I think that has been earmarked already.

You must find this time of year interesting Red.

If we are interested in him (and i can't see any reason why we wouldn't) we should be using the NT links to our full advantage in trying to convince him to come to us.

If he's not getting a game with Hawthorn then surely they couldnt ask more than a 3rd round pick.

You must find this time of year interesting Red.

Since we have not been involved in September, over the last 10 years or so, this has become a favourite time of the year for me, with all the speculating, not to mention fighting, going on here on Demonland.

Let's get Neville Jetta in front of him. This kid's got some terrific traits. Skill, good overhead, good left foot kick, has pace and loves to tackle. Terrific character as well. Ticks all of the boxes.

Has had some bad luck with injury, but has shown plenty of talent.

It would depend on the cost obviously, but I think we'd be better off with targeting Whitecross as a FA anyway, and keeping focus on Bugg & Melksham.

Would be very happy to get the above three and Kennedy & Anderson though.

Since we have not been involved in September, over the last 10 years or so, this has become a favourite time of the year for me, with all the speculating, not to mention fighting, going on here on Demonland.

i was thinking more along the lines of your background and experience. Youd have good eyes to read the nature of the circus (imho)

If he's not getting a game with Hawthorn then surely they couldnt ask more than a 3rd round pick.

If he's not getting a game with the Hawks, it makes me wonder why it's been reported that he's potentially going to head to the Eagles for 'greater opportunities.'

It defies logic to leave the top team to get more opportunities at the second top team.

A bottom 8 club is where I'd be looking..

Edited October 10, 20159 yr by McQueen

If we're not happy giving a pick for a guy that can't break into the Hawthorn side why wouldn't we go hard after Suckling who gets a game every week, is the best kick in the comp and would cost nothing?

If we're not happy giving a pick for a guy that can't break into the Hawthorn side why wouldn't we go hard after Suckling who gets a game every week, is the best kick in the comp and would cost nothing?

Malceski is far better than Suckling and look how much he struggled this year (prior to his injury especially)

I envisage a similar thing happening if Suckling were to come to the dees

Malceski is far better than Suckling and look how much he struggled this year (prior to his injury especially)

I envisage a similar thing happening if Suckling were to come to the dees

I agree. He isn't the type we need.

I reckon he'll go alright with the Dogs though.

Very high on Anderson. I'd love to see him in red and blue. Would add something to the side, no doubt. He has class.

Very high on Anderson. I'd love to see him in red and blue. Would add something to the side, no doubt. He has class.

Smoked, inhaled or vein?

Smoked, inhaled or vein?

Or renal?

Has Anderson actually nominated a club yet which seems to be the "in" thing to do?

If he's not getting a game with the Hawks, it makes me wonder why it's been reported that he's potentially going to head to the Eagles for 'greater opportunities.'

It defies logic to leave the top team to get more opportunities at the second top team.

A bottom 8 club is where I'd be looking..

Because Suckling is probably the only running player who will go from Hawthorn's best 22 and he's in competition with Langford and Hartung for that spot.

At West Coast you could put him in the best 22 almost immediately and take out either Hutchings or Hill. Plus he'd be ahead of the grand final emergencies in McGinnity and Scott Selwood (who's gone).

As a traded in player West Coast can all but guarantee him a spot in the team without upsetting their current players, where as Hawthorn have to stay loyal to the current order of things and go by form.

Of course opportunities is almost always code for cash!

Has Anderson actually nominated a club yet which seems to be the "in" thing to do?

Everyone's going to Geelong.

Has Anderson actually nominated a club yet which seems to be the "in" thing to do?

He should take whichever damn club will give him 22 games a year provided he works his butt off.

Otherwise he's another spoiled, entitled GenY brat, and I don't want him.

Class and pace.

Does our midfield need someone like this?

Yes yes and yes

Of all the young Hawks not getting a game he is the one I would target. Has some speed and likes the tough stuff. Ticks plenty of boxes for mine, I would expect we have made an approach

We need to be going hard after this guy, exactly the type of player and situation we should be targeting.

Hey Chook chook in Perth have u heard anything about this dude?

Cheers

I must admit to knowing little about him

Stats, for what they are worth.........averages just 9.7 disposals over his 10 games. 179 cm, 79 kgm, so not a "typical Roos mid".

Also, I bet 17 clubs will sit down with Hawthorn during the daily routine roundtable discussions this week and "show interest" in Anderson.

The real question has no answer - if an agreeable trade can be done for both parties.

Jed who?

Every name that crops up...

'Get him, gun!'

'300 gamer!'

'Get it done, Dees!'

Chill, ffs.

he sounds interesting But: at the right price.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jed_Anderson#Greater_Western_Sydney