Daniel Chick

[brey9186 102]

is out of favour at west coast and will not be offered a new contract

could we pick up for 1-2 seasons?? our midfield and backline lacks a "mature mongrel" and chicky likes the hard stuff (no pun intended)

might be cheap, and if he could give us 10-15 games a season, and takes a bit of physical pressure off some young guys too, especially that byron is gone too

what do you think?

[grazman 7,432]

is out of favour at west coast and will not be offered a new contract

could we pick up for 1-2 seasons?? our midfield and backline lacks a "mature mongrel" and chicky likes the hard stuff (no pun intended)

might be cheap, and if he could give us 10-15 games a season, and takes a bit of physical pressure off some young guys too, especially that byron is gone too

what do you think?

NO!

[Jaded No More 68,901]

NO!

Nicely put.

[Rogue 585]

Too old.

Seriously, why would we do this instead of picking up a young kid?

I don't mean to offend, but I just find some of the attitudes mind-boggling.

[deesrock 0]

Another NO! here.

[WonnaJurah 5]

toooo old

[Guest unstable punt]

is out of favour at west coast and will not be offered a new contract

could we pick up for 1-2 seasons?? our midfield and backline lacks a "mature mongrel" and chicky likes the hard stuff (no pun intended)

might be cheap, and if he could give us 10-15 games a season, and takes a bit of physical pressure off some young guys too, especially that byron is gone too

what do you think?

NO

[dee-luded 2,959]

Nicely put.

NO

[Pepe Dee Pew 0]

No, we need to build with youth. Chick will only put us behind a few more years.

[barpen 0]

NO

[Yencks 8]

everyone is saying "NO" but if we got him for nothing if he has been delisted and no one else wants him....remember the 2006 GF??

[praha 11,240]

The four finger bandit

[grazman 7,432]

everyone is saying "NO" but if we got him for nothing if he has been delisted and no one else wants him....remember the 2006 GF??

Remember the Ben Cousins saga.... if West Coast are dumping him and not even offering him up for trade there's serious issues there to consider.

[Yencks 8]

Remember the Ben Cousins saga.... if West Coast are dumping him and not even offering him up for trade there's serious issues there to consider.

haha, you may have a point

[Bristling T 11]

Chick is such a hack, never has been any good, never will be any good.

[deanox 9,912]

no.

[Lamberto Bava 6]

Chick would have to pay us to let him play, and then we'd still be getting ripped off.

[Ausyid 0]

Why do people make suggestions like this.

Look at Geelong, look at Hawthorn.

You have to build for the FUTURE.

[whelan45 203]

NO!!

[Rogue 585]

everyone is saying "NO" but if we got him for nothing if he has been delisted and no one else wants him....remember the 2006 GF??

What's the point?

I find it unlikely he'll be part of our next Premiership team, so lets use that list spot for someone else.

[Adzman 2,154]

Chick is a tool.

[dazzledavey36 54,861]

i hate daniel chick :angry:

[Legendsinc 2]

He has too much baggage!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Diablo 1]

He has too much baggage!!!!!!!!!!!!

And not enough fingers to carry it... Rare form Diablo, rare form.

[rpfc 28,383]

Depth players with no hope of eventually getting into the starting 22 is the wrong way to go.

We just got rid of some of those: Bizzell, Brown, Ward, Godfrey.

Depth is overrated, having a good season comes down to your best players, or most important players, having an injury free season.

Just look at Geelong.