Jump to content

Featured Replies

6 minutes ago, KingDingAling said:

If they want our 2017 & 18 first round picks, fine. But we want their 2018 first round pick included in the Lever deal.

Out: 2017 FIRST & SECOND PICK, 2018 FIRST ROUND PICK.

In: LEVER & ADELAIDE 2018 FIRST ROUND PICK.

what's the hurry? we made a generous offer. we stick to our guns or it's the nd

 
1 hour ago, DaveyDee said:

This is absolute rubbish.

No way do the Tigers swap "their two late first round picks and our pick 10." They may have just won a premiership but they are not a charity. 

And if you read my post you’d understand that was not my implication. Simply that it would be a deal involving those picks. And that we were going to ask the question. 

If you’re going to attack someone’s posts it’s best to know what you’re talking about.

1 hour ago, faultydet said:

Hmmm, can you imagine how stupid the Crows would look if the Tigs agreed to swap their 2 x late 1st picks for pick 10, and we kept our second round pick?

 

Why wouldnt they have their own meeting with the tigers, swap 10, and keep our pick 27 to themselves?

Strange.

The deal would involve those picks but it would not be a straight swap. Its just something we will discuss in order to get picks capable of getting the deal dine

 
2 hours ago, Dr evil said:

An update on the lever deal. The crows won’t budge on the two first round picks deal so the club will be having a meeting with Richmond to discuss an exchange involving their two late first round picks and our pick 10. 

The crows have indicated that those two picks would satisfy the deal if the tigers are willing to trade them. 

With all due respect you wrote. No mention of other picks - none at all. It was not till after you mentioned the other picks.

Just for the record both clubs had a very cordial fishing trip today. 

 

2 minutes ago, DaveyDee said:

With all due respect you wrote. No mention of other picks - none at all. It was not till after you mentioned the other picks.

Just for the record both clubs had a very cordial fishing trip today. 

 

“ an exchange involving their two late first round picks and our pick number 10” vs an exchange of their two first round picks and pick number 10. 

 

Not that it matters, we all just want the deal done


35 minutes ago, Dr evil said:

“ an exchange involving their two late first round picks and our pick number 10” vs an exchange of their two first round picks and pick number 10. 

What?

 

42-16991558.jpeg

2 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

Adelaide and Melb are still very much at loggerheads 

That wont last long, Adelaide will cave by the end of the week. 

They have no leverage at all.

 

Is t just me or does it seem like the crows as a club have totally lost the plot?


1 hour ago, Abe said:

Is t just me or does it seem like the crows as a club have totally lost the plot?

Caro agrees with you

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/adelaides-dummy-spit-over-jake-lever-is-not-a-good-look-nor-is-his-departure-20171009-gyxg1u.html

 

1 hour ago, Demons11 said:

Adelaide and Melb are still very much at loggerheads 

That's how I read it Demons11. I think both clubs agreed to try and take the spotlight off their clubs by making mother hood statements

1 hour ago, Abe said:

Is t just me or does it seem like the crows as a club have totally lost the plot?

Agreed. From Walker to Burton and probably many more around those two. They force a 21 yr old to declare his intentions 4 weeks out from the finals so they could up an offer to Mcgovern. He takes care of the club with his honesty when he could have easily stayed mum.... and they  shame the [censored] out of him, then bag him in the press. Im not saying any club would be happy to lose a quality young player ( we wouldnt either ) but the way they have handled themselves sends out a very reflective message about the club I reckon. No wonder everyone wants to leave! 

4 hours ago, Dr.D said:

So i had a look at pick 10's in the last 10 years of national drafts, this is who clubs got:

Chris Egan
Marcus Drum
Nathan Brown
Dangerfield
Phil Davis
Melksham
Gorringe
Sumner
Cockatoo
Nathan Freeman

Makes me feel a bit more at ease knowing that only 2 of those players  (Danger and Davis) justified their drat position. So if we have to cough up more, so be it. Lever is a ready made gun for the next 9 years

Pick 7 seems always to be the one to have.

 


1 hour ago, Demons1858 said:

That's how I read it Demons11. I think both clubs agreed to try and take the spotlight off their clubs by making mother hood statements

That's 100% correct 

3 hours ago, DaveyDee said:

What?

 

42-16991558.jpeg

I'd say he's referring to the word 'involving'. I.e. involving said picks doesn't mean limited to said picks.

Melbourne should play hardball.  Crows have treated Lever like siht.  We should re-arrange contracts so we can front-end him a whopping amount that other clubs cannot match in 2018.  Let him go to draft.

One thing better than Lever?

Lever and 10 and 27.  Worth the risk in my book.

 

 

 

That is my take.  I aint KB.

7 hours ago, TGR said:

Melbourne should play hardball.  Crows have treated Lever like siht.  We should re-arrange contracts so we can front-end him a whopping amount that other clubs cannot match in 2018.  Let him go to draft.

One thing better than Lever?

Lever and 10 and 27.  Worth the risk in my book.

 

 

 

That is my take.  I aint KB.

We don't want to play games on this one. Hold firm re a first and second round pick and negotiate a swap of late picks and deal will be done. We have a good reputation for being fair and transparent during trade period and if we muck around it could backfire.


14 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

First class, nice work Snake, could have taken a little less cash so the club hired something better than the acoustic duo we had to put up with during the B&F.

1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Proposing at 21 years of age? He can't be too smart then..

 

Old mate Dwayne want the Cats to have a crack at Jake, even though they have no early picks.

Trade Radio played audio of Tex Walker teeing off on Lever on Triple M Adelaide. Did not hold any punches. Said he has chosen "money over success".

Had some respect for Adelaide as a club but they are not handling this situation with much dignity,


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 150 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 42 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 327 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies