Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
 

I am against pokies but I am for a strong and stable cashflow for the Club. Makes me concerned  how they will replace the lost revenue


I have seen the down side of Pokey addiction up close and personnel and I would love nothing more than to see the "banning" of all Pokies in our fair state.

 

Go Dee's...............!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just now, Clint Bizkit said:

Great news, if North Melbourne can do it then so can we.

Really proud of the club for doing this.

And North are thriving off the field. 

 

Melbourne and Collingwood meeting the AFL right now apparently 

working out the alternatives....

Makes a difference. Great from a social aspect but the obvious question remains - How to we supplement the revenue?

Gaming & Social Revenue                     

  • Collingwood – $22,887,477
  • Hawthorn –  $19,087,366
  • Carlton – $18,825,869
  • Brisbane – $15,687,630
  • Essendon – $13,351,296
  • Melbourne – $11,641,049
  • Geelong – $10,537,358
  • Richmond – $7,180,170
  • Western Bulldogs – $7,061,232
  • Port Adelaide – $6,784,180
  • St Kilda – $1,934,045
  • Gaming Profit
  • Collingwood – $6,037,992
  • Brisbane – $3,744,228
  • Melbourne – $3,720,679
  • Carlton – $3,169,884
  • Essendon – $2,276,154
  • Western Bulldogs – $1,390,994
  • Richmond – $942,060
  • St Kilda – $616,340
  • Port Adelaide – $301,173
  • Hawthorn – No costs available
  • Geelong – no costs available

Revenue without Gaming

  • West Coast – $64,013,222
  • Richmond – $57,984,202
  • Adelaide – $54,954,790
  • Collingwood – $54,848,992
  • Essendon – $51,814,111
  • Hawthorn – $51,655,098
  • Port Adelaide – $51,123,008
  • Sydney – $50,837,971
  • Fremantle – $49,263,474
  • Geelong – $47,266,694
  • St Kilda – $46,018,621
  • Western Bulldogs – $44,883,240
  • GWS – $42,605,892
  • Melbourne – $40,347,662
  • Carlton – $39,793,007
  • North Melbourne – $39,717,822
  • Brisbane – $36,372,790

Profit/Loss without Gaming

  • St Kilda – $4,651,074
  • Essendon – $2,778,032
  • Richmond – $2,121,238
  • Western Bulldogs – $252,056
  • North Melbourne – $242,656
  • Sydney – $105,186
  • Port Adelaide ($272,562)
  • GWS – ($522,896)
  • Melbourne – ($2,357,619)
  • Carlton – ($2,502,081)
  • Brisbane –  ($6,006,218)
  • Collingwood ($8,770,616)
  • Hawthorn – Not available
  • Geelong – not available.

 

Edited by Eelesie


That's great, but next time the club is broke don't come knocking on my door.

Yet another example of a small minority of people not wanting to take responsibility for their actions and hence the majority who do the right thing and have some self control suffer.

 

Fantastic news ..... whatever you say the continued reliance on this form of revenue is unsustainable from a social responsibility aspect

13 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

And North are thriving off the field. 

They've made profits the last two years from memory.

There are other ways to make money other than gambling.


Perhaps the AFL could give up on the jolly for Port to China and the AFLX to Hongkers.

Would go a long way to making up the short fall across the clubs.

Next challenge is to get off the "teat" of the sports betting agencies.

20 minutes ago, Eelesie said:

Makes a difference. Great from a social aspect but the obvious question remains - How to we supplement the revenue?

Gaming & Social Revenue                     

  • Collingwood – $22,887,477
  • Hawthorn –  $19,087,366
  • Carlton – $18,825,869
  • Brisbane – $15,687,630
  • Essendon – $13,351,296
  • Melbourne – $11,641,049
  • Geelong – $10,537,358
  • Richmond – $7,180,170
  • Western Bulldogs – $7,061,232
  • Port Adelaide – $6,784,180
  • St Kilda – $1,934,045
  • Gaming Profit
  • Collingwood – $6,037,992
  • Brisbane – $3,744,228
  • Melbourne – $3,720,679
  • Carlton – $3,169,884
  • Essendon – $2,276,154
  • Western Bulldogs – $1,390,994
  • Richmond – $942,060
  • St Kilda – $616,340
  • Port Adelaide – $301,173
  • Hawthorn – No costs available
  • Geelong – no costs available

Revenue without Gaming

  • West Coast – $64,013,222
  • Richmond – $57,984,202
  • Adelaide – $54,954,790
  • Collingwood – $54,848,992
  • Essendon – $51,814,111
  • Hawthorn – $51,655,098
  • Port Adelaide – $51,123,008
  • Sydney – $50,837,971
  • Fremantle – $49,263,474
  • Geelong – $47,266,694
  • St Kilda – $46,018,621
  • Western Bulldogs – $44,883,240
  • GWS – $42,605,892
  • Melbourne – $40,347,662
  • Carlton – $39,793,007
  • North Melbourne – $39,717,822
  • Brisbane – $36,372,790

Profit/Loss without Gaming

  • St Kilda – $4,651,074
  • Essendon – $2,778,032
  • Richmond – $2,121,238
  • Western Bulldogs – $252,056
  • North Melbourne – $242,656
  • Sydney – $105,186
  • Port Adelaide ($272,562)
  • GWS – ($522,896)
  • Melbourne – ($2,357,619)
  • Carlton – ($2,502,081)
  • Brisbane –  ($6,006,218)
  • Collingwood ($8,770,616)
  • Hawthorn – Not available
  • Geelong – not available.

 

With feel good hugs and the pleasure that comes with knowing we no longer support gambling. Obviously.

Didn't the club go back into debt to finance the purchase of the Pokie licences.  Hope the sale has covered our debt

All well and good but reminds me of that idiot that shut down power stations BEFORE an alternative was in place !!

Need to get this right or bottom line will be shredded. Still...the club seems to have a better handle on the register these days. Hope this goes well.

Not quite so clear cut on reading the email. The Leighoak deal is not done until 31 July and the Bentleigh Cub runs out in August 2022.

So still a few coins to rattle in the tray yet.


7 minutes ago, Miles from Nowhere said:

Not quite so clear cut on reading the email. The Leighoak deal is not done until 31 July and the Bentleigh Cub runs out in August 2022.

So still a few coins to rattle in the tray yet.

As ought there be. Get the order of events right. Still a good result in end.

As DrDrake mentions, these will be assets that are sold off, if it means clearing down some debt, or investing money into other ventures that can make the club money then thats the key here. Those numbers are misleading as all they do is say how much of our profit comes from gaming revenue. Can't just say now we don't have pokies therefore we don't have a revenue source.

What the club does with the profits from selling these two assets will be the key.

pre-emptive move - all clubs are preparing for the afl stopping clubs owning pokies licenses, whilst at the same time taking in excess of $10m from crownbet to be official wagering partner, plus all the residuals from the other gambling companies

the afl hypocritical? well, i never...

 
39 minutes ago, poita said:

Yet another example of a small minority of people not wanting to take responsibility for their actions and hence the majority who do the right thing and have some self control suffer.

 

Please, what benefit to society do pokies bring?

Jackson is a very smart operator as we know. I am 100% sure that he already has some revenue supplements lined up to replace pokies. 

There will be more sponsorship opportunities as a result, from “socially responsible” companies who wouldn’t sponsor clubs at the moment due to their involvement in gambling. 

Good on the club. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies