Travis Tuck

[w00dy 146]

Travis Tuck has got his life back on track according to his SANFL coach, and definitely up to the standard it would seem. Would we look at him? Could give us even more midfield depth.

Travis Tuck deserves second AFL chance

[Good Times Grimes 2,396]

No thank you...not what we're looking for.

[Thehardtackler 785]

I think that Roos would be prepared to give Tuck a second chance in the AFL if he is good enough. Tuck would run through walls for a team prepared to take a chance on him.

[S.R.J 418]

Happy to take him if he has it in him to pull the jumper on and do the hard yards

[Yeats8 21]

The type of player we need...worth a rookie selection!

[Ron Burgundy 8,584]

Clearance specialist. Would he be worth pick 57?

No use rookie-ing him. Don't see why we'd recruit a 25 year old hard bodied on baller just to have them play at Casey all year.

[DemonTux 97]

wouldn’t he be a de-listed free agent?

[binman 42,920]

Yes

[rpfc 28,408]

wouldn’t he be a de-listed free agent?

No. If you are delisted you can be picked up in the designated DFA periods in the year you were delisted.

He has been playing SANFL and he will have to go through the draft like everyone else.

[dazzledavey36 54,891]

A big bodied 188cm tall midfielder who is a big time clearence machine in the SANFL.

Yes please.

[jumbo returns 6,741]

Andy Collins says so? Well, that makes it massive no from me.

[Guest]

It won't be this year at least. The list is settled is it not?
Let's see how year one of the Paul Roos reclamation project goes and if it goes well, then let's think about Travis. If it's the same old same old, let's focus on getting that right first.

[daisycutter 29,613]

lets not get too scattergun

[rjay 24,919]

Andy Collins says so? Well, that makes it massive no from me.

Why would you say that?

[rpfc 28,408]

It won't be this year at least. The list is settled is it not?

Let's see how year one of the Paul Roos reclamation project goes and if it goes well, then let's think about Travis. If it's the same old same old, let's focus on getting that right first.

I think Nicholson and Jetta are still OOC.

[MadAsHell 4,212]

I'd throw him in as a maybe in the rookie draft, but would be putting the likes of Tom Langdon, George Hampson, Nathan Gordon and Brad Dalziell all ahead of him.

[TGR 1,367]

If we didn't land Vince/Tyson etc., I would have been for Shane Tuck. Neeld might have considered Michael, the way he was recruiting old rejects.

[ignition. 1,466]

I really hope he comes into consideration with one of our late picks, or at least the club interviews and tests him.

I would also be happy to see the back of one of the OOC players if the club would want another selection to acquire him on the basis he passes the above.

He really falls under that flavour of the month, tall (190 cm) strong bodied midfielder - so I won't be surprised if he is picked up by one of the clubs.

[jumbo returns 6,741]

Why would you say that?

Because I don't rate Andy Collins as a good judge of players.

Edited November 11, 2013 by jumbo returns

[rjay 24,919]

Because I don't rate Andy Collins as a good judge of players.

I thought you might have had a more personal reason or contact with him as a player.

[Webber 10,465]

I thought you might have had a more personal reason or contact with him as a player.

Andy Collins support is probably the only thing that WOULD make Travis Tuck worth considering for me.

[jumbo returns 6,741]

I thought you might have had a more personal reason or contact with him as a player.

No, nothing like that. Just a footy tragic

[waikikkamukau 62]

Thoughts on Travis Tuck?

Trouble we don't need;

Add value; or

Worth a look?

[Machsy 2,858]

I'd definitely consider him worth pick 57 in this draft.

Not sure the club will though.