Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'll be very disappointed if we dont win this, Sydney still have half their side out and look very short all over the ground where we are at full strength

 
4 hours ago, jackaub said:

Viney in Sharp out Spargo out Brown in

i really like Sharp he competes and get into great positons and chases

could have kicked 3 unfortunately a serial offender in front of goals

agree 100%, he just lacks alot of polish with the ball

I'm surprised this isn't well known. The centre square is 50m by 50m. That's a policy.

The 50m arc is a guideline. I believe it is under 45m at SCG.

As I tell newbies at work a policy is just a posted guideline that has been laminated.

 
18 hours ago, jaydenh10 said:

if turner gets dropped we riot, was in our best 3 on sunday

It would be unacceptable and getting way too cute at selection if we drop Turner. He’s already harshly been dropped once this year.

either:

1) rest one of T Mac or May and retain Turner down back.

2) drop AJ and send Turner forward. I would have a second ruck committee of Turner and Petty and concede a few hit outs to Ladhams which won’t be the end of the world.

Prefer option 2.

Sharp the other player to be dropped.

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell


Ranking our team v lions in order of importance (in terms of impact if they were injured/unavailable)

Gawn

Petracca

Oliver Pickett

Rivers Bowey Langdon

Tmcd May Turner Petty Melksham

Salem Mcvee Chandler Sparrow Windsor Langford Lindsay

AJ Fritsch

Sharp Spargo

(Disclaimer imv )

4 hours ago, picket fence said:

Spargo would struggle to get a game at any other club including Richmond, Norf and West Coast!

this reminds when most of when demonland were giving it to chandler early this year after a couple of poor performances. not taking into account any injury concerns, game plan etc. they have shut up now.

19 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Ranking our team v lions in order of importance (in terms of impact if they were injured/unavailable)

Gawn

Petracca

Oliver Pickett

Rivers Bowey Langdon

Tmcd May Turner Petty Melksham

Salem Mcvee Chandler Sparrow Windsor Langford Lindsay

AJ Fritsch

Sharp Spargo

(Disclaimer imv )

no Melksham is up the top of that list. his asset is our biggest weakness.

 
1 hour ago, Damo said:

The 50m arc is a guideline. I believe it is under 45m at SCG.

According to Mr Google this was perhaps one of those urban myths but I do agree that unlike some other lines it can have a little give and take

3 hours ago, D Rev said:

You know how dimensions work, yeah?

I do. 155 metres is only five metres shorter than 160 metres.

That's a difference of a mere 2.5 metres in each direction from the centre circle. (Imagine Max Gawn with his arms up ... about that distance)

The SCG is almost the same length as the MCG. Any further queries should be directed to my Captain.

8M8QFOc.jpg


16 hours ago, Adam The God said:

A score involvement means his disposal hasn't broken down in a chain that results in a score.

If you go back to my original rebuttal, it was to be debunk the idea that Charlie was a poor kick.

Agree. Not sure how anyone thinks he is a poor kick. Spargo is not back to his 2018-23 kicking level yet but he will get there. His kicking is as good as anyone playing in the forward half. His career goal average is 0.6 v Miers at 0.7. Miers has spent 17% more time on ground in his career as well. He needs more kicks but maybe we just need to accept he will be 7 kicks a game and they will be impactful. As long as he combines that with pressure he shouldn’t be dropped.

IMG_1322.jpeg

28 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

I do. 155 metres is only five metres shorter than 160 metres.

That's a difference of a mere 2.5 metres in each direction from the centre circle. (Imagine Max Gawn with his arms up ... about that distance)

The SCG is almost the same length as the MCG. Any further queries should be directed to my Captain.

8M8QFOc.jpg

Get your Captain to measure it on google maps with their handy distance measuring tool and report back. Looks more like 150m (which would mean an honest 50m arc would touch the mandated centre square.)

I note the ABC stated that they had lengthened the ground since 2007. Not sure how they did that.

Edited by sue

23 hours ago, roy11 said:

Agree we need more goals from Spargs, but worth noting there's only 5 players at the club with more Goal Assists. So wouldn't crucify him for that one too much.
Chuck also 3rd highest tackles inside F50 for the Dees.
He's never going to light a match on fire, so the spot is his until someone comes along with better attributes. Uncertain if that is K.Brown or not.
Would like us to draft/trade another small forward who has more 'elite' stats than 'average'.



Would prefer Spargo, who some excuse as coming back from injury, playing a few weeks at Casey with K Brown herring a decent seniors run in the same role.

Come list management time we will have the likes of Brown and Woey without sufficient exposure from which to make a hard call.

18 hours ago, Garbo said:

So tmac then?

or May (managed)?

