can't know what it takes to make finals without actually making it. But how can you make it if you don't know how?

If we miss again I suspect Goodwin to go back to the drawing board and do a mini rebuild aka Richmond at the end of 2016. That may well mean hard decisions and a Deledio-type trade of a/some favourite sons.

Stats are quantifiable and accurate. We are not a 100% chance to make finals. We are a 95% chance based on our performance and statistics.

The 5% is an outlier and may be immeasurable in some capacity. 


6 hours ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

No more than loosing to Geelong twice, Port and to Sydney last week.  This year it has been more just failing to get the job done against the better teams that has cost us.

Sure the St Kilda game was disapointing but many of the top sides have lost to lesser teams during the season, as I think the competition is that close where you have a bad game, an underdog has a good one and senses a victory and gets up on the day.  We have done pretty well by AFL standards getting the job done against lesser teams.

Geelong bad losses: Bulldogs, Adelaide, Essendon;

Hawthorn bad losses: Brisbane  (twice), North;

Port bad losses: Freo, Essendon, Adelaide;

Sydney bad losses: Suns, North;

GWS bad losses: St Kilda (draw), North, Essendon.

 

This not beating top teams thing is starting to get over hyped and over rated.  Last year we beat 4 top 8 teams (Adelaide, Port, Essendon and West Coast), but still missed finals, because we had dropped so many games to lesser sides.  I feel like we have been so much more competitive overall and consistently better this year, that I'm hoping we look at the lack of beating a top team to this point as more of a querk than any kind of mental deficiency or lack of ability.  It's about beating who ever is in front of you on a weekly basis and the rest is retrospect... but only time will tell in the next two weeks I guess.

There is no doubt we are better than last year, just look at percentage and when we get going can massacre teams, we couldn’t do it in the past.

A few areas where we need to improve:

- Defensive running (Swans ran harder than Melb, we got caught out a number of times)

- maximising forward entries (goal kicking against Swans and generally using the 60 plus entries we get each week better, lower eyes)

- Backline sits too high and would just love to see one defender sit in goalsquare more (pity Lever went down, things were improving during the 6 win streak)

- Missing Viney, he made a huge difference against Eagles & Port last year willing us over the line

Reflect on the point we are the highest scoring team in the league! If we improve forward entry and conversion that’s another 2-3 goals a game!

Anyway, 100% effort next two weeks, win then play finals, win one or more, and then we should be ready for something special next year!

On 8/13/2018 at 6:49 PM, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Champion Data are rubbish.

With that said and looking at the draw, I think we’ll fall over the line by percentage without winning another game.  It’ll be absurd, and some may even say undeserving, but we’ll make it.

Funny you say that...it is possible. Depends on two games I think( outcomes ) 

Oh what a magnificent way to announce yourself into September !!

Edited by beelzebub

1 minute ago, Mazer Rackham said:

Only 5% chance of missing? Our boys will take that as a challenge

And most likely succeed .....

(Winning ????)

We already hold the record for missing out on playing finals by percentage. This year if we miss, we might create two more records:

  • highest percentage for a team missing finals; and
  • missing finals by the smallest time gap. (If the siren had gone one second earlier in the second Geelong game, we wouldn't have lost it). 

I'm not sure what to make of champion data, sometimes I actually think it's better to use your own eyes. (and I love stats, used in the right way)

 
23 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

We already hold the record for missing out on playing finals by percentage. This year if we miss, we might create two more records:

  • highest percentage for a team missing finals; and
  • missing finals by the smallest time gap. (If the siren had gone one second earlier in the second Geelong game, we wouldn't have lost it). 

Don't know if it makes you feel any better but Zach Tuohy took that mark 7 seconds before the siren went, not one second. So we'll miss the finals by 7 seconds...

1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

Funny you say that...it is possible. Depends on two games I think( outcomes ) 

Oh what a magnificent way to announce yourself into September !!

It's actually 4 games which makes it seriously unlikely we'll be limping into finals with 12 wins.

1. Richmond beating Essendon

2. Collingwood beating Port

3. Adelaide beating North

4. Essendon beating Port.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies