Jump to content

Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>


Jonesbag

Recommended Posts

Bang indeed.

They should be hung on this one point alone:

" failed to identify and record the source from which all substances used by players were obtained;"
I wonder what the redacted bits around Hird are not to mention the missing drug (h) under item 124. Hard to know where to start
Edited by sue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A interesting thing here is that the more they took the worsst the performed in 2012,

By the time some alarm bells were ring mid year they had multiplere injuries and were playing poorly.

It truely is unbelievable that so many people did nothing for so long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sick of all this dragged out uncertainty by Vlad. What a donkey brain, he is. F C S make up yr mind and charge the f'n cheats who also have a pack of inept players health and welfare managers. Hird and Watson should be the 1st to cop it in the neck. That old doctor nutter needs to get out too. Gutless performance by the AFL and inept, stupid practices by the EFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sick of all this dragged out uncertainty by Vlad. What a donkey brain, he is. F C S make up yr mind and charge the f'n cheats who also have a pack of inept players health and welfare managers. Hird and Watson should be the 1st to cop it in the neck. That old doctor nutter needs to get out too. Gutless performance by the AFL and inept, stupid practices by the EFC.

I fail to see what else the AFL should have done.

they waited for a report from ASADA which is obviously huge, got an interim report and charged people and the club a week later on the strength of that.

the players will be issued with infraction notices by ASADA when ASADA releases their final report and not before.

ALL the other crap going on is Essendon and their spin doctors and lawyers trying to make themselves look squeaky clean.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's quite a report isn't it.

Was this just made public today?? It is dated 13 August, is it new evidence compared to this mornings media?

Only ask because there seems to be a softening of guilt because of the new stance to AOD.

This report is filthy. The club should be banned from the competition on this stuff 10 year minimum. This is Hunter S Thompson meets Walter Whyte..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Essendone

72. The Thymosin referred to on the “Patient Information/Informed Consent” forms and
administered to the players was:
(a) Thymosin Beta-4 which is prohibited by the AFL Anti-Doping Code and the
World Anti-Doping Code
so Essendone will say they didn't administer it, but they did ask players to consent to it explicitly? The mind boggles.

Looks like an attempted cover-up too with those rescinded receipts from their compounding chemist?

TA-65 at Collingwood claimed by Dank - anyone know the significance?

Edited by sue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's quite a report isn't it.

Was this just made public today?? It is dated 13 August, is it new evidence compared to this mornings media?

Only ask because there seems to be a softening of guilt because of the new stance to AOD.

This report is filthy. The club should be banned from the competition on this stuff 10 year minimum. This is Hunter S Thompson meets Walter Whyte..

I think the AFL just went 'SNAP' in more ways than one after the stuff Essendon put out last night about AOD.

Edited by rjay
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I fail to see what else the AFL should have done.

they waited for a report from ASADA which is obviously huge, got an interim report and charged people and the club a week later on the strength of that.

the players will be issued with infraction notices by ASADA when ASADA releases their final report and not before.

ALL the other crap going on is Essendon and their spin doctors and lawyers trying to make themselves look squeaky clean.

For a start, maybe Vlad being here instead of OS could have pushed this along a little. Maybe under their own AFL rules of behaviour they could have charged the efc with UNAPPROVED substances and therefore conduct unbecoming or any number of new things that the AFL usually "make up on the run". Maybe they could have asked the efc if they had correct procedural approval for any of these substances that they administered. Maybe Hirds relationship with a few shady types should have been looked at much earlier. Perhaps the AFL could have had their most senior execs and not an understudy report on the findings a few weeks ago. Perhaps the AFL needed to shore up the approved substance list for all clubs way before all this broke news way back then...........etc etc etc The AFL have shown a distinct lack of leadership, direction and governance in this whole matter. The efc have run rings around them, and thus far, continue to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colostrum is what Neil Craig gave to the Adelaide players prior to the 1997/98 flags. It defies belief that Craig was not aware of what Dr Bates was subsequently up to at Melbourne (possibly with Dank).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As always in these situations: there but for the grace of God, go us. Schadenfreude on hold.

Sorry, after this season, schadenfreude is the only thing keeping my interest in AFL going.

But yes, there but for the grace of god; we could have been Essendon supporters or it could have been us.

Interesting to reflect on how the MFC has had a weak, anything will do culture, which leads to disaster while Essendon have a strong, whatever it takes culture, which also leads to disaster at the other extreme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a start, maybe Vlad being here instead of OS could have pushed this along a little. Maybe under their own AFL rules of behaviour they could have charged the efc with UNAPPROVED substances and therefore conduct unbecoming or any number of new things that the AFL usually "make up on the run". Maybe they could have asked the efc if they had correct procedural approval for any of these substances that they administered. Maybe Hirds relationship with a few shady types should have been looked at much earlier. Perhaps the AFL could have had their most senior execs and not an understudy report on the findings a few weeks ago. Perhaps the AFL needed to shore up the approved substance list for all clubs way before all this broke news way back then...........etc etc etc The AFL have shown a distinct lack of leadership, direction and governance in this whole matter. The efc have run rings around them, and thus far, continue to do so.

ASADA investigation, not AFL investigation.

the AFL has no power there.

Essendon would have you believe they have run rings around the AFL. looks like the AFL and ASADA have just been building a brick wall for Essendon to run into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Essendon doctor Bruce Reid warned the Bombers about the club's supplements program

http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/essendon-doctor-bruce-reid-warned-the-bombers-about-the-clubs-supplements-program/story-fndv8gad-1226701308598

Wow just Wow - Very interesting reading

The way this is playing out is really starting to feel like war between The AFL/ASADA and the Bombers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any speculation on what was blacked out in the document? Especially relating to the side effects of a naughty little boy? Man, I was a bit shocked reading the report - I cant see how anyone can put any spin on whats been made public. (I know that they will try lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Essendone

72. The Thymosin referred to on the “Patient Information/Informed Consent” forms and
administered to the players was:
(a) Thymosin Beta-4 which is prohibited by the AFL Anti-Doping Code and the
World Anti-Doping Code
so Essendone will say they didn't administer it, but they did ask players to consent to it explicitly? The mind boggles.

Looks like an attempted cover-up too with those rescinded receipts from their compounding chemist?

TA-65 at Collingwood claimed by Dank - anyone know the significance?

I assume Thymosin Alpha which the AFL is at pains to point out that Essendon were not after, instead alleging that they were after Thymosin Beta-4. I assume therefore that TA-65 is not prohibited under WADA or ASADA regs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading those charges how can any of these people still be working, surely they are suspended until the hearing because seriously that is some damaging stuff. The bombers are going to be in crisis control after this being released. So if they are the facts of what has happened at Essendon, then that's it, it is a clear cut case where they should be stripped of points, no drafts, fines, it's just beggars belief what is in that report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I did what the EFC non-medics are accused of doing (including not keeping records etc etc etc) I'd be struck off.

This is crystal clear - NO GOVERNANCE, and just awful beyond belief

or they did have records, but they were shredded.

I find it hard to believe anyone, no matter how amateurish, would embark on this without keeping records to monitor progress, make comparisons etc. Waste of money otherwise. Either way, they are condemned unless they can prove the whole thing is a fabrication.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    LIVE AND LET DIE by Meggs

    The Demons’ impressive late season charge to finals will most likely come unstuck this Saturday evening when the Bombers blow up the also-ran Blues in the Ikon Park double-header.   To mangle McCartney, what does it matter to ya? To have any chance to play next week Narrm has got a job to do and needs to do it well.  We’ve got to give the Pie sheilas hell, say live and let die! It’s Indigenous Round for this game and the chance to celebrate and engage with Aboriginal and Torres

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    2024 Player Reviews: #32 Tom Sparrow

    Had to shoulder more responsibility as the club’s injury concerns deepened but needs to step up more as he closes in on 100 games. Date of Birth: 31 May 2000 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 21 Career Total: 95 Goals MFC 2024: 6 Career Total: 34 Games CDFC: 1 Goals CDFL: 0

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 18

    2024 Player Reviews: #35 Harry Petty

    Failed to fulfill the promise of his breakout six goal effort against the Tigers in 2023 and was generally disappointing as a key forward. It remains to be seen whether Simon Goodwin will persevere with him in attack or return him to the backline where he was an important cog in the club’s 2021 premiership success. Date of Birth: 12 November 1999 Height: 197cm Games MFC 2024: 20 Career Total: 82 Goals MFC 2024: 9 Career Total: 28 Brownlow Medal Votes 3

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 14

    2024 Player Reviews: #22 Blake Howes

    After a bright start to the season, playing mostly in defence, Howes seemed to lose his way in midseason but fought back with some good performances at Casey and finished the year back at AFL level. One to watch in 2024. Date of Birth: 7 March 2003 Height: 191cm Games MFC 2024: 15 Career Total:  15 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total:  0 Games CDFC 2024: 6 Goals CDFC 2024: 0

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #33 Tom Fullarton

    Originally an NBL basketballer with the Brisbane Bullets, he moved across town in 2019 to the AFL Lions where he played 19 games before crossing to Melbourne where he was expected to fill a role as a back up ruckman/key forward. Unfortunately, didn’t quite get there although he did finish equal sixth in Casey’s best and fairest award. Date of Birth: 23 February 1999 Height: 198cm Games CDFC: 14 Goals CDFL: 13

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #10 Angus Brayshaw

    Sadly, had to wrap up a great career in midstream on the back of multiple concussions which culminated in the Maynard hit in the 2023 Qualifying Final. His loss to the club was inestimable over and above his on field talent given his character and leadership qualities, all of which have been sorely missed. Date of Birth: 9 January 1996 Height: 188cm Games MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 167 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 49

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 8

    2024 Player Reviews: #40 Taj Woewodin

    The son of former Demon Brownlow Medalist Shane, Taj added a further 16 games to his overall tally of games but a number were as substitute. He is slowly fitting into the team structure but without doing anything spectacular and needs to take further steps forward in 2025 for his career to progress. Date of Birth: 26 March 2003 Height: 182cm Games MFC 2024: 16 Career Total: 20 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 3 Games CDFC 2024: 6 Goals CDFC 2024: 1

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 5

    2024 Player Reviews: #16 Bailey Laurie

    The clever small was unable to cement a place in the Melbourne midfield and spent most of his time this year with the Casey Demons where he finished equal fourth in its best & fairest. Date of Birth: 24 March 2002 Height: 179cm Games MFC 2024: 6 Career Total: 11 Goals MFC 2024: 2 Career Total: 2 Games CDFC 2024: 12 Goals CDFC 2024: 7

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 24

    2024 Player Reviews: #17 Jake Bowey

    Bowey’s season was curtailed early when he sustained a shoulder injury that required surgery in the opening game against Sydney. As a consequence, he was never able to perform consistently or at anywhere near his previous levels.  Date of Birth: 12 September 2002 Height: 175cm Games MFC 2024: 14 Career Total: 61 Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 6

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 7
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...