Jump to content

Is the afl competition any more even since the draft & salary cap??


Demonsone

Recommended Posts

My point is that we won't have a fair system until compo picks have been abolished. Without compo picks the Hawks would have been given nothing for Buddy , which is fair given the talent raid they have had since fa started, and we would have retained frawley instead of being gifted a supreme talent like brayshaw. I'm not complaining about getting brayshaw, but if we are serious about a fair and equitable competition then free agency compo picks must go.

Still not sure if trolling or just crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just remembered that I had a grind through all this about 18 months ago and took the time to write out my thoughts.

It is a bit long-winded (what, me?) but I was trying to cover everything thoroughly.

https://wanderinggoffy.wordpress.com/2014/08/23/drifting-apart-the-troubles-of-afl-free-agency/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, imo the draft and salary cap so far have been completely cancelled out by free agency.

How have we done in Free Agency?

Sylvia for the pick that got us Vince.

Moloney and Rivers for the pick that got us Kent.

Frawley for the pick that got us Brayshaw.

But putting Vince, Kent, and Brayshaw to one side - would we be better off with those players?

Sylvia, Rivers and Moloney are gone as of right now and Frawley was pushed out of our backline by McDonald and co.

We haven't gone after FAs very heavily yet because of the way the compensation is worked out but right now - I have got to tell you - FA has been good to the worst run club of the last decade.

I don't think this half-pregnant FA is bad for the lowly teams, it just needs to be tweaked in a few areas.

Trade veto abolishment, RFA re-think, Prelim final teams out of FA for the next year, and those are the ones off the top of my head...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How have we done in Free Agency?

Sylvia for the pick that got us Vince.

Moloney and Rivers for the pick that got us Kent.

Frawley for the pick that got us Brayshaw.

But putting Vince, Kent, and Brayshaw to one side - would we be better off with those players?

Sylvia, Rivers and Moloney are gone as of right now and Frawley was pushed out of our backline by McDonald and co.

We haven't gone after FAs very heavily yet because of the way the compensation is worked out but right now - I have got to tell you - FA has been good to the worst run club of the last decade.

I don't think this half-pregnant FA is bad for the lowly teams, it just needs to be tweaked in a few areas.

Trade veto abolishment, RFA re-think, Prelim final teams out of FA for the next year, and those are the ones off the top of my head...

Seriously? The same bloke that is going to be playing a key role in the backline in this year's GF, in the very next season after he left us?

Wow.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How have we done in Free Agency?

Sylvia for the pick that got us Vince.

Moloney and Rivers for the pick that got us Kent.

Frawley for the pick that got us Brayshaw.

But putting Vince, Kent, and Brayshaw to one side - would we be better off with those players?

Sylvia, Rivers and Moloney are gone as of right now and Frawley was pushed out of our backline by McDonald and co.

We haven't gone after FAs very heavily yet because of the way the compensation is worked out but right now - I have got to tell you - FA has been good to the worst run club of the last decade.

I don't think this half-pregnant FA is bad for the lowly teams, it just needs to be tweaked in a few areas.

Trade veto abolishment, RFA re-think, Prelim final teams out of FA for the next year, and those are the ones off the top of my head...

Trade veto abolishment is the big one, the players have too much power at the minute and it undermines a clubs ability to plan for the future. Brisbane is a good case study for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade veto abolishment is the big one, the players have too much power at the minute and it undermines a clubs ability to plan for the future. Brisbane is a good case study for this.

Brisbane is also a good case study for pulling your head out of your arse and telling your captain that he is not Jon Brown and that demanding the new generation be treated like a throwback to an earlier generation is not healthy.

They need to get their club right, and old school brutal, clique-based, talk-to-me-when-you-have-earned-it, footy clubs are a thing of the past. Especially when the one trying to administer a culture like that changes from Jon Brown to Tom Rockliff. Good player is Tom, but a commanding presence that demands respect he is not - he should have taken a different tact.

Well run clubs can work in any environment and badly run ones look for excuses - the Lions have only themselves to blame, as we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brisbane is also a good case study for pulling your head out of your arse and telling your captain that he is not Jon Brown and that demanding the new generation be treated like a throwback to an earlier generation is not healthy.

They need to get their club right, and old school brutal, clique-based, talk-to-me-when-you-have-earned-it, footy clubs are a thing of the past. Especially when the one trying to administer a culture like that changes from Jon Brown to Tom Rockliff. Good player is Tom, but a commanding presence that demands respect he is not - he should have taken a different tact.

Well run clubs can work in any environment and badly run ones look for excuses - the Lions have only themselves to blame, as we do.

Agreed, but none of that takes away from the fact that players can walk at will and in doing so the clubs have very little power to create or build change in their playing stocks. Get rid of the veto and it would be fine, it works in various codes in the US where free agency is also a player in the market. The players need to accept they cant have both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How have we done in Free Agency?

Sylvia for the pick that got us Vince.

Moloney and Rivers for the pick that got us Kent.

Frawley for the pick that got us Brayshaw.

But putting Vince, Kent, and Brayshaw to one side - would we be better off with those players?

Sylvia, Rivers and Moloney are gone as of right now and Frawley was pushed out of our backline by McDonald and co.

We haven't gone after FAs very heavily yet because of the way the compensation is worked out but right now - I have got to tell you - FA has been good to the worst run club of the last decade.

I don't think this half-pregnant FA is bad for the lowly teams, it just needs to be tweaked in a few areas.

Trade veto abolishment, RFA re-think, Prelim final teams out of FA for the next year, and those are the ones off the top of my head...

Your last point is the clincher and the one that most needs to be considered

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think most people don't understand free agency and are confusing petulant young players choosing a destination with free agency.

I completely understand the situation. Which is why I believe if they want free agency moving forward they need to remove the 'agree to a trade' part for non-free agents moving forward. I think at most the player can nominate a state they want to move to, from there it is up to the club to work out a trade based on the clubs in that state. Obviously there would need to be provisions agreed to relating to contract amounts and length but by removing the agreement part would mean they can't just nominate a club and hold their club to ransom.

That way once they get to free agent status they are entitled to go wherever they like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frawley was pushed out of our backline by McDonald and co.

That is just wrong....Frawley put up the white flag in Round 2 last year...(visibly)

and checked out..

He was moved forward so the younger players got used to life without him

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is just wrong....Frawley put up the white flag in Round 2 last year...(visibly)

and checked out..

He was moved forward so the younger players got used to life without him

I am not getting into a semantic battle, wyl, whatever the interpretation of his body language - the MFC moved past Frawley as a key defender BEFORE he left, which was my point that you overlooked or missed entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not getting into a semantic battle, wyl, whatever the interpretation of his body language - the MFC moved past Frawley as a key defender BEFORE he left, which was my point that you overlooked or missed entirely.

It's not semantics..Chip FORCED the hand of the club..He was not overlooked...We hoped Mcdonald could do the job..His form did not push Frawley out

My point being Frawley was able to play the system. By moving him forward (which i agreed with) did weaken our back line on numerous occasions, highlighting yet another level that FA weakens the lesser club even more.

Frawley is playing a lot better now (Qualifying Final aside) than he did at MFC for years...

Attitude plays a big part

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With GWS and Gold Coast receiving the draft concessions it was always going to mean the top teams would stay up for an extended period of time. We had our chance to get talent in prior to the effected drafts but as we all know we stuffed it and West Coast got it right. With free agency the top teams have been able to add top end talent and also attract young players through the draft. I still think teams should lose the pick for a free agent, so for Frawley Hawthorn should loss first round pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free agency has definitely benefited top clubs in the premiership clock & perhaps even kept them there longer... Eg buddy to Swans & frawley to Hawks..... The appeal for players to move & taste premiership success is a key driver but we're 18 team comp & not all players can play in a premiership......

My fear is lower clubs will pay overs to attract free agents to an unsuccessful club....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FA has done just that for the competition.

Ryan Griffen might enjoy Chopper Read's excellent story of one of his associates who was repeatedly bashed and then driven to the lost dogs home in North Melbourne for lack of an appropriate home address.

Dal Santo ,Ball,Goddard are all cheapschits who took cash and sacrificed class.

Frawley is a gormless twit like his idiotic keno schilling half wit uncle.

You can't buy class, credibility or integrity.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Free agency has definitely benefited top clubs in the premiership clock & perhaps even kept them there longer... Eg buddy to Swans & frawley to Hawks..... The appeal for players to move & taste premiership success is a key driver but we're 18 team comp & not all players can play in a premiership......

My fear is lower clubs will pay overs to attract free agents to an unsuccessful club....

At the moment as long as the AFL can use their secret formula for FA agency to overcompensate lowly clubs who lose good players to FA it is having a reduced effect on equalisation. They are using the FA compensation as replacement for the old priority pick to try and throw a lifeline to the battling clubs. But it is messy and the Commission is to blame and really they need a backbone.

