Jump to content

Roos sleepless over loss

Featured Replies

 

the thought of failure would make him sick

Despite the weekends disaster I am still backing him in

But hes certainly not immune to criticism, as he says himself

 

Roosy is fine, mass hysteria over this. He minimised damage in defence, a pre season to combine that defence mentality with an attacking flair.

This would be hurting him, but a more competitive man you will not meet. He will correct this.

I was glad that Robbo put the torch on him last night - he was quizzed about his arm's length approach to the role and the lack of motherhood statements.


I was glad that Robbo put the torch on him last night - he was quizzed about his arm's length approach to the role and the lack of motherhood statements.

Me too. I just wanted to hear Roos take some responsibility, himself, for his coaching performance and his team which he selected and directed. Something that he failed to do in the presser.

Robbo got that out of him, sort of.

I'm a Roos fan but these are awkward times for him and the club.

I've been sleepless over our performances since 1965.. Roos should consider himself lucky

Must be hard sleeping on his 1.6 million dollar a year matress !

 

He said he was responsible but he didn't say he'd coached badly. He made general comments. Sort of like the buck stops at the top.

I hope that internally he and his coaching group examine the game plan because to be honest it's putrid. Roos and Jackson both talk of a game style that people want to watch. Well the truth is that we are the most unwatchable team in the AFL.

To be scoring less than 10 goals a game is a disastrous outcome.

I accept this year MAY be the first step in a grand plan but I also think it's worth asking the question as to whether the game has moved on while Roos has been in the media and he's out of date. If this year is the first step we need to be told because supporters who are welded on are starting to walk.

He'll evaluate the players at year end. I hope he evaluates himself and his game plan as well.

He said he was responsible but he didn't say he'd coached badly. He made general comments. Sort of like the buck stops at the top.

I hope that internally he and his coaching group examine the game plan because to be honest it's putrid. Roos and Jackson both talk of a game style that people want to watch. Well the truth is that we are the most unwatchable team in the AFL.

To be scoring less than 10 goals a game is a disastrous outcome.

I accept this year MAY be the first step in a grand plan but I also think it's worth asking the question as to whether the game has moved on while Roos has been in the media and he's out of date. If this year is the first step we need to be told because supporters who are welded on are starting to walk.

He'll evaluate the players at year end. I hope he evaluates himself and his game plan as well.

I don't see scoring less than 10 goals a game a nightmare but I did find leaking 120 points a year last year as disastrous. There is nothing wrong with the game plan. We can't execute skills or decisions forward of centre and if we did we have neither of the two main targets you would have hoped to be there to kick to. He will tinker with the game plan but if he believes in the way to win a flag is what he is progressing with he will more likely find the players that fit what he needs rather than vice versa.


Yes Roosy is accountable for the teams performance.....but ffs he inherited a train wreck, damaged goods & clearly players who are not afl standard... Look @ the players he brought in Tyson, salem, vince all doing well... Dunn playing great.... When will the players take responsibility for their pathetic efforts???

Im confident Roos & co will clear the decks & find, develop the right players!

Judge him by 2016


"I believe in the players more than the players believe in themselves.".


This is one of the first things he needs to work on with this team

Yes Roosy is accountable for the teams performance.....but ffs he inherited a train wreck, damaged goods & clearly players who are not afl standard... Look @ the players he brought in Tyson, salem, vince all doing well... Dunn playing great.... When will the players take responsibility for their pathetic efforts???

Im confident Roos & co will clear the decks & find, develop the right players!

Judge him by 2016

Jury still out on Salem.

Vince Cross Tyson Michie and even JKH have been good pick ups.

Add the improvement from Pedersen Jetta Dunn aswell.

Roos is doing fine just needs more cattle.

Yes Roosy is accountable for the teams performance.....but ffs he inherited a train wreck, damaged goods & clearly players who are not afl standard... Look @ the players he brought in Tyson, salem, vince all doing well... Dunn playing great.... When will the players take responsibility for their pathetic efforts???

Im confident Roos & co will clear the decks & find, develop the right players!

Judge him by 2016

This forum judges blokes who have had 1 year (or less) pretty harshly. Why does he get 3 years. It seems that most agree that the past two coaches have had a detrimental impact on those players still listed but want that out of their minds/games now yet Roos is getting 3 years. The real assessment should be at the end of next season. He said as much last night where he said he would get thru this year, make his list changes, get another pre season in under his game plan so he should be judged at the end of next season.

hmm so where is that magic switch that allows the MFC to now go out there and kick bags of goals. Roos has tried to instil some defensive awareness into players who sadly lacked it, they obviously also lack attacking instinct. A coach can only do so much if the players cannot execute even basic hand and foot passes. We have burnt heaps of coaches, we cannot afford to burn another.


hmm so where is that magic switch that allows the MFC to now go out there and kick bags of goals. Roos has tried to instil some defensive awareness into players who sadly lacked it, they obviously also lack attacking instinct. A coach can only do so much if the players cannot execute even basic hand and foot passes. We have burnt heaps of coaches, we cannot afford to burn another.

if you get your dream job but for whatever reason your no good at it do you leave or do you stay, you'd stay, managers are paid to manage.players don't burn coaches, coaches burn clubs.

He said he was responsible but he didn't say he'd coached badly. He made general comments. Sort of like the buck stops at the top.

I hope that internally he and his coaching group examine the game plan because to be honest it's putrid. Roos and Jackson both talk of a game style that people want to watch. Well the truth is that we are the most unwatchable team in the AFL.

To be scoring less than 10 goals a game is a disastrous outcome.

I accept this year MAY be the first step in a grand plan but I also think it's worth asking the question as to whether the game has moved on while Roos has been in the media and he's out of date. If this year is the first step we need to be told because supporters who are welded on are starting to walk.

He'll evaluate the players at year end. I hope he evaluates himself and his game plan as well.

I'm more than happy to look at our current game plan in the mould of Roos focusing on the defence first. If, in 2015, we are not able to increase our scoring, then I think you will have much more of an argument. But where we are coming from, I'm happy with the decision to focus on stopping the onslaught first, getting that under control (to an extent), and then working on offence later.

Roos game plan seems pretty clear to me, if this year we had Hogan and Clarke which was our original expectation then we would not be having this same discussion about our inability to kick so few goals, these other two would have contributed something. Next year we will have hogan and dawes that still leaves us significantly reliant on these two for our scoring. Roos has done what he can with the players he has to try to boost the forward line by moving frawley there, not a lot of other options other than possiblty Howe and garland. I prefer Howe in the backline at the moment to provide a bit more marking power there especially for kick ins etc..

He said he was responsible but he didn't say he'd coached badly. He made general comments. Sort of like the buck stops at the top.

I hope that internally he and his coaching group examine the game plan because to be honest it's putrid. Roos and Jackson both talk of a game style that people want to watch. Well the truth is that we are the most unwatchable team in the AFL.

To be scoring less than 10 goals a game is a disastrous outcome.

I accept this year MAY be the first step in a grand plan but I also think it's worth asking the question as to whether the game has moved on while Roos has been in the media and he's out of date. If this year is the first step we need to be told because supporters who are welded on are starting to walk.

He'll evaluate the players at year end. I hope he evaluates himself and his game plan as well.

I think you're mixing up what you're seeing with the gameplan - they're two different things.

I suspect the real gameplan bears little resemblance to the turgid rubbish we've seen in recent weeks.

I think you're mixing up what you're seeing with the gameplan - they're two different things.

I suspect the real gameplan bears little resemblance to the turgid rubbish we've seen in recent weeks.

I doubt you would afford Mark Neeld the same latitude.


I doubt you would afford Mark Neeld the same latitude.

Don't worry, I spent more than enough time on the reality bus before I abandoned Neeld, but that's beside the point.

The general perception with Neeld was that he was implementing the Collingwood '10 'kick it long down the line' plan - it certainly seemed that way. Maybe he, too, had other offensive strings he was trying to add to the bow, that we never got to see. Clark was certainly one part of that.

Of course the Roos plan is also rooted in defence.

But don't the stats say that we're getting a lot more i-50's this year as opposed to 2012 and 2013 ? Even on Sunday, we had so much of the ball in the first half, plenty of action in and around 50m, just couldn't buy a goal to save ourselves.

I reckon the addition of Hogan will make a really big difference. No, I'm not expecting a bag of goals in his debut season. As much as I hate the word, I think he'll help with our 'structures', straighten us up, and perhaps enable some of the other cogs in the forward line to contribute more, Dawes being the obvious one.

He said he was responsible but he didn't say he'd coached badly. He made general comments. Sort of like the buck stops at the top.

I hope that internally he and his coaching group examine the game plan because to be honest it's putrid. Roos and Jackson both talk of a game style that people want to watch. Well the truth is that we are the most unwatchable team in the AFL.

To be scoring less than 10 goals a game is a disastrous outcome.

I accept this year MAY be the first step in a grand plan but I also think it's worth asking the question as to whether the game has moved on while Roos has been in the media and he's out of date. If this year is the first step we need to be told because supporters who are welded on are starting to walk.

He'll evaluate the players at year end. I hope he evaluates himself and his game plan as well.

I agree. His coaching on the weekend seemed reasonably stubborn, IMO. He practically didn't try anything until the third term and even then, it wasn't anything particularly drastic. We never altered our approach in terms of ball movement. We continued to go wide, when I think we may have been able to open up GWS if we'd used the corridor. He obviously doesn't want to engrain bad habits, but there needs to be some attacking flair. It is difficult though with the dire state of our list.

 

He said he was responsible but he didn't say he'd coached badly. He made general comments. Sort of like the buck stops at the top.

I hope that internally he and his coaching group examine the game plan because to be honest it's putrid. Roos and Jackson both talk of a game style that people want to watch. Well the truth is that we are the most unwatchable team in the AFL.

To be scoring less than 10 goals a game is a disastrous outcome.

I accept this year MAY be the first step in a grand plan but I also think it's worth asking the question as to whether the game has moved on while Roos has been in the media and he's out of date. If this year is the first step we need to be told because supporters who are welded on are starting to walk.

He'll evaluate the players at year end. I hope he evaluates himself and his game plan as well.

He did coach badly any one could see that if you were at the game and BTW Minimising scores against isnt working when we get spanked by 10 goals by the second bottom team

  • Author

A very short time before Roos took over as head coach he was on record saying 'Melbourne will be lucky to win one game next year'.

After a shaky start to the season our trajectory seemed to be on a somewhat upward trend. Winning 4 games well before seasons end.

Then the wheel nuts started rattling loose......

We and the game lost Mitch Clark, Chip is looking ever more increasingly like he is gone.

We then get to the dreaded point of putting our hands out for a priority pick. Something none of us thought would happen midway through the year.

The landscape has changed considerably since our last win.

I don't think anybody would disagree that this trade period is the most important in the history of our club.

The wheels have well and truly fallen off and I feel (unfortunately) that the old field manual has been dusted off and 'operation goodwood' is underway.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies