Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 16/06/2025 at 10:43, dpositive said:

The club really needs to make some sort of statement on the umpiring.

Our coaches are unable to coach technique and skill when our players are frustrated by inconsistent umpiring decisions.

I believe the goal kicking is a result of the lack of confidence in their ability caused by the lack of confidence created by inconsistent application of rules by umpoires.

Of course we could also practice kicking the football and not he round soccer ball in training. The bounce of the oval shaped ball is also an unknown to our players who fumble and drop the ball. maybe cos its not round. Get rid of the soccer ball and train with AFL footballs

God so much need to vent

Another season wasted when we have uch a good list of playing stock

Coached bear responsible.

Blaming the umps because professional footy players can't kick a 25m goal directly in front, that's a new one.

 

At the risk of offending Werridee, here is a team i'd like to see that takes Tracc, Oliver and Viney out of our mids for the main - although occasional spurts through the middle would be ok - as long as its only one of them at a time.

B. McVee May Lever

HB. Rivers Petty Sestan

Mid. Windsor Langford Langdon

HF. Tracc Turner Chandler

F. Viney Jeffo JVR

R. Max Bowie Kossie

Bench. Oliver, Fritsch, Lindsay, Laurie - Salem.

Edited by Neil Crompton
Forgot XL!!

12 hours ago, Superunknown said:

Any of them in Byron? Very happy to head over with a Premiership Sherrin for some practice. Threading them through the hoop pines at the Beach Hotel

Not that I know of, Super. Plenty on the Gold Coast. Noosa is also popular.

They’ll know they’re alive when they’re back in Melb for training on Sunday morning, a sunny and warm 6 degrees to welcome them back 😅

 
3 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Blaming the umps because professional footy players can't kick a 25m goal directly in front, that's a new one.

just a part of the problem but shouldnt be discounted.

2 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

At the risk of offending Werridee, here is a team i'd like to see that takes Tracc, Oliver and Viney out of our mids for the main - although occasional spurts through the middle would be ok - as long as its only one of them at a time.

B. McVee May Lever

HB. Rivers Petty Sestan

Mid. Windsor Langford Langdon

HF. Tracc Turner Chandler

F. Viney Jeffo JVR

R. Max Bowie Kossie

Bench. Oliver, Fritsch, Salem, Laurie - Howes.

TMac for Petty

Petty to sub


2 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

At the risk of offending Werridee, here is a team i'd like to see that takes Tracc, Oliver and Viney out of our mids for the main - although occasional spurts through the middle would be ok - as long as its only one of them at a time.

B. McVee May Lever

HB. Rivers Petty Sestan

Mid. Windsor Langford Langdon

HF. Tracc Turner Chandler

F. Viney Jeffo JVR

R. Max Bowie Kossie

Bench. Oliver, Fritsch, Salem, Laurie - Howes.

Dont mind this at all! T. MAC for Lever??

Edited by picket fence

2 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

At the risk of offending Werridee, here is a team i'd like to see that takes Tracc, Oliver and Viney out of our mids for the main - although occasional spurts through the middle would be ok - as long as its only one of them at a time.

B. McVee May Lever

HB. Rivers Petty Sestan

Mid. Windsor Langford Langdon

HF. Tracc Turner Chandler

F. Viney Jeffo JVR

R. Max Bowie Kossie

Bench. Oliver, Fritsch, Salem, Laurie - Howes.

Not a fan of Lindsay?

 
On 15/06/2025 at 19:40, 48 Year Now said:

In

Jefferson, McDonald, Verall, Laurie Thorstrup.

Our Petty, May, Salem, Rivers, Chandler

Finally at least someone agrees with me about Chandler - [censored] irrelevant player.

Rivers is the one there you’ve been unfair on - he is constantly being thrown around and doesn’t have consistency - goodwins fault (for playing Viney last week)

19 hours ago, adonski said:

VIRAL

Agree in Rivers. I thought more as a one week thing to freshen him up.

1 hour ago, nextskipclaz said:

Finally at least someone agrees with me about Chandler - [censored] irrelevant player.

Rivers is the one there you’ve been unfair on - he is constantly being thrown around and doesn’t have consistency - goodwins fault (for playing Viney last week)


Since the Brisbane game we’ve generated 26 scoring shots (including rushes) per game which is more than what Collingwood are managing on the season. I’d love to know what would happen if we kick a scoreline of 14.12.96 against GC. I’d suggest we’re winning that game.

Last year the bye rejuvenated us as we went 3-1 the next month and the loss was a terrific performance against Brisbane at the GABBA. Hopefully we see a similar effect this year.

I want there to be serious conversations about our mix in the midfield because right now it is definitely not balanced with bulls and finesse. Viney's time attending bounces should be halved, and he should be played more as a pressure forward/tagger than a midfielder. Trac and Oliver can attend bounces together but only when we have the likes of Langford, Lindsay, and Koz around them to be the designated kickers inside. They also need to be told, "if you can't spot a direct pass, look for a lateral kick".

Oh and the way we used Rivers last week set him backwards in development, play him as a midfielder.

We should be doing everything we can to avoid seeing Viney, Trac, and Oliver in the centre at the same time.

Windsor,Langford and Langdon ........ good idea as midfielder.

Would like to see Sestan defence and perhaps give Howes a go forward.

None of the above is going to happen as per usual . It is like

It does not matter if people think the players in the reserves are not up to playing seniors , the club needs to send a message to senior players that they will get dropped. Surely having 9 loses you would expect something major to happen. If the young reserve players are not up to senior level after 14 rounds there is something dramatically wrong with the way we coach and train players. Mind you the reserve comp is a joke , why do the MFC put up with it.

With our list I really thought we would make eight!!! Bloody disappointed If only GWS win Pies win Hawthorn win (which we had a real chance) things would be so different Bummer !!


On 15/06/2025 at 22:39, spirit of norm smith said:

We need a 2nd ruck. We need to keep JVR forward and not allow a small forward structure to consistently get out marked. Verrall in. Give him a go.

This is the most obvious move that should be made. As George states in the pod each week, JVR barely plays 40% game time up fwd. If we had a genuine 2nd ruck option, he might have a chance!

It's always fun to head into a game against an opponent who was a surprise loser the week prior.

They'll be primed to avenge that loss, especially at home.

Our Football Brains Trust ( i-don't) will have its work cut out. Our kicking essentially a 50/50 [censored] shoot at goal v Suns 60% on target. Ranked 4th.

So for mine, though it sounds ridiculously simplistic , and given much of our game WON'T/Can't change we have but two areas we CAN hopefully direct the outcome.

1) kick goals. I know , how has this Einsteinian element escaped use before now . Maybe because we haven't left anyone there long enough who might have this craft as key. Im no particular fan of JVR but if he's selected then ffs play him as a forward, not a wandering minstrel. Whoever lines up, leave them there and find the solution to the other problem ( ruck-relief ) elsewhere and otherwise.

2) stop them kicking goals. I know, clever huh. This is actually part of a two-fer special deal find . A bargain at the Albert-mart 😉 Tighten up the backend, not have a mare of a day letting off a leash some wally to kick 7 goals.. just sayin' 🙄

There are other things but they could fall under the realm of swings and roundabouts...i.e.. might be countered and the result not a lot different. So for now just 2 things.. More goals than points and cut down opponents shots on goal.

All jokes aside to win that's what you do.

Why do we lose ? Because we don't do it.

A lot of things you can't change , not wholesale. Some you can. Finding some stability and functionality up front is key. This is exactly what the Suns will be attempting also as at there last 3 outings they've suffered from the Demonics... the act of kicking more points than goals !! We just need to do it better.

Apparently we get it in the arc OK ( though arguably not in best parts of it...but.. ) Even if we can muster a 50/50 hit rate we will win.

So.... in summary. Stop stuffing around with forward setup and personell. Let it play out the game. And it's the two BIG sticks 😉 !!

Go us...

5 hours ago, Doug Reemer said:

This is the most obvious move that should be made. As George states in the pod each week, JVR barely plays 40% game time up fwd. If we had a genuine 2nd ruck option, he might have a chance!

Wonder if they will pull the trigger and play Verrall as a ruck/forward and hope for the best....

Given where our season is at I wouldn't be opposed to it.

Taking my 10yo to his first game. On the boundary! Got some local friends also ex Viccos sitting behind us. Apprehensive about the game but pumped for a kick on the ground after.

And of course we’ve had stellar June weather in the northern rivers only for it to rain Saturday.

I think we'll have to kick at least forty behinds this week to get close to the Suns. Until we start converting some of our out on the full kicks into points and our banana attempts from 15 metres out start making the distance I can't see it happening.


How good was the weekend?!!!! Nothing to worry about, some lovely winter weather to help settle my into a few Pinot’s. Life was good!

Then realised we are playing GC17 up there this week!

You know life as a supporter is bad when the Bye is your saving grace.

As always I'll add a disclaimer that I don't read every post in every thread, so apologies if this has been done to death.

I've always scoffed at suggestions of putting May forward. Why would you put a generational key backman in the forward line?

However, right now, I'm here for it. After getting his pants pulled down by Mitch Georgiades (feels weird even typing that), he is now leading the reverse Coleman for the year. We have good key defensive stocks in Turner, Lever, Petty, McDonald. Our key forwards are lacking at this stage. He would compete in the air, and make intercept defenders very nervous. Is it not worth a try?

35 minutes ago, BigFez said:

After getting his pants pulled down by Mitch Georgiades (feels weird even typing that), he is now leading the reverse Coleman for the year.

If correct, that would be some effort given that he has missed three games. As I've said previously, May and Lever (5 losses from 6 games) should not be playing in the same side under any circumstances.

 

This thread has got very loose. Not long before someone earnestly suggests dropping 12 to 15 players, resuscitating the supplementary list and bringing in 17 and 35 year old from the ammos and Division 3 suburban leagues.

Here's my attempt to make it looser still:

The two players I'm keenest to see get a game as we limp to the end of the year are Brown and Sestan.

Sounds like Sestan's hamstrings will make that unlikely, which is a real pity. Interesting to see whether they keep him on for another season. In the few games I've seen him play at Casey his kicking looks really strong.

Brown looks like someone who just goes and goes and goes. Far better judges than me say his disposal is well below "the level" (as Goodwin would say), but three or four players who sit in this category are first-picked for our AFL side. If we can forgive them, can we forgive one more and just see how his intensity looks at the top level?

Not averse to Jefferson getting a good AFL run, either, but I just don't think he'll come into his own until we sort out who our number one forward is - the bloke who refuses to get pushed aside by his opponent and even takes a couple of contested marks a game.

My tip, 7.13. Loss in the 30’s. Hopeful I’ll be proven wrong but I’ve lost hope.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Like
    • 253 replies