Edited by Earl Hood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top 4 teams should have a limit on picking free agents and trade for players, at the moment Sydney can only pick up players to the value of 450000, this should apply to all top 4 teams, and compo should only go to bottom 2 teams on the ladder, even if they pick up free agents that should not effect what they get in compo, that would even out the competition

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not getting into a semantic battle, wyl, whatever the interpretation of his body language - the MFC moved past Frawley as a key defender BEFORE he left, which was my point that you overlooked or missed entirely.

he was useless at Melbourne. He's had a couple of good games at the Hawks (and some shockers).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    LIVE AND LET DIE by Meggs

    The Demons’ impressive late season charge to finals will most likely come unstuck this Saturday evening when the Bombers blow up the also-ran Blues in the Ikon Park double-header.   To mangle McCartney, what does it matter to ya? To have any chance to play next week Narrm has got a job to do and needs to do it well.  We’ve got to give the Pie sheilas hell, say live and let die! It’s Indigenous Round for this game and the chance to celebrate and engage with Aboriginal and Torres

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    2024 Player Reviews: #32 Tom Sparrow

    Had to shoulder more responsibility as the club’s injury concerns deepened but needs to step up more as he closes in on 100 games. Date of Birth: 31 May 2000 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 21 Career Total: 95 Goals MFC 2024: 6 Career Total: 34 Games CDFC: 1 Goals CDFL: 0

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 18

    2024 Player Reviews: #35 Harry Petty

    Failed to fulfill the promise of his breakout six goal effort against the Tigers in 2023 and was generally disappointing as a key forward. It remains to be seen whether Simon Goodwin will persevere with him in attack or return him to the backline where he was an important cog in the club’s 2021 premiership success. Date of Birth: 12 November 1999 Height: 197cm Games MFC 2024: 20 Career Total: 82 Goals MFC 2024: 9 Career Total: 28 Brownlow Medal Votes 3

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 14

    2024 Player Reviews: #22 Blake Howes

    After a bright start to the season, playing mostly in defence, Howes seemed to lose his way in midseason but fought back with some good performances at Casey and finished the year back at AFL level. One to watch in 2024. Date of Birth: 7 March 2003 Height: 191cm Games MFC 2024: 15 Career Total:  15 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total:  0 Games CDFC 2024: 6 Goals CDFC 2024: 0

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #33 Tom Fullarton

    Originally an NBL basketballer with the Brisbane Bullets, he moved across town in 2019 to the AFL Lions where he played 19 games before crossing to Melbourne where he was expected to fill a role as a back up ruckman/key forward. Unfortunately, didn’t quite get there although he did finish equal sixth in Casey’s best and fairest award. Date of Birth: 23 February 1999 Height: 198cm Games CDFC: 14 Goals CDFL: 13

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #10 Angus Brayshaw

    Sadly, had to wrap up a great career in midstream on the back of multiple concussions which culminated in the Maynard hit in the 2023 Qualifying Final. His loss to the club was inestimable over and above his on field talent given his character and leadership qualities, all of which have been sorely missed. Date of Birth: 9 January 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 167 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 49

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #40 Taj Woewodin

    The son of former Demon Brownlow Medalist Shane, Taj added a further 16 games to his overall tally of games but a number were as substitute. He is slowly fitting into the team structure but without doing anything spectacular and needs to take further steps forward in 2025 for his career to progress. Date of Birth: 26 March 2003 Height: 182cm Games MFC 2024: 16 Career Total: 20 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 3 Games CDFC 2024: 6 Goals CDFC 2024: 1

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #16 Bailey Laurie

    The clever small was unable to cement a place in the Melbourne midfield and spent most of his time this year with the Casey Demons where he finished equal fourth in its best & fairest. Date of Birth: 24 March 2002 Height: 179cm Games MFC 2024: 6 Career Total: 11 Goals MFC 2024: 2 Career Total: 2 Games CDFC 2024: 12 Goals CDFC 2024: 7

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 23

    2024 Player Reviews: #17 Jake Bowey

    Bowey’s season was curtailed early when he sustained a shoulder injury that required surgery in the opening game against Sydney. As a consequence, he was never able to perform consistently or at anywhere near his previous levels.  Date of Birth: 12 September 2002 Height: 175cm Games MFC 2024: 14 Career Total: 61 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 6

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!
×
×
  • Create New...