Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 Brownlow vote for an absolute jet back man?

What am I missing?

 
1 minute ago, McQueen said:

1 Brownlow vote for an absolute jet back man?

What am I missing?

The Brownlow is a midfielders award. The only other position that polled well where key forwards in Buddy, Kennedy and Brown.

3 minutes ago, McQueen said:

1 Brownlow vote for an absolute jet back man?

What am I missing?

not many back men got votes. no glamour. too negative. umps like mids.

 
10 minutes ago, mo64 said:

The Brownlow is a midfielders award. The only other position that polled well where key forwards in Buddy, Kennedy and Brown.

 

9 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

not many back men got votes. no glamour. too negative. umps like mids.

Cheers guys but I was just throwing a lure out.

2 minutes ago, McQueen said:

 

Cheers guys but I was just throwing a lure out.

he only got 1 vote because he was 4th best in 15 other games

just joshing


10 hours ago, Wrecker45 said:

Juice spilled some of the easiest marks I've ever seen but at least he could get to the drop of the ball and be in a position to take them.

i'm yet to see any evidence that weid can read the flight of the ball.

it get's excused on demonland as bad kicking but I can assure you juice wasn't getting it on a silver platter

Don't recall Weed's first mark against Hawthorn in his first spell on the ground in his first game when he drifted in from the back of the Hawthorn defenders and took an easy mark ?????? He's read the flight at least once.

OMG !!!!!!! I just realised that last post was my 1000th !!!! I think I'll go and have a Scot.

4 minutes ago, pineapple dee said:

OMG !!!!!!! I just realised that last post was my 1000th !!!! I think I'll go and have a Scot.

Congrats PD, I'm nearly there myself. 

Are you happy with your 1000th?

 
1 minute ago, Deemented Are Go! said:

Congrats PD, I'm nearly there myself. 

Are you happy with your 1000th?

That one was alright. There have been a few shockers if I'm honest. ?

reported we are offering 5 years @900k for him on the couch... thats some serious dosh


8 hours ago, Wrecker45 said:

How come Robbie Flower could always get to the drop of the ball and not be pushed out of the way? It is more than a strength issue.

Different game back then. Not apples with apples.

The kid needs more than a couple of years and a handful of games.

1 hour ago, pineapple dee said:

OMG !!!!!!! I just realised that last post was my 1000th !!!! I think I'll go and have a Scot.

details!!? what's the young man's name??

:D

1 hour ago, McQueen said:

1 Brownlow vote for an absolute jet back man?

What am I missing?

I remember Scarlett getting 3-4 votes when he won the BnF for Geelong (pretty sure this is right)

The Brownlow is a joke. Umpires clearly don't understand the game. Buddy/Carey can't win one but Priddis/Woewodin do?

1 hour ago, mattjm said:

reported we are offering 5 years @900k for him on the couch... thats some serious dosh

Way too much.

If true, we should look elsewhere.


53 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Why so concerned with what he may cost? 

Agree. In 3-4 years at current rates of growth, $900K will be ho-hum.

3 minutes ago, Akum said:

Agree. In 3-4 years at current rates of growth, $900K will be ho-hum.

Will he be in our best 3 players?

I don't think so, therefore we shouldn't be paying that kind of money to him.

3 hours ago, pineapple dee said:

OMG !!!!!!! I just realised that last post was my 1000th !!!! I think I'll go and have a Scot.

Your're last 1000's would have been more relevant than Chris or Brad Scotts !

7 hours ago, DubDee said:

I remember Scarlett getting 3-4 votes when he won the BnF for Geelong (pretty sure this is right)

The Brownlow is a joke. Umpires clearly don't understand the game. Buddy/Carey can't win one but Priddis/Woewodin do?

Every award is given to midfielders the MVP always goes to a midfielder, the coaches award goes to a midfielder most BF go to midfielders, it's not only the brownlow, I guess all  the coaches  know nothing about football, its the biggest myth if the brownlow  was judged by some other then the umpires you would get more forwards or defender winning it.

The deal is not done yet:

"...Michael Warner told On the Couch:...“Five years, $900,000 a season,” he revealed to gasps from panel members Jonathan Brown and Jason Dunstall...The Crows will come after the Grand Final pretty hard and I think they’ve got some more money to offer.”

TBH, I don't give a lot of credence to anything Warner says/writes.  But I wouldn't be surprised if the Crows open their cheque books for Lever. 

But Lever seems a genuine kid so if he says he is leaving he is leaving.  It would be really disappointing if he/his manager have used us as a bargaining chip, as his team mate Tom Lynch did two years ago.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


9 hours ago, mattjm said:

reported we are offering 5 years @900k for him on the couch... thats some serious dosh

I'd be happy to spend the next five years "on the couch" for half that! ?

It's obvious the FD rate this kid as most of us on here and if takes that much to get him so be it.

600k probably won't do it per season but if they believe Lever will make us better I'm all for it.

I know nothing about the contract status of other Crows players but you would think their stocks would rise if they win the flag so it will be interesting to see if they offer Lever similar money to us.

 
1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

The deal is not done yet:

"...Michael Warner told On the Couch:...“Five years, $900,000 a season,” he revealed to gasps from panel members Jonathan Brown and Jason Dunstall...The Crows will come after the Grand Final pretty hard and I think they’ve got some more money to offer.”

TBH, I don't give a lot of credence to anything Warner says/writes.  But I wouldn't be surprised if the Crows open their cheque books for Lever. 

But Lever seems a genuine kid so if he says he is leaving he is leaving.  It would be really disappointing if he/his manager have used us as a bargaining chip, as his team mate Tom Lynch did two years ago.

I don't think it'll matter, I think the crux of it is Jake and his GF want to come back home to Victoria anyway.

1 hour ago, don't make me angry said:

Every award is given to midfielders the MVP always goes to a midfielder, the coaches award goes to a midfielder most BF go to midfielders, it's not only the brownlow, I guess all  the coaches  know nothing about football, its the biggest myth if the brownlow  was judged by some other then the umpires you would get more forwards or defender winning it.

don't agree.  The coaches more a lot more than the umps

2 key forwards won the coaches award - Barry Hall and Treadrea 

Reiwoldt won an MVP

defenders seemingly get screwed by everyone!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 170 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 46 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies