Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Kent said:

Not necessary Steve!

Okay, so you want him then. 

 
2 hours ago, Rusty Nails said:

Whenever a player is on the skids at a club you start "hearing" things Bin.  Conversely when they are sought after / needed you tend to "hear" the opposite.

I have "heard" things as well about "a player" at our club allegedly saying things on the field that under the scrutiny some are saying should apply here in terms of determining whether to get/keep or not,  would probably see him terminated or rejected in a trade.

I have no idea whether what this player allegedly said on field is true or otherwise but said player will still be running around in 2020.  Probably because he is very much a required player & fan fav (in many cases).  If he wasn't he may well have been traded (assuming what was allegedly said was overheard by MFC officials).

If we were to decide our list based on this sort of behavioral criteria we might end up with a very short list indeed Bin.

All that might be true. But we are not making a call, nor are other fans. Professional recruiting teams are. And atm the evidence is that despite being a two goal a game kpf who can mark has not been picked up. I'm surmising they have more informations than Joe public.

1 hour ago, Kent said:

No way we need this guy 

No way. We need this guy!

There is (sic) no way we need this guy

I'm guessing you want him? Or not!

Edited by ManDee
Steve beat me to it

 

Averages 2 goals a game. Can he kick set shots for goals from inside 40m consistently? If so go get him in my opinion. 

10 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Averages 2 goals a game. Can he kick set shots for goals from inside 40m consistently? If so go get him in my opinion. 

The bloke is a dead set liability if the ball hits the ground and he rarely leaves the goal square. 

If we get which I REALLY hope we don't I would be happy to eat my words if he can perform but I really cant see him being anything more than a list clogger which could potentially limit Weid's development. 


10 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

Averages 2 goals a game. Can he kick set shots for goals from inside 40m consistently? If so go get him in my opinion. 

I really dont think he can, would love to get numbers on how many goals he has kicked from 30 meters and beyond.

Wouldn't be too many from the Crows games i have watched.

Like i've previously stated, if he comes cheap and doesn't affect our draft priorities or cap space, it really wouldn't hurt us, surely?

3 minutes ago, GCDee said:

The bloke is a dead set liability if the ball hits the ground and he rarely leaves the goal square. 

If we get which I REALLY hope we don't I would be happy to eat my words if he can perform but I really cant see him being anything more than a list clogger which could potentially limit Weid's development. 

GC I haven’t seen him play much but he is often described as a 200cm flanker not a KPF so I assumed he doesn’t kick all of his 2 goals a game from taking pack marks or manhandling KPB one on one, but just as often when the ball has hit the deck in the forward line. Also being 200cm would give us a ruck support option as well. 

1 hour ago, GCDee said:

The bloke is a dead set liability if the ball hits the ground and he rarely leaves the goal square. 

If we get which I REALLY hope we don't I would be happy to eat my words if he can perform but I really cant see him being anything more than a list clogger which could potentially limit Weid's development. 

Where did this originate? So in seasons 2016 - 2018 he laid 126 tackles in the goalsquare? At a quick glance he had more tackles than Tom McDonald who covers quite a bit of ground.

 

Year Games Goals Tackles

2014    20    40    27

2015    21    46    28

2016    24    62    46

2017    21    45    52

2018    22    46    61

2019    11    22    18

We can overlook the 2019 season because according to most it doesn’t count for our players so going off his previous five seasons his numbers look alright. I can’t see how having him on board for 2 seasons would hurt us that much.
 

 

 

Any player that has kicked 8 goals in a game of footy whom you can get for close to minimum chips should be warranting some careful consideration over the next 48 hours

Particularly for a side that has one of the worst forward lines in the league 

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

9 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Any player that has kicked 8 goals in a game of footy whom you can get for close to minimum chips should be warranting some careful consideration over the next 48 hours

Particularly for a side that has one of the worst forward lines in the league 

I feel like our administration and coaches are really over rating our forward line.

McDonald - 1 good year

Weid - 3-4 good games

Melksham - solid but no star

Trac - developing into a good player but poor set shot

Fritsch - could be a gun but still has a way to go

Hannan/Vanders - both injury prone

Petty - still very young

I just don't understand how we aren't looking at someone like Jenkins.


6 minutes ago, Collar-Jazz-Knee said:

I feel like our administration and coaches are really over rating our forward line.

McDonald - 1 good year

Weid - 3-4 good games

Melksham - solid but no star

Trac - developing into a good player but poor set shot

Fritsch - could be a gun but still has a way to go

Hannan/Vanders - both injury prone

Petty - still very young

I just don't understand how we aren't looking at someone like Jenkins.

Because they don't like his character perhaps...

6 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

Because they don't like his character perhaps...

I'd prefer to have a few iffy blokes in our squad but still win games.

MFC need to grow a set and put it on the line with these blokes, put it in their contracts.

The whole he isnt a very nice person, so we decided against it, doesn't stack up with you finishes 17th last year. 

he'll play for $400k a year (their minimum wage), if hes a screw up, it least Casey will have a goal kicker for next year.

Just now, BrisbaneDemon said:

I'd prefer to have a few iffy blokes in our squad but still win games.

MFC need to grow a set and put it on the line with these blokes, put it in their contracts.

The whole he isnt a very nice person, so we decided against it, doesn't stack up with you finishes 17th last year. 

he'll play for $400k a year (their minimum wage), if hes a screw up, it least Casey will have a goal kicker for next year.

I didnt say he isnt a nice person...

1 minute ago, Engorged Onion said:

I didnt say he isnt a nice person...

Read it again mate, i was referring to the MFC recruitment team.

4 minutes ago, BrisbaneDemon said:

I'd prefer to have a few iffy blokes in our squad but still win games.

MFC need to grow a set and put it on the line with these blokes, put it in their contracts.

The whole he isnt a very nice person, so we decided against it, doesn't stack up with you finishes 17th last year. 

he'll play for $400k a year (their minimum wage), if hes a screw up, it least Casey will have a goal kicker for next year.

Maybe we finished 17th more because of lack of togetherness and selfless football rather than because of lack of talent. 

Jenkins would be a missionary keen for a media career. A self promoter and not exactly a team player. Do you think he'd be happy at Casey? I don't. 

I just can't see Jenkins being successful enough to bother. If we want depth then go find someone younger with upside, we found Tim Smith, there has to be a younger version of someone like him out there in the state leagues. If we want someone clearly better than Weideman then make a move for that kind of player.


25 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Maybe we finished 17th more because of lack of togetherness and selfless football rather than because of lack of talent. 

Jenkins would be a missionary keen for a media career. A self promoter and not exactly a team player. Do you think he'd be happy at Casey? I don't. 

I just can't see Jenkins being successful enough to bother. If we want depth then go find someone younger with upside, we found Tim Smith, there has to be a younger version of someone like him out there in the state leagues. If we want someone clearly better than Weideman then make a move for that kind of player.

How do you possibly know that? There is a bloke who can kick multiple goals and has proven he can do it over multiple years, has clearly had a clash of personality with the senior coach (wasn't the only player).

The point I'm trying to get across is, i think he can add value to our forward line, i believe he can kick goals for us to be more competitive, if TMac and Weid come out this season firing, brilliant, Jenkins can play when there is an injury etc.

If our forward line doesn't function again this year, we have no plan B apart from the guys we currently have on our list.

To me that isn't smart planning....  

Edited by BrisbaneDemon

48 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Maybe we finished 17th more because of lack of togetherness and selfless football rather than because of lack of talent. 

Jenkins would be a missionary keen for a media career. A self promoter and not exactly a team player. Do you think he'd be happy at Casey? I don't. 

I just can't see Jenkins being successful enough to bother. If we want depth then go find someone younger with upside, we found Tim Smith, there has to be a younger version of someone like him out there in the state leagues. If we want someone clearly better than Weideman then make a move for that kind of player.

Mormon, Christian, Latter day Saints? I had no idea, thought he could be mercenary though.

33 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Mormon, Christian, Latter day Saints? I had no idea, thought he could be mercenary though.

The cult of Hutchy. Serving up hot takes that are more fiery than hell! Even the fireman Cornes can’t put them out. 

7 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

The fact he hasn’t been picked up and there’s also been little to no interest should tell the story. 

 


11 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Essentially no other club at this time wants him pretty much as sums it may.  That may change by the deadline...

3 hours ago, Demonland said:

 

Does make you wonder, so many other players out there clubs are taking shots on but Jenkins who has been a match winner in the past is now not event worth taking a cheap shot on. 

 
4 hours ago, Pates said:

Does make you wonder, so many other players out there clubs are taking shots on but Jenkins who has been a match winner in the past is now not event worth taking a cheap shot on. 

He won't be returning to the Crows.  If you believe some accounts the fall out was apparently mega and he hasn't even been back to clean the locker out.

May have even left town...elaine benes running GIF by HULU

8 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

He won't be returning to the Crows.  If you believe some accounts the fall out was apparently mega and he hasn't even been back to clean the locker out.

May have even left town...elaine benes running GIF by HULU

Which goes exactly to my point that there must be 'cultural' issues at play explaining why there us so little interest for him from other clubs.

As you have noted stuff gets said all the time - but the evidence is pretty clear this goes way past a disgruntled player.

The rumour is extremely strong he leaked info about the crows to the media. Who knows if true but I suspect it is (and I doubt that is the only issue) based on no clubs wanting him, pyke  dropping him repeatedly when in form and there being a physical altertaction between him and pyke.

For what it's worth I think a club, perhaps even the dees, will pick him up late tommorow.

Too good a player for him to sit out football but the main reason is he will be a bargain. The crows will be desperate to off load him as if they can't his salary will go to there cap, so will probably take a third round pick and agree to pay some of his salary. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 546 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 287 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 372 replies