18 hours ago, Adam The God said:

A score involvement means his disposal hasn't broken down in a chain that results in a score.

If you go back to my original rebuttal, it was to be debunk the idea that Charlie was a poor kick.

so does that mean that every player in a chain from deep defence to a goal of uninterrupted would get a goal assist? Just asking.

2 hours ago, Bay Riffin said:

this reminds when most of when demonland were giving it to chandler early this year after a couple of poor performances. not taking into account any injury concerns, game plan etc. they have shut up now.

Recovering from a long injury layoff with half a dozen senior games doesn’t seem logical to me. Lever came back (or will be coming back) via Casey so why not Spargo?

58 minutes ago, sue said:

Get your Captain to measure it on google maps with their handy distance measuring tool and report back. Looks more like 150m (which would mean an honest 50m arc would touch the mandated centre square.)

I note the ABC stated that they had lengthened the ground since 2007. Not sure how they did that.

Maybe the usual ABC “fact checker”?🤔

1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

I do. 155 metres is only five metres shorter than 160 metres.

That's a difference of a mere 2.5 metres in each direction from the centre circle. (Imagine Max Gawn with his arms up ... about that distance)

The SCG is almost the same length as the MCG. Any further queries should be directed to my Captain.

8M8QFOc.jpg

I think your missing drevs point ds - as I noted it's also 5 metres narrower.

Which means there's less area.

Which us why over the last 10 seasons the average score there is aprox 10 points less than at the g, which statistically is very significant.

It's a [censored] ground that's too small for modern AFL footy.

Ditto kardinia Park for exactly the same reason.

11 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Would prefer Spargo, who some excuse as coming back from injury, playing a few weeks at Casey with K Brown herring a decent seniors run in the same role.

Come list management time we will have the likes of Brown and Woey without sufficient exposure from which to make a hard call.

or May (managed)?

so does that mean that every player in a chain from deep defence to a goal of uninterrupted would get a goal assist? Just asking.

Recovering from a long injury layoff with half a dozen senior games doesn’t seem logical to me. Lever came back (or will be coming back) via Casey so why not Spargo?

Maybe the usual ABC “fact checker”?🤔

I do wonder if Tmac is not in better shape than May .

Perhaps it's Lever and May who need managing.

Leave Disco and Tommy alone unless otherwise.. .

I'm not Spargypants greatest fan but he does have footy smarts. Certainly an enigma to me. Goody has mucho faith in him 🤔🤷‍♂️


1 hour ago, sue said:

Get your Captain to measure it on google maps

My Captain sent me to see Private Parts who referred me up the chain to Corporal Punishment and I eventually ended up with a Major Headache.

5 minutes ago, binman said:

I think your missing drevs point ds - as I noted it's also 5 metres narrower.

Which means there's less area.

Which us why over the last 10 seasons the average score there is aprox 10 points less than at the g, which statistically is very significant.

A smaller ground (with shorter distances to cover) should result in higher scores.

1 minute ago, Demonstone said:

A smaller ground (with shorter distances to cover) should result in higher scores.

Sure.

If it was 1977 and zones weren't a thing.

3 minutes ago, binman said:

I think your missing drevs point ds - as I noted it's also 5 metres narrower.

Which means there's less area.

Which us why over the last 10 seasons the average score there is aprox 10 points less than at the g, which statistically is very significant.

It's a [censored] ground that's too small for modern AFL footy.

Ditto kardinia Park for exactly the same reason.

Kittylitter Park is the most offensive ground. Practically missing a wing ffs ( Moorabool St side ), that peatfield is an abomination. Refuse to go there.

I truly think the SCG thing is more a mental thing imo. Get a tape measure and mark off 5m and 9m .. ( resp len and width diff ) ..it's not that much. I don't think so anyways.

Other grounds have greater discrepancies.

Ours perfect..... of course 😉

33 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

My Captain sent me to see Private Parts who referred me up the chain to Corporal Punishment and I eventually ended up with a Major Headache.

Who totally lost the plot with the ensuring General Mayhem.


On 21/05/2025 at 13:33, D Rev said:

tap it from the centre to inside 50 for a 30m kick to goal

Binman: I think your missing drevs point ds - as I noted it's also 5 metres narrower. Which means there's less area.

@D Rev is clearly talking about going straight to goal from the centre bounce. Nothing to do with the width of the ground or overall dimensions.

4 hours ago, Damo said:

As I tell newbies at work a policy is just a posted guideline that has been laminated.

a bit like speed signs and road rules in Italy

Advisable only

 

No Vines is a right shame, must not have passed the latest concussion test.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 47 